Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

HL-LHC Corrector Magnet 3D design status Giovanni Volpini on behalf of the LASA team CERN, February 25, 2014.
ADJUSTABLE STRONG PERMANENT MAGNET FOR FINAL FOCUS QUADRUPOLE T. MIHARA, Y.IWASHITA Kyoto University M. KUMADAN.I.R.S. C.M.SpencerS.L.A.C.
PXIE: SSR1 Section Focusing Lens 1.Requirements table 2.Developed at FNAL 3.Available from vendors 4.Used at ANL 5.Layout of the SSR1 cryomodule 6.Case.
Linac Quad Field and Position Stability Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
IR Magnets for SuperKEKB KEK, Norihito Ohuchi 1.IR Magnets (ES, QCS, QC1) 2.Interference between Magnet-Cryostats and Belle 3.Summary SuperB.WS05.Hawaii.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Hybrid QD0 Studies M. Modena CERN Acknowledgments: CERN TE-MSC CLIC Magnets Study Team: A.Aloev, E. Solodko, P.Thonet, A.Vorozhtsov “CLIC/ILC QD0” Meeting.
Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.
April 24, 2008 FNAL ILC SCRF Meeting 1 Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin, T. Fernando, J. DiMarco, G. Velev.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
MCTF Alexander Zlobin MUTAC Meeting 8-10 April MCTF Magnet and HTS Conductor R&D.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Shielding the Weiner PSU 7 May 2013 Kiril Marinov ASTeC, MaRS, DL 1.
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
1 M. Modena for the CLIC MDI magnet study Team (A. Aloev, P. Thonet, E. Solodko, A. Vorozhtsov) CLIC MDI Meeting,16 January 2015.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Focusing Solenoids Yuri Tereshkin Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 10 th – 12 th, 2006.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
Status of the HINS Linac Front End Focusing Lens Development Can we use these lenses in the SSR1 crymodule of PXIE ? 9/27/20111 I.Terechkine for PXIE Cryomodule.
Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova,
Focusing Lens for PXIE SSR1 Cryomodule Summer 2012 Status 7/10/2012I. Terechkine1.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
PIP-II Solenoid Focusing lens for SSR2 Cryomodule Kumud Singh, Affiliation: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre PIP-II Technical Meeting 19 Jan 2016.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
Prepare specifications/requirements magnetic and mechanical characteristics operation mode Development of Test facility - dedicated test facility to study.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
SSR1 Cryomodule Development for PXIE - Alignment T. Nicol Decenber 6, 2011.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013D2 Status and Plans – G. Sabbi 1 D2 Conceptual Design Status and Next Steps G. Sabbi, X. Wang High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
Possible Configurations for Prototypes of PX Cryomodules: SSR0 and SSR1 Prepared for discussion at the HINS  PX technical meeting 12/10/20101I. Terechkine.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Final doublet: future activity plan
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
MQXF coil cross-section status
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
JLEIC Magnet R&D Tim Michalski NP Community Panel Review of the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1

Requirements Number, total4 Operating temperature, K2 Current at maximum strength, A~100 ∫B 2 dL, T 2 m4.0 Alignment precision, RMS: center position [mm]±0.5 Alignment precision, RMS: angle [mrad]±1 Maximum fringe field at the cold cavity walls, mT< 1 Maximum fringe field in the warm state, µT 5 ?? 1 mrad error of solenoid alignment excites betatron oscillations of about 1.5 mm Number, total8 Number, per solenoid package2 Current, A≤50 Correctors Main Coil Minimum beam bore diameter 30 mm Maximum allowed longitudinal real estate 170 mm Nominal temperature 2 K 2/76/2012 I. Terechkine 2 Required strength T-m – Main concept approaches reviewed: 1. Lens is not mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding; 2. Lens is mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding; 3. Lens is mechanically connected to the beam pipe; active shielding. CoolingShieldingBPM Integration LHe vesselCombinedLens Cooling pipeActive CombinedPassiveBeam pipe Design options:

Strand 2/76/2012 I. Terechkine3 B (T) Specs – 0.5 mmIc (A) Sample1 0.5 mmIc (A) Sample2 0.5 mmIc (A) Modeling 0.5 mmIc (A) Specs mmIc (A) Modeling 0.4 mmIc (A) Oxford Instruments, 54/50 NbTi strand at 4.2 K

Lens is not mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding 2/76/2012I. Terechkine4 Design Principles 1.Two layer shielding 2.LHe vessel with small diameter filling pipes or pure conduction cooling

Lens is not mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding 2/76/2012I. Terechkine5 List of parameters (preliminary): Coil : Ri = 27 mm, Ro = 37 mm, L = 130 mm, Strand diameter (Oxford 54 x 6) is 0.4 mm, N = 6535 Compaction factor is 0.65 Coolant temperature – 2 K Icr = 133 A Bcr = 7.7 T ∫B 2 dl = 6.6 T 2 ∙m with the flux return. Primary flux return: Ri = 50 mm Ro = 80 mm L = 140 mm Flux catcher length = 50 mm Flux catcher thickness = 5 mm Secondary flux return: Cryoperm10 plate thickness – 2 mm Cryoperm10 plate outer radius – 135 mm

2/76/2012I. Terechkine6 Coil : Ri = 22.5 mm, Ro = 29 mm, L = mm, Strand diameter is 0.4 mm, N = 3797 Compaction factor is 0.65 Icr = 168 A Bcr = 6.6 T ∫B 2 dl = 4.5 T 2 ∙m with the flux return Primary flux return: Ri = 31 mm Ro = 56 mm L = 150 mm Secondary flux return: Cryoperm10 plate thickness – 2 mm Cryoperm10 plate outer radius – 135 mm Cryoperm10 plate position – 185 mm Lens is mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding: 2K

Lens is mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding: 2K 2/76/2012I. Terechkine7

Lens is mechanically connected to the beam pipe; passive shielding: 2.5 K 2/76/2012I. Terechkine8 Coil : Ri = 22.5 mm, Ro = 29 mm, L = 120 mm, Strand diameter is 0.4 mm, N = 3800 Compaction factor is 0.65 Icr = A Bcr = 6.3 T ∫B 2 dl = 4.4 T 2 ∙m with the flux return Magnetic field in the plane Z = 250 mm The need to use this temperature is due to some uncertainty of the inbound heat flux in a case of pure conduction cooling, and strand parameters at T < 4.2 K

Residual Field due to the presence of magnetic materials 2/76/2012I. Terechkine9 For soft steel (SMS Electric Steel, C, and N max), after it is brought to saturation at Bm = ~2 T: Hc = 1 Oe Br = Gs For the Cryoperm-10 material, With H = 0.1 A/cm, Bm = 0.8 T Br = 0.55 T Hc = A/cm = 1.2 A/m  Oe. Only the flux return is magnetized; no additional shield No magnetization in the magnetic shield Only the magnetic shield is magnetized Additional shield is needed to ensure low field in warm state

Magnetic Materials: Relevant Properties 2/76/2012I. Terechkine10 B = B R + µ eff ∙µ0∙H µ eff ∙µ0 = B R /H C BRBR HCHC Load line Magnetization curve B H MarerialBRBR HCHC SMS steel13,000 G0.6 Oe Silicon steel11,000 G0.5 Oe ,000 G1 Oe Permalloy 78% Ni5,000 G0.05 Oe Cryoperm-105,000 G0.1 Oe

Choise of Magnetic Shield Material 2/76/2012I. Terechkine11 Flux return: low carbon structural steel; stress-relief annealing Primary magnetic shield– electric grade silicon steel Secondary (cleaning) magnetic shield – Cryoperm 10 Residual magnetic field on the surface R = 250 mm after warming up is less than 1 µT even if low quality carbon steel is used as material for the main flux return (H C = 2 Oe) Size of the hole for the beam pipe is not a critical parameter: Hole diameterR = 0R = 200 mmZ = 250 mmZ = 400 mm 40 mm3.4 µT1.2 µT0.8 µT0.45 µT 50 mm4.0 µT1.2 µT0.87 µT0.45 µT 60 mm4.8 µT1.3 µT0.9 µT0.48 µT 70 mm5.5 µT1.3 µT0.93 µT0.5 µT

Active Shield Lens 2/76/2012I. Terechkine12 ANL Lens Residual field requirement (warm) – 3 µT -Wire: NbTi, - Operating temperature: K, - Magnetic field integral: ∫Bzdz = 0.75 T-m, - Operating current: ~79 amps, - Inductance: 1.1 Henries, - Shielding: B = 15cm, - Steering coils: 0.2 T, 30 T-mm, - Bore diameter: 35 mm. Wall field – less than 40 G

Active Shield Lens 2/76/2012 I. Terechkine 13 ANL Lens in the SSR1 cryomodule (after some optimization): Round 0.35 mm NbTi strand is used to wind both coils, Coil length mm, Inner radius of the main coil – 22.5 mm, Outer radius of the main coil –35.5 mm, Compaction factor in the main coil – 0.65, Number of turns in the main coil – Inner radius of the flux return coil – 65 mm, Outer radius of the flux return coil –.67.5 mm, Compaction factor in the flux return coil – 0.65, Number of turns in the flux return coil – 2283, Current - 75 A. Focusing strength – 4.35 T 2 m Field integral – 0.86 T-m Wall field less than 10 G (R = 100 mm) Outer border field less than 3 G

Active Shield in SSR1 Cryomodule 2/76/2012I. Terechkine14

Summary 2/76/2012I. Terechkine15 1.All the versions are doable; 2.Options with passive shielding seem simpler in implementation; 3. Fringe field requirements still needs to be understood; 4.Alignment precision and reproducibility needs to be studied; options with passive shielding provide more options (e.g. conduction cooling plus separate beam pipe); 5.Design study should start, so that prototypes are built and tested at 2K in the SSR1 test cryostat (conditions close to what to expect in the SSR1 cryomodule).