ESPAM2 Water Budget Status ESHMC 21 September 2010 B. Contor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Table and Aquifers
Advertisements

1 Recharge on Non-irrigated Lands ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor.
Appraisal of the Northern Shenandoah Valley Non-Carbonate Aquifer System, Warren County, Virginia January 25, 2011.
Expansion and Update of the City of Spokane and SAJB Spokane Valley Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Model Doug Greenlund City of Spokane March 26, Spokane.
From the ground! Where’s the water coming from??
1 One-month Stress Period Considerations Presentation to ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor.
Perched River Seepage ESHMC Meeting January 13-14, 2009 Stacey Taylor.
Southwest Kansas Groundwater Management District #3 Model Kansas Water Office Contract A Kansas Water Plan Project Progress Report March 29, 2010.
GHB61 GENERAL HEAD BOUNDARY PACKAGE The General Head Boundary Package is used to, –Simulate head-dependent recharge or discharge across an aquifer boundary,
VIC Model Status Blowing Snow and Lake Algorithms Princeton Meeting December 4, 2006.
Idaho Water Resources Research Institute
California’s Water Resources
The Calibration Process
GLY 521- Hydrogeology Modflow Packages. Block Center Flow (BCF) Package The BCF package is the central package for all solutions Specify the way each.
Water Budget Status Report ESHMC Meeting September 13, 2011 Presented by Stacey Taylor.
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Where is Earth's water located?
Hydrographs and Drainage Basins. Drainage Basins: A drainage basin is the catchment area of a river and its tributaries. The boundary of the catchment.
Great Valley Water Resources Science Forum
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
MODFLOW – Introduction Organization & Main Packages
Hypothesis-Testing Model-Complexity. Hypothesis Testing …..
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
Determination of Ellenburger Aquifer Sustainability
Return Flows Discussion Continued ESHMC Meeting 6 May 2008 Stacey Taylor.
III. Ground-Water Management Problem Used for the Exercises.
Summary Utility ESHMC August 2008 B. Contor. Background ESPAM.exe produces intermediate text files –*.celmodel cell dimensions & status –*.cnlcanal leakage.
Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
Understanding Ground Water Modeling Gary Johnson Donna Cosgrove Idaho Water Resources Research Institute University of Idaho Idaho Falls.
Appropriation Policy Escalante River Drainage Kurt Vest Regional Engineer Division of Water Rights.
Boundary Conditions Based on Slides Prepared By Eileen Poeter, Colorado School of Mines.
1 New Scenario: "Current Policy" or "Continued Changes in Practice" ESHMC Meeting 13 November 2007 B. Contor.
Irrigation Scheduling. 10:00 – 10:15: Personal Introductions 10:15 – 10:45: Background 10: 45 – Noon: Gathering the Data Noon – 12:30: Break 12:30 – 1:30:
1 Water Budget Update ESHMC Meeting November 22-23, 2010 S. Taylor, B. Contor.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
RIV61 RIVER PACKAGE The purpose of the River Package is to simulate the effects of flow between surface-water features and groundwater systems. For each.
1 Recharge on Non-irrigated Lands ESHMC Meeting January 2009 W. Schreuder & B. Contor.
Analytic Vs Numeric Ground Water Models Ray R. Bennett, PE Colorado Division of Water Resources.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Mountain Home Plateau Ground Water Conditions and Management Activities Presented to the Idaho Legislature Natural Resources Interim Committee By Helen.
Prioritization Review ESHMC August 2008 B. Contor 1.
Ogallala Formation (containing High Plains Aquifer): Deposited over 10 million years ago Coarse-grained sand, gravel, fine clay, silt, and sand 174,000.
Review of ET Representation in ESPAM2.0 and How to Represent ET in ESPAM2.X Presented by Mike McVay September 12, 2012.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department EENV 5326 Groundwater Modeling.
1 Canal Seepage ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor. 2 Outline Current treatment of Canal Seepage Review of Recharge Tools PEST Possibilities Implications.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Surface-Groundwater interactions on the Eastern Snake River, ID.
Environmental Modeling Weighting GIS Layers Weighting GIS Layers.
A GIS approach to understanding groundwater – surface water interactions in the Logan River and Red Butte Creek, Utah Trinity Stout CEE 6440.
LO: To describe and explain the features of artesian basins and aquifers. To explain the balance between extraction and recharge of these stores. To outline.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 2: Surface and Groundwater Hydrologic Systems.
EVT61 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION PACKAGE. EVT62 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION PACKAGE The Evapotranspiration (ET) Package simulate the effects of plant transpiration and.
a) Water stored in the rocks below ground
Groundwater Modeling Assignment #2. Parts A and B.
Colorado Public Meeting
Creating a Generalized Hydrologic Water Budget for Cache Valley, UT/ID
Overview of Spokane- Coeur d’Alene Hydrology
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
WELL PACKAGE Simulates the discharge or recharge of water from wells.
Boundary Conditions Sources and Sinks Based on Slides Prepared By
Transient Models See Anderson and Woessner Chapter 7
Chapter 4 Boundaries.
Chapter 5 Sources and Sinks
OBJECTIVE HYDROSPHERE
GHOST (Generic Hydrologic Overland-Subsurface Toolkit)
C2VSimFG State of the IDC Calibration Dominick Amador Woodard & Curran
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
State of Calibration for California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) CWEMF 2019 Annual Meeting Folsom, CA Presenter:
Presentation transcript:

ESPAM2 Water Budget Status ESHMC 21 September 2010 B. Contor

!

What do I mean by "water budget?" All required input to MKMOD MKMOD calculates all flux across land surface EXCEPT TARGETS Target fluxes are applied separately –spring discharges –Snake River gains and losses Aquifer heads provide additional targets

15 Files Comprise the "Water Budget" E100910A.cel E100910A.cnl E100910A.div E100910A.ent E100910A.eff E100910A.eti E100910A.fpt E100910A.iar E100910A.mdl E100910A.nir E100910A.off E100910A.pch E100910A.pre E100910A.red E100910A.sol E100910A.trb

E100910A.cel This file contains the square footage of each model cell, and whether the cell is active or inactive. It reflects the boundary changes Allan presented last spring.

E100910A.cnl This file contains the cell locations and leakage fractions for model cells with leaky canals. Nearly all entities have one or two major canals represented as leaky. The data set accommodates time-varying leakage, but I have held them constant for all stress periods, per the Ad Hoc memo.

E100910A.div This file contains diversion volume for each surface-water entity, for each stress period. Returns are zeroed as a fail-safe for the On- Farm algorithm.

E100910A.ent This file contains information about the surface-water entities and groundwater polygons (entities) to which all irrigated parcels are assigned. –water source –ET adjustment factors –Sprinkler percentage (and changes through time)

E100910A.eff I know nothing. Ask Allan & Willem.

E100910A.eti This file contains unique irrigated-et depth for every cell, for every stress period –MKMOD decides when, where and how to apply it –Based on National Ag Statistics Service crop mix and ET-Idaho evapotranspiration depths.

E100910A.fpt FPT means "fixed point" Any flux that is independent of MKMOD calculations is eligible –wetlands –urban/industrial areas –exchange wells WD 01 Mud Lake Some indelicacy with data flags

E100910A.iar Irrigated lands by model cell –square feet, entity, source, source fraction Four data sets: 1980, 1992, 2000, 2006 We're knocking on the door of 2002 completion Possibly in the near future we will attempt a repair of 1986?

E100910A.mdl Model simulation data –Brief background information –stress period lengths –Rows, columns, layers –PEST multipliers for non-irrigated recharge, by soil type –PEST multiplier for fixed points with flag "W"

E100910A.mdl (2) "ESPAM2 water budget using NIR values (ESPAM1 algorithm)from Contor, 3 June Reflects round 2 adjustments, corrections to irrigated lands, zero returns as failsafe for on-farm. Identical to P100827A except for refinements described in E100910A.readme.txt. No *.eff file supplied by IWRRI."

E100910A.nir Non-irrigated recharge depth One value for each model cell, for each stress period Depends on general soil type and precipitation depth Non-linear ESPAM1.1 algorithm was applied to PRISM precipitation depths

E100910A.off Offsite groundwater pumping This means the wells are distant from the irrigated lands MKMOD uses the pumped volumes in irrigated-lands and canal-seepage calculations Differ from exchange wells in that exchange-well volumes are already in the diversions data

E100910A.pch Perched river seepage Unique value for each model cell, for each stress period This is actually all non-Snake seepage, whether perched or not. No Snake-River seepage is included, whether perched or not. –Snake seepage is included in calibration targets

E100910A.pre Precipitation depth for every model cell, every stress period. Used in irrigated-lands calculations MKMOD also uses for sense check w/ non- irrigated recharge Data are from PRISM

E100910A.red Reduction for non-irrigated inclusions One value for each stress period, for sprinklers and for gravity –we didn't have enough data so all the sprinkler values = gravity values Calculated by comparing hand-drawn polygons with data-set polygons in a statistical sample (100 one-mile squares) for all irrigated lands data sets.

E100910A.sol Generalized soil type by model cell –lava rock, thin soil, thick soil Based on RASA 1406 (Garabedian) maps Used in selecting parameters for *.nir calculation Used to assign PEST multipliers –Currently set to 11 zones

E100910A.trb Tributary valley underflow Annual values based on RASA 1406 no intra-year variability –we know it exists but we don't have adequate data inter-year variability based on dampened Silver Creek hydrograph –Silver Creek is spring-fed at the mouth of a tributary basin

Party Responsibly!