FASTNET Event Report: 040705July4Haze, July 6, 2004 July 4, 2004 Aerosol Pulse Event Summary by the FASTNET Community Please send PPT slides or comments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft By Hilary H. Main Paul T. Roberts Sonoma Technology, Inc Redwood Way, Suite C Petaluma, CA Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection.
Advertisements

Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
FASTNET Report: 0409RegHazeEvents04 Eastern US Regional Haze Events: Automated Detection and Documentation for 2004 Contributed by the FASNET Community,
A Study of Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury Concentrations in Windsor, Ontario, Canada Xiaohong (Iris) Xu, Umme Akhtar, Kyle Clark,
Diurnal Variability of Aerosols Observed by Ground-based Networks Qian Tan (USRA), Mian Chin (GSFC), Jack Summers (EPA), Tom Eck (GSFC), Hongbin Yu (UMD),
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Assessing PM 2.5 Background Levels and Local Add-On Prepared by Bryan Lambeth, PE Field Operations Support Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF UK ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and National Centre for Atmospheric Science.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUM F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET CAPITA September 2004 Natural Aerosol.
Integration of PMF Data into AoH Analyses AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Map of the Guadalupe Mountains Region NEW MEXICO TEXAS Guadalupe Mtns. Park Map To Carlsbad To El Paso To I-10 Visibility Degradation in Guadalupe Mountains.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
1 The FASTNET Project Presented by: Sean Raffuse 1 Rudy Husar 2 Rich Poirot and Gary Kleiman 3 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc. 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
Lake Champlain & the Adirondacks from Burlington VT CAMNET FASTNET Event Report: NENitrate Winter PM Event over the Northeast and Quebec: Nitrate?
Presenting Evidence to Justify Data Exclusion as an Exceptional Event Ideas based on how EPA has recently documented events to support regulatory decisions.
Supplemental Regional Haze-Related Data Rich Poirot, VT DEC Dallas RPO Mtg, December 2002.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Exceptional Event Decision Support System (EE DSS) Illustration for PM2.5 Exceedances The EE DSS is a screening tool for EE flagging. It uses the regulatory.
Black Carbon Measurements at Whistler Sarah Hanna (UBC)
The Pattern and Transport of Ozone in the Missouri Region Rudolf Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITA Washington University April 9, 1997 Prepared for a briefing.
FASTNET Report: 0409FebMystHaze Mystery Winter Haze: Natural? Nitrate/Sulfate? Stagnation? Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
Presenting Evidence to Justify Data Exclusion as an Exceptional Event Ideas based on how EPA has recently documented events to support regulatory decisions.
Estimating local versus regional contributions to tropospheric ozone: An example case study for Las Vegas Mark Green and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Exceptional Event Analysis Draft, July 13, 2005
Regional Scale Air Pollution Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA 6 th Int. Conf.
1 The FASTNET Project Presented by: Sean Raffuse 1 Rudy Husar 2 Rich Poirot and Gary Kleiman 3 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc. 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Project Period: June May 2008 Reports:
Analysis Examples and Issues: Identifying Sources Policy Analysis Tools for Air Quality and Health A workshop hosted by NERAM and Pollution Probe Jeffrey.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.
Status Report on CATT and FASTNET R. Poirot, VT DEC & R. Husar, CAPITA, 9/29/04 CATT: Combined Aerosol Trajectory Tools FASTNET: Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools.
June 4, 2004 – Tucson Dust Community Analysis PPT Please add your content by downloading this PPT, and returning to
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair Telling the OTAG Ozone Story with Data.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Evaluation of the Light Scattering Data from the ASOS Network Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis January 2, 2002.
PM Event Detection from Time Series Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence to R Husar, R PoirotR Husar, R Poirot Coordination Support.
MANE-VU Status Report on CATT and FASTNET R. Poirot, VT DEC, 9/30/04 CATT: Combined Aerosol Trajectory Tools FASTNET: Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools for Natural.
Sea Salt comes from the Sea Shore, as She Should. But how can Soil Dust come from the South?
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Seasonal Airmass Transport to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri Submitted.
F. Lucarelli 1, S. Becagli 2, G. Calzolai 1, M. Chiari 1, T. Martellini 2, S. Nava 1, L. Paperetti 1, R. Udisti 2 and E. Yubero 3 1. INFN and Dept. of.
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data E. M. Robinson and R. B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Fine Particles in the Air: Taking Action, Improving Health Presentation at STAPPA/ALAPCO Meeting Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Tom Curran, EPA Office of Air Quality.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Assessment of the Speciated PM Network (Initial Draft, November 2004 ) Washington University, St. Louis CIRA/NPS VIEWS Team.
Working progress Li Du. JJA-aggregated over 2000 to 2005.
Pinal County Air Quality July 23, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Atmospheric Lifetime and the Range of PM2.5 Transport Background and Rationale Atmospheric Residence Time and Spatial Scales Residence Time Dependence.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Emissions Background and Rationale North American SO 2 Emission Rates North American NO x Emission Rates Contact: Bret Schichtel,
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-evaluation of the contribution from wood burning Willy Maenhaut1,2, Reinhilde Vermeylen2, Magda.
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Presentation transcript:

FASTNET Event Report: July4Haze, July 6, 2004 July 4, 2004 Aerosol Pulse Event Summary by the FASTNET Community Please send PPT slides or comments to Erin Robinson or Rudy Husar, CAPITAErin Robinson Rudy Husar Visit the event discussion forum

Background During the US Independence day celebrations on July 4 th, fireworks cause the emission of considerable smoke in most populated areas While it is a sort-term aerosol event, the fireworks smoke has a measurable impact on the local aerosol pattern Earlier analyses of IMPROVE aerosol chemistry data have shown that fireworks smoke has a strong signature, rich in potassium (Poirot, 1998)Poirot, 1998 The FASTNET data shown here also demonstrates that the fireworks cause a strong short-term pulse of the PM2.5 concentration in most urban areas. A community analysis activity could quantify the magnitude, significance and relevance of this phenomenon.

Previous work: The July 4th Potassium Spike (Poirot 1998)The July 4th Potassium Spike Potassium nitrate is a major component of all fireworks (provides the bang!). Fine particle K for all IMPROVE data ( ) were averaged for each day of year The potassium spike on July 5 is 120 ng/m3 compared to during the year The corresponding IMPROVE-average daily fine mass did not show the spike The K spike is clearly something to consider (and perhaps screen out) in conducting any analyses using K data

FASTNET Analysis: AIRNOW PM25 Hourly data Hourly PM25 concentrations are averaged over all the AIRNOW sites (~300) Late on July 4 and early July 5, the average PM2.5 increased from 12 to 35 ug/m3 An aerosol pulse of the same magnitude occurred on July 4, 2003 Thus, the July 4-5 smoke pulse is clearly discernable in the mass concentration data

AIRNOW PM25 Maps, July 4, 5, :0000:00 04:0016:00 08:00 AIRNOW PM25 mass concentration shows urban hot-spots The aerosol pulse first appeared in the East and subsequently in the West See the GIF animation for the hourly patternGIF animation 20:00

ASOS Light Scattering Hourly ASOS scattering is averaged over all the ASOS_STI sites (~200) Conspicuous is the absence of ANY trace of the July 4 spike Note: ASOS sites are at airports; many AIRNOW sites are downtown

Discussion Issues Why is the PM25 mass spike so strong in AIRNOW but not in the IMPROVE data? Is the fireworks smoke significant on regional scale? How to handle the July 4 th data in the source apportionment models (UNMIX, PMF) Is the PM25 and potassium pulse useful for further tracer analysis?

July 4, 2004 Aerosol Pulse The US-avg. AIRNOW PM25 shows a 3 hr. spike at midnight In the (airport) ASOS the July 4 spike is conspicuously absent Thus, the US spike is due to the urban sites affected by smoke 00:00 04:00 08:00 20:00 AIRNOW PM25 US Hourly Average ASOS Bext US Hourly Average Pulse No Pulse