Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG WP5 Impact assessment and evaluation of ERA-NET.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
RD4S Exercise Pillar C: How can the contribution of research to SD be measured ? By L. Esterle, Cermes and Ifris, France.
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
CARERA: The Impact of CAP Reform on the WP2 Employment Levels in Rural Areas ________________________________________ * Research team * Objectives * Tasks.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Statistical Office FSO Guidelines of Statistical Business Register Draft chapter 7 Fabio Tomasini – Paul.
WP1: Mapping and Analysis of Research and Innovation and Update of the Strategic Research Agenda Jack Verhoosel, TNO Jan Erpenbach, BLE Christophe Guizard,
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
Management structure and procedures KickOff Meeting ICT-AGRI 2 4 th – 5 th Februrary 2014 Niels Gøtke, Iver Thysen Jan Erpenbach, Elke Saggau.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Impact assessment framework
PEACE III - Theme 1.1 Aid for Peace – Phases I & II 21 September 2011 Celeste McCallion.
THE OECD APPROACH TO ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Frank van Tongeren Head of Division, Policies in Trade and Agriculture (OECD) ICAE pre-conference.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Small scale productive water uses Background  Several Regions raised a concern about the lack of policy on the provision of water for stock watering.
Measuring effects and impact: Analysis of practices in Analysis of practices in HI & partners projects Impact and evaluation seminar - 2 to 6 December,
DATOURWAY Transnational Strategy for the Territorial Development of the Danube Area with special regard to Tourism WP3 - ANALYSIS Kick off meeting Braila.
Big Data Quality, Partnerships and Privacy Teams.
2010/12/10 First Skills Council Meeting Brussels, April 14 th 2014 Federico Brugnoli.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Socioeconomic and Policy Research Program (SEPRP) - ICARDA Roberto Telleria, Agricultural.
1 PRODUCTION OF A MANUAL FOR STATISTICS ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN HOUSEHOLDS MESH PROJECT 3 rd Working Meeting Vienna, 4 rd October 2012 WP3: Draft Manual.
Jing Wan.  Introduction  Logic model  Evaluation methods(Design, data collection, analysis)  Communication & dissemination.
Supported by the European Commission, grant agreement pending EUROSUPPORT V “Improving sexual and reproductive health of PLWH” Kick-off meeting, May 6-7,
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Initial plans for WP 2 KickOff Meeting ICT-AGRI 2 Jan Erpenbach, Elke Saggau.
Initial plans for WP 4 KickOff Meeting ICT-AGRI 2.
TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
South African – Flemish (SAF) Development Programme DGOS-attachés 2003 VVOB.
Presents: Information for participants: Your microphone will be muted for the formal presentation. If your audio portion the presentation is not working,
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Work Package 6 L2C Kick-off meeting Fontainebleau, March 7th 2006.
Antonio Mocci Mestre, January 17, 2011 Lead partner: Governance of the project monitoring, evaluation and dissemination systems.
Impact assessment and evaluation of ERA-NET effectiveness Juliana Zweifel, Bert Beck, Katrien Broekaert, Iver Thysen, Agris Nikitenko, Markus Loetscher.
Task 4.1 Communication Strategy Task 4.3 Networking and Dissemination Activities Task 4.4 Communication Kit Task Leader: ADELPHI Research AWARE Kick-off.
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY YSDF THURSDAY 12, NOVEMBER, 2009.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Module 1 Program Evaluation and Its Practice. 2 Overview n What is evaluation? n Definitions of program evaluation n What can be evaluated? n What is.
Logic Model, Monitoring, Tracking and Evaluation Evaluation (Section T4-2)
SERSCIDA WP2 and WP3 Marijana Glavica SEEDS kick-off meeting, 4th May 2015.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG Task D 3.4 Report "Lessons learnt" 04/02/ /209.
Identifying Monitoring Questions from your Program Logic.
A Hierarchy for Targeting Outcomes and Evaluating Their Achievement S. Kay Rockwell Professor and Evaluation Specialist Agricultural.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Energetická náročnost budov
An Evaluation of AgroForestry Farms in Limpopo Province, South Africa
Enacting Multiple Strategies and Limiting Potential Successes: Reflections on Advocacy Evaluation, Competing Objectives, and Pathways to Policy Change.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Continuous Improvement Plan (CIP)
شاخصهای عملکردی بیمارستان
مدل زنجیره ای در برنامه های سلامت
فرق بین خوب وعالی فقط اندکی تلاش بیشتر است
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Monitoring Status Patriq Fagerstedt
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG WP5 Impact assessment and evaluation of ERA-NET effectiveness 04/02/ /83 Markus Lötscher FOAG

2 Kick-off Meeting ICT-AGRI-2 | WP 5 Evaluation Markus Lötscher FOAG WP5 tasks Task 5.1 Definition of objectives and indicators for the assessment of ERA-NET ICT-AGRI-2 activities (Lead: LAS) Aim: to define a set of questions and related indicators in the frame of the evaluation objectives: Elaboration of a specific impact model for ICT-AGRI-2 funding and networking which describes input, output, outcome and impact – Identification of indicators for the characterisation of data to be collected. First steps: Overview of evaluation activities in other ERA-NETs, NETWACH … Development of a model for impact evaluation

3 Kick-off Meeting ICT-AGRI-2 | WP 5 Evaluation Markus Lötscher FOAG WP5 tasks Task 5.2. Data collection (Lead: DAFA) Aim: to collect data for the questions and indicators defined in Task 5.1. Task 5.3. Impact evaluation and recommendations (Lead: DAFA) Aim: to analyse the collected data in task 5.2 in terms of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, utility and sustainability for the ERA-NET activities:  Quantitative and/or qualitative analysis of the surveys and monitoring  Formulation of recommendation on the basis of stakeholders input  Draft a report with results and recommendations

4 Kick-off Meeting ICT-AGRI-2 | WP 5 Evaluation Markus Lötscher FOAG Call impact model: first reflections ICT-AGRI Funders Project Researcher Result New Product New Service … Own funds New partners Access to Consortia New projects, funds, activities Result Intermediate New Questions … Expansion of research activity Third party funding