The CGI: Advancing International Geoscience Data Interoperability John Broome - CGI Council - Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISPRS WG II/3 Chongjun YANG Sept th 2003, Thailand Co-Chair of ISPRS WG II/3 IRSA/Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Advertisements

Requirements. UC&R: Phase Compliance model –RIF must define a compliance model that will identify required/optional features Default.
Interoperability Work Group Brodaric, G, Interoperability, and GeoSciML Boyan Brodaric, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa Interoperability.
OneGeology An overview Ian Jackson 25 April 2008 OneGeology Secretariat British Geological Survey.
1 IC GS J. Broome, Mar Introduction to the Informatics and Data Aspects John Broome (Canada)
Interoperability Work Group Approaches to interoperability and future aspirations Lesley Wyborn Boyan Brodaric Harvey Thorleifson.
Community semantics and interoperability: the ISO/TC 211 framework and the “Hollow World” Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 6 September.
Using Web Services to Underpin and Improve the 1:1M Global Geological ‘Map’ Lesley Wyborn Geoscience Australia 19 October 2006.
Decision Support Systems and Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Working Group Decision Support Systems and the Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Working.
GeoSciML borehole data exchange and applications Christian Bellier (BRGM), John Laxton (BGS)
Centre for eResearch and Digital Innovation Creating virtual groundwater research laboratories through interoperable technologies Peter Dahlhaus, Helen.
IC GS Informatics Breakout Group. Informatics Breakout – topics discussed 1)How will 1G integrate with topographic data? 2)Centralized, distributed, or.
OneGeology-Europe - the first step to the European Geological SDI INSPIRE Conference 2010, Session Thematic Communities: Geology Krakow, June 24 th 2010.
Web Feature Service and Web Map Service WATER FOR A HEALTHY COUNTRY FLAGSHIP SISS Workshop v2.3 Pavel Golodoniuc, Josh Vote 8 May 2013.
Geological Survey of Norway - concepts and contributions from Norway Sverre Iversen, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU) ICC Conference Santiago, Chile
© NERC All rights reserved BGS Linked Data Pilot – aims & objectives DNF Expert Group Meeting London, 18/11/10 John Laxton.
NRCan Groundwater Program Interoperability in GIN B. Brodaric, E.Boisvert OGC TC Meeting, Boston, June 22, Geospatial Information Interoperability.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Making your data accessible on the network using standards Bruce Simons.
The role of registries within a spatial data infrastructure Simon CoxRob Atkinson Research ScientistSpatial Architect 16 April 2008.
What a State Geological Survey Learned from Contributing to the NGDS Denise J. Hills Geological Survey of Alabama.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Geographic Metadata North American Profile Development for ISO Geographic Metadata.
GeoSciML cool logo. GeoSciML v3.0 – the CGI-IUGS geoscience data model I nternational U nion of G eological S ciences C ommission for the Management and.
GeoSciML An international (IUGS) GML3 standard for sharing geologic map information, with examples from Canada and the U.S. Boyan BrodaricGeological Survey.
The Pragmatics of Geo-ontologies, and the Ontology of Geo-pragmatics Boyan Brodaric, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.
GWML IGC August 10, 2008, Oslo 1 Groundwater Markup Language (GWML) Extending GeoSciML for Groundwater Eric Boisvert Boyan Brodaric Groundwater Program.
GeoSciML Interoperability Working Group GeoSciML - a progress report.
European Spatial Data Infrastructure Conceptual Schema Language workshop Summary INSPIRE – EuroSDR – CEN/TC 287 WG SDI 13 and 14 Oct 2005, JRC, Ispra,
Deploying OGC Web Services GeoScience Victoria’s Experience Alistair Ritchie, Senior Information Geologist GeoScience Victoria.
National Earth Science Infrastructure Program AuScope Limited Headquarters School of Earth Sciences University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Tel
Geology, mining, groundwater, landscape and soils The ‘Earth Science’ domains Bruce Simons Spatial Information Modelling Community of Practice workshop,
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
® GeoSciML The History and Future of an International Geoscience Data Transfer Standard Ollie Raymond GeoSciML Standards Working Group, Open Geospatial.
Serving North American Geologic Map Information using Open Geospatial Web Services Eric BoisvertGeological Survey of Canada Bruce JohnsonU.S. Geological.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
The IUGS/CGI Data Model and Interchange Collaboration John Laxton BGS.
Roberto Lucchi Esri INSPIRE Discovery, View and Download and OGC standards.
AGU Fall Meeting 2007 Coordinating Communities and Building Governance in the development of Schematic and Semantic Standards: Is this the key to solving.
AuScope Spatial Data Infrastructure Supporting Earth Science Dr Robert Woodcock CSIRO.
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Testbed 2: Demonstrating Geoscience Web Services Bruce Simons & Alistair Ritchie GeoScience Victoria, Minerals & Petroleum.
Workshop WSS-03: Delivery of Geoscience Information using Web Services IGC August 2008.
GeoSciML Interoperability Working Group. Formed in 2003 under the Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information (CGI) of the.
Making Geological Map Data for the Earth Accessible OneGeology: assisting Geological Surveys worldwide to interoperate seamlessly on the Next Generation.
Interoperable sharing of groundwater data across international boarders is essential for the proper management of global water resources. However storage.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
Geoscience data standards Establishing geological map and mineral occurrence data exchange standards Bruce Simons GeoScience Victoria.
Introduction to the CGI - aims, activities and progress Kristine Asch, CGI Chair.
Utrecht Technical Workshop Outcomes and progress to date OneGeology Management Meeting, Nov 2-3, Ottawa.
Standards-based methodology for developing a geoscience markup language Simon Cox Research Scientist 9 August 2008.
Introduction to GeoSciML: standard encoding for transfer of geoscience information Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 11 September 2006.
International Association for Mathematical Geology XIth International Congress Universite de Liege, Belgium Tuesday 5 th September 2006 The IUGS-CGI international.
Some international collaborations in geoscience informatics: IUGS GeoSciML testbed, & AUKEGGS forum Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining.
NADM-H2O and H2O-GML Enabling decision support by extending NADM for groundwater information interoperability Eric Boisvert (Geological Survey of Canada.
GeoSciML 4 The OGC/CGI Geoscience Data Transfer Standard Ollie Raymond
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Demonstrating delivery of Geological Data using Web Feature and Web Mapping Services based on international standards.
® Using (testing?) the HY_Features model, 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA Rob Atkinson 3 June 2015 Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial.
SEE Grid Information Services Roadmap Dr Rob Woodcock CSIRO.
GeoSciML: Enabling the exchange of geological map data DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES GeoSciML: a geoscience exchange language GeoSciML: enabling the.
GeoSciML meeting April 24th-28th 2006 INSPIRE Drafting teams.
E-Government Initiative Geospatial Information One-Stop FGDC Coordination Group January 10, 2002 John Moeller.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
CGI – GeoSciML Testbed 3 Status for BRGM Jean-Jacques Serrano.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
Status and Progress of OneGeology: Operational and Technical Ian Jackson and Francois Robida 23 April 2009 OneGeology Secretariat.
Implementing distributed geoscience information systems using Open GIS Web Services Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining
XML Interoperability & Convergence ISO XML Working Group (WG 10) XML on Wall Street November 20th, 2001 John Goeller.
EarthresourceML version 2
The IUGS-CGI international geoscience information
CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, Feb.28  March 4, University of Tokyo, Japan
Club d’innovation – Forage-Puits et Monitoring
WG standards for data access/exchange
Presentation transcript:

The CGI: Advancing International Geoscience Data Interoperability John Broome - CGI Council - Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada

1) Geological Data Interoperability 2) The CGI and its goals 3) The CGI Interoperability Working Group 4) GeoSciML 5) Next steps 6) Lessons learned Outline

Access to geological data is often crucial in protecting human life, health and assets, and sustaining our environment and resources, but …. Geology in Society Geological data are often not used because they are not accessible in a standard form that can be understood by non- specialists.

Geology is plagued by a lack of internationally-accepted data standards. Geological map data are a complex combination of information describing lithology, age, physical structure, chemical properties, and genesis. Geoscience varies with regional or national context. Result: Geological data and information cannot be easily exchanged, integrated, and understood. The Geology Interoperability Problem

In 2004, the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) created the “Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information”. The CGI has 150 members in 50 nations (2006) The CGI is operated by a small but enthusiastic international Council. Visit the CGI website: The CGI

1) Provide the means for transferring knowledge on geoscience information and systems. 2) Stimulate international dissemination of best practice in geoscience information. 3) Stimulate and support initiatives which are developing standards. 4) Establish and occupy an accepted position in the international geoscience information community and represent IUGS on geoscience information matters. CGI Goals

Interoperability Working Group Multi-lingual Thesaurus Working Group Metadata standards African Outreach Workshop on Geoscience Information Data Management “Super-session” at International Geological Congress (2008) Regional Working Groups CGI Initiatives

Interoperability Working Group Multi-lingual Thesaurus Working Group Metadata standards African Outreach Workshop on Geoscience Information Data Management “Super-session” at International Geological Congress (2008) Regional Working Groups CGI Interoperability Working Group

1) Provide the means for transferring knowledge on geoscience information and systems. 2) Stimulate international dissemination of best practice in geoscience information. 3) Stimulate and support initiatives which are developing standards. 4) Establish and occupy an accepted position in the international geoscience information community and represent IUGS on geoscience information matters. Interoperability & CGI

Organizations have invested in customized data management systems that support local requirements, the implementation of new standards is intrusive and costly. Recognizing this problem, the CGI approach to interoperability is based on development of core standards integrated with standard XML/GML interchange formats. This non-intrusive approach allows retention of local systems but achieves interoperability through translation of data to a standard CGI interchange format (GeoSciML) that is compatible with OGC-standard services. CGI Approach to Interoperability

Recipe for Data/Information Interoperability: 1)Context: Conceptual model – classification/ontology 2)Content: Terminology Standards – dictionaries/thesauri 3)Structure: schematic model - schema Interoperability 101

systems syntax schematic semantic interoperability GeoSciML (data structure) Ontology/Vocabulary (data content - information) Geoscience GML (data language) WFS, WMS, WCS, … (data systems) OGC Standards OGC & Interoperability

Interoperability WG Objectives 1.Develop a conceptual model of geological information drawing on existing data models (NADM). 2.Implement an agreed subset of this model in an agreed schema language. 3.Identify areas that require standardised classifications in order to enable interchange. 4.Implement an XML/GML encoding of the model subset 5.Develop testbeds based on OGC standards to illustrate the potential of the data model/schema for interchange.

GeoSciML is an IUGS standard being developed by the Interoperability Working Group to enable geologic map data interoperability. Key international geologic agencies are involved (U.S.A., Canada, U.K., France, Sweden, Australia, etc.), GeoSciML development activities: (1)Standard data interchange structure (schema) (2)Standard data content, (3)A series of testbeds, in which geological agencies interchange information and test developments. What is GeoSciML?

GeoSciML conceptual model: no GML logical model: UML physical model: XML Granite, syenite, volcanogenic sandstone, conglomerate, minor trachyte lava Mount Leinster Igneous Complex typicalNorm <value codeSpace=" cgi.org/geologicAgeVocabulary">Triassic <value codeSpace=" cgi.org/geologicAgeVocabulary">Triassic <value codeSpace=" cgi.org/geologicAgeEventVocabulary">intrusion physical model: GML-XML UML to GML Conceptual  Logical  Physical Design

TRANSLATION How does GeoSciML work? GML Client WMS WFS WMS WFS WMS WFS GeoSciML GA BGS USGS GSC USGS schema BGS schema GA schema GSC schema GeoSciML is a GML(3)-based Schema for geological data International Geoscience Agencies

GeoSciML Testbeds Integrated web visualization and query of geological map data

GeoSciML: Next steps 1) Separate development and operational streams. 2) Support operational implementation 3) Develop detailed documentation and user guides. 4) Investigate OGC certification of GeoSciML

Standards are easily developed but often not adopted. Standards must address a business need or solve a problem. Autonomous organizations are most likely to adopt standards if they are non-intrusive. Standards must be fully documented & supported with compliant tools. Obtaining resources for long-term support & maintenance is difficult. Design standards as extensions of core standards (ISO, OGC, etc.); implement using open source tools. New technologies and standards are typically not fully tested and will have problems. Lessons learned …