U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lidar Interoperability: The Need for Common Guidelines and Practices ASPRS Annual Conference Thursday.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COUNTER: improving usage statistics Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER December 2006.
Advertisements

Usage statistics in context - panel discussion on understanding usage, measuring success Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER AAP/PSP 9 February 2005.
Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data A story of data, more data and some more data.
REQUIRING A SPATIAL REFERENCE THE: NEED FOR RECTIFICATION.
High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Barry Y. Miller GEOG 596A: HLZ Capstone Project Proposal, 26 September 2012.
ASPRS Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data Dr. David Maune (Dewberry) Dr. Qassim Abdullah (Woolpert) Hans Karl.
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
2012 NHD/WBD Stewardhsip Conference – 3/29/2012.  Provide framework for appropriate levels of rigor, consistency and cooperation  Report by Stewards.
Update on Use of Hazus for FEMA Risk MAP Flood Risk Products Shane Parson – RAMPP PTS (URS)
Zachary Fancher Last updated 12/15/2012. Background Regulatory Division responsible for making jurisdictional determinations on “Waters of the U.S”, as.
Characteristics, uses, and sources Introduction to DEMs.
Brian S. Keiling Program Head – Forest Management Dabney S.Lancaster Community College.
Landsat Advisory Group Update December 11, 2013 Co-Chairs Kass Green and Roger Mitchell.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Digital Aerial Mapping Camera Status CRSS/ASPRS Specialty Conference October 2007 USGS Remote.
NOAA Coastal Management Fellowship: Coastal Hazards Analysis & Management Project (CHAMP) Coastal Hazards Analysis & Management Program (CHAMP)
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote.
GIS In Maryland Ken Miller Director, Watershed Information Services.
1. LiDAR Mapping Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping provided for the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) – established.
Obtaining LiDAR Data, Contracting Considerations Kenny Legleiter Project Manager Merrick & Company.
Data Quality Data quality Related terms:
Illinois Height Modernization Sheena K. Beaverson.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
Panel: Strategies for CyberGIS Partner Engagement.
DISTRIBUTION OF LIDAR DATA VIA THE INTERNET Michael Hearne and Andrew Meredith Technology Planning and Management Corporation Coastal Remote Sensing Program.
3001 LiDAR Services VGIN Presentation – December 2007.
Minnesota Elevation Mapping Project Metro Area Collect 1/13/2011 Tim Loesch Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ASPRS Panel on USGS Progress on Remote Sensing Calibration and Quality The National Map Quality.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group The Proposed USGS Plan for Digital.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
+ 3D Elevation Program May 8, 2013 The National Map.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CLICK : The USGS Center for LIDAR Information Coordination and Knowledge Jordan Menig SAIC, contractor.
State of Connecticut Nutmeg Network Statement of Direction 9/10/
2012 KYTC Transportation-GIS Conference Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Office Building 200 Mero St., Frankfort, KY Thursday March 29, 2012 Pavement.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Elevation Data Product Needs and Requirements Larry Sugarbaker Senior Advisor - Geography.
Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships IGIC.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A Proposal for the Geospatial Platform: Data Acquisition as a Service National Geospatial Advisory.
LiDAR Contour Options Randy Mayden, VP Business Development
Where to find LiDAR: Online Data Resources.
LIDAR Technology Everett Hinkley USDA Forest Service Geospatial Management Office Prepared for Congressman Allan Mollahan's Office.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Geospatial Liaisons - Supporting NHD Stewardship NHD Workshop April 14, 2009.
Digital Imagery Guideline ASPRS/PDAD Gerald J. Kinn Applanix ISG A Trimble Company 2 Dec 2003.
1 Status of the National Elevation Dataset and the National Lidar Initiative Kris Verdin SAIC Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS)
ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference, Baltimore, Maryland Overview of USGS Calibration Activities U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey LP DAAC Stacie Doman Bennett, LP DAAC Scientist Dave Meyer, LP DAAC Project Scientist.
Guidelines for Procurement of Professional Aerial Imagery, Photogrammetry, Lidar and Related Remote Sensor-based Geospatial Mapping Services Background.
The technology and techniques driving effective highway management LandScope Engineering Ltd Sarah Jones GI Manager.
Commercial Mapping Products Guideline CMPG Ad Hoc Team Report ASPRS Hot Topic San Diego Conference.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Steve Helterbrand, USGS Bryan Christensen, SAIC at USGS EROS Digital Aerial Data Provider Certification.
SWFWMD LiDAR Specifications – 18 April 2008 LiDAR Specifications at the SWFWMD Ekaterina Fitos & Al Karlin.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
E-Education Institute Lidar Technology and Applications Proposal for an elective course to be offered by the Dutton e-Education Institute MGIS Capstone.
Management and Use of LiDAR-Derived Information Elizabeth Cook USDA-NRCS Columbia, MO.
Statistical Data and Metadata Exchange SDMX Metadata Common Vocabulary Status of project and issues ( ) Marco Pellegrino Eurostat
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
IGIC - Indiana GIS LiDAR Applications for Surveyors ISPLS State Conference January 18, 2013 (8:00 am – 11:00 am)
Contour Mapping from LiDAR Presented by: Dave Bullington Surdex Corporation St. Louis, MO
ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference, Baltimore, Maryland Overview of USGS Calibration Activities U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Archiving Geospatial Data John Faundeen, Archivist Presentation to Map & Geographic Information.
An Accuracy Assessment of a Digital Elevation Model Derived From an Airborne Profiling Laser Joseph M. Piwowar Philip J. Howarth Waterloo Laboratory for.
-National Lidar Initiative- the NDEP Perspective National Lidar Initiative Meeting February 2007 – Reston, VA Presented by Bryon Ellingson Executive Secretary,
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD Work performed under.
Ontario’s Current LiDAR Acquisition Initiative
Analysis Ready Data ..
Washington Geological Survey
COUNTER Update February 2006.
Digital Imagery Guideline ASPRS/PDAD Gerald J
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lidar Interoperability: The Need for Common Guidelines and Practices ASPRS Annual Conference Thursday April 29, 2010 San Diego, CA Karl Heidemann, GISP Physical Scientist U.S. Geological Survey, EROS

Lidar Vocabulary ☀ Lidar: Point data representing the X-Y-Z location, with other attributes, of any terrestrial target reflecting the laser pulse. ☀ Not limited to bare-earth points ☀ Not a surface such as raster DEM or TIN ☀ DEM: Digital Elevation Model of the bare-earth surface, almost always raster. ☀ DEMs derived from Lidar are still just DEMs.

All-Return Lidar (Points)

Bare-Earth DEM (Surface)

A Little Background ☀ Lidar became commercially viable in the mid-late 1990s ☀ Initially regarded solely as a means to develop bare- earth DEMs - little interest in the point cloud data ☀ Lidar technology was developed by a number of mapping firms working in a competitive, commercial environment ☀ Data producers developed their own methods, practices, software, and deliverables – largely driven solely towards a DEM deliverable ☀ The competitive environment allowed for much innovation and rapid development of the technology, however… ☀ … it also contributed to the significant variations in how point data is handled and delivered today

Lidar Specifications ☀ Appropriately dictated by topography, landcover, and primary use of the data ☀ Post Spacing/Point Density ☀ Spatial Accuracy (Vertical & Horizontal) ☀ Classifications ☀ Others… ☀ Cannot realistically be uniform across the nation ☀ Mohave Desert ☀ Great Smokey Mountains ☀ Gulf Coast ☀ Accepted that specifications will vary within a national collection effort

Practices ☀ Currently unique to project, data producer, software, and instrument ☀ Some variations are inevitable, acceptable, and healthy for continued innovation in the industry ☀ Others pose significant impediments to a “seamless” National Lidar effort: ☀ Point delivery - completeness ☀ Classification – completeness ☀ Accuracy – assessment and reporting ☀ Metadata – consistency and completeness ☀ Calibration & Boresighting – consistency ☀ Adjacent Project Registration

A Possible National Lidar System LAS Data Stores (petabytes) Metadata and Index Stores XML Metadata & Reduced Resolution Views User Request for Data, Analysis, & Derived Products Points Needed to Fulfill User Request Common Data/Product Cache Delivery Cache Finished Products Check for Existing Data/Product Data Analysis and Processing Software Systems User Interface Software Data Delivery Management Software Systems Data Access and Control Software Systems

USGS-NGP Lidar Guidelines and Base Specification ☀ Prompted by ARRA funding for lidar to support the NED ☀ Clarify USGS-NGP minimum requirements for NED usage ☀ Identify common buy-up options ☀ Initially viewed as a one-pager ☀ Wide variety of lidar issues caused expansion of scope ☀ Improve consistency across lidar point deliveries ☀ Allow waivers for flexibility (previous collections; science) ☀ Addresses both point cloud data and derived products ☀ Assures delivery of bare-earth DEMs suitable for use in the NED ☀ Assures delivery of more consistent point cloud data for use in other scientific and mapping applications ☀ Specs to remain durable beyond ARRA projects

Status of the Base Specification ☀ Still a draft, the Spec has already been tentatively embraced by numerous other organizations: ☀ FEMA, NRCS, NGA ☀ Dewberry, Merrick, URS ☀ ASPRS, MAPPS ☀ Although planned to be finalized and published this year, periodic updates are presumed ☀ Expectation that a broader Federal Lidar Spec will be developed ☀ Common body dealing with point clouds and practices ☀ Appendices specific to individual agencies/projects ☀ Collection specifics ☀ Derived product requirements

ASPRS Lidar Best Practices ☀ Growing movement for national lidar is adding urgency to the need for industry “standards” and Best Practices ☀ Significant topic of discussion at ASPRS Lidar Subcommittee Meeting of this conference ☀ Important issue to other ASPRS Divisions ☀ Upcoming ASPRS Airborne Lidar Manual includes sections on Best Practices ☀ Endorsed Best Practices expected to be drawn from multiple sources: ☀ ASPRS Airborne Lidar Manual ☀ USGS-NGP Lidar Guidelines and Base Specification ☀ Other inputs …

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lidar Interoperability: The Need for Common Guidelines and Practices Discussion Karl Heidemann, GISP Physical Scientist U.S. Geological Survey, EROS