Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PREDICTING AXIAL LENGTH USING AGE, KERATOMETRY AND CYCLOREFRACTION LIONEL KOWAL & PRASHANT SAHARE Center for Eye Research Australia & Ocular Motility Clinic,

Advertisements

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas with LENSTAR LS 900® Tsunekazu Hamada Hamada Eye Clinic, Osaka, Japan Disclosure statement of.

Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification trough 3.2, 2.2 and 1.8 clear corneal incision. Luis Izquierdo Jr MD. PhD. Maria.

Accuracy of Predicted Refractive Error in Resident-Performed Cataract Surgery Using Partial Coherence Interferometry Nickolas P. Katsoulakis, M.D., Paul.

A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,

Correlation Of Corneal Contour With Higher Order Ocular Aberrations (HOA) In Indian Eyes Manish Chaudhary MS Amit Gupta MS Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate.

Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology,

Yüksel Totan, Ramazan Yaĝcı, Zeynel Arslanyılmaz, Uĝurcan Keskin The authors have no financial interest.

Financial Disclosure I have a financial interest with the following companies: Abbott Medical Optics Alcon Calhoun Vision NuLens Optimedica Optivue

Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.

INTRA-OCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION IN POST- REFRACTIVE SURGERY ASIAN EYES USING THE HAIGIS-L FORMULA Dr Daphne Han, FRCS Dr Wei-Han Chua, FRCS Dr Peter.

IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.

Personalised eye modelling for customised intraocular lens designs Matthew Sheehan, Eamonn O’Donoghue, Conor Sheil and Alexander Goncharov Photonics Ireland,

Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,

Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Brad H Feldman, MD Derek DelMonte,

JAIRO E. HOYOS, MD MELANIA CIGALES, MD Instituto Oftalmológico Hoyos Barcelona - SPAIN.

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

PIGGYBACK IMPLANTATION OF FOR HIGH HYPEROPIA 24 MONTHS FOLLOW UP JL. FEBBRARO I.VIELPEAU, F. KRIFA, S.BERBACHE, S. GANEM Department of Ophthalmology S.

Daycase Cataract Surgery Audit 20 th of April, Singleton Hospital.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2012 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master

Reanalysis of Refractive Growth in Pediatric Aphakia and Pseudophakia Susan Whitmer, MD 1 Aurora Xu 2 Scott McClatchey, MD 1,3,4 1 Naval Medical Center.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2011 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan Resident, Hong Kong Eye Hospital.

Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes

Occurrence of Retinal Detachment After Cataract Surgery Peter Jeppesen MD, PhD and Thomas K. Olsen, MD, DMSc Department of Ophthalmology Århus University.

INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,

Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,

LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.

EVALUATION OF REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION

Jamie Ng, Marcus Tan, Lennard Thean National University Health System

M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

Michael J. Endl, M.D. The author of this poster has no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Early Results of Static and Dynamic Iris.

Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.

10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:

IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.

Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.

Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,

Long-Term Longitudinal Change in Keratometry After Pediatric Cataract Surgery Rupal H. Trivedi, MD MSCR M. Edward Wilson, MD Osman Melih, MD Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,

Jae Lim Chung MD, MBA 1,3 ; Jin Pyo Hong MD 2,3 ; Kyoung Yul Seo MD, PhD 3 ; Eung Kweon Kim MD, PhD 3 ; Tae-im Kim MD, PhD Noo Ne Eye Hospital, Seoul,

Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,

Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;

Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.

Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.

Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.

John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.

Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.

Changes of Axial Length After LASIK Surgery: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study

FreeVis LASIK Zentrum Universitätsklinikum Mannheim

William W. Culbertson, MD Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront

Financial Disclosure Drs. Nix and Awdeh have no financial relationships to disclose. Dr. Yoo has received consultant, research, and travel reimbursement.

Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.

Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.

MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch

Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.

Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.

Ashkan M. Abbey, BA, Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD, George D

Comparison of Autokeratometry and Manual Keratometry

Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR Kerry D Solomon, MD

versus 2.75mm Incision Phacoemulsification

Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,

Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK

The authors have no financial interest

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject matter. 1- BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE 2- SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

New Paradigm More than refractive surgery cases per year; Ageing of “Baby Boomers”; Higher expectations regarding refractive cataract surgery outcomes.

Current Biometric Formulas Challenges Anatomic parameters: - axial length - keratometry Pre-refractive surgery measurements and history Theoretical non-optical formulas to derive optical estimate Current biometric formulas for IOL power estimation after LASIK surgery – low prediction

Intraoperative Optical Refractive Biometry - ORB Intraoperative aphakic auto-refraction for IOL estimation. (Ianchulev et al, Cataract Refract Surg Aug;31(8):1530-6) No Axial Length measurement needed! No Keratometry needed! No Pre-Op History needed! ORB FORMULA

Purpose To figure out a predictive factor for IOL power estimation using the ORB methodology.

Patients and Methods 29 patients – 34 eyes 100% = myopic LASIK INTRAOPERATIVE PROCEDURE Phacoemulsification + cortex aspiration Discovisc ® (Alcon, Forthworth, Texas) in the bag APHAKIC AUTO-REFRACTION (Retinomax ®– Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) IOL IMPLANT – according to SRK/T and Holladay Formulas (IOLMaster®, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany)

Patients and Methods POST –OP MANIFEST SPHERICAL EQUIVALENT (1 month post-op) ADUSTED EMMETROPIC IOL POWER APHAKIC SHPERICAL EQUIVALENT REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Results AXIAL LENGTH Average: mm (21.950mm – mm) APHAKIC SPHERICAL EQUIVALENT Average : ( – ) POWER IOL IMPLANTED (conventional formulas) Average: D (5.0D – 26.0D) MODEL IOL IMPLANTED IOL% SN60WF Alcon® 58.82% SN60AT Alcon® 26.47% LI61A0 Bausch & Lomb® 5.88% OTHERS8.82%

Results Correlation between intraoperative aphakic spherical equivalent and IOL power adjusted for emmetropia. (R 2 = 0.831) IOL ADJUSTED FOR EMMETROPIA

Results Predictive factor derived (PF) = 2.104±0.393 (p = ). n = 34 Type Eyes ORB ESTIMATED IOL POWER CONVENTIONAL ESTIMATED IOL POWER CORRELATION WITH ADJUSTED EMMETROPIC IOL POWER LASIK EYES R 2 = p< R 2 = p< ORB IOL = PF X APHAKIC SE

Conclusion ORB Clinical Utility A purely refractive methodology was derived to predict IOL power after refractive surgery (LASIK); The ORB method showed close correlation with conventional formulas; The ORB method showed close correlation with emmetropia; The ORB method appears to be sustainable over a large axial length range: mm – mm.

New Perspectives Improve accuracy and usability through: Intraoperative ACD Measurement; Intraoperative Wavefront Refractive Technology; Microscope Embedded Refractive Systems (Flow-through Retinoscopy); Optimized Tracking and Visual Axis Centration.