Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF-03-08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1
OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF
Evaluation of ACSF during periodic technical inspection Informal group ACSF # / 17 in Tokyo Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Submitted by the experts from Sweden and Japan Presentation in conjunction with GRRF Amendment proposals to UN R79 to introduce the requirements.
Definition for Levels of Automation
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Research on HMI Homework item 1 (ACSF-01-13)
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
What is SBC ? Sensotronic Brake Control (SBC) is the name given to an innovative electronically controlled brake system which will fit to future passenger.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Discussion paper – Major Issues
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-06-25
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Concept of ACSF TAN (Type Approval Number)
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Lane change driver reaction times
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
What is SBC ? Sensotronic Brake Control (SBC) is the name given to an innovative electronically controlled brake system which will fit to future passenger.
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
ACSF B1+C functional description
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Maximum allowable Override Force
ACSF B1+C functional description
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF Toru Ihara Automobile Type Approval Test Department National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan Submitted by the expert of Japan

Traffic Jam Assist is a corrective steering function under the current R79. - Traffic Jam Assist system has a function of steering control on ACC to follow a vehicle in front without lane recognition over 10km/h. This may be interpreted as the automatically following function in lateral like "Lane changing" On the other hand, Lane changing is a kind of ACSF function under ACSF informal group. Systems with the same function can be classified as ACSF or Corrective steering depending on whether or not lane recognition is active. Question 1: - Under amended R79, does a steering function on ACC without lane recognition belong to Corrective steering function ? or ACSF ?

Category 5 of ACSF is a function defined as "continuously determine the possibility of a manoeuver (e.g. lane change) and complete these manoeuvers for extended periods without further driver command/confirmation" On the other hand, "Autonomous Steering System" is defined as "The driver will not necessarily be in primary control of the vehicle " and out of scope of R79. Category5 of ACSF may be interpreted as "The driver will not necessarily be in primary control of the vehicle" Question 2: - To distinguish Category 5 from "Autonomous Steering System" do we need clearer definition for Category 5 ?

System Current R79Amended R79 CorrectiveACSFCorrectiveACSF Steering control on ACC to follow a vehicle in front without lane recognition over 10km/h ✓ - ✓ ? (Q.1) LKAS ✓ - ✓ - Parking assist below 10km/h- ✓ - ✓ Lane keepingNot approved- ✓ Lane changingNot approved ? (Q.1) ✓ Category 5 of ACSFNot approved- ? (Q.2) Autonomous steeringOut of Scope Understanding for current and amended R79 for each system

Ref.) Corrective steering function and LKAS Corrective steering function and LKAS are defined in LKAS as follows; "Corrective steering function" means the discontinuous control function within a complex electronic control system whereby, for a limited duration, changes to the steering angle of one or more wheels may result from the automatic evaluation of signals initiated on- board the vehicle, in order to maintain the basic desired path of the vehicle or to influence the vehicle's dynamic behaviour. Systems that do not themselves positively actuate the steering system but that, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, simply warn the driver of a deviation from the ideal path of the vehicle, or of an unseen hazard, by means of a tactile warning transmitted through the steering control, are also considered to be corrective steering "Lane Keeping Assistance System" means a system which assists the driver in keeping the vehicle within the chosen lane, by influencing the lateral movement of the vehicle.

Ref.) ACSF and its categories ACSF and its categories are defined in ACSF as follows; "Automatically commanded steering function" (ACSF) means the function within a complex electronic control system where actuation of the steering system can result from automatic evaluation of signals initiated on-board the vehicle, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, to generate continuous control action in order to assist the driver in following a particular path, in low speed maneuvering or parking operations Category 1 ACSF means, a function that operates at a speed no greater than 10 km/h to assist the driver, on demand, in low speed maneuvering or parking operations Category 2 ACSF tbd. By OICA Category 3 ACSF means, a function that operates at a speed no greater than [130 km/h] and which can perform a single manoeuver (e.g. lane change) when commanded by the driver Category 4 ACSF means, a function that operates at a speed no greater than [130 km/h] and which can indicate the possibility of a single maneuver (e.g. lane change) but performs that function only following a command confirmation by the driver Category 5 ACSF means, a function that operates at a speed no greater than [130 km/h], which is commanded initiated by the driver and which can continuously determine the possibility of a maneuver (e.g. lane change) and complete these manoeuvers for extended periods without further driver command/confirmation.

Ref.) Autonomous Steering System Autonomous Steering System is defined in current R79 as follows; 1.2This Regulation does not apply to: Autonomous Steering Systems as defined in paragraph "Autonomous Steering System" means a system that incorporates a function within a complex electronic control system that causes the vehicle to follow a defined path or to alter its path in response to signals initiated and transmitted from off-board the vehicle. The driver will not necessarily be in primary control of the vehicle.