“(Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
DMSAG 14/8/06 Mark Boulay Towards Dark Matter with DEAP at SNOLAB Mark Boulay Canada Research Chair in Particle Astrophysics Queen’s University DEAP-1:
Particle interactions and detectors
Institut für Kernphysik Markus Horn ILIAS-N3, BSNS-working group meeting Valencia, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft.
Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei Tina Leitner, Ulrich Mosel LAUNCH09 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Background issues for the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Laura Baudis Stanford University.
GEANT 4 simulation of energy deposited in KASCADE-Grande detectors Carpathian Summer School of Physics 2012.
Report from Low Background Experiments Geant4 Collaboration Workshop 10 September 2012 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
WP2 Background simulations Outline Execution plan for the third year Progress of the work Activities and news.
13/12/2004Vitaly Kudryavtsev - LRT20041 Simulation of backgrounds for particle astrophysics experiments V. A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Cosmic Induced Backgrounds D. Reyna Argonne National Lab.
Ali Hanks - APS Direct measurement of fragmentation photons in p+p collisions at √s = 200GeV with the PHENIX experiment Ali Hanks for the PHENIX.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Modane, 12/01/2005 Vitaly Kudryavtsev - JRA1 meeting 1 Background simulations: testing Monte Carlo codes V. A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
JRA1 meeting - 10/07/2006Vitaly Kudryavtsev1 Muon-induced neutrons: how deep should we go to get rid of them? V. A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and.
N3-BSNS/JRA1-WP2 - Valencia, 15 April 2005Vitaly Kudryavtsev 1 Monte Carlo codes: MUSIC, MUSUN, SOURCES Vitaly Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
Recent Developments in Geant4 Hadronics Geant4/Spenvis Workshop at JPL 6 November 2006 Dennis Wright.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Neutron background and possibility for shallow experiments Tadao Mitsui Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University December, 2005 Neutrino.
Energy deposition for 10 MeV neutrons in oxygen, carbon, argon and hydrogen gaseous chambers (1mx1mx1m). Energy Deposition in 90% argon (1.782mg/cm 3 )
Report on The Study of (α,n) Neutron Yield and Energy Spectrum Dongming Mei for the AARM collaboration 1.
Jun Cao Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics, Oct. 3-8, 2005 National.
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
VALSIM status J. Apostolakis, V. Grichine, A. Howard, A. Ribon EUDET meeting, 11 th Sept 2006.
Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #6 Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2.Neutrino.
A Study of Background Particles for the Implementation of a Neutron Veto into SuperCDMS Johanna-Laina Fischer 1, Dr. Lauren Hsu 2 1 Physics and Space Sciences.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
G4GeneralParticleSource Class: Developed by ESA as the space radiation environment is often quite complex in energy and angular distribution, and requires.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Photoproduction at Hadron Colliders Results from STAR at RHIC Spencer Klein, LBNL (for the STAR Collaboration)
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Direct Detection of Supersymmetric Particles in Neutrino Telescopes Z. Chacko University of Arizona I. Albuquerque & G. Burdman.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
1 Henderson DUSEL Capstone 05/06/2006 Background Modeling and Clean Room Design Considerations for HUSEP Zeev Shayer and Jonathan Ormes Department of Physics.
MaGe framework for Monte Carlo simulations MaGe is a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation package dedicated to experiments searching for 0 2  decay of.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
The n_TOF neutron flux and resolution function by GEANT4 simulations
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
Low Background Studies at the Soudan Underground Laboratory-9/20/ Low Background Studies at the Soudan Underground Laboratory The Soudan Underground.
Robert Cooper. What is CENNS? Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering To probe a “large” nucleus Recoil energy small Differential energy spectrum.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Phenomenology and Detection p 00 ++  e+e+ e-e- ++  Michelangelo D’Agostino Physics C228 October 18, 2004.
Observation of new neutron-deficient multinucleon transfer reactions
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Luciano Pandola, INFN Gran Sasso Luciano Pandola INFN Gran Sasso Genova, July 18 th, 2005 Geant4 and the underground physics community.
Muon-induced neutron background at Boulby mine Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev University of Sheffield UKDMC meeting, ICSTM, London, 27 June 2002.
The physics of Mu2e Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology Mu2e computing review doc-db XXXXX.
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
Heating and radiological
Update on Muon Flux Underground Using Geant4 Simulation
the s process: messages from stellar He burning
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Neutron and 9Li Background Calculations
Simulations of UAr dark matter detectors shielded by LAr vetoes
Neutron backgrounds in KamLAND
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
BACKGROUND STUDY IN CRESST
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Hadronic Physics in Geant4
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Understanding Neutrino Events at Liquid Argon Detectors
Presentation transcript:

“(Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust.” Background Models for Muons and Neutrons Underground Joseph A. Formaggio University of Washington LRT Workshop December 13 th, T.S. Eliot, The WasteLand

“(Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust.” --T.S. Eliot, The WasteLand Based on recent article by C.J. Martoff and J.A. Formaggio, ARNPS, (2004) By no means complete on all background sources for each experiment. Rather, cover major backgrounds for different experimental arch- types. Focus on physical processes and Monte Carlo implementations.

“A Conspiracy of Events” Experiments Next generation of sensitive experiments: Dark Matter Experiments (CDMS, Picasso, Xenon, etc.) Solar Neutrino Experiments (CLEAN, LENS, etc.) (  ) Experiments (Majorana, EXO, CUORE, etc.) Laboratories New underground facilities being planned in the U.S. and Canada. Simulations: Backgrounds become a key issue in these and other next generation projects. Trying to encompass wide range of energies and particle types within one system.

Sources of Background Natural Radioactivity ( ,n) reactions from uranium and thorium decay chains. Spontaneous fission. Muon-Induced Activity Muon capture. Includes neutron production from neutron photo-production and subsequent secondary activity. Isotope production (direct/secondary)  Capture U/Th Chain  Spallation U/Th Chain  Spallation  Capture U/Th Chain  Spallation  Capture

Uranium & Thorium Chains For deep underground facilities, often the main source of background for experiments. Contributes to both photon and neutron background in the detector. Natural concentrations in surrounding environment, as well as detector materials.

Neutrons from Radioactivity Main sources from ( ,n) reactions from Po decays. Most abundant elements below neutron production threshold. Typical production from reactions on 9 Be, 13 C, 17 O, 25 Mg and 43 Ca. Concentrations differ depending on rock type. M. J. Carson et al, Astrophys. J.607, 778 (2004).

Spontaneous Fission Neutron production can also take place through spontaneous fission: Falls rapidly beyond 2 MeV Sub-dominant process Typically less than 30% of ( ,n) neutron production. Multiple neutrons produced.

Cosmic Ray Flux Once below ~30 mwe, cosmic ray flux is dominated primarily by muons. For muons that reach deep sites, the LVD parameterization works well to determine incoming rate and spectrum. Well measured by existing underground experiments. Uncertainties typically associated with rock density and composition ( ). Vertical muon flux as function of depth. Hagiwara K, et al. Phys. Rev.D66:010001(2002)

Muon Capture Source of neutron production, typically dominant at shallow depths.  - + A(Z, N)   + A(Z-1, N+1) One or more neutrons typically produced, depending on target material. Stopping rate    fraction Capture rate Neutron multiplicity

Muon Capture Source of neutron production, typically dominant at shallow depths.  - + A(Z, N)   + A(Z-1, N+1) One or more neutrons typically produced, depending on target material. Here, P c =  c /(  c +Q  d ), and X (1,2) = (170 s -1, 3.125) Suzuki T, et al. Phys. Rev. C 35: 2212 (1989)

Muon Spallation Actually, a complex process, since a number of physics processes are at play: Virtual photon exchange. Electromagnetic interactions. Secondary production from particle showers. Neutron Spectrum At 300 mwe

Virtual Photon Exchange Two dominant theories: Weizsacker & Williams formalism. Treat virtual photon as a real photon exchange. Bezrulov & Bugaev formalism: Treat in the framework of a generalized vector meson dominance model Includes nuclear shadowing effects. In general, two methods differ by ~30%, depending on the energy and target type. Both describe the reaction in terms of a virtual photon flux, coupled with a real photo- neutron cross-section.

Photo-neutron Production Processes involved: Giant Dipole Resonance (below 30 MeV) Quasi-deuteron production. Pion resonance Hard scattering Finally, one must consider re- interactions of primary neutrons produced at the vertex. Full Monte Carlo simulations necessary! IAEA DatabaseChadwick et al.R. Schmidt et al.

Neutron Production Data Limited available data for neutron production underground. Main measurements made in scintillator (LVD, Palo Verde, etc.). Lead and other targets available through the Artemovsk Scientific Station. Energy dependence appears to follow simple scaling law: Lead Scintillator N n = 4.14 × E  0.75 n/(  g -1 cm -2 )

Target Dependence Only limited number of underground target measurements made, mostly from the Artemovsk Scientific Station. Also appear to have simple scaling dependence. Target measurements also performed at the CERN SPS muon beam facility. Limited since secondary reactions difficult to probe. Monte Carlo estimates place this closer to A N n  A

Neutron Energy Spectrum Spectral comparisons between data and Monte Carlo done by Y.F. Wang et al and Kudryavtsev et al. Global parameterizations seem to break down below 20 MeV for neutron energies. Can be parameterized by simple dependence on muon energy. Y-F Wang, et al. Phys. Rev. D 64: (2001)

Isotope Production Isotope production at the surface from hadronic showers. Below surface from capture, (n,p) reactions, or direct spallation. Muon spallation measured in CERN’s SPS muon beam facility. Performed for a number of final states, including 11 C, 7 Be, 11 Be, 10 C, 8 Li, 6 He, 8 B, 9 C, and 9 Li+ 8 He. Hagner T, et al. Astropart. P. 14: 33 (2000)

Simulation Techniques Muon Propagation: First order, Gaisser parameterization. MUSIC & PrompMu deliver fast propagation through dense material. FLUKA and GEANT4 Neutron Production: Comprehensive Monte Carlo often required. SNO hybrid system GEANT4 and FLUKA tested against existing data. LVD Flux MUSIC SNO Photo-production Code GDRQD  -res. Pythia Hadron Propagation

Outlook Physics processes behind neutron production from natural radioactivity, muon capture, and muon spallation well understood. Neutron energy spectrum varies as a function of source and depth. Monte Carlo codes improving in incorporating decay chains and neutron spallation products. Limited data still available for direct MC/data comparisons.