ITPA Meeting, PPPL, 24-27 April, 2006 1 y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamo and Magnetic Helicity Flux Hantao Ji CMSO & PPPL CMSO General Meeting Princeton, October 5-7, 2005 Contributors: Eric Blackman (Rochester) Stewart.
Advertisements

Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Where are we in Integrated modeling? S. Jardin Mature 1½ D evolution code packages exist with reduced modules for most processes –Japan: BPSI: (TASK, TOPICS)
Korean Modeling Effort : C2 Code J.M. Park NFRC/ORNL In collaboration with Sun Hee Kim, Ki Min Kim, Hyun-Sun Han, Sang Hee Hong Seoul National University.
Chalkidikhi Summer School Plasma turbulence in tokamaks: some basic facts… W.Fundamenski UKAEA/JET.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 12 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas SPS Annual Meeting in Lausanne, 14/2/2006 SOLPS5 modelling of ELMing H-mode on TCV.
A. Kirk, 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu, China, October 2006 Evolution of the pedestal on MAST and the implications for ELM power loadings.
Cyclic MHD Instabilities Hartmut Zohm MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Seminar talk at the ‚Advanced Course‘ of EU PhD Network, Garching, September.
1 G.T. Hoang, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Euratom Turbulent Particle Transport in Tore Supra G.T. Hoang, J.F. Artaud, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet and.
Emmanuel JoffrinXXth Fusion Energy Conference, November The « hybrid » scenario in JET: towards its validation for ITER E. Joffrin, A. C. C. Sips,
FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Tony Donné Introduction to fusion control.
Examples of using Langevin equation to solve FP equation.
European Taskforce on Integrated Tokamak Modelling A Brief Overview Oak Ridge, June 7 Joint ORNL/Indiana University Workshop.
Predictive Integrated Modeling Simulations Using a Combination of H-mode Pedestal and Core Models Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Thawatchai Onjun, Alexei.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
F. Imbeaux et al – Numerical Models for Controlled Fusion 1 Association Euratom-CEA April 2008 Integrated modelling of tokamak plasmas : the CRONOS.
Joaquim Loizu P. Ricci, F. Halpern, S. Jolliet, A. Mosetto
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
Database structure for the European Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force F. Imbeaux On behalf of the Data Coordination Project.
Status and Plans Transport Model Validation in ITER-similar Current-Ramp Plasmas D. R. Mikkelsen, PPPL ITPA Transport & Confinement Workshop San Diego.
US ITER UFA Meeting APS-DPP Savannah, GA Ned Sauthoff (presented by Dale Meade) November 15, 2004 US In-kind Contributions and Starting Burning Plasma.
Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 European Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force TF Leader & Deputies:
ITPA NAKA, October P. Strand Plans and status of the European Task Force Integrated Tokamak Modelling Presented by: Pär Strand TF Leader : P. Strand,
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
The european ITM Task Force data structure F. Imbeaux.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
1 Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement – DB ITPA - 1 October 2007 by Peter de Vries Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement Studies at JET P.C. de.
G.Huysmansworkshop : Principles of MHD 21-24/3/2005 MHD in Tokamak Plasmas Guido Huysmans Association Euratom/CEA Cadarache, France with contributions.
TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015.
LH Meeting, Prague 17 December, Integrated Predictive Modelling at JET V. Parail, G. Corrigan, D. Heading, J. Spence, P. Belo, G. Huysmans, F. Imbeaux,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
Comparison of Ion Thermal Transport From GLF23 and Weiland Models Under ITER Conditions A. H. Kritz 1 Christopher M. Wolfe 1 F. Halpern 1, G. Bateman 1,
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
D. Tskhakaya et al. 1 (13) PSI 18, Toledo July 2008 Kinetic simulations of the parallel transport in the JET Scrape-off Layer D. Tskhakaya, R.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
1 I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego ISM modelling activity on current ramp up Presented by I VOITSEKHOVITCH.
Tuomas Tala 1/24 ITPA TC Meeting, Naka, Japan 31 March – 2 April 2009 NBI Modulation Experiments to Study Momentum Transport on JET + Status of TC-15 Tuomas.
1Peter de Vries – ITBs and Rotational Shear – 18 February 2010 – Oxford Plasma Theory Group P.C. de Vries JET-EFDA Culham Science Centre Abingdon OX14.
1 13 th ITPA Transport Physics Group Meeting Naka, 1-3 October 2007 V. Mukhovatov ITER Rotation Issues.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
D. McCune 1 PTRANSP Predictive Upgrades for TRANSP.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
Summary CDBM IMAGE meeting, 07 IMAGE SUMMARY IMAGE set up to provide a venue for discussion between the different Integrated Modelling (IM) activities.
Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.
Angelo A. Tuccillo EX/ th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura, 1-6 November 2004 Development on JET of Advanced Tokamak Operations for ITER.
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND VTT PROCESSES Tekes Contribution to European Fusion Roadmap Seppo Karttunen and Tuomas Tala VTT / Association.
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ROTATION AND MOMENTUM TRANSPORT SESSIONS 10th ITPA Transport Physics and CDBM TG Meetings Princeton.
M.F.F. Nave 1 ITPA 22 March 2010 Intrinsic Rotation in JET M. F. F. Nave 22 nd March 2010.
ISM Working Group 1 ITPA meeting 24 th March 2010 Modelling of JET, Tore Supra and Asdex Upgrade current ramp-up experiments F. Imbeaux, F. Köchl, D. Hogeweij,
SUMMARY OF 4th IPTA TRANSPORT AND ITB PHYSICS TG MEETING St. Petersburg, Russia, April 8-11, 2003 Presented by E.J. Doyle for the TG Note: this summary.
ASIPP, 24/ Modelling of near LH effects on the SOL, in view of extrapolation to ITER V. Petrzilka 1, G. Corrigan 2, P. Belo 3, A. Ekedahl 4, K.
US-Japan JIFT Workshop on Theory-Based Modelling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas and 21COE Workshop on Plasma Theory, Kyoto, 2003/12/15-17.
Moving fast in fusion reactors: ASCOT – race track for fast ions
IMP3 1 RITM – code Computation with stiff transport models presented by D.Kalupin 12th Meeting of the ITPA Transport Physics (TP) Topical Group 7-10 May.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
BOUT++ Towards an MHD Simulation of ELMs B. Dudson and H.R. Wilson Department of Physics, University of York M.Umansky and X.Xu Lawrence Livermore National.
Integrated Operation Scenarios ITPA NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting, February 8, 2016 Yong-Su Na 1 Core Plasma Particle Transport Benchmark Activities in.
1 Peter de Vries – ITPA T meeting Culham – March 2010 P.C. de Vries 1,2, T.W. Versloot 1, A. Salmi 3, M-D. Hua 4, D.H. Howell 2, C. Giroud 2, V. Parail.
Integrated Plasma Simulations C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop Toward an Integrated Plasma Simulation Oak Ridge, TN November 7-9,
Simulation of Turbulence in FTU M. Romanelli, M De Benedetti, A Thyagaraja* *UKAEA, Culham Sciance Centre, UK Associazione.
Tuomas Tala 1/16 ITPA TC Meeting, Princeton, USA 5 October – 7 October 2009 T. Tala (JET, DIII-D), W. Solomon (DIII-D, JET, NSTX) and S. Kaye, L.F. Delgado-
6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.
Status of integrated core-edge modelling
of current ramp-up & ramp-down
Magnetic Ripple as a Tool for ELMs Mitigation
J. Menard for the MHD Science Focus Group Tuesday, November 22, 2005
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas
EX/6-1 Heavy Impurity Transport in the Core of JET Plasmas
Presentation transcript:

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from all Associations start bringing their codes to work with JET data; y2003: Five core transport codes, three SOL transport codes, three MHD stability codes, three turbulence simulation codes, all can be run remotely from Associations; yNumber of code users reached 90 with simulations per year; yMany codes had no interfaces with the JET data; yEven similar codes were using different input/output format, different transport models, different boundary conditions etc., making result comparison and code benchmarking very difficult if at all impossible. Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET 1/6 V. Parail, UKAEA

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, z 2004: “Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET” Project commence to integrate codes into a unified Code Management System (CMS), linked with JET and ITER databases: zWe decide that the first step towards unification and integration would be to bring all codes under the same shell so that similar codes can share the same input/output files and the same user-friendly environment; zThey would be all linked with JET and ITER Profile databases and would all share the same link with MHD stability codes, turbulence simulation codes and post-processing facilities; zThey would share the same data storage and catalogue system; Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET 2/6

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, zThis would allow users to use any code in a similar way and compare codes in a very easy way; zSharing the same platform and input/output files will allow easier exchange of specific modules, which would originally developed for just one specific code; zIf successful, such a joint cluster of codes will act as an attraction point for modellers and code developers and will make easier process of code integration; Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET 3/6 Code Management System Pre-processing Job Execution: JETTO, CRONOS, ASTRA, SANCO, EDGE2D, B2/EIRENE etc. Job Completion Post-processing: MHD, turbulence simulation, synthetic diagnostics, etc. DATABASES: JET, ITER, MDSPlus Catalogue

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, PPF MDSplus EU ? JAMS Catalogue System PPF ITER Pre-process Prejet Modex EX Core Transport Jetto Cronos Astra Analysis Helena Mishka Elite Kinezero UTC Catman Edge Transport Edge2d Solps PPF Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET 4/6 z The following codes have been added to CMS in 2004 (in red):

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET 5/6 l 2005: “Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET” Project was extended to accommodate the following tasks: ¬ Completing the user-friendly suite of transport, MHD and turbulence simulation codes, which are needed for a fully integrated tokamak modelling: yUser-friendly environment was extended to include GRID2D, EDGE2D, COCONUT and some post processing tools; yMHD stability code ELITE was added to CMS and benchmarked against MISHKA; ­ Start benchmarking existing codes and make codes more modular to optimise CMS: yEDGE2D was linked with 3D cold neutral code EIRENE, previously used by SOLPS; yStandard modules for sawtooth reconnection and for ICRH heating were implemented in JETTO and CRONOS;

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, Integration of transport and MHD codes at JET 6/6 ­ Cont’d yStandard interface between transport codes and theory-based transport models has been developed and implemented in JETTO and CRONOS (note that this task was done as a joint venture between Project and EU ITM TF, see bullet  below) ; ® Develop a link with EU ITM TF to make CMS a testbed for the EU system of integrated codes: yAn implementation of standard interface between transport codes and an equilibrium solvers, which is being developed by ITM TF, in JET Code Management System is planned for Total number of CSM users: 90 in 2004; 140 in 2005.

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, Examples of integrated predictive modelling at JET 1/2 The following modelling activity was pursued during 2005 under TF-T: –Modelling of ELM mitigation by magnetic ripple and by stochastic magnetic field (V. Parail: EPS-2005, 15 th ISW-invited ). Code used : JETTO, ASCOT, OFMC (JAEA) – Benchmarking of Weiland and GLF23 transport modules using plasma in hybrid scenario (F. Imbeaux, EPS-2005-invited). Code used: CRONOS, JETTO, ASTRA; –Simulation of ELM-induced heat and particle flux propagation through the SOL (J. Lonnroth, 11 th PET-invited). Code used: JETTO, MISHKA, EDGE2D, COCONUT; –Modelling of LH waves interaction with the gas puffing localised near grill entrance (V. Petrzilka). Code used: JETTO, modified EDGE2D; –Predictive and interpretative analysis of poloidal and toroidal plasma rotation in JET (T. Tala et al.). Code used: JETTO; –Predictive modelling of multiple impurities penetration through the SOL in JET plasmas (P. Belo, EPS-2005, APS-2005). Code used: JETTO, SANCO, EDGE2D.

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April,  Narrow edge-localised ripple losses reduce performance and increase ELM frequency; z Energy losses during the ELM are reduced, which leads to smaller, more benign ELMs; Red lines - no ripple losses Blue lines - moderate ripple; Green lines - strong ripple Examples of integrated predictive modelling at JET 1/2 Modelling of ELM mitigation by magnetic ripple and by stochastic magnetic field (V. Parail: EPS-2005): Energy content Edge transport (arb. Units)