RPF Laboratory Accreditation/Verification Task Group Feedback from meetings of 12 April 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pan American Health Organization Inter-American Mechanism for Disaster Response Where do we go? Dr. Jean Luc Poncelet Area Manager Emergency preparedness.
Advertisements

B E S T B E S T B E S T.
Binder Distributor Certification 21 November 2007 RPF Pretoria.
Binder Distributors Task Team Feedback. Progress since May Resolution #7 –To review the process of binder distributor certification as fit for purpose.
Road Pavement Forum May 2001 Road Materials Committee.
Developing Guiding Principles for ICT in Education Policy
National Accreditation System for Laboratories  Progress to date  Meeting held on 18 May 1999 under auspices of COLTO RMC & SANAS  Purpose  Chart the.
FEEDBACK ON SANRAL / SAACE /SAFCEC WORKSHOP ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION & MANAGEMENT Held on 28 MARCH 2003.
Accreditation and Proficiency Testing. APT Subcommittee MembershipMeeting Activities 21 members, 15 non- Commissioners Representation: Accreditation bodies.
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
Arnhem Business SchoolJ.Vinke 2005 Human Resource Management (HRM) Plan guide on developing a practical HRM plan.
1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management Systems Review August 8-9, 2006 B erkeley Lab Safety Committee Presentation Paul Blodgett.
RPF Skills Development Task Group Feedback from meetings of 31 January 2002 & 29 April 2002.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Conformity Assessment and Accreditation Mike Peet Chief Executive Officer South African National Accreditation System.
Overview of existing assessment schemes Rolf Bienert, John Lin.
John Neuner, Program Manager ASCLD/LAB-International CWAG January 28, 2010 Sacramento, California.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
Quality assurance / Quality control system for the Greek GHG emissions inventory Yannis Sarafidis, Elena Georgopoulou UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems.
The concept for a network of national Reference Laboratories for high risk IVDs – Results of the working group meeting 1.
RPF Task Group Feedback Lab Accreditation TG Skills Development TG 11/12 May 2005.
SANAS ACCREDITATION DEES DHANRAJ BEE Lead Assessor.
Review of TMH1 Tests on asphalt. Role of Sabita Motivation Standards.
PROGRESS OVERVIEW: COLTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS TMH AND TRH DOCUMENTS OTHER DOCUMENTS.
RPF Laboratory Accreditation/Verification Task Group RPF meeting 13/14 November 2002.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
UNIDO - Energy Efficiency Creating a Standard Framework for Sustainable Industrial Energy Efficiency Lorence Ansermet UNIDO Regional Office in South Africa.
ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM STATUS OF TRAINING OF MATERIALS TESTERS & TECHNOLOGISTS IN THE CIVIL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY.
“The Quality Infrastructure in Lebanon” Export Norms, Quality Control and Competitiveness FUTURE PROGRAMME Prepared By Ali Berro Director of Quality Programme.
Skills Development Task Group Feedback to RPF 20/21 November 2007.
Binder Distributor Accreditation 22 November 2005 RPF Pretoria.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
Task Force on the Future Development IG9, October 2007, Maldives “Task Force” will be established on an ad hoc basis during the phase IV implementation.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
1 st Quality Assurance Workshop Belgrade, Nov 2007 Case Study: Quality Assurance in Ireland Strengthening Higher Education Reforms in Serbia An EU-funded.
EIGHTH ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM Programme and Status of Resolutions.
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM Roodevallei Country Lodge 13 & 14 November 2001.
15 th ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM Mpekweni Beach Resort 6-7 May 2008 Final Session: Resolutions.
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
Pavement Research Advisory Committee (PRAC) 13 th Meeting of the RPF 8 May 2007.
REPORT to RPF November 2007 TMH1 Revision & Proficiency Testing Mervyn Henderson TMH1 report prepared by Dave Wright.
Do’s and Don’t's of Accreditation Visits Barbara Ford San Francisco State University.
NFP/Eionet meeting, October 2014, EEA PAN NFP/Eionet coordination European Environment Agency (EEA) Key points and actions Bratislava, Slovakia,
Foamed Asphalt Working Group Road Pavements Forum 13 November 2001.
Science & Technology for National Progress in African Region: Highlights of Regional Strategy and Action Professor Gabriel B. Ogunmola, FAS President,
ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM CSIR CONFERENCE CENTRE 7/8 August 2000 Final Session.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia NATA accreditation and criteria for validation and verification Mark Worrell – RACI.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
1 IUCN GL GLPA Standard Framework Matthew Wenban-Smith (Technical Support to Green List PA Steering Group) 25 th February 2014.
National Standardization Secretariat ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa and SG5RG-ARF and SG5RG-AFR Meetings Livingstone, Zambia March.
Brownfield Register Making Data Standards Work Kevin Flanagan April 2016.
Strategic Objectives for Goal 1 Draft Strategic Plan for INTOSAI 2017 – 2022 Provide a strong organizational framework to support INTOSAI’s standard- setting.
Initiating Process “The Project Charter”
ISO/IEC
PowerPoint to accompany:
ACCREDITATION PROCESS
Principles for a robust MRV System Lessons learnt from Kyoto Mechanisms Workshop 15: Accounting and accountability: Towards a credible and robust carbon.
Vijay Mauree, Programme Coordinator ITU
Stack Testers Association
FJJ Labuschagne - Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport
Guidelines for Establishing a National Standardization Secretariat
THE SANAC RESEARCH SECTOR
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Presentation transcript:

RPF Laboratory Accreditation/Verification Task Group Feedback from meetings of 12 April 2002

RPF Resolution That inter-laboratory testing be conducted on an ongoing basis under the guidance of a task group to be convened by the Asphalt Academy

Task Group Members NameOrganisationSector Les Sampson AsAcAsphalt/Bitumen Rob Damhuis SANRAL Road Agency/MTC Barry Dumas PAWCProvinces/MTC Rod Raw C & CI Cement & Concrete Monica Childs-Hurn SANAS Accreditation Authority Uli Kaempffer SAACEL Private sector laboratories Mike Vlok TransportekTransportek/MTC Russell Clayton Nineham Shands Consultants

Role of Task Group To coordinate the accreditation, verification and proficiency activities of materials testing laboratories with the ultimate aim of improving confidence levels in test results emanating from the laboratories To coordinate the accreditation, verification and proficiency activities of materials testing laboratories with the ultimate aim of improving confidence levels in test results emanating from the laboratories

SANAS Responsible for managing the accreditation process Responsible for managing the accreditation process Specialised Technical Committee (STC) for Civil Engineering Laboratories established Specialised Technical Committee (STC) for Civil Engineering Laboratories established Problems in the road sector: Problems in the road sector: Upgraded test methods not yet available Upgraded test methods not yet available No direct linkage to road sector for technical input and assessors No direct linkage to road sector for technical input and assessors Accreditation of site labs especially those not linked to permanent labs Accreditation of site labs especially those not linked to permanent labs Feedback of activities at next RPF Feedback of activities at next RPF

Actions from the meeting Finalise the upgrading of the test method for roads (mainly TMH 1) Finalise the upgrading of the test method for roads (mainly TMH 1) SAACEL to provide comments on test method before end of April SAACEL to provide comments on test method before end of April Validation of test methods – B Dumas to report to next meeting Validation of test methods – B Dumas to report to next meeting Set up proficiency scheme driven by the Task Group Set up proficiency scheme driven by the Task Group Identify ways of ensuring test equipment/apparatus is consistent and correctly calibrated Identify ways of ensuring test equipment/apparatus is consistent and correctly calibrated

Proficiency Scheme Actions Establish a sub-committee to investigate appropriate proficiency schemes; Establish a sub-committee to investigate appropriate proficiency schemes; Create a prioritisation framework for test methods required to undergo proficiency testing; Create a prioritisation framework for test methods required to undergo proficiency testing; Prioritise test methods for proficiency testing; Prioritise test methods for proficiency testing; Develop Guidelines on proficiency scheme for the road sector; Develop Guidelines on proficiency scheme for the road sector; Identify potential service providers to manage the scheme; Identify potential service providers to manage the scheme; Identify and motivate funding to implement the scheme Identify and motivate funding to implement the scheme

Feedback from the Materials Testing Committee meeting of 23 April 2002