Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

Teacher Performance Assessment System The Processes.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
The Framework for Teaching: Digging Deeper August 27, 2012 Bernie Cleland & Duffy Miller
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Understanding the Rubric Presenters: Rhonda Pitts and Bridgette Blue June 18, 2012.
Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,
November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support System: Guide to Evidence & Artifacts.
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
JOHN F. SHEEHAN, PH.D. EVIDENCE-BASED OBSERVATIONS.
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
 Updated on: October 15,  Category 1 and 2 teachers  Score does not compute into the Summative Evaluation  Designed to give feedback on Instructional.
HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I.
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Assessing Teachers’ Performance in Newport News, VA Presenters: Saundra C. Boatwright & Susan A. Piland National Conference on New Directions in Teacher.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Create a “folder” called CT_Summit_presentation on your thumb/flash drive or desktop. It is best to save in at least 2 places. In this folder place your.
An Introduction to Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum January 9, 2013.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
COMPONENT 3A: COMMUNICATING WITH STUDENTS Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
CAIU 15 October 14,  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦
Cathy Taylor Teaching children to count is good, but teaching what counts is better.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Fulfilling the Promise of Preparation: Translating Vision Into Reality.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Education and Schooling Session #4 Week of October 1 st 2007 Asst. Professor G. Sharpe.
Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Citywide Expectations for
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
The Framework for Teaching Understanding the Levels of Instructional Practice.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Learning Management System
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Avon Grove School District October 2009
A guide for holders of initial and transitional certificates
Definitions of Levels of Performance
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Literacy.
Teacher Practice Instruments
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence Webinar February 28th, 2013 [LISA / ROBERT] Thank you for joining us for the second in a series of webinars.
Mapleton Public Schools Educator Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013

Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domains – Domain 1: Planning and Preparation – Domain 2: The Classroom Environment – Domain 3: Instruction – Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

Performance Levels Danielson’s FrameworkNYS Levels of Effectiveness DistinguishedHighly Effective ProficientEffective BasicDeveloping UnsatisfactoryIneffective

What do these levels really mean? Do a close reading of the excerpt entitled “Levels of Performance” from Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson. As you read: – Highlight or underline important ideas to remember – Place a ? by anything that seems confusing

Table Discussion What is the difference between experience and expertise? What are some characteristics of expert teachers? In your own words, summarize what it means when teaching is unsatisfactory (ineffective), basic (developing), proficient (effective), and distinguished (highly effective).

The Swimming Metaphor

What Happens When You are Observed: The administrator records evidence of domains 2 and 3 while watching your lesson. The administrator reviews his/her notes and organizes the evidence by domain and element. The administrator uses all evidence and the rubrics to select a performance level for each element of domains 2 and 3. The administrator completes the observation form by giving examples of evidence for each element of domains 2 and 3.

Review the Rubrics Have each person at your table choose a different rubric for an element of Domain 2 or 3. Read the description under each performance level. Highlight or underline important words. Share what you learned with your table.

Whole Group Discussion What is the major difference between proficient (effective) and distinguished (highly effective) in most elements?

Next Steps: Become very familiar with all of the rubrics. You may also want to read those sections of the book for more clarity. Look at the rubrics when you receive your observation form from your administrator. Use this information to help you understand how he/she evaluated your lesson. Always feel free to ask questions!

Reminder: Evidence folders for Domains 1 and 4 are due on June 1 st. All pieces of evidence should be placed in the APPR folders on the Shared Drive. Please refer to the examples on the handout. Include at least one and no more than two pieces of evidence for each element. Please label your evidence!