Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction  Federal law requires DPI to monitor programming and implementation of the ESEA requirements, Title specific.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Next Generation Science Standards Adoption and Implementation Workbook.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
2007 Institute for School Improvement and Education Options How the System Might Address Parental Involvement.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Speed Bumps on the Fiduciary Road Title I Administrative Meeting Timonium Maryland April 14, 2010 Cvieta Jovanovich.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Title IA Planning, Fiscal, and Parental Involvement Workshops Maine Department of Education Kathryn Manning Jackie Godbout Rachelle Tome May 2006.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes Consolidated Application Spring Report District Learner Advisory Commitee (DAC) Meeting June.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Presented by: Dr. Jobi Lawrence Director, Title III Iowa Department of Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Developing State Systems To Support School Improvement And Restructuring Lauren Morando Rhim Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
WVDE System of Support Michele Blatt Office of School Improvement.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Office.
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Welcome! Title III, Part A Meeting Texas Education Agency Division of NCLB Program Coordination TEA/ESC NCLB Coordinated Meeting Austin Marriott Hotel.
2007 Institute for School Improvement and Education Options Statewide Systems of Support: The State of Research.
Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A However,
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Title III and ESOL. Chapter 7: Serving Students with Special Needs IDEA Section 504 ESOL Chapter 8 – Student Discipline, Suspension, and Expulsion Student.
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Chair: Linda Miller, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Statewide Systems of Support: The RCC & State Story.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Statewide Systems of Support
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Welcome! Title III, Part A Meeting
The Statewide System of Support The Ten Roundtables: Supporting all school districts September 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response

Statewide System of Support Issues based on ED Monitoring No Statewide System of Support or a disorganized structure; Missing elements of the Statewide System of Support; Lack of LEA understanding regarding the Statewide System of Support; and Lack of documentation to support the use of School Improvement funds under Section 1003

Ohio’s Statewide System of Support The Ohio Department of Education (ODE) met the statutory requirements regarding its Statewide System of Support when it was monitored in 2007

So What is Ohio Doing Right? Ohio is appropriately implementing Section 1117 of the ESEA which requires SEA’s to establish a Statewide System of Support that meets the following requirements: Providing LEAs with intensive and sustained support for Title I schools in corrective action, restructuring, improvement, or in need of support;

Ensuring that the Statewide System of Support works with and receives support from the comprehensive regional technical assistance centers and regional educational laboratories; Establishing school support teams; Designating and using distinguished Title I teachers and principals who have been successful in improving academic achievement; and

Devising additional approaches to providing assistance (i.e. institutions of higher education, educational service agencies, other local consortia, or private providers of scientifically based technical assistance).

What are Key Strengths of Ohio’s Approach? Figuring out how to consolidate funds from different programs without violating supplement versus supplant requirements of the Federal statutes Coordinating service delivery across four major SEA offices and with school districts Focusing on building district and school capacity to meet needs of its schools (increasing sustainability) Establishing single points of contact for each regional service center

What are Key Strengths of Ohio’s Approach? Partnering with Institutions of Higher Education and others Using technology as a tool in planning Providing feedback to districts Evaluating the effectiveness of the system

Bitten by the Bug! Parallels at U.S. ED We are continuing our work on developing assessment guidance and policy working with ODS, OGC, OSEP, OELA and OESE We are coordinating the development of guidance for SEA’s on Response to Intervention with ODS, OGC, OSEP, OELA and OESE We are moving the Title III Consolidated Grant Program to the Title I office for better coordination of assessment/accountability policies and program delivery We are communicating on a weekly basis with our state contacts to keep them apprised of program developments, policy letters, staffing changes, etc. Starting to shift the focus from just compliance to program quality