Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) “Top 10” Tips for SaTC Proposals One program director’s observations Sol Greenspan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Putting a Face on the CAREER Peer Review Process Ross Ellington Associate Vice President for Research FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
Counting Down the Top Ten List for Proposal Writing Royal Roads University Office of Research February 26, 2010.
Grant Writing Gary Roberts Dept of Bacteriology
The partnership studied 10 existing methods founded suitable for finding Mission in Life. The sources varied from books, to Eu projects or methods already.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Program Sam Weber Program Director March 2012.
DECO3008 Design Computing Preparatory Honours Research KCDCC Mike Rosenman Rm 279
Bill Pugh NSF (Jan - Jun 2011) Univ. Of Maryland Google NSF Broader Impact.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
1 RESEARCH DESIGN: What are you researching? Identifying a researchable question Assignment 1: Reviewing the Literature.
NSF CAREER Proposal: Thoughts on Proposal Development Mark Snyder Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Copyright © 2013 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Fundraising Planning for Education.
The Denison Model.
Developing and Writing Winning Individual, Corporate and Foundation Proposals Robin Heller, Director, Corporate and Foundation Philanthropy, BBBSA Robert.
On Preparing Proposals: Comments from Both Inside and Outside NSF Xiaodong Zhang The Ohio State University.
Getting There: Example of Successfully Obtaining SaTC CAREER Award Dr. Oleg Komogortsev Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Texas State.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
TE Workshop - October 6, 2011 Review of ABoVE Scoping Study The NASA Terrestrial Ecology Program requested community input on the Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
National Science Foundation Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Trustworthy Computing and Transition to Practice Secure.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Stephanie Adams February 9, 2006.
Congress created the NSF in 1950 as an independent federal agency. Budget ~$7.0 billion (2012) Funding for basic research.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Associate Professor of Civil and.
In April l993, the URC began reviewing NCAR's non-core proposals. UCAR Office of Programs (UOP) non-core proposals were added in 1995 and UCAR Education.
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
National Science Foundation. Seeking Doctoral Dissertation Support from the National Science Foundation: Do’s and Don’ts Program Officer Political Science.
The Review Process o What happens to your proposal o Two Review Criteria.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Professor of Civil and Environmental.
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
1 Choosing a Computer Science Research Problem. 2 Choosing a Computer Science Research Problem One of the hardest problems with doing research in any.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
1 Grant Applications Rachel Croson, PhD Dean, College of Business UT Arlington (formerly DD SES/SBE NSF)
New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA.
1 Student and Supervisor Panel Starting a PhD Associate Professor John Thornton RHD Coordinator for School of ICT.
Improving Research Proposals: Writing Proposals and the Proposal Review Process Heather Macdonald (based on material from Richelle Allen-King, Cathy Manduca,
Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.
Evaluation of NSF’s Research and Evaluation on Education in Science and Engineering (REESE) program Challenges and Strategies Joy Frechtling, Westat John.
© Ana Muriel, UMass 5/24/05 CAREER PROPOSAL WRITING Tips for Success Ana Muriel Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Massachusetts.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Internal Funds: Some practical suggestions from OR-member(s) Matthias E. Storme Facultaire onderzoeksdag 19 mei 2015.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Applying for NSF CAREER Grants
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Identifying Programs and Contacting Program Directors
Cybersecurity Education
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
How to Succeed with NSF: September 14, 2018
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) “Top 10” Tips for SaTC Proposals One program director’s observations Sol Greenspan

Disclaimers Talk shares some observations about proposals  Observations you might glean from panels  Not an official NSF FAQ – just my opinions  Other program directors may have their own lists  Use your own judgment  “Top 10” ? Not humorous, and there are 11 2

Title and Project Summary  Used to decide if proposal is in scope of SaTC (and/or other) program  Used to sort proposals into SaTC panels  Avoid distracting digressions, allusions, puns, ambiguities. Metaphors only if really good.  Multiple program directors may read them, with varying degrees of expertise in the main thrusts of the proposal 3 Make as clear and straight-forward as possible 10

Why is the research important?  Don’t assume the reviewers know why – tell them  What is the relationship of your research to “big questions” in the field?  Explain both intellectual merit and broader impacts, short-term and long-term, goals and possibilities  Bottom line: why should the nation invest in this research? 4 Explain why the research is important to fund 9

Comparison to related work  Establish that your work has not been done already by others and will be a significant advancement  Need more than “others working on this problem are [refs]” and “so-and-so takes a similar but different approach [refs]  Not helpful to say “malware has been much studied [see refs 1-23, 46-61, 78, 99, 120]”  Use related work to justify approach, highlight originality, comparative effectiveness, potential breakthroughs, etc. 5 Explain what makes your project “competitive” 8

Prior Work by You  Most research directions go beyond a single project  Where does the prior work end and the new work start?  Don’t make readers guess how your recent publications relate to the proposed project  Explain how prior/preliminary work validates assumptions, justifies further exploration  NSF requires mention of IM and BI for prior grants 6 Clearly explain the new work to be done 7

Project Management/Coordination  Collaboration Plan required for Frontiers and Medium proposals with more than one PI  Explain how you will coordinate people and activities to achieve the overall vision.  The reader wants a sense that the people and resources are well-reasoned and appropriate for the project, and that some strategic thinking will take place over the course of the project 7 Give reader confidence that there will be executive functioning at work 6

Research Process  Research outcomes are not predictable. What decision points might you encounter? How will you mitigate?  Allow for unexpected results and dynamic changes in direction  What is the process to refine your theories, algorithms, models, etc. ?  Sometimes the research requires novelty/creativity and is a contribution in itself 8 Show that you have thought about contingencies 5

Research Evaluation  What are you evaluating?  How will you evaluate it?  How do others do evaluation in this area?  What is considered an advancement?  Do benchmarks exist (or are you developing them)?  Sometimes evaluation methods require development and are contributions in themselves 9 Explain how you will evaluate progress and results 4

Pursuit of Science  Building a body of long-lasting knowledge  Devising theories that explain phenomena (represented by data, models algorithms, software, etc.)  Problem characterization and solution discovery  Paradigm shifts, different ways to conceptualize the problems, open to new and better solutions  Again: Conscious, explicit evaluation to show advances in the field  Community resources and activities 10 Where is the Science? (Engineering) 3

SaTC Mission  Topically connected: Security, privacy, etc. (e.g., ACM taxonomy)  Threats, attack models, evolving societal scenarios, etc.  Foundational (software, hardware, networks, systems, formal methods, etc.) with strong connection to SaTC  National needs and priorities (e.g., CNCI, CSIA): designed-in security, moving target, tailored trustworthy spaces, science of security, cyber-economics 11 How does your proposal support the SaTC mission? 2

Broader Impacts  What is your contribution to the SaTC mission?  You will publish, educate/train, and develop curriculum  Impact on other fields of research  Impact on business/industry or on society  Outreach to share knowledge with communities 12 1 Concrete activities

Your Career  Work on topics that you believe in and motivate you.  Always in the process of building a track record.  Network with others to build community around important areas and accelerate the pace of research.  Propose your best ideas 13 What is your passion? 0

 Further comments/suggestions from PIs?  Further comments/suggestions from PDs? Sol Greenspan 14 The End