David S. Berry / Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complex Organizational System A Complex System Model for Organizations, Companies and Social Actions.
Advertisements

Debris Avoidance and the CCSDS Navigation Working Group Presentation to NSPO in Taiwan November 2013 Mike Kearney CCSDS Chair & General Secretary NASA.
METS: An Introduction Structuring Digital Content.
Interoperability Principles in the Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Presented 13 March 2006 at eGY in Boulder, CO by: Eliot Christian,
CCSDS Navigation Working Group David Berry 10/01/2007.
Folie 1 Service Oriented Architecture - Prototyping study - DLR/GSOC Author: S.Gully.
Software Requirements
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB Improved Orbit Estimation Using GPS Measurements for Conjunction Analysis Gabriel Hugh Elkaim, Assistant Professor.
CCSDS XML Telemetric and Command Exchange (XTCE)
Richard DalBello Vice President Government Affairs Intelsat General Joseph Chan Senior Manager Flight Dynamics Intelsat Improving Space Operations Workshop.
Improved Conjunction Analysis via Collaborative Space Situational Awareness T.S. Kelso & David A. Vallado, CSSI Joseph Chan & Bjorn Buckwalter, Intelsat.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Sep 2003 CCSDS Navigation WG Progress Report MOIMS Meeting Oct 2003 CSC, Maryland, USA Felipe Flores-Amaya CCSDS Navigation WG.
CSSM Meeting Summary Fall 2012 Meetings 15 – 18 October E. Barkley Chair (NASA/JPL) C. Haddow Co-Chair (ESA/ESOC) Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
SSFS Test Plan/Report Overview of the test cases What “success” means for a data format type test How the tests were conducted Key results and conclusions.
AIXM 5.1 Seminar 12 – 13 December 2011
1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group SEA Plenary Daniel J. Crichton, Chair NASA/JPL 12 September 2005.
Improved SSA through Orbit Determination of Two-Line Element Sets David A. Vallado, Benjamin Bastida Virgili, and Tim Flohrer Paper 6ECSD 13-4a.0-7 presented.
The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) NISO Metadata Workshop May 20, 2004 Rebecca Guenther Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library.
Orbit Generator for the Next Generation SPENVIS INTRODUCTION TO SPENVIS-NG The Next Generation SPace ENViroment Information System is the latest revision.
System Engineering Area SANA BoF Kick-Off 12 May 2004 Peter Shames NASA/JPL.
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
An Introduction to Programming and Algorithms. Course Objectives A basic understanding of engineering problem solving process. A basic understanding of.
Exchanging Databases with Dissimilar Systems Using CCSDS XTCE
Panel P1J: Navigation Data April 2003 CCSDS P1J FINAL REPORT Spring Meeting, ESA/ESTEC, Netherlands Dates: April 1-4, 2003 Felipe Flores-Amaya NASA/GSFC/Code.
© GMV S.A., 2004 Property of GMV S.A. All rights reserved 2004/05/13 XML in CCSDS CCSDS Spring Meeting - Montreal Fran Martínez GMVSA 4081/04.
Panel P1J: Navigation Data May 2001 CCSDS P1J Status Report P1 Plenary Meeting May 23, 2001 TSG Meeting May 24-25, 2001 Pasadena, California, USA Felipe.
A Brief Introduction to Astrodynamics
C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC, D.M. Sawyer/NASA/GSFC, J.G. Garrett/NASA-Raytheon Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard PAIMAS.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Ajh January 2007 CCSDS “Books” Adrian J. Hooke CMC Meeting, Colorado Springs 26 January 2007.
1 15 quality goals for requirements  Justified  Correct  Complete  Consistent  Unambiguous  Feasible  Abstract  Traceable  Delimited  Interfaced.
JPL/Caltech proprietary. Not for public release or redistribution. This document has been reviewed for export control and it does NOT contain controlled.
November MOIMS AREA PLENARY NAVIGATION WG REPORT November 2004 CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEMS.
1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group Daniel J. Crichton, Chair NASA/JPL 14 September 2005.
10-Dec-2012-cesg-1 Keith Scott (AD) Dai Stanton (DAD) SPACE INTERNETWORKING SERVICES (SIS) AREA REPORT.
May 2004 CCSDS Navigation WG Activity Report CCSDS Spring Series May 2004 CSA, Montreal, Canada Felipe Flores-Amaya CCSDS Navigation WG.
Information Architecture WG: Report of the Spring 2004 Meeting May 13, 2004 Dan Crichton, NASA/JPL.
2009 Spring CCSDS meeting ( Colorado Springs,USA ) SMWG 1 Validation Test Coordination for the SCCS Service Management (R-3.4) 20. April 2009 JAXA YAGI.
Some comments on the TLE problemetic Main point: the TLE are self consistent and need no other informations The only extrapolation program usable is SGP4.
CCSDS Navigation Working Group David Berry 04/20/2009.
Trajectory Predictions Data Formats Draft White Book CCSDS CSSM Technical Meetings Pasadena, CA, USA 23 – 27 March 2015 Jessica Reinert NASA/GRC.
Navigation WG Report D. Berry NASA J. Fertig ESA.
© ИАЦ КВНО ЦНИИмаш Собственность ИАЦ. All rights reserved GLONASS Status and Progress Sergey Revnivykh CGSIC Meeting , Savannah, GA, US.
(c) 2009 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Improving Predictions of the Earth’s Rotation Using Oceanic Angular Momentum.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
CCSDS Meeting data Archive Ingest - January 2007 CNES 1 CCSDS - MOIMS Area Data Archive Ingest WG CNES Report Colorado Springs meeting – January 2007 Claude.
Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.
Djc -1 Daniel J. Crichton NASA/JPL 9 May 2006 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group.
Information Architecture BOF: Report of the Fall 2003 Meeting October 28, 2003 Dan Crichton, NASA/JPL.
Unit – I Presentation. Unit – 1 (Introduction to Software Project management) Definition:-  Software project management is the art and science of planning.
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems 1 JAXA CCSDS Status April 12 – 13, 2005 Kaneaki Narita Consolidated Space Tracking and Data Acquisition.
CCSDS Navigation Working Group David Berry 01/16/2007.
1 Systems Architecture WG: Charter and Work Plan October 23, 2003 Takahiro Yamada, JAXA/ISAS.
Panel P1J: Navigation Data April 2002 CCSDS P1J Status Report Spring Meeting, ESA/ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Dates: April 8 – 11, 2002 Felipe Flores-Amaya.
CCSDS Navigation Working Group David Berry 10/13/2008.
June MOIMS AREA PLENARY NAVIGATION WG REPORT June 2006 CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEMS.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
National Aeronautics & Space Administration European Space Agency & 1 Modulation and Coding: Draft IOAG Resolutions to CCSDS September 9, 2008 Les Deutsch.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group Daniel J. Crichton NASA/JPL 24 March 2005.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
1 Software Requirements Descriptions and specifications of a system.
© 2012 Anwendungszentrum GmbH Oberpfaffenhofen Idea by: Dr. Eng. Mohamed Zayan | 1.
Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
Test Executive Trades (1)
CCSDS Navigation Working Group
CCSDS Navigation Working Group
CCSDS P1J FINAL REPORT Spring Meeting, ESA/ESTEC, Netherlands Dates: April 1-4, 2003 Felipe Flores-Amaya NASA/GSFC/Code 450/Code 572 April 2003.
The Need for Comparative SSA
Presentation transcript:

The CCSDS Orbit Data Messages – Blue Book Version 2: Status, Applications, Issues David S. Berry / Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 and   David Finkleman / Center for Space Standards and Innovation, Analytical Graphics, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO 80920 © 2010 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged.

The Need for Orbit Data Messages The technical community requires essential elements of information about spacecraft past, current, and future state of motion For contact planning and execution For satellite tracking, telemetry, and commanding For maneuver development and collaborative operations

Orbit Data Messages Were Developed to Meet Need Work on the ODM standard commenced in the 1990’s Became a CCSDS Blue Book in 09/2004 (“ODMV1”) Incorporated Orbit Parameter and Orbit Ephemeris Messages Orbit parameters for propagation with astro models Orbit ephemerides over a time span for interpolation ISO TC20/SC13 and /SC14 committed to collaborating on a modified ODM to accommodate newly identified SC14 needs Backward compatibility with standard two line element sets (TLE) Inclusion of quantified uncertainty in orbits (covariances) ODMV2 was formally published by CCSDS in 11/2009 Orbit Parameter, Orbit Ephemeris, and Orbit Mean Element Messages with covariances

Introduction – Orbit Data Messages Orbit Data Messages (ODM) is a CCSDS and ISO standard ("Blue Book") Part of CCSDS Navigation Working Group (WG) Technical Program ODM was recently modified and updated ODMs are consistent with modern Service Oriented Architectures Messages are ASCII text in “Keyword Value Notation” (KVN) format or Extensible Markup Language (XML) format ODM sets standard format/content Does not constrain the communication medium or transmission scheme Does not require that data exchange partners operate in the same way or even use the same operational or astrodynamic tools Simply a way to communicate essential spacecraft orbit information clearly, completely, and effectively

Orbit Data Message Applications Space Situational Awareness Conjunction prediction, estimation, and response Interoperable, effective exchange of orbit data Satellite Tracking, Telemetry, and Commanding Interoperable satellite management and data extracton Assured consistent units, reference frames, coordinate systems, time references Overcoming deficiencies in current de facto standards and practices Two Line Element sets lack essential elements of metadata and covariances Enable high fidelity propagation or interpolation of existing orbit parameter and orbit ephemeris messages 5

Significance of Covariances for Contact Management Open loop pointing difficult w/o covariance info, complicating search The satellite is likely to be somewhere within covariance ellipsoid but not necessarily on its mean orbit 6

Significance of Covariance for Collision Assessment Figure shows mean locations of two satellites and 3σ covariances Satellites are most likely to be at the centers of the ellipsoids that describe the probability density of trajectory excursions Satellites only 400 meters apart, but very unlikely to collide Assessment based only on distance would generate a false alarm 7

OPM, OMM, OEM Content and Structure ODMV2 Message Structure Header, Metadata, & Comment features same for all messages Header contains identification information essential for parsing Metadata (“data about data”) describes coordinate and reference frames, physical assumptions, nature of mean or osculating element technique, and information essential to use the content COMMENT feature for non-standard explanatory information OPM Data Section Overview Required: Cartesian state vector at single epoch Optional: osculating Keplerian elements; solar radiation pressure,drag; maneuver parameters; covariance OMM Data Section Overview Required: Mean Keplerian state at single epoch Optional: TLE parameters; solar radiation pressure, drag; covariance matrix OEM Data Section Overview Required: Ephemerides relative to an epoch – position, velocity Optional: accelerations to accommodate non-conservative forces, covariance matrix

ODMs Satisfy Requirements for a Variety of Missions Orbit Data Message Element Blue areas are essential metadata no matter what the application Orange areas are unique to specific missions, the depth of color emphasizing criticality. Yellow areas indicate that only one of the elements of information is necessary White areas are desirable or situational

Differences Between Orbit Data Messages V 1 & V2 Orbit Mean-Elements Message (OMM) was added 6x6 covariance matrix was added to all messages Optional accelerations were added to OEM state vectors Julian Date formatting option for time fields was withdrawn ODMV1 requirement to put object identifier in SPACEWARN format changed from a “shall” to a “should” Maximum line width for all messages was increased to 254 Text value fields restricted to all upper or all lower case OPM spacecraft parameters changed from obligatory to optional User Defined Parameters feature was added to the OPM Added optional keyword to specify reference frame epoch Some restrictions imposed on placement of comments

Mandatory Prototyping and Testing CCSDS requires “at least two independent and interoperable prototypes or implementations must have been developed and demonstrated in an operationally relevant environment, either real or simulated." Nine tests of varying complexity were performed: Simple OPM w/only a spacecraft state Keplerian elements Maneuvers (impulsive and finite) Covariance matrices Interpolation between states Transformation between formats Where possible, test artifacts were input to operational navigation S/W used by the test conductors Some tests involved exchange of new “user defined parameters” Participants: CNES, JAXA, NASA (GSFC &JPL), GMV, CSSI

ODMV2 Prototype Test Plan Spacecraft Msg Type Agencies & Msg Flow Direction 1 SOHO OPM NASA/GSFC => NASA/JPL 2 3 NASA/GSFC =>NASA/JPL 4 ISS/Zarya OMM CNES => CSSI => CNES 5 Iridium 33 debris GMV => CSSI => GMV 6 SELENE OEM JAXA => NASA/JPL 7 MEX/ODY ESA=>NASA/JPL,NASA/JPL=> ESA 8 9 CNES = Centre National d’Études Spatiales CSSI = Center for Space Standards & Innovation ESA = the European Space Agency GMV = GMV JAXA = Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency GSFC = Goddard Spaceflight Center JPL = Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Guidance for Employing ODMs Accelerations in the OEM Ephemeris Fewer ephemeris points, and thus less disk space Essential when drag and radiation pressure, non-conservative forces are important Not all navigation S/W can process accelerations as input Interface Control Documents Jointly developed Interface Control Documents (ICD) between exchange participants should be negotiated whenever possible ODMs and their standard elements of data and metadata are essential for immediate interactions between operators who have not established ICDs ODMs are guides for developing ICDs in due course User Defined Parameters Allow users to add mission-essential elements of information for which there is no other data exchange medium; use judiciously OMM Conversion to TLEs Programs converting OMMs to TLEs must be aware of TLE rules (e.g., checksum, formatting, angle precision, reference frame) Covariances Interpolating or propagating covariances requires great understanding and care

Agency/Operation Infusion There is no point in having a standard if no one uses it. Organizations currently using ODM: ESA/ESOC NASA/JPL JAXA Future and potential users: ESA Space Surveillance Network CNES Satellite Data Association: Satellite Data Center US Air Force Commercial and Foreign Entities (CFE) Program Additional NASA Centers Organizations and Suppliers with parsers and ability to ingest ODMs: GMV Analytical Graphics (Satellite Toolkit, Orbit Determination Toolkit)

Future XML Format XML schemas that encode the ODM data items in progress Target completion date of ODM XML version in late 2010/early 2011 Eliminates a number of exceptions in the KVN formatted messages Examples: For the OPM and OMM, all header, metadata, and data lines must use KVN, however, in the OEM the ephemeris data line has a fixed structure containing seven required fields and three optional fields OPM and OMM covariance matrices are expressed in KVN, while the OEM covariance matrix is WYSIWYG, easily recognizable as a 6x6 lower triangular matrix

Conclusion The CCSDS ODMV2 Blue Book is an international standard Some ISO standardization process steps remain Work to accomplish this will be managed by the ISO TC20/SC13 (CCSDS) and ISO TC20/SC14 Secretariats More work to do in the area of infusion of the new standard and conversion from ODMV1 to ODMV2 We believe that the collaboratively developed ODMV2 is a substantial improvement over its predecessor

Acknowledgments Authors acknowledge the essential contributions of all the people at the participating space agencies and in industry that have contributed to the development and use of the ODM Part of this work was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology (Caltech), under contract with NASA Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement by the US Government or JPL/Caltech Clearance number CL#10-0694 was assigned to the accompanying document; CL#10-1524 was assigned to this presentation. Part of this work was enabled by corporate support from Analytical Graphics, Inc. All of this work is in the public domain and accessible to all parties AGI also assumes no liability for the consequences of one employing these standards

Backup Material - Example Orbit Data Messages

Example Orbit Data Messages All of the following example orbit data messages are drawn directly from the ODMV2 (some non-essential lines were removed due to space requirements) This is not an exhaustive set representing all the possible combinations of ODM features, but it is meant to convey the general sense of the messages Figure 3 consists of a simple OPM Figure 4 shows several of the optional data structures in the OPM (i.e., Keplerian elements, a covariance matrix, and a user defined parameter Figure 5 shows a NORAD TLE and Figure 6 the OMM constructed from it; the OMM also includes a synthetic covariance matrix Figure 7 shows an OEM that is compatible with the ODMV1 Figure 8 shows an OEM which contains the optional accelerations and covariance matrix 

Simple OPM CCSDS_OPM_VERS = 2.0 CREATION_DATE = 1998-11-06T09:23:57 ORIGINATOR = JAXA COMMENT GEOCENTRIC, CARTESIAN, EARTH FIXED OBJECT_NAME = GODZILLA 5 OBJECT_ID = 1998-057A CENTER_NAME = EARTH REF_FRAME = ITRF-97 TIME_SYSTEM = UTC EPOCH = 1998-12-18T14:28:15.1172 X = 6503.514000 Y = 1239.647000 Z = -717.490000 X_DOT = -0.873160 Y_DOT = 8.740420 Z_DOT = -4.191076 MASS = 3000.000000 SOLAR_RAD_AREA = 18.770000 SOLAR_RAD_COEFF = 1.000000 DRAG_AREA = 18.770000 DRAG_COEFF = 2.500000

OPM w/Keplerian Elements, Covariance, User Defined Parameter CCSDS_OPM_VERS = 2.0 COMMENT Current intermediate orbit IO2 and maneuver planning data CREATION_DATE = 2000-06-03T05:33:00.000 ORIGINATOR = GSOC OBJECT_NAME = EUTELSAT W4 OBJECT_ID = 2000-028A CENTER_NAME = EARTH REF_FRAME = TOD TIME_SYSTEM = UTC COMMENT State Vector EPOCH = 2006-06-03T00:00:00.000 X = 6655.9942 [km] Y = -40218.5751 [km] Z = -82.9177 [km] X_DOT = 3.11548208 [km/s] Y_DOT = 0.47042605 [km/s] Z_DOT = -0.00101495 [km/s] COMMENT Keplerian elements SEMI_MAJOR_AXIS = 41399.5123 [km] ECCENTRICITY = 0.020842611 INCLINATION = 0.117746 [deg] RA_OF_ASC_NODE = 17.604721 [deg] ARG_OF_PERICENTER = 218.242943 [deg] TRUE_ANOMALY = 41.922339 [deg] GM = 398600.4415 [km**3/s**2] COMMENT Spacecraft parameters MASS = 1913.000 [kg] SOLAR_RAD_AREA = 10.000 [m**2] SOLAR_RAD_COEFF = 1.300 DRAG_AREA = 10.000 [m**2] DRAG_COEFF = 2.300 COV_REF_FRAME = RTN CX_X = 3.331349476038534e-04 CY_X = 4.618927349220216e-04 CY_Y = 6.782421679971363e-04 CZ_X = -3.070007847730449e-04 CZ_Y = -4.221234189514228e-04 CZ_Z = 3.231931992380369e-04 CX_DOT_X = -3.349365033922630e-07 CX_DOT_Y = -4.686084221046758e-07 CX_DOT_Z = 2.484949578400095e-07 CX_DOT_X_DOT = 4.296022805587290e-10 CY_DOT_X = -2.211832501084875e-07 CY_DOT_Y = -2.864186892102733e-07 CY_DOT_Z = 1.798098699846038e-07 CY_DOT_X_DOT = 2.608899201686016e-10 CY_DOT_Y_DOT = 1.767514756338532e-10 CZ_DOT_X = -3.041346050686871e-07 CZ_DOT_Y = -4.989496988610662e-07 CZ_DOT_Z = 3.540310904497689e-07 CZ_DOT_X_DOT = 1.869263192954590e-10 CZ_DOT_Y_DOT = 1.008862586240695e-10 CZ_DOT_Z_DOT = 6.224444338635500e-10 USER_DEFINED_EARTH_MODEL = WGS-84  

TLE + Converted OMM w/Synthetic Covariance Matrix GOES 9 [P] 1 23581U 95025A 07064.44075725 -.00000113 00000-0 10000-3 0 9250 2 23581 3.0539 81.7939 0005013 249.2363 150.1602 1.00273272 43169   CCSDS_OMM_VERS = 2.0 CREATION_DATE = 2007-065T16:00:00 ORIGINATOR = NOAA/USA  OBJECT_NAME = GOES 9 OBJECT_ID = 1995-025A CENTER_NAME = EARTH REF_FRAME = TEME TIME_SYSTEM = UTC MEAN_ELEMENT_THEORY = SGP4  COMMENT USAF SGP4 IS THE ONLY PROPAGATOR THAT SHOULD BE USED FOR THIS DATA EPOCH = 2007-064T10:34:41.4264 MEAN_MOTION = 1.00273272 ECCENTRICITY = 0.0005013 INCLINATION = 3.0539 RA_OF_ASC_NODE = 81.7939 ARG_OF_PERICENTER = 249.2363 MEAN_ANOMALY = 150.1602 GM = 398600.8  EPHEMERIS_TYPE = 0 CLASSIFICATION_TYPE = U NORAD_CAT_ID = 23581 ELEMENT_SET_NO = 0925 REV_AT_EPOCH = 4316 BSTAR = 0.0001 MEAN_MOTION_DOT = -0.00000113 MEAN_MOTION_DDOT = 0.0  COV_REF_FRAME = TEME CX_X = 3.331349476038534e-04 CY_X = 4.618927349220216e-04 CY_Y = 6.782421679971363e-04 CZ_X = -3.070007847730449e-04 CZ_Y = -4.221234189514228e-04 CZ_Z = 3.231931992380369e-04 CX_DOT_X = -3.349365033922630e-07 CX_DOT_Y = -4.686084221046758e-07 CX_DOT_Z = 2.484949578400095e-07 CX_DOT_X_DOT = 4.296022805587290e-10 CY_DOT_X = -2.211832501084875e-07 CY_DOT_Y = -2.864186892102733e-07 CY_DOT_Z = 1.798098699846038e-07 CY_DOT_X_DOT = 2.608899201686016e-10 CY_DOT_Y_DOT = 1.767514756338532e-10 CZ_DOT_X = -3.041346050686871e-07 CZ_DOT_Y = -4.989496988610662e-07 CZ_DOT_Z = 3.540310904497689e-07 CZ_DOT_X_DOT = 1.869263192954590e-10 CZ_DOT_Y_DOT = 1.008862586240695e-1 CZ_DOT_Z_DOT = 6.224444338635500e-10  A TLE  OMM Derived from TLE

Version 1 OEM Compatible Example (No r", No Covariance) CCSDS_OEM_VERS = 2.0 CREATION_DATE = 1996-11-04T17:22:31 ORIGINATOR = NASA/JPL META_START OBJECT_NAME = MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR OBJECT_ID = 1996-062A CENTER_NAME = MARS BARYCENTER REF_FRAME = EME2000 TIME_SYSTEM = UTC START_TIME = 1996-12-18T12:00:00.331 USEABLE_START_TIME = 1996-12-18T12:10:00.331 USEABLE_STOP_TIME = 1996-12-28T21:23:00.331 STOP_TIME = 1996-12-28T21:28:00.331 INTERPOLATION = HERMITE INTERPOLATION_DEGREE = 7 META_STOP 1996-12-18T12:00:00.331 2789.619 -280.045 -1746.755 4.73372 -2.49586 -1.04195 1996-12-18T12:01:00.331 2783.419 -308.143 -1877.071 5.18604 -2.42124 -1.99608 1996-12-18T12:02:00.331 2776.033 -336.859 -2008.682 5.63678 -2.33951 -1.94687 < intervening data records omitted here > 1996-12-28T21:28:00.331 -3881.024 563.959 -682.773 -3.28827 -3.66735 1.63861 META_START OBJECT_NAME = MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR OBJECT_ID = 1996-062A CENTER_NAME = MARS BARYCENTER REF_FRAME = EME2000 TIME_SYSTEM = UTC START_TIME = 1996-12-28T21:29:07.267 USEABLE_START_TIME = 1996-12-28T22:08:02.5 USEABLE_STOP_TIME = 1996-12-30T01:18:02.5 STOP_TIME = 1996-12-30T01:28:02.267 INTERPOLATION = HERMITE COMMENT This block begins after trajectory correction maneuver TCM-3. 1996-12-28T21:29:07.267 -2432.166 -063.042 1742.754 7.33702 -3.495867 -1.041945 1996-12-28T21:59:02.267 -2445.234 -878.141 1873.073 1.86043 -3.421256 -0.996366 1996-12-28T22:00:02.267 -2458.079 -683.858 2007.684 6.36786 -3.339563 -0.946654 1996-12-30T01:28:02.267 2164.375 1115.811 -688.131 -3.53328 -2.88452 0.88535

Version 2 OEM Example with Optional r" and Covariance CCSDS_OEM_VERS = 2.0   COMMENT OEM WITH OPTIONAL ACCELERATIONS MUST BE OEM VERSION 2.0 CREATION_DATE = 1996-11-04T17:22:31 ORIGINATOR = NASA/JPL META_START OBJECT_NAME = MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR OBJECT_ID = 1996-062A CENTER_NAME = MARS BARYCENTER REF_FRAME = EME2000 TIME_SYSTEM = UTC START_TIME = 1996-12-18T12:00:00.331 USEABLE_START_TIME = 1996-12-18T12:10:00.331 USEABLE_STOP_TIME = 1996-12-28T21:23:00.331 STOP_TIME = 1996-12-28T21:28:00.331 INTERPOLATION = HERMITE INTERPOLATION_DEGREE = 7 META_STOP COMMENT This file was produced by M.R. Somebody, MSOO NAV/JPL, 2000 NOV 04. It is COMMENT to be used for DSN scheduling purposes only. 1996-12-18T12:00:00.331 2789.6 -280.0 -1746.8 4.73 -2.50 -1.04 0.008 0.001 -0.159 1996-12-18T12:01:00.331 2783.4 -308.1 -1877.1 5.19 -2.42 -2.00 0.008 0.001 0.001 1996-12-18T12:02:00.331 2776.0 -336.9 -2008.7 5.64 -2.34 -1.95 0.008 0.001 0.159 < intervening data records omitted here > 1996-12-28T21:28:00.331 -3881.0 564.0 -682.8 -3.29 -3.67 1.64 -0.003 0.000 0.000 COVARIANCE_START EPOCH = 1996-12-28T21:29:07.267 COV_REF_FRAME = EME2000 3.3313494e-04 4.6189273e-04 6.7824216e-04 -3.0700078e-04 -4.2212341e-04 3.2319319e-04 -3.3493650e-07 -4.6860842e-07 2.4849495e-07 4.2960228e-10 -2.2118325e-07 -2.8641868e-07 1.7980986e-07 2.6088992e-10 1.7675147e-10 -3.0413460e-07 -4.9894969e-07 3.5403109e-07 1.8692631e-10 1.0088625e-10 6.2244443e-10 EPOCH = 1996-12-29T21:00:00 3.4424505e-04 4.5078162e-04 6.8935327e-04 -3.0600067e-04 -4.1101230e-04 3.3420420e-04 -3.2382549e-07 -4.5750731e-07 2.3738384e-07 4.3071339e-10 -2.1007214e-07 -2.7530757e-07 1.6870875e-07 2.5077881e-10 1.8786258e-10 -3.0302350e-07 -4.8783858e-07 3.4302008e-07 1.7581520e-10 1.0077514e-10 6.2244443e-10 COVARIANCE_STOP