Local Pots of Gold Local Pots of Gold Maintaining Fiscal Constraint for Local Funds in the TIP Srikalyani Srinivasan Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CALTRANS EXTERNAL ADVISORY LIAISON COMMITTEE Transportation Funding For Today’s Projects July, CEAL.
Advertisements

Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
The Fuel Tax: An Unsustainable Transportation Revenue Source
Paul F Mullen August  Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)  5 Year plan for transportation improvement activities inside the MAPA Transportation.
County of Orange Teeter Program
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
Ballot Financing Alameda County Presented by Tess Lengyel, Deputy Director Center for Transportation Excellence June 22, 2011.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Consumption and Excise Taxes 2009 Orientation Excise Taxes Tobacco Alcoholic Beverages Telecommunications Fuel and Weight Mile Transient Lodging Tax.
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit Urban Roundtable September 30,
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
TPO Board. 25-Year Planning Horizon Update LRTP every 5 years Identify needed major improvements Determine those that are “cost feasible” (i.e., highest.
New Partners for Smart Growth January 27, 2006 Steve Kinsey Supervisor, Marin County Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Smart Growth.
Association of Indiana Counties Community Forum Indiana Road and Highway Funding Neal Carboneau Research Manager Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
October Prop K Strategic Plan & 5-Year Prioritization Programs Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee October 24, 2007.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Division of Budgets August 22, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 14.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
Bridge Toll Increase for Transit Senate Select Committee June 3, 2002.
2006 Annual Report on the Status of the Implementation of Proposition 400 Management Committee 9/6/06.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Finance—The Critical Link Shifting Sands The Evolution of Surface Transportation Finance The California Experience UCLA Policy and Research Symposium Series.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
The Road to New Hampshire's Future. Transportation Funding Overview/summary Operational deficit Preservation and Maintenance Capital needs.
IMN’s Fourth Annual California Municipal Finance Conference IMN’s Fourth Annual California Municipal Finance Conference April 3, 2006 Steve Heminger Executive.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
What & Why? The Current State of California’s Transportation Funding Therese W. McMillan Deputy Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
TRANSIT REVENUE AND FUNDING UPDATE Robert Dunlavey – Director Transit & Parking Joanne Parker – Transit Planner March 10, 2009.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
Achievements & Challenges Contra Costa County Transportation Town Hall May 25,2006 Bay Area Transportation:
Funding Infrastructure in A Weak Economy TRANSPORTATION: Funding Infrastructure in A Weak Economy Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC California Institutional.
Opportunity Knocks Creative Funding Approaches From The San Francisco Bay Area Therese W. McMillan Deputy Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation.
Proposed FY 2016 Budget Town of Lisbon Presentation to Board of Selectmen October 7, 2015.
Transportation Planning: A Field in Flux Steve Heminger, Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission April 2004.
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
Revisions to Draft Transportation 2035 Plan MTC Commission March 25, 2009.
Water Emergency Transportation Authority 1 San Francisco Bay Area Draft Short Range Transit Plan January 2016.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Division of Budgets January 25, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 13.
1 Transit Performance Standards Commission Workshop Alix Bockelman May 24, 2006.
OVERVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION FINANCE OPTIONS SEPTEMBER 28, 2011.
Federal Transportation Improvement Programs Financial Planning and Financial Constraint 2017 FSTIP Workshop Wade Hobbs, FHWA CADO February 9-10, 2016.
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | BUDGET Public Hearing and Budget.
City of Gig Harbor General Revenue Sources Prepared by Dave Rodenbach 1/11/2016.
House Transportation Policy and Finance April 13, 2016 Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer.
State Legislative Update and Local Projects Overview Collin County Day March 27, 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Financial Planning and Fiscal Constraint Requirement MAG Regional Council February 24, 2010.
Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee October 1, 2007.
The Roads Most Traveled: California’s Transportation Funding Needs
Transportation Funding Deal Explained
What is AMC? A Voluntary Association of Minnesota’s 87 Counties Since 1909 The Voice of County Government in Minnesota An Education, Training & Communication.
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
SB1: Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017 “Local Perspective”
Autumn 2017 CalACT Conference November 3rd, 2017
Spring 2018 Calact conference Newport beach, ca April 2018
SB 1 Funding Overview and Regional Impacts
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
E-SPLOST V On May 20, 2014 the voters of Paulding County will be asked to extend the penny sales tax that is helping build classrooms, improve current.
Transportation Planning and Funding Overview
Presentation transcript:

Local Pots of Gold Local Pots of Gold Maintaining Fiscal Constraint for Local Funds in the TIP Srikalyani Srinivasan Metropolitan Transportation Commission 2013 FTIP Workshop January 17, 2012

Where Revenue Comes From Source: California Department of Transportation

Local Funding Local Measure Sales Taxes: 19 counties have approved sales tax measures for transportation Four transit agencies have approved permanent local measures Expenditures of sales tax revenues are normally specified by a voter approved plan Transit Fares: On average, transit fares account for about 25% of transit operating revenue Local General and Other Funds: Most common expenditure is for street and road operations and maintenance Includes property taxes, developer fees, assessment levies, bond revenue, etc. STIP: 40% of Proposition 42 and excess PTA funds regional and interregional capital improvement programs (RTIP/ITIP) that are approved by the CTC. RTIP – (75% of STIP program) 5-Year programs containing county priority projects. Each county’s share is based 25% on state highway mileage and 75% on population ITIP – (25% of STIP program) Interregional projects that are nominated by Caltrans All RTIP and 40% of ITIP funds are subject to the North/South (60%/40%) split. A portion (about 9%) of ITIP funds must be set aside to fund Intercity Rail Truck Weight Fees: Collected on commercial vehicles based on weight State Sales Tax: Portions of the 7.25% sales tax is earmarked for transportation: Transportation Development Act (TDA) – ¼ percent of state sales tax used for transit operations PTA/STA – 4.75% of the diesel sales tax is used for public transit capital and operations funding Proposition 42 – Revenues from 5% state gasoline sales tax Spillover Proposition 1B: 2006 bond act provides $19.9 billion for transportation over a 10-year period

Local Revenues in the TIP Local funds are estimated during the development of the Long Range Plan or RTP. For the RTP - Local revenue estimates for local streets and roads are based on survey data from local agencies. The revenues are estimated and escalated over the RTP period. Operator-specific revenue projections including transit fares, Bridge tolls, property taxes (AC Transit and BART), AC Transit parcel taxes, BART seismic bond proceeds, and San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency general fund and parking revenue, have been provided by the respective operators. The fund estimate is another invaluable source to update revenues. State law requires the MTC to annually complete a Fund Estimate by March 1 st. Provides estimates and apportionments of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds

FY MTC Fund Estimate Overview SourceDescriptionFY FY TDA ¼ cent sales tax in each county $276 million$269 million AB 1107 MTC administered portion (25%) of the ½ cent sales tax in Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco Counties $60 million$58 million STA Sales tax on diesel fuel $147 million$150 million Bridge Tolls AB 664, MTC 2% tolls, 5% State General Fund $16 million$20 million Total$499 million$498 million

TDA Overview ¼-cent general Sales Tax for transportation purposes Mainly used for Transit Operations and Capital Generated funds are distributed at a county level into counties’ LTF accounts, and then distributed to operators based on population factors TDA estimates included in the annual Fund Estimate are provided by County Auditors, and actual generation values are provided by the State Board of Equalization (BOE)

STA Overview Generated through a sales tax on Diesel Fuel Mainly used for Transit Operations – Transit Capital is eligible State law requires that 50% of the generated funds be distributed based on Transit Operator Revenues and 50% be distributed based on Population Revenue-based funds are distributed directly to Transit Operators, and Population-based funds are distributed based on MTC Policy The State provides an estimate of annual STA funds

Programming in the TIP All projects in the TIP are checked for consistency with the RTP (scope and cost of the project in the TIP is within scope and cost of the RTP listing) Both the RTP and TIP have to be financially constrained “Other Local” funds are used extensively as matching funds within the TIP Period –Justification for “Other Local” funds programmed in the TIP in excess of $2 million – serves as a check for the funds –Justification has to be consistent with board approved plans and programs and has to be on the jurisdictions letterhead. To show total project cost, RTP-LRP (RTP Long range planning) funds are used for uncommitted funds beyond the TIP period.

Resolution of Local Support Before projects are programmed into the TIP, as part of the project selection process for most MTC managed programs, sponsors have to provide a Resolution of Local Support when applying for funds. Individual programs like STP, CMAQ, FTA 5307 and 5309 programs and RTIP programs all require resolutions of Local support. This ensures that match requirements are met and that the local funds / support of the project exist.