Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
AccreditationEncore New Standards, New Thinking & Next Steps.
The Year Three Report and Visit Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
SEM Planning Model.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
New Traditions: NWCCU Standards and Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Our Mission For College Council First Reading February 17, 2012.
League of Women Voters November 2, Governing Board Clackamas Community College Board of Education is a Governing Board CCC cannot legally exist.
Accreditation Briefing August NWCCU Full Scale Accreditation: Introduction Planning has begun for the 2010 Full Scale Accreditation Self Study and.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Accreditation Liaison Officer WorkshopFebruary 4, 2011 Accreditation Liaison Officer Workshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities DoubleTree.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
Year Three Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 13, 2012 Year Three Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 14, 2012 Year Seven Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Mission and Accreditation Strategic Planning Steering Committee March 9, 2009 Dr. Richard Beck.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
SPRING 2014 CONVOCATION. AGENDA Organizational Chart Revisions and Reporting Structure Key Elements to Turn Planning Into Action Accreditation.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Dr. ERINDA PAPA.  This manual is a clear proof of “Fan S. Noli” University’s commitment to assure its internal quality. It demonstrates not only that.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Revisions to the nwccu accreditation standards: what does it mean for me? Diane E. Waryas.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Welcome The Mid-Cycle Evaluation Workshop. Background and History of MCE NWCCU emphasis on outcomes Review of Year Seven Self-Evaluations – Needing more.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
“The Visitors are Coming” – Accreditation 401
Core Themes, Objectives, and Achievement Indicators
Pathways 2017: HLC Accreditation Overview
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
University of Alaska Fairbanks Accreditation
A primer for the April 2019 visit
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Mission Fulfillment Update on Core Themes
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012

Accreditation Steering Committee Accreditation Steering Committee Bill Briare, Kim Carey, Tiffanie Clifford, Kate Gray, Phillip King, Wes Locke, Elizabeth Lundy, Terry Mackey, Steffen Moller, Sharon Parker, Tara Sprehe, and Bill Waters

Recap: Key concepts Continual self-analysis Data-informed, systems-based, and focused on continuous improvement Integration of strategic planning, resource allocation, and accountability Primary yardstick is the extent of mission fulfillment

Standard One: Standard One: Mission, Core Themes, and Expectations Standard Two: Standard Two: Resources and Capacity Standard Three: Standard Three: Planning and Implementation Standard Four: Standard Four: Effectiveness and Improvement Standard Five: Standard Five: Mission Fulfillment, Adaptation, and Sustainability Five New Standards

Seven Year Evaluation Cycle (Five Years for CCC this time) EventPrimary FocusYear

Mission, Core Themes, and Expectations Examines institutional purpose and intentions based on a clear statement of institutional mission, articulation of mission fulfillment, and identification of mission core themes complete with objectives and assessable indicators of achievement of those objectives. Standard One: We addressed this in our first report (submitted this Fall)

CCC’s Core Themes Academic Transfer Career and Technical Education Essential Skills Life-long Learning

Resources and Capacity By documenting the adequacy of its resources and capacity, the institution demonstrates the potential to fulfill its mission, accomplish its core themes objectives, and achieve the goals or intended outcomes of its programs and services, wherever offered and however delivered. Through its governance and decision-making structures, the institution establishes, reviews regularly, and revises, as necessary, policies and procedures which promote effective management and operation of the institution. What’s next? Standard Two Standard Two

Weave Governance Human Resources Education Resources Student Support Resources Library and Information Resources Financial Resources Physical and Technical Infrastructure Core Theme 1 Core Theme 2 Core Theme 3 Core Theme 4 Core Theme N...

Year Three Self-Evaluation Report Revise your Year One Report based on panel feedback and ADD Chapter Two: Resources and Capacity Eligibility Requirements 4 through 21 (Executive Summary) Standard 2.A Governance Standard 2.B Human Resources Standard 2.C Education Resources Standard 2.D Student Support Resources Standard 2.E Library and Information Resources Standard 2.F Financial Resources Standard 2.G Physical and Technological Infrastructure Conclusion

Creating Chapter 2 Design a model for campus-wide contribution to Standard Two – TURTLEs! Identify Key Communicators co-leads, team members, and team resources

Introduction to the 10 Turtles

Comments and Questions