Embarking on transparent priority setting – different strategies in Sweden Peter GarpenbyPer Carlsson Mari Broqvist National Centre for Priority Setting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Initial thinking on clinical commissioning group (CCG) authorisation
Advertisements

A Health and Wellbeing Board for Leicestershire Cheryl Davenport Programme Director.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Changes to the Educational Landscape: an SHA perspective Tricia Ellis, Head of Knowledge Management and eLearning South West Technology Enhanced Learning.
Copyright © Healthcare Quality Quest, Proposed standards for a national clinical audit — How we got involved and what we have learned.
Promoting Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities at the Local Level Sean O’Riordain Faculty of Geography National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
Monday 17 September (Materials presented to the Mayoral Team on 28 August 2012)
Gateshead Local Strategic Partnership Shifting Resources Upstream.
GRI NW Stakeholder Group Meeting – 25 November 2011 GRI NW Stakeholder Group Meeting 25 November 2011 Kristóf Kovács The 2014 target and the role of the.
The National Performance Framework and Scotland Performs Maureen Bruce – Strategy & Ministerial Support Directorate.
Integration of Adult Health and Social Care VHS Member event, Monday 1 July Grant Hughes, Scottish Government
St Luke’s Symposium November 2010 Leading Change Cathal Magee Chief Executive Officer Health Service Executive St Luke’s Symposium Novmber 2010 St Luke’s.
The NHS White Paper A system not structure Outcomes focused Robust Quality & Economic regulation Empowered professionals in autonomous providers.
The Role of Parliament in approving the budget World Bank Institute’s Parliamentary Staff Training Program.
The NHS Five Year Forward View: New Care Models Programme An overview March 2015.
DECENTRALIZATION AND RURAL SERVICES : MESSAGES FROM RECENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Graham B. Kerr Community Based Rural Development Advisor The World Bank.
IT Governance and Management
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
Third Edition Dr. Wasim Al-Habil. Chapter Strategic Management in the Public Sector.
Policy, Information and Commissioning Group Department of Health and Human Services Tasmanian Health Organisations David Nicholson and Alex Tay Department.
Socialdepartementet Primary care and the care for the elderly.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
KEEP ‘Knowledge and Expertise in EU Programmes‘ A Capitalisation tool for EU-wide promotion of Territorial Cooperation.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
 Road Safety the European Union Policy Carla Hess European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport Road.
Presentation to Inclusion Ireland Conference & AGM Pat Healy – National Director Social Care 10 th May, 2014.
Setting Priorities Delivering Best Value Managing Scarcity: Experience from Tayside Danny Ruta.
Measuring policy and institutional coherence for migration and development Operationalising a dashboard of indicators.
The Role of Patients in EU Policy Development European Health Forum Gastein October 2003 – Bad Gastein Presented by Erick Savoye Director of the European.
Handicap-International Challenges of the Sustainability of physical rehabilitation sector Nepal, January 2013.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Shifting resources: disinvestment and re-investment Craig Mitton, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research.
Health Overview Policy and Scrutiny Panel Update on Health Reform Proposals James Foster North Somerset Council.
E-participation and transparency in the decision making process Rauna Nerelli Ministry of Justice, Finland.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
Priority setting in practice; procedures, results, and participants’ opinions Susanne Waldau PhD candidate Umeå University; Strategic prioritisation advisor,
1 European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network National Guidance Forum of the Czech Republic Open Session Career Guidance Council in Lithuania Aleksandra.
Supporting tough decisions: linking Health technology assessment (HTA) and national priority setting in Norway Ånen Ringard 1, Berit Mørland 1,2 1 Secretariat.
Fiscal Policy Audit – National Audit Office of Finland Hannu Rajamäki Director for Performance Audit NAO of Finland.
New Directions, Services & Supports for Adults with Disabilities.
Joint Reviews of Local Authority Social Services JOINT REVIEW OF SALFORD COUNCIL 17 th June 2003.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” AHCCCS/ADHS Report Summary & Recommendations.
BEYOND MKUKUTA FRAMEWORK: Monitoring and Evaluation, Communication and Implementation Guide Presentation to the DPG Meeting 18 th January, 2011.
Themes Emerging from Country and Related Presentations Notes from session 1545 – 1730 Thursday 17 February 2011 Albert Weale.
Northern Health and Social Care Trust DEVELOPING THE SKILLS OF OTHERS Donna Morgan Head of Service.
Commissioning High Quality Stroke Services
Local and Strategic View Ann James, Chief Executive NHS Devon Devon Care Training Conference Tuesday 28 September 2010 Westpoint 09:55-10:10am.
DEINSTITUTIONALISATION IN LATVIA EXPERIENCES AND NATIONAL STRATEGY Tallin
National Information Communication Technologies Strategy Vasif Khalafov “National strategy” working group - Web -
Making Tough Choices: A journey to improve Engagement and Transparency National Health Leaders Conference June 16, 2015.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Cam Donaldson Yunus Chair in Social Business and Health NIHR Senior Investigator Joint Strategic Commissioning – analysis event 8 th October 2014 PBMA.
Week 4: Budgeting as Policy Making Discuss memo #2 and selection of agency/department What is policy making in the context of budgets? Application of Kingdon.
The EU Directive on "Services in the internal market", COM(2004) 2 final/3 Agnese Knabe Project coordinator European Public Health Alliance Civic Alliance.
NHS Reform Update October Context Health Reform Agenda Significant pace of change Clear focus on supporting the Transition Process At the same time.
Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS David Williams Director of Commissioning.
Health and Social Care Integration Update Name Role October 2015.
Patient and Public Involvement Practice Development Day Thursday 17 October 2013.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
PRS – Budget linkages in Tanzania Making Budget Reform Matter for Poverty Reduction 27 April 2006 Allister Moon.
National Cancer Peer Review Programme NUSG Meeting 6 December 2012.
8 March 2016 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE HEALTH SECTOR In association with.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Derick W. Brinkerhoff RTI International
Carers and place-based commissioning
EUREGIO III STAKEHOLDER EVENT VENICE, FEBRUARY 2010
Presentation transcript:

Embarking on transparent priority setting – different strategies in Sweden Peter GarpenbyPer Carlsson Mari Broqvist National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care Sweden

The Swedish health care system Universal system National framework legislation (HSL 1982) 21 local government bodies (county councils) - Directly elected political bodies - Right to impose taxes - Right to decide on the appropriate health care package to the population A majority of public service providers

National initiatives in Sweden 1995 Report by the Priority Commission 1997 Principles established by the Parliament (human dignity, need, cost-effectiveness) 2001 The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care established as clearing-house 2004 The first National Guideline to include explicit priority setting issued by the NBHW

The first wave

County Council of Östergötland 2003 Clinical departments responsible for ranking of services Scrutiny by medical advisors Final political decision on service release Dialogue

The features of the first wave Negative framing – focus on rationing Communication strategy in place but undeveloped Confusion of objectives (e.g. between the process of priority setting and the process of hospital restructuring) Undeveloped interaction & dialogue Politicians in the driving seat Politicians left alone to defend content Transparency on the result (output)

Explicit priority setting

The second wave 2008-

The second wave of explicit priority setting in Sweden County Council of Västerbotten (AC) County Council of Jämtland (Z) County Council of Kronoberg (G) County Council of Västmanland (U) More local authorities in progress

The stages of the priority setting process All clinical departments separately identify options for resource release corresponding to 10 % of the net budget (the vertical prioritization) A critical review and comparison of proposals followed by group decisions on resource release corresponding to 4 – 6 % of the net budget (the horizontal prioritization) A second review of data applying political criteria, and a final decision scaling down to 2 – 3 % of the net budget (final decision)

Ranking of services by clinical departments Clinical directors and managers work together to compile horizontal priorities Final decision by politicians Scrutiny by politicians and managers in general forum Peer review and test round Västmanland County Council 2009

Priority setting process in the County Council of Västmanland October 2009

The common features of the second wave Learning from past experiences Intention to speed up the process Positive framing (priority setting as reallocation with the aim to modernize health care) Proactive communication strategy Use of formal model (the vertical prioritization) Priority setting as a collaborative process

The common features of the second wave Shared responsibility for the result between politicians and clinical directors Identification of a list for investments Transparency on the process and the result

Divergences in the second wave The handling of options for disinvestment and options for enhancing organizational efficiency (separated or in parallel) The use of micro and macro strategies in developing the process for priority setting Level of involvement for politicians in the rating of options for reductions

Results from the second wave (so far) Experiences are encouraging Minimal opposition (staff and public) County councils will repeat the process

Challenges The involvement of stakeholders (health care staff and citizens) The appropriate role in the process for key actors like clinicians, managers and politicians The identification of proposals for investments The legitimacy of the process when “hard” evidence is mixed with “soft” evidence To find the optimal level of transparency in the different stages of the process

What long-term effects will explicit priority setting have on the trust for universal health care? What long-term effect will explicit priority setting have on the trust for universal health care ?