Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hazard Mitigation Planning I Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning I Coastal Hazards Management Course Signed by the President on October 30, 2000 Amends.
Advertisements

FEMA PROGRAMS II Session Name: FEMA Programs II Coastal Hazards Management Course Amends the Stafford Act Establishes a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program.
IV. 1 IV. Overview Of State Standards A.SS1-97: Requirement for Flood Study Technical Documentation.
Questions concerning the Halloween Flood in Onion Creek Presentation by David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at.
15 March 2012 WATERSHED Science & Engineering WEST Consultants.
Use of a hydrodynamic model to
Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics URS Group Inc ASFPM National Flood Conference May 19, 2010.
Benefits of a Flood Warning Network to Findlay, Ohio Brian C. Hurt, P.E. – Former City Engineer Findlay, Ohio.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Getting Caltrans to Approve Your Plans Basic Drainage Policies and Requirements Roy H. King, MS,PE California Department of Transportation Division of.
The Risk is Real… Be PREPARED! Robert Billings, PE, PH, CFM Flood Mitigation Project Manager Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services May 18, 2011 Briar.
1 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Update FEMA Public Meeting October 22, 2009.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
A Simplified Method of Implementing No Rise Analysis in Unnumbered A-Zones Based Upon No Loss of Conveyance Dwayne E. Culp, Ph. D., P.E., CFM Second National.
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
Flood Recurrence Intervals and the 100 Year Flood Concept Bruce F. Rueger, Department of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME
Earth’s six water reservoirs Reservoir% Earth's Water% Usable Water Oceans97.54%----- Glaciers2.15%----- Shallow Groundwater0.31%96.9% Fresh Lakes/Streams0.009%2.8%
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
Floodplain Delineation of Indiana Streams Allison Craddock Tom Gormley Jessica Tempest Erin Wenger.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
HEC-RAS.
Oregon Flood Hazard Data Standard v2.0 Summary of Proposed Amendment Collaborative Effort of: Jed Roberts (DOGAMI), Steve Lucker & Christine Shirley (DLCD)
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 15 Risks to Human Settlements What Are Hazards? Prepared By Rod Emmer CFM, PhD Larry Larson, CFM, PE.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Drainage Source: AREMA Ch. 5, J. Rose Lectures, Ch. 19 “Transportation exists to conquer space and time -”
Map Modernization Management Support Best Practices Project - FEMA State of Idaho Idaho Department of Water Resources Boise, Idaho November 2008.
Acquisition of Flood Control Easements Triangle High-Ground Area City of West Sacramento, Yolo Co. Meeting of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Bridge Building Timelines Presented by The Richland County Engineers Office Thomas E. Beck, PE, PS 77 North Mulberry Street Mansfield, Ohio Jan.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 11 DESIGNATED FLOODWAY MODIFICATION.
Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL entity] Company Confidential Hydrologic Evaluation of the Little Thompson River Phase 2: Little Thompson.
Taming the Alabama River Patrick Dobbs & Clay Campbell AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Alabama Water Resources Conference.
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
Flooding New Orleans, Aug Flooding –Varies with intensity and amount of rainfall –Perhaps the most universally experienced natural hazard Flood.
James River in Richmond, Virginia looking upriver from the Robert E. Lee bridge. Belle Isle is on the right, November What is happening in this.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers – Norfolk District Rappahannock River Basin Gaging Analysis 27 JUNE 2012.
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Program Liaison Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview.
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Cooperative Efforts in Nashville Flood Preparedness Jamie G. James, P.E. Water Resources Section Nashville.
Minnesota Silver Jackets Pilot Project Flood Inundation Map and Warning System for Downtown St. Paul National Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets.
Natural Hazards Science: Reducing America’s Risk from Floods David Ford David Ford Consulting Engineers.
Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Rebecca Haney Coastal Geologist Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Analyzing the Effects of Navigation Structures Edward Brauer, P.E. Applied River Engineering Center U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – St. Louis District.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
Floodplain Management D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L5 Water Resources Systems Modeling.
Boise River, Idaho: Many Agencies Working Towards One Version of the Truth Ellen Berggren, USACE Walla Walla District Idaho Silver Jackets USACE Flood.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 7D Methylmercury Open Water Workplan.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
4.0 Unit 4: BFE Considerations. 4.1 Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to:  List potential data sources for determining BFEs in A.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Peter Gabrielsen Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Eastern Region NOAA’s.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Hydrologic Calibration: October 2010 U PDATE OF E FFECTIVE H YDROLOGY FOR M ARYS C REEK.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Proposed Floodplain Inundation Mapping on the Flathead River Travis Ball Hydraulic Engineer
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
FLO-2D Model Development Below Caballo Dam to Ft. Quitman Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District and Mussetter Engineering, Inc.
Logan River Floodplain Mapping Kedric Curtis, Josh Hogge, Jordan Jarrett, Jared Justensen 4/25/2015 CEE 6190 Photo credit:
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
N Current Adopted Post-LCP Certification and Appeal Jurisdiction Map Exhibit 1.
Overview of Spokane- Coeur d’Alene Hydrology
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Flood Frequency Analysis
City of Kingfisher: Using Historic Flooding to Quantify Damages
Flood Frequency Analysis
Flood Plain Regulations
Presentation transcript:

Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.

2 Burnham Parcel

3 Water Code Section (c) The board shall, in any evidentiary hearing, consider all of the following, as applicable, for the purpose of taking any action pursuant to Section 8560:. (2) The best available science that relates to the scientific issues presented by the executive officer, legal counsel, the department, or other parties that raise credible scientific issues.

4 Precedence for Modification to Floodway Maps – Kaweah River Map 1SA

5 Precedence for Modification to Floodway Maps – Kaweah River Map 3SA

6 Basis for Establishing River Stage CVFPB – Staked locations reported to be high water marks FEMA – Hydraulic modeling calibrated by reported high water marks

7 Basis for Establishing Flow Rate CVFPB  80,000 cfs  Basis – reported high water, topography  Return Interval - ? FEMA  73,000 cfs  Basis – USGS gaging station  Return Interval – 140-year

8 Comparison of Designated Floodway and FEMA FIS Maps

9 HEC-RAS Study (Flow = 73,000 cfs)

10 HEC-RAS Study (Flow = 80,000 cfs)

11 CVFPB Issues (a)The current request for modification of the floodway boundary will move the boundary within the actual river channel, thereby reducing any inherent factor of safety provided by a conservative estimate of the boundary location. (b) There is significant staff work associated with an approval of a designated floodway modification. Affected map sheets must be revised and renumbered, the revised maps sent to Tulare County recorders office as an official document, and the Board’s records and website updated.

12 CVFPB Issues (continued) ( c) Calculations by the consultant and Board staff, show that the Island Building Pad would be 0.2 feet to 1.00 feet below the 100 year storm (1% chance). In storms that exceed this frequency, the Building Pad would be inundated. This does not consider Wind Wave Run-up (1.0 feet to 2.0 feet) nor margins of error within the Hydrology calculations.

13 CVFPB Issues (continued) (d) There has been no discussion of the likelihood of large boulders which are carried through this river course which do damage and present a clear danger to life and property. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, California, prepared a Flood Plain Information packet for the Kaweah River at Three Rivers, California on October They state that Kaweah River velocities can reach up to 20 feet per second and “…velocities would be slightly higher on all streams and would be extremely dangerous to life and property.” On page 3 of the above mentioned report, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers states; “Hazardous Conditions would occur during large floods as a result of rapidly rising streams, high velocities and deep flows.”

14 Cross Section 8

15 CVFPB Issues (continued) (e) If a residential structure were to be allowed, it would create an in-stream blockage which would decrease flow area and increase velocities causing negative impacts both upstream and downstream.

16 Summary The current Designated Floodway Map is inaccurate, and should be modified to reflect detailed survey information and engineering studies. Safety Factor - Our request is to modify the map to reflect river stage for flows that are 10% greater than the 140- year flow.