FFAG’s Wonderful World of Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamics  Phase space properties of pendula with nonlinear dependence of ‘speed’ on momentum – characterized.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMMA Upgrade: Slow Acceleration with Low-Frequency Cavity J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 12 March 2010.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation- Variation and 0ptimization David Neuffer, A. Poklonskiy Fermilab.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Introduction to Particle Accelerators Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN & University of Oxford October 2010 Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Large Dynamic Acceptance and Rapid Acceleration in a Nonscaling FFAG C. Johnstone Fermilab Shane Koscielniak Triumf WG1 NuFact02 July 4 Imperial College,
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field Nonscaling FFAG Lattice Design C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG07 April 12-17, 2007 LPSC, Grenoble,
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Oscillations & Waves IB Physics. Simple Harmonic Motion Oscillation 4. Physics. a. an effect expressible as a quantity that repeatedly and regularly.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
FFAG Hardware development for EMMA Electron Model with Many Applications Electron Model with Muon Applications C. Johnstone, Fermilab NuFact05 INFN, Frascotti,
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Longitudinal Dynamics in Linear Non- scaling FFAGs using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF Principal Cast of Characters in the U.S./Canada: C. Johnstone, S.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Optimization of Non-scaling FFAG’s LatticesFor Muon Acceleration  How did we get here? - History  Where are we now? – Optimization and Status of  lattices.
Novel Constant-Frequency Acceleration Technique for Nonscaling Muon FFAGs Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, October 2004 Classical scaling FFAGs (MURA) have geometrically.
Bucketless Acceleration in nonscaling FFAG’s & Sketches of muon and electron machines Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada April 2004  Phase.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field FFAG C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG06 Japan f Fermilab.
Hooke’s Law F s = - k x F s is the spring force k is the spring constant It is a measure of the stiffness of the spring A large k indicates a stiff spring.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Electron Model of Linear-Field FFAG for Muon Acceleration What does it look like? – much like the KEK ATF (36 F0D0 arc cells) but without its straight.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Stephan I. Tzenov STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for MR-commissioning group September 20, 2005 for RCS-MR commissioning group September 27, 2005 Sextupole effect for MR -
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Hardware development for EMMA
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2011 E. J. N. Wilson.
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Nonlinear Accelerator Resonances
PHY 554 Fundamentals of Accelerator Physics Lecture 12: Longitudinal Dynamics October 10, 2018 Vladimir N. Litvinenko
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

FFAG’s Wonderful World of Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamics  Phase space properties of pendula with nonlinear dependence of ‘speed’ on momentum – characterized by discontinuous behaviour w.r.t. parameters  F0D0 or regular triplet FFAG lattices lead to quadratic  L(p) - gutter acceleration when energy gain/cell exceeds critical value  Asynchronous acceleration:  Normal mode: rf commensurate with revolution fixed points Fundamental & harmonics  Slip mode: rf deviates from revolution fixed points Fundamental & harmonics  Conclusions and outlook Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada October 2003

Phase space of the equations x'=(1-y 2 ) and y'=(x 2 –1) WEPLE072

Linear Pendulum Oscillator Phase space of the equations x'=y and y'=a.Cos(x) Manifold: set of phase- space paths delimited by a separatrix Rotation: bounded periodic orbits Libration: unbounded, possibly semi-periodic, orbits Animation: evolution of phase space as strength `a’ varies. For simple pendulum, libration paths cannot become connected.

Bi-parabolic Oscillator Phase space of the equations x'=(1-y 2 ) and y'=a(x 2 -1) Animation: evolution of phase space as strength `a’ varies. Condition for connection of libration paths: a  1 Topology discontinuous at a =1  For a < 1 there is a sideways serpentine path  For a > 1 there is a upwards serpentine path  For a  1 there is a trapping of two counter- rotating eddies within a background flow. GIF W3 a=2a=1 a=1/2a=1/10

TPPG009 Conditions for connection of fixed points by libration paths may be obtained from the hamiltonian; typically critical values of system parameters must be exceeded.

Quadratic Pendulum Oscillator Animation: evolution of phase space as strength `a’ varies. Phase space of the equations x'=(1-y 2 ) and y'=a.Cos(x) Condition for connection of libration paths: a  2/3 a=1/6 a=1 a=1/2a=2

Cubic Pendulum Oscillator Phase space of the equations x'=y(1-b 2 y 2 ) and y'=a.Cos(x) Animations: evolution of phase space as strengths `a,b’ vary. Parameter `b` is varied from 0.1 to 1 while `a` held fixed at a=1. Parameter `b` is varied from to 0.8 to 0.14 while `a` varies as a=1/(8b 2 ).

Quartic Pendulum Oscillator Phase space of the equations x'=y 2 (1-b 2 y 2 )-1 and y'=a.Cos(x) Animations: evolution of phase space as strengths `a,b’ vary. Parameter `a` is varied from 0.1 to 2.9 while `b` held fixed at b=1/3. Parameter `b` is varied from to 0.1 to 0.5 while `a` held fixed at a=3/4.

Equations of motion from cell to cell of accelerator: E n+1 =E n +eV cos(  T n ) T n+1 =T n +  T(E n+1 )+(  0 -  s )  0 =reference cell-transit duration,  s =2  h/  T n =t n -n  s is relative time coordinate Conventional case:  =  (E),  T is linear,  0 =  s, yields synchronous acceleration: the location of the reference particle is locked to the waveform, or moves adiabatically. Other particles perform (usually nonlinear) oscillations about the reference particle. Scaling FFAG case:  fixed,  T is nonlinear, yields asynchronous acceleration: the reference particle performs a nonlinear oscillation about the crest of the waveform; and other particle move convectively about the reference.Two possible operation modes are normal  0 =  s and slip  0   s (see later).

Hamiltonian: H(x,y,a)=y 3 / 3 –y -a sin(x) For each value of x, there are 3 values of y: y 1 >y 2 >y 3 We may write values as y(z(x)) where 2sin(z)=3(b+a Sinx) y 1 =+2cos[(z-  / 2 )/ 3 ], y 2 =-2sin(z/ 3 ), y 3 =-2cos[(z+  / 2 )/ 3 ]. Rotation manifold Libration manifold The 3 libration manifolds are sandwiched between the rotation manifolds (or vice versa) and become connected when a  2/3. Thus energy range and acceptance change abruptly at the critical value. y1y1 y2y2 y3y3

Phase portraits for 3 through 12 turn acceleration; normal rf Acceptance and energy range versus voltage for acceleration completed in 4 through 12 turns Small range of over-voltages

The need to match the path-length parabola to the gutter entrance/exit and fixed points of the phase space has implications for  T 1 &  T 2 etc. Hamiltonian parameter a= . Example: a=2/3 means  =2,  =1/3 and  T 1 /  T 2 =3. If requirements are violated, then acceptance and acceleration range may deteriorate. Path length dependence Requirements for lattice

Addition of higher harmonics The waveform may be flattened in the vicinity x=0 by addition of extra Fourier components n  2 Restoring force a  sin(x)  a[n 3 sinx-sin(nx)]/(n 3 -n) Analogous discontinuous behaviour of phase space, but with revised critical values a c. Write  =a/a c nFixed points/(  /2) acac a c  boost 1 112/3   114/7   1120/31  n=2 n=3

T n+1 =T n +  T(E n+1 )+(  0 -  s ) And vary initial cavity phases Asynchronous acceleration with slip rf  0  s There is a turn-to-turn phase jumping that leads to a staggering of the phase traces and a smaller r.m.s. variation of rf phase. As the number of turns increases, so does the range and number of the outliers. When a significant portion reach `trough phases’ the beam fails to receive sufficient average acceleration – limit about 8 turns f.p.c. Phase portrait: 3-5 turn acceln.Phase portrait: 6-9 turn acceln.

Asynchronous acceleration with slip rf and harmonics fundamental & 2 nd harmonic& 3 rd harmonic Acceptance and acceleration range vary abruptly with volts/turn. Critical a c can be estimated by tracking of particle ensemble a c  0.68 a c  0.55 a c  0.65

Phase spaces for normal rf with harmonics 8-turn +2 nd harmonic 7-turn +3 rd harmonic 6-turn fundamental input output Acceptance,  =.49 eV.sAcceptance,  =.52 eV.sAcceptance,  =.57 eV.s

Phase spaces for slip rf with harmonics 8-turn +2 nd harmonic 7-turn +3 rd harmonic 6-turn fundamental input output Acceptance,  =.52 eV.sAcceptance,  =.49 eV.sAcceptance,  =.51 eV.s

“Methodical, Insidious Progress on Linear Non-scaling FFAGs using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF” C. Johnstone et al NuFact03 NuFact03 Columbia Univ., NY Columbia Univ., NY June 10, 2003 June 10, 2003 Conclusions at the time of:  Performace of nonlinear systems, such as quadratic, cubic, quartic pendula, may be understood in terms of libration versus rotation manifolds and criteria for connection of fixed points.  Same criteria when higher harmonics added; critical a renormalized.  Normal and slip rf operations produce comparable performance. Acceleration is asynchronous and cross-crest.  The acceptance & acceleration range of both normal and slip rf have fundamental limitations w.r.t. number of turns and energy increment – because gutter paths becomes cut off.  Regime in which slip rf performs best is one in which energy-increment parameter a  1; but this also regime in which phase-space paths become more vertical for normal rf operation.  Nonlinear acceleration is viable and will have successful application to rapid acceleration in non-scaling FFAGs.

What would we do different? (October 2003)  Consider different magnet lattices – quadratic dispersion of path length versus momentum may be smaller.  Reference trajectory for construction of lattice and transverse dynamics is not necessarily the same as that for longitudinal dynamics. This allows zeros of path length and/or  T 1 /  T 2 to be adjusted.  Pay more careful attention of matching longitudinal phase space topology to desired input/output particle beam. Perhaps adjust  T 1 /  T 2 as function of a.  Match orientation and size of beam to the libration manifold.  If F0D0 or regular triplet, dispersion of arrival times (at extraction) is a symmetric minimum about central trajectory H(x,y,a)=0; inject beam on to that trajectory. For example, if inject/extract at x=  /2,  =2cosh[(1/3)arccosh(a/a c )],  = -1+  2 /3