1 1 Nunn-McCurdy Legislation/Program Impacts Della McPhail Chief Financial Officer 308 ARSW DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unauthorized Commitments
Advertisements

Simplified Risk Management Planning for A Risk Management Process Overview presentation, which should take about.
1 May 2009 ver. 5.5 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) MDA: Approves AoA Study Guidance Determines acquisition phase of entry Identifies initial review.
1 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) Overview July 2013 NAVY CEVM.
Phase B Exit Criteria Issues Resolved or Addressed Technical Reviews / Readiness Reviews, Audits Initiate Milestone C Program Review Planning Process Initiate.
“Common Process for Developing Briefings for Major Decision Points” INSTRUCTIONS Provide Feedback via to: Lois Harper PEO C4I and Space
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
Program Visibility, Analysis, and Reporting (PVAR)
0 9 Dec 2009, V1.2 Bradford Brown Director for Acquisition & Program management Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) Implementation of the Weapon Systems.
CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING
FAR Part 2 Definitions of Words and Terms. FAR Scope of part (a)This part – (1) Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR; (2)
Initiate Technology Development Finalize AoA Plan, AS, ICD, TDS, Develop CDD, and TEMP Initiate Milestone B Program Review Planning Process Initiate Acquisition.
1 APB, SAR, and Nunn-McCurdy Status DAMIR Conference October 30-31, 2007 Larry Axtell & Wendell Irby OUSD(AT&L)
1 [insert briefing type here] [insert program name here] for [insert name and organization of person(s) to be briefed here] [insert “month day, year” of.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
How to Review a SAR (Key attributes of a good SAR) October 2007 DAMIR Conference Dana Harrison (703)
1 GAO’s Use of DAMIR October 31, 2007 David Best Assistant Director
1 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting NDIA PMSC Meeting August 15-16, 2006.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
System Integration Exit Criteria Issues Resolved or Addressed Preliminary Design Review/Critical Design Review, Audits Initiate Design Readiness Review.
PEO C4I and SPACE FULL-RATE PRODUCTION REVIEW TIMELINE
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
10/20/ Welcome to Overview for Grants.
FTA Research Program Requirements Bruce Robinson Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation April 17, 2007.
1 1 Defense Acquisition Guidebook Progress Update March 27, 2012.
1 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting NDIA PMSC Meeting January 31, 2007.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Information Requirements
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Sealed Bids Unit 5.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
Presidential Direction
MORS Special Meeting: Risk, Trade Space, & Analytics for Acquisition
Lesson Objectives Determine the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone A to Milestone B Explain the purpose.
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Lesson Objectives Determine the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone A to Milestone B Explain the purpose.
Lesson Objectives Determine the key Requirements Manager activities and the role of the ICD leading up to the MDD and during Materiel Solution Analysis.
October 31, 2007 David Best Assistant Director
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities July 12, 2016.
Life Cycle Logistics.
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
FAR Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Establishing and Managing a Schedule Baseline
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
September 2016 EVM 202—Lesson 8 Integrated Product Team (IPT) Analysis and Performance Case.
Program Visibility, Analysis, and Reporting (PVAR)
APB, SAR, and Nunn-McCurdy Status
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Information Required for Milestone and Decision Reviews
Mastering Change Control
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Letter Contracts Rabbanai T. Morgan
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
NDIA PMSC Meeting May 21, 2009 Larry Axtell, OUSD(AT&L)
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Nunn-McCurdy Legislation/Program Impacts Della McPhail Chief Financial Officer 308 ARSW DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

2 2 Outline Unit Cost Reporting (UCR) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Unit Cost Breaches Certification Process Anatomy of a Unit Cost Breach Reduce Risk of a Unit Cost Breach

3 3 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Background/Purpose To provide Congressional unit cost reporting for Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs) Drafted by Senator Nunn in 1982 (Representative McCurdy co-sponsored) Title 10, United States Code, Section 2433 (Unit Cost Reports) and Section 2435 (Baseline Description) Largely unchanged until FY06 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in January 2006

4 4 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting (UCR): Unit Cost Measurements Two UCR criteria: -- Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) -- Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC) Definitions (in base-year $) : -- PAUC = [Total Development $ + Procurement $ + Construction $] / Total program quantity -- APUC = Total Procurement $ / Procurement quantity Other Unit Cost Measure: Average Unit Production Price (AUPP) Not a Nunn-McCurdy Measure!

5 5 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Unit Cost Tracking Compare Current Estimate to Current Baseline Estimate and to Original Baseline Estimate -- Current Estimate – Latest estimate of approved program -- Current Baseline Estimate – currently approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) -- Original Baseline Estimate – APB approved at Milestone B or program initiation, whichever occurs later

6 6 Acquisition Program Baseline (APB): Purpose Contract between the Program Manager (PM) and the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) –Documents program performance, schedule, and cost goals (objectives and thresholds) Becomes reference point for measuring program status Establishes the PM’s trade space: –How is the system supposed to perform? –When are critical events to occur? –How much will it cost? Identifies deviation limits (thresholds) beyond which the PM may not exceed without authorization from the MDA

7 7 Acquisition Program Baseline (APB): Original Baseline First APB - prepared just before a program enters SDD (Milestone B) or program initiation, whichever occurs later For programs designated as MDAPs after Milestone B or program initiation, the Original APB is the first APB approved as an MDAP Serves as the current baseline description until a revised APB is prepared at a major milestone, full rate production, or deviation (breach) The cost estimate parameter may be revised under 10 U.S.C only if a breach occurs that exceeds a critical cost growth threshold for the program under 10 U.S.C. 2433

8 8 Acquisition Program Baseline (APB): Current Baseline Shall be revised at major milestone decisions & full rate production Revisions to cost or other APB parameters are not automatically authorized if there is a change to cost, schedule, or performance May be revised only: –As a result of a major program restructure that is fully funded and approved by the MDA –As a result of a program deviation (breach), if the MDA determines that the breach is primarily beyond control of the PM Multiple revisions may not be authorized, and in no event will a revision be authorized if proposed merely to avoid a reportable breach MDA determines whether to revise the APB

9 9 Acquisition Program Baseline (APB): Default Thresholds Performance: No default (However, if no threshold provided, threshold = objective values) Schedule: 6 months after the objective date Cost: 10% above objective values (BY$) Note: Non-default thresholds can be used if justified and approved by the MDA

10 Acquisition Program Baseline (APB): Deviations (Breach) PM shall immediately notify the MDA of a deviation (beyond threshold) in any cost, schedule, or performance parameter (via Program Deviation Report (PDR) Within 30 days of occurrence of the deviation, the PM shall inform the MDA of the reason for the deviation and planned actions Within 90 days of occurrence of the deviation –A proposed revised APB shall be submitted for approval; or –An OIPT or equivalent Component-level review shall be held to review the program The MDA shall decide based on above criteria whether it is appropriate to approve a revision to an APB

11 Unit Cost Breaches Notification Notification, and SAR, and SAR Certification New requirements from FY06 NDAA PAUC or APUC (measured in base-year $) New Nunn-McCurdy thresholds against Original Baseline Estimate New Definitions Current Baseline Estimate + 15% + 25% “ Significant” “ Critical” Original Baseline Estimate +30% +50% Perception: Rebaselining Allowed Cost Growth to Go Unreported

12 Acquisition Program Baselines: Examples

13 Reporting Unit Cost Breaches Program has a Breach to PAUC and/or APUC Breach May be “Significant” or “Critical” What Happens Now?

14 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Reporting Requirements For “Significant” breaches: -- Service Secretary must notify Congress within 45 days after the report (normally program deviation report) upon which the determination is based -- Submit a Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) with the required additional unit cost breach information

15 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Reporting Requirements For “Critical” breaches -- In addition to notification and SAR, the USD(AT&L ) must certify to Congress within 60 days of SAR that: 1.The program is essential to the national security 2.There is no alternative which will provide equal or greater capability at less cost 3.The new estimates of the PAUC & APUC are reasonable 4.The management structure is adequate to control PAUC & APUC (Note: No certification required for a terminated program)

16 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Certification Process USD(AT&L) establishes an IPT for each of the 4 certification criteria Periodic meetings held: -- USD(AT&L) -- Principals IPTs (i.e., Executive Review Team) -- Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) Site visits to contractor and PM locations Process outputs: -- Certification package to Congress (Letters with supporting explanation) -- Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM)

17 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Penalties Suspension of Obligations -- If either SAR or certification are not submitted on time, obligational authority suspended on all major contracts -- Suspension shall cease to apply after 30 days of continuous session of Congress (starting from the date of receipt of SAR/certification)

18 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting: Anatomy of a Breach Change in requirements since baseline Development or production stretch outs Premature entry into production Technical or performance/reliability issues Lack of quantification of risk (Cost) Optimism in schedule and testing Decrease in Production Quantities

19 Structuring to Help Avoid Nunn-McCurdy Establish separate programs for new capabilities –Calls for new APBs Better define requirements – Balance, prioritize capabilities based on funding, schedule and technology Finalize requirements documentation early – ICD, CDD Quantify tech risks – assign dollars to those risks Fund contracts to realistic cost estimate Use the right metrics

20 Summary FY06 NDAA included new definitions for Nunn-McCurdy Breaches New definitions driving more occurrences of Nunn-McCurdy Breaches Means and ability exist to mitigate risk of Unit Cost Breaches