FUNDING A STATE WETLANDS PROGRAM Kenneth N. Kettenring New Hampshire DES.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

An improved imperiled species system for Florida Staff ideas, February 2009.

Advertisements

Managing Development in the Coastal Zone, Federal Policy II: Coastal Zone Management Act; Slide 29.1 Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal.

NATALIE BELL TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS (SEPs)

Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.

Gulf Hypoxia and its Impact on Ohio Municipalities.

Response to LDEQ Consolidated Compliance Order and Notice of Potential Penalty.

Managing NAWCA Grants Lessons Learned. Involve grants administrator in writing of grant Involve grants administrator in writing of grant Clearly delineate.

WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINANCE WORKING GROUP WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT FUND CONCEPTUAL REVENUE SOURCES March 17, 2011.

PROVIDE PUBLIC GOODS PUBLIC GOOD: PRODUCT OR SERVICE WHICH, ONCE PROVIDED, IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL TO USE; OR, IT IS COSTLY TO EXCLUDE USERS IN CONTRAST:

Removing Barriers to Wetland Restoration Facilitating Wetland Restoration Permitting Gildo M. Tori – Ducks Unlimited HOW Conference 2010.

Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.

Federalism 9/12/2011 Lecture 4. Clearly Stated Learning Objectives Upon completion of this course, students will be able to: – understand and interpret.

TAXES CHANGE BEHAVIOR. 1.PAY FOR THE COST OF GOVERNING WHAT ARE THE FUNCTIONS OF TAXATION?

Farm and Forest Land Preservation with Conservation Easements.

©2008. Oklahoma State Department of Education. All rights reserved.1 Taxes: Somebody has to Pay Standard 2.2.

Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department.

Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.

JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.

Federalism The Relationship between the States and the Federal Government.

National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.

Economic Benefits of DRGR Land Use Change July 2014.

“AUDITS” Checks and Balances End of Each Fiscal Year. 2. When there is a Change in Officers. Most People will ask….. …. When do I need to do an.

NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation

CALFED Finance Planning. Need for Finance Planning Status quo approach to rely so heavily on State bond funds unlikely in the future Existing funding.

Florida’s Water Challenge Presentation for House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee February 20 th, 2013 By Florida Water Advocates.

 A mutual fund is a business that pools money from many people to invest in various ways.  A mutual fund’s investors, in effect, own a portion of the.

Federalism Chapter 3.

Federalism. Federalism How does power flow through our federal system of government? Essential Question How does power flow through our federal system.

CONFIDENTIAL Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund July 2015.

Watershed Management Bureau WMB – Reorganization Process Update – January 2012.

The Experience of Term Agreements in Farm and Ranch Land Protection Programs Bob Wagner, American Farmland Trust.

CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS© Thomson South-Western LESSON 14.1 SLIDE 1 Government Spending, Revenue, and Public Choice Public Goods and Taxation 14.2.

Monetary Policy Review

Connect with your Joint Venture Coordinator Helps you understand priorities Connects you with partners Advises on grant application Can serve as a project.

Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.

Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.

Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.

EPA and Ecosystem-Based Management: Success of the Watershed Approach Michael H. Shapiro Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water, US EPA Capitol Hill.

Federalism Chapter 3. Defining Federalism What is Federalism? –Definition: A way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government have.

Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.

Brownfields: Real Property, the expansion or redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of contamination.

©2011 Cengage Learning. Chapter 15 ©2011 Cengage Learning REQUIRED GOVERNMENT REPORTS.

NOAA RESTORATION CENTER The NOAA RC seeks to make the process of regulatory review and permitting of environmentally beneficial habitat restoration projects.

Michigan’s Nonpoint Source Program Pass Through Grant Funding Past, Present, and Future Outlook Bob Sweet Past Aquatic Biologist, Present Administrative.

State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.

Introduction to the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program Christie Deloria USFWS U.P. Sub-Office (906)

Pennsylvania’s newest tool… Stormwater Management Authorities.

Legislation and Louisiana Wetlands Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act passed in 1990 named for La. Senator John Breaux of Louisiana.

DRAFT Sustainable Groundwater Use Through the Lens of Rural Working Lands.

BASIC ECONOMICS FOR THE CITIZEN. The ECONOMY - a system by which goods and services are produced, sold, and bought in a country or region. The ECONOMY.

Federalism Chapter 3. Defining Federalism What is Federalism? – Definition: A way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government have.

Georgia Studies Unit 9: Personal Finance Lesson 1: Personal Finance

STANDARDS 1.4.3, Local and State Governments.

AGENDA WORKSHOP OVERVIEW SURVEY RESULTS WETLAND SCENARIOS.

FINE TUNING OUR COLLECTION AT THE CLAIREMONT BRANCH OF THE SAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY Acquisitions & Collection Development.

Amended in 1990 National. Overview Of OPA OPA was signed in response to The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) was signed into law in August 1990, largely in response.

BOCC Special Meeting December 11, RESTORE Act  Clean Water Act grants the Federal EPA authority to impose fines on parties responsible for oil.

1 Essential Question: Explain the benefits people gain from saving money; compare and contrast Savings Accounts to Time Deposits; identify the reason why.

 In your notebook: › Draw › List › Write › Everything you know about credit and credit cards. › When the time sounds, share your list with your partner.

Fiscal Year 2017 Joint Hearing – Board of Selectmen and Advisory Board Budget Presentation Tuesday March 29, 2016.

Do Now What are some strengths/weaknesses of your city? Think of its government if you can…

Bellevue Public Schools Budget Development

Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, 1984, and 1996

Federalism Chapter 3.

Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division

Wetland Mitigation.

Federalism Chapter 3.

Water Law and Management

Federalism Chapter 3.

Federalism Chapter 3.

Presentation transcript:

FUNDING A STATE WETLANDS PROGRAM Kenneth N. Kettenring New Hampshire DES

FED SHARE STATE SHARE NH WETLANDS PROGRAM

FEES

Developer pays cost of review

FEES Developer pays cost of review Time is money

FEES Developer pays cost of review Time is money $0.04 X = $ /acre

FEES Developer pays cost of review Time is money $0.04 X = $ /acre Clear approval / denial criteria are essential

GENERAL FUNDS

The public pays for the protection of public interests.

GENERAL FUNDS The public pays for the protection of public interests. It is difficult to obtain additional tax dollars.

FINES AND CIVIL PENALTIES

Create a level playing field

FINES AND CIVIL PENALTIES Create a level playing field Unpredictable funding source

FINES AND CIVIL PENALTIES Create a level playing field Unpredictable funding source Potential misperceptions

Federal Funds

The Federal Government pays for the protection of federal public interests.

Federal Funds The Federal Government pays for the protection of federal public interests. Match requirements.

Federal Funds The Federal Government pays for the protection of federal public interests. Match requirements. Other strings may be attached.

EPA - 104(b)(3)

Program development

EPA - 104(b)(3) Program development 20% (25%) match

EPA - 104(b)(3) Program development 20% (25%) match PPA /PPG

EPA – OTHER WATER PROGRAMS PPA /PPG 106, 319, other?

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Available to coastal and Great Lakes states.

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT FUNDS Available to coastal and Great Lakes states. 50% match.

RESTORATION FUNDS

USFWS

RESTORATION FUNDS USFWS NRCS

RESTORATION FUNDS USFWS NRCS USACE

RESTORATION FUNDS USFWS NRCS USACE NOAA

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate federal funds are not currently available for the operation of a “full service” state wetlands program. (and opinions)

CONCLUSIONS Adequate federal funds are not currently available for the operation of a “full service” state wetlands program. Some states may be able to focus on the most significant resources, and do a good job with a smaller budget. (and opinions)

CONCLUSIONS Adequate federal funds are not currently available for the operation of a “full service” state wetlands program. Federal and State tax dollars should be in proportion to the value of Federal and State public benefits. Some states may be able to focus on the most significant resources, and do a good job with a smaller budget. (and opinions)

CONCLUSIONS Adequate federal funds are not currently available for the operation of a “full service” state wetlands program. Fees can provide a significant source of funds when applied to an efficient program with clear criteria and purpose. Federal and State tax dollars should be in proportion to the value of Federal and State public benefits. Some states may be able to focus on the most significant resources, and do a good job with a smaller budget. (and opinions)

CONCLUSIONS Adequate federal funds are not currently available for the operation of a “full service” state wetlands program. Fees can provide a significant source of funds when applied to an efficient program with clear criteria and purpose. Federal and State tax dollars should be in proportion to the value of Federal and State public benefits. There is no single funding solution that will meet the needs of all states. Some states may be able to focus on the most significant resources, and do a good job with a smaller budget. (and opinions)