SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Manure Concentration of N:P, Animal Performance, and Blood Urea.
Advertisements

BYPRODUCT FEEDS FROM GRAIN PROCESSING Pages
Module #6 Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
50 years of Pharmaceutical Technology and Its Impact On The Beef We Provide To Consumers.
Managing Phosphorus with Distillers Grains Diets Allen Trenkle Iowa State University.
Nutrient Reduction in Manure through Livestock Nutritional Management.
Horse Nutrition Bob Coleman Ph. D. PAS Extension Horse Specialist.
Corn Co-Products in Beef Cow Rations John D. Lawrence, Iowa State University Darrell Mark, University of Nebraska.
Dr. Mary Drewnoski.  US agriculture production oriented  More is better! Right?  Focus on making profitable decisions  Increasing profit ◦ Increase.
Grazing Corn Stalk Residue With Beef Cows
* Strategically Feeding Protein and Energy During Winter and Managing Cow Condition Don C. Adams
Backgrounding Cattle Larry C. Hollis, D.V.M., M.Ag.
Mark Petersen, Jen Muscha & Travis Mulliniks USDA-ARS Fort Keogh Livestock & Range Research Laboratory.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
RICH PORTER PORTER FARMS WET DISTILLERS. STARTING CALVES.
Fall Feeder Cattle Marketing Options ANR Update October 10, 2013 Kevin Laurent UK Animal Sciences.
Utilizing Stockpiled Bermudagrass to Reduce Hay Feeding Costs.
Effects of Decreasing Pasture Land Availability on Beef Operations October 10, 2013.
Effects of delayed implant protocols on performance, carcass characteristics and meat tenderness in Holstein steers J. L. Beckett, and J. Algeo Cal Poly.
Optimum range beef production is achieved only by matching the animal’s genetic potential to the nutritional environment.
Evaluation of Conventional vs. Grass Fed Beef Production G. C. Duff Department of Animal Sciences The University of Arizona, Tucson July 29, 2009.
Ethanol byproduct use by feedlots G. Erickson, T. Klopfenstein & many students.
Natural vs. Conventional
Winter Feeding a Cow for $200 UW Extension State-wide Beef Cow-calf Days Medford By: Keith Vander Velde UW Extension Seven County Agriculture Specialization.
Production Costs Hints UW Extension Livestock Team Statewide Cow/Calf Seminars 2008.
Maintaining U.S. Beef Industry Competitiveness with High-Priced Grain Derrell S. Peel Breedlove Professor of Agribusiness And Livestock Marketing Specialist.
Beef Cattle Nutrition Feeder and Stocker Cattle. Market Beef Lifecycle Age of animal, months Weaning Birth GrowingFinishing 06-7 Stocker and.
LECTURE 25 FEEDLOT CATTLE NUTRITION
USING A TEST HAY FOR FEEDING LIVESTOCK Shelby J. Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Proper nutrition at a lower cost.
Post-Weaning Management and Nutrition Strategies for Beef Calves Lawton Stewart The University of Georgia April 3, 2013.
Feeding During a Drought Johnny Rossi Extension Animal Scientist – Tifton.
Pasture-Based Nutrition Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Extension Animal Scientist April 15, 2009.
Growing Iowa’s Beef business through advocacy, leadership and education. Synergies of Livestock & Ethanol Perspectives from the Iowa Cattlemen’s Association.
MANAGING Tough Times Feeding Strategies for Coping with High Commodity Prices Dan Loy Iowa State University.
Corn Ethanol Co-Products For Finishing Beef Cattle Darrell R. Mark, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Galen Erickson, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Crystal.
Nutrient Composition, Use and Limitations of Commonly Available Feedstuffs.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Feeding Dried Distillers Grains to Hogs Ron Plain, University of Missouri.
Quantity and Quality Lawton Stewart - Extension Beef Specialist The University of Georgia Lawton Stewart - Extension Beef Specialist The University of.
Utilization of byproducts by growing & finishing cattle G. Erickson, T. Klopfenstein & many students.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Mineral & Vitamin Supplementation for Beef Cattle on Pasture.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Ration Formulation 2/05/2001 ANS Steps in Balancing a Ration Nutrient requirements generally represent the minimum quantity of the nutrients that.
Nutrition and Reproduction in Beef Cows Cattlemen’s College January 29, 2003 David Lalman Oklahoma State University.
Feeding Smart Dan Morrical Iowa State University Know requirements Condition Score Make adjustments multiple pens Control waste Use pasture and crop residue.
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Energy Value of Feeding Distillers in a Forage Diet and Feeding Fresh versus Stored Distillers Terry Klopfenstein, B.L. Nuttelman, Crystal Buckner Animal.
Segregating herds based on animal class and nutritional need Lawton Stewart Grazing School September 22, 2011.
Equine Science Classes of Feeds
Beef Extension Specialist
Winter Supplementation Utilizing Co-Products as a Supplement on Winter Range and Crop Residue Systems Aaron Stalker University of Nebraska.
Summer Supplementation: Plant, Animal and Environmental Response ─ A Nebraska Perspective Terry Klopfenstein, Will Griffin, Kelsey Rolfe Animal Science,
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Livestock on Pasture Donna M. Amaral-Phillips University of Kentucky.
The Role of Animal Agriculture in the Bioeconomy Allen Trenkle Iowa State University.
Feed Costs Cost per unit of nutrient supplied Usually protein or energy Most feeds are priced $ per ton (If $ per bushel, need lb/bu) – Corn = 56 lb/bu.
Receiving cattle. Dry matter intake of stressed calves; first 28 days Weeklb/hd/d% of BW Receiving issues.
Know how. Know now. Jerry D. Volesky Walter H. Schacht University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ethanol CoProduct Conference Grazing Management when Supplementing.
Winter (and Spring) Forage Management Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop.
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School May 6, 2010.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science Lesson C3-1 Nutrients and Their Importance to Animals.
SOUTHEAST AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER BEEF CATTLE RESEARCH PROGRAM
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Feeding Lambs Goal is to do it as cheap as possible.
Managing Stockpiled Forage
How to Feed the Cow Herd When There Is No Feed
Animal Nutrition and Alternative Feedstocks
Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast 4/5/
Presentation transcript:

SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons

WHY SUPPLEMENT GRAZING CATTLE? Forage supplies are limited. Forage is deficient in one or more nutrients. Delivery of feed additives for animal health, parasite control, etc. To increase body weight gain. Value of supplementation is expected to exceed the cost.

DISTILLERS GRAINS (DDG) By-product of the ethanol industry U.S. ethanol production has quadrupled in the past 10 years and is expected to increase even more in the future. Ethanol production has had and will continue to have a major impact on the beef industry.

1 bushel of corn = 2.7 gallons ethanol 18 lbs. DDGS 18 lbs. carbon dioxide

KANSAS Twelve dry mill ethanol plants Capacity to produce 450 million gallons of ethanol annually Requires 160 million bushels of corn and grain sorghum annually (30% of total production) Yields more than 1.4 million tons of dried distillers grains annually

DISTILLERS GRAINS Wet - 35% dry matter –$63.50/ton = $0.09/lb of dry matter (Jan. 08) –$46.00/ton = $0.065/lb of dry matter (May 09) Dry – 88% dry matter –$195/ton = $0.11/lb of dry matter (Jan. 08) –$135/ton = $0.077/lb of dry matter (May 09) 2.5 x more nutrients in dry vs. wet

DDG NUTRIENT COMPOSITION 3X nutrient value of corn 25% crude protein (>30%)– high by-pass 9% crude fat (11%) High phosphorus (0.83%) Complements nutrient composition of mature forages to meet requirements of grazing cattle Highly palatable

DDG FEEDING CONSIDERATIONS High phosphorus –Potential problem in feedlot – nutrient management (3-4 X requirement) –Asset for grazing cattle High sulfur –From grain and sulfuric acid –Can be toxic when DDG fed at high levels Antibiotic residue? –Used in ethanol production

KANSAS GRAZING RESEARCH Stocker steers –Grazing performance –Available forage –Forage quality –Subsequent finishing performance –Carcass traits

SUPPLEMENT CONVERSION Amount of supplement required for each additional lb of gain over that of unsupplemented control steers Amount of supplement fed/(Gain of supplemented steers – gain of unsupplemented control steers)

SMOOTH BROMEGRASS Steer calves grazed from April 6 to October 3 (180 days) Continuous stocking rate of 0.8 steer per acre or 1.25 acres per steer (473 lb) Supplemented with 0, 0.5, or 1.0% body weight DDG/head/day (as-fed) – group fed meal in bunks

Three replicates (pastures) of each treatment. Steer gains and available forage were measured and the amount of DDG fed was adjusted every 28 days. No feed additives or implants were used during the grazing phase.

FINISHING PHASE Steers were implanted with Synovex-S. Steers were fed a finishing diet of 80% ground milo, 15% corn silage, and 5% supplement (DM basis) for 124 days. Steers were slaughtered and carcass data were collected.

SMOOTH BROMEGRASS (180 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) Final wt, lb 738 a 844 b 871 c Gain, lb 266 a 371 b 398 c Daily gain, lb1.48 a 2.06 b 2.21 c Gain/acre, lb213 a 297 b 318 c Total DDG intake, lb Daily DDG intake, lb DDG conversion

FINISHING PEFORMANCE (124 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) Daily gain, lb 3.85 a 3.67 a,b 3.51 b Feed:gain 6.73 a 7.22 b 7.63 b Hot carcass wt, lb 727 a 783 b 795 b Yield grade 2.7 a 3.0 b 3.1 b Percent Choice Marbling score SM 26 SM 40 SM 54

OVERALL PERFORMANCE (304 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) Total gain, lb 742 a 824 b 833 b Daily gain, lb 2.45 a 2.72 b 2.74 b Total DDG intake, lb

SMOOTH BROMEGRASS DDG supplementation increased grazing gains. Supplement conversion was more efficient for 0.5% than 1.0% level (5.9 vs. 10.0). DDG supplementation had no effect on quantity of available forage.

SMOOTH BROMEGRASS Steers supplemented with DDG during the grazing phase were heavier at slaughter and yielded heavier carcasses. Steers that were not supplemented with DDG during the grazing phase had higher finishing gain, lower slaughter weight and hot carcass weight, lower feed:gain, and lower yield grade than those that received 1.0% DDG.

Steers that were supplemented with DDG during the grazing phase had higher overall gains that those that received no supplement. Overall gain was similar between 0.5% and 1.0% levels If ownership of cattle were retained to slaughter, the 0.5% level would be more profitable than the 1.0% level.

BERMUDAGRASS Yearling steers grazed from June 2 to September 12 (102 days) Continuous stocking rate of 1.0 steer per acre (initial wt. = 765 lb) Supplemented with 0, 0.5, or 1.0% body weight DDG/head/day (as-fed) – group fed meal in bunks

Two replicates (pastures) of 0 treatment and three replicates (pastures) of 0.5% and 1.0% treatments. Steer gains and available forage were measured every 28 days and the amount of DDG fed was adjusted. No feed additives or implants were used during the grazing phase.

FINISHING PHASE Steers were implanted with Synovex-S. Steers were fed a finishing diet of 80% ground milo (whole-shelled corn in 2008), 15% corn silage, and 5% supplement (DM basis) for 94 days. Steers were slaughtered and carcass data were collected.

BERMUDAGRASS (102 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) Final wt, lb 928 a 963 b 1016 c Gain, lb 163 a 198 b 251 c Daily gain, lb1.64 a 1.97 b 2.48 c Gain/acre, lb163 a 198 b 251 c Total DDG intake, lb Daily DDG intake, lb DDG conversion

FINISHING PEFORMANCE (94 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) Daily gain, lb Feed:gain Hot carcass wt, lb 780 a 803 ab 814 b Yield grade Percent Choice Marbling score SM 39 SM 56 SM 70

OVERALL PERFORMANCE (196 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) Total gain, lb 558 a 580 ab 616 b Daily gain, lb 2.86 a 2.97 ab 3.14 b Total DDG intake, lb

BERMUDAGRASS DDG supplementation increased grazing gains. The 1.0% level resulted in greater grazing gain than the 0.5% level. Supplement conversion was similar for 0.5% and 1.0% levels (12.5 vs. 10.2). DDG supplementation had no effect on quantity of available forage.

BERMUDAGRASS DDG supplementation during the grazing phase had little effect on finishing performance or carcass characteristics. Steers supplemented with 1.0% DDG during the grazing phase had greater slaughter weight, hot carcass weight, and overall gain than steers that received no supplement. Slaughter weight, hot carcass weight, and overall gain were similar between steers that were supplemented with 0 or 0.5% DDG.

NATIVE GRASS 2005 Epp et al. 2007, Manhattan, KS Big bluestem and Indian grass were dominant species, little bluestem and side oats grama were subdominant species. Yearling steers (573 lb) grazed from May 1 to August 3 (95 days) Pastures were double stocked (250 lb/acre for 90 days)

First 45 days (May 1-June 14) No supplement was fed. Oxytetracycline was offered in a mineral mix that was fed free-choice to control foot rot and pinkeye.

Last 50 days (June 15 – Aug. 1) Steers were supplemented with 0, 0.25, 0.5, or 0.75% body weight DDG/head/day (DM basis) – pellets fed in bunks Level of supplement was adjusted every 14 days based on a projected gain of 2.0 lb/head/day. DDG from grain sorghum –34.6% crude protein –8.8% crude fat

NATIVE GRASS (2005) Date Crude Protein(%) ADF(%) May June July All samples were collected during the last week of each month.

NATIVE GRASS DDG( %BW/hd/day) Final wt., lb 792 a 813 b 819 bc 833 c Gain, lb, 219 a 240 b 246 bc 260 c Daily gain, lb 2.31 a 2.53 b 2.59 bc 2.74 c Total DDG intake, lb Daily DDG intake, lb DDG conversion

FINISHING PERFORMANCE DDG( %BW/hd/day) Daily gain, lb Feed:gain

NATIVE GRASS All levels of DDG supplementation resulted in greater grazing gains than the unsupplemented control. Highest grazing gain was obtained with the 0.75% level. Supplement conversion was most efficient at the 0.25% level. Supplement conversion was similar between the 0.50 and 0.75% levels.

NATIVE GRASS Steers that received no supplement during the grazing phase had higher finishing gains and more efficient feed conversion that those that were supplemented with DDG. Finishing performance was lowest for steers that were supplemented with 0.75 DDG during the grazing phase.

SUPPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Smooth Bromegrass Steer calves grazed from April 9 to October 22, 2008 (196 days) Continuous stocking rate of 0.8 steer per acre (initial wt. = 450 lb) Supplementation treatments were : –No supplement –0.5% of body weight DDG/head/day (0.05C) –No supplement for first 56 days, then 0.5% DDG/head/day for remainder of grazing phase (0.05D)

Steers were group fed DDG in meal form in bunks daily. Three replicates (pastures) of each treatment. Steer gains and available forage were measured every 28 days and the amount of DDG fed was adjusted. No feed additives or implants were used during the grazing phase.

FINISHING PHASE Steers were implanted with Synovex-S. Steers were fed a finishing diet of 80% whole-shelled corn, 15% corn silage, and 5% supplement (DM basis) for 112 days. Steers were slaughtered and carcass data were collected.

SUPPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Smooth Bromegrass (196 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) 00.5C 0.5D Final wt., lb 772 a 871 b 846 b Gain, lb 321 a 421 b 396 b Daily gain, lb 1.64 a 2.15 b 2.02 b Gain/acre, lb 257 a 337 b 317 b Total DDG intake, lb Daily DDG intake, lb DDG conversion

FINISHING PEFORMANCE (112 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) 0 0.5C 0.5D Daily gain, lb Feed:gain Hot carcass wt, lb Yield grade Percent Choice Marbling score MT 75 MT 45 MT 40

OVERALL PERFORMANCE (308 days) DDG( %BW/hd/day) 0 0.5C 0.5D Total gain, lb Daily gain, lb Total DDG intake, lb

SUPPLEMENTATION STRATEGY DDG supplementation increased grazing gains. Grazing gain and supplement conversion were similar between steers supplemented with 0.5% DDG continuously and those supplemented with 0.5% DDG only during the latter part of the grazing phase. DDG supplementation had no effect on quantity of available forage.

SUPPLEMENTATION STRATEGY There was no difference in finishing gain, feed conversion, or carcass characteristics between supplementation treatments. There was no difference in overall gain between supplementation treatments.

SUMMARY Supplementation with DDG can improve gain of grazing stocker cattle. Supplement conversion is usually more efficient at lower levels of DDG supplementation. Supplementation of grazing cattle with DDG had no effect on the quantity of available forage.

Supplementation of grazing stocker cattle with DDG may reduce gain and efficiency of feed conversion during the finishing phase. Supplement conversion, supplement cost, and cattle market will determine the optimum level of supplementation.

QUESTIONS?