Becoming familiar with QPS systems in the LHC (incl. EE) Presentation 02 Sept. 2008 PART 1 of 3. Part 1: General layouts and principles Presentation of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Power Supply System John Joseph LBNL Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Review Feb 17 th 2012.
Advertisements

CLIC Workshop 2009 Power Converters implications for CLIC machine protection 25/05/2015TE-EPC / S. Pittet1.
58 th MPE-TM – October 2, 2014 G.J. Coelingh, TE-MPE-EE Long Shutdown 1 Status Report Energy Extraction Systems On behalf of all EE teams involved.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 03-Dec Quench Detection and Energy Extraction Systems R. Denz (Quench Detection), K. Dahlerup-Petersen (Energy Extraction Systems),
REVIEW OF THE CRYOGENIC BY-PASS FOR THE LHC DS COLLIMATORS ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT MODIFICATION, INCLUDING OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS PRESENTED BY A. SIEMKO.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
41 st LSC – March 21, 2014 G.J. Coelingh, TE-MPE-EE Long Shutdown 1 Status Report The upgrade of 600 A Energy Extraction Systems.
Upgrades and Activities of 13kA EE systems during LS1 Bozhidar Panev TE-MPE-EE
How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.
TE/MPE/EE Presentation to MPE at TM #52 on K. Dahlerup-Petersen TE/MPE/EE – Individual System Tests of the 13 kA Energy Extraction.
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
HOW THE DUMP RESISTOR’S TANK LOOKS LIKE COOLING OF THE LHC ENERGY EXTRACTION RESISTORS G. Peón (ST/CV), K. Dahlerup-Petersen, G. Coelingh (AT/MEL) Air.
Why Energy Extraction in the LHC ?  For the LHC 13 kA circuits of arc dipole and quadrupole chains: In case of a magnet quench a rapid current decay is.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
Update and status for the Work Unit ‘Energy Extraction’ - equipping the three test benches for series testing of Super-FRS Dipoles D2, D3, D4 and Quadrupoles.
Interlock and Protection Systems for SC Accelerators: Machine Protection System for the LHC l The Risks l The Challenge l The LHC Layout l The Systems.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
13 kA Energy Extraction LHC machine Gert Jan Coelingh – Knud Dahlerup-Petersen – TE/MPE/EE.
Essential lessons from commissioning of the 28 EE systems of LHC sector A corrector circuits.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
NQPS commissioning …a long way to go. Topics nQPS component overview Enhancements in Firmware Commissioning diagram Detailed task list Summary.
Andrzej SIEMKO CERN, Geneva The 2014 Kyoto Workshop on HTS Magnet Technology for High Energy Physics –WAMHTS-2.
TE-MPE -EI 23/6/2011,Antonopoulou Evangelia RQS circuit Simulation results of Quench Antonopoulou Evangelia June 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
TE-MPE participation on the GSI-CERN Collaboration for Testing Super-FRS's Superconducting Magnets (aka FAIR project) Daniel Calcoen Acknowledgements:
QPS Signal Analysis Case studies from MPP and QPS Bob Flora.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Main dipole circuit simulations Behavior and performance analysis PSpice models Simulation results Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Powering the damping rings wigglers Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Powering superconductive magnets, Powering wigglers strategy, Existing.
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit protection point of view Arjan Verweij, CERN, TE-MPE with input from M. Prioli, R. Schmidt, and A. Siemko A.
PLCs at CERN for machine protection and access interlocks Session: Machine Protection and interlock systems at different labs I. Romera Ramírez (CERN /
TEST FACILITY STATUS FOR TESTING CERN Marta Bajko WP10. EUCARD 2 Task 4 - HTS Magnet Tests, June 2015.
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Mikhail Ovsienko TE-MPE-EE
Electrical Configuration and System Protection
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
D1 and D2 powering and protection
MQY-30 Test Result Report
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
Status of RB circuit modeling PSpice models Simulation results: nQPS & oQPS Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele Ravaioli TE-MPE-TM
Superconducting Circuits, a generic view
RELIABILITY OF 600 A ENERGY EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Powering the LHC Magnets
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
Concepts for magnet circuit powering and protection M
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Dipole circuit & diode functioning
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Knud Dahlerup-Petersen
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Rüdiger Schmidt and Karl Hubert Mess
DC Choppers 1 MH1032/brsr/A.Y /pe/DC CHOPPERS
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
COOLING OF POWER DEVICES
Hilumi WP3 meeting, 1 October 2014
Presentation transcript:

Becoming familiar with QPS systems in the LHC (incl. EE) Presentation 02 Sept PART 1 of 3. Part 1: General layouts and principles Presentation of equipment Knud Part 2: Presentation of typical QPS signals and their interpretation. Bob Part 3: Operational aspects Possible events and first diagnostics / treatment by 1 st -line team -incl. summary of failures experienced during Hardware Commissioning. Support by QPS specialists Reiner / Knud

Challenge 1: Adiabatic Temperature Rise At 13 KA it takes only 200 mS to destroy a dipole magne t. 31 Miits (for TeV 7 Miits)

320 Tons 970 Km/Hr 11 GJ11 GJ 10.6 GJ Challenge 2: Stored Energy 10.6 GJ 747 USS Enterprise 84,000 Tons 60 Km/Hr 11 GJ11 GJ

Protection features in the LHC Four basic protection principles: –Detection of resistive build-up –Spread of the quenching area by firing of heaters –By-passing the quenching magnet by cold diode –Extraction of the stored energy Not all circuits require all four protection measures.

LHC What to power? The beams are controlled by: SC main dipoles -392 SC main quadrupoles -124 SC quads/ dipole insertion magnets SC corrector magnets -112 warm magnets Total current in the 8000 magnets: 1.72 MA (1718 distinct circuits) Comparison of the stored energy (10.6 GJ) with Hera: 0.5 GJ Tevatron: 0.3 GJ RHIC: 0.2 GJ Reference for viewing circuit topologies and parameters: Also available in CCC in paper form (the QPS Reference File)

Main elements of QPS and EE 16’000 quench heaters More than 2’000 specially doped diodes for 13 kA commutation at 1.9 K 40’000 instrumentation wires 6’200 quench heater power supplies (DQHDS) 3’400 multi-channel detectors 2’650 data acquisition and monitoring controllers (AMC, AMS, AMG, (AMR in future)) 32 energy extraction facilities for 13 kA, comprising - 256, 4.5 kA electro-mechanical switches - 64 breaker control modules (DJPC) - 32 current-equalizing busways - 48 / 16 dipole- / quadrupole extraction resistors 202 energy extraction systems for 600 A.

Quench Detection in the LHC Type of detectors: -DQQDL ‘local’ quench detector, one per arc dipole and quadrupole (in total (51 x x 4) = 1624 racks). Dipoles: Aperture to aperture comparison Quadrupoles: Half-coil to half-coil comparison in the same aperture (F or D) Mainly analogue electronics (because of location in the tunnel). Balanced Wheatstone bridges used for comparison. Two channels per card and two redundant cards. Operating principle: Double 1 oo 2 (one out of two) Featuring: Missed-quench probability is negligible (for asymmetric quenches!) Less than 10 false quench detections per year in worst modeled scenario. Possibility to detect broken voltage tap wires Controller: AMC

Quench Detection in the LHC Type of detectors: -DQQGPU: Digital quench detectors: Installed outside radiation areas exclusively TYPE A: For global protection of corrector circuits. As no voltage taps were provided (an unforgivable mistake !) the detection principle is based on compensation for inductive voltage, using pre-loaded inductance tables, which have been fine-tuned during the Hardware Commissioning. TYPE B: ADC-based digital comparators – on Individually Powered Dipoles and Quadrupoles (voltage taps available). Controller: AMG

Quench Detection in the LHC Type of detectors: -Main Busbar Quench Detector: A ‘local’ detection for the main magnets implies to have a ‘global’ detection for the associated busbars The instrumentation wires on the busbars have been minimized The topology of the detector requires two reference magnets and measurements of the circuit voltage at the current leads (for the dipole circuit in either end of the sector). The resistive voltage is calculated as the sum of the two measured voltages minus the average of the measured reference magnet voltages multiplied by the number of magnets in the circuit. The ‘global’ detector also protect the associated current leads with combined feature of HTS quenching and resistive heating

Quench Detection in the LHC The Quench Loop: –Role: Passing remotely the information about quench detection to other systems such as the energy extraction facilities and the Power Interlock Controller. –Solution: Two hard-wired current loops (50 mA) across each sector, one for the main dipole circuit and one for the QF/QD circuits combined (with simultaneous activation in both circuits). –Every quench detector can open the current loop, the energy extraction facilities can open the loop (in case of internal faults) as well as react on a rupture of the loop by opening the extraction switches. –Information about the rupture of the quench loop will be transmitted to the PIC for further action (shutting down of power converter, ejection of the beams). –NOTE: The fire-preselected-heaters loop has been deactivated.

13 KA Diodes Heat Sinks Compression Rings

Why Energy Extraction in the LHC ? For the LHC 13 kA circuits of the arc dipole and main quadrupole chains the EE system is activated in the following cases: –In case of a quench in a magnet coil: A rapid current decay is required after transfer of the current to the cold diode of the quenching magnet in order to preserve the by-pass diode and its associated busbars. –In case of a quench in a superconducting busbar or in a current lead or in case of risk of overheating of a component of the warm part of the power circuit (water-cooled cables or crowbar): A rapid current decay is needed to remain within the thermal limits of the component, which has a problem –In case of a failure in the energy extraction switches: A rapid transfer of the current to the dump resistors is required to avoid damage of the breaker system In each of the above cases, the rapid current decay is obtained by switching external resistance into the circuit. Almost the complete stored energy is absorbed by the external dump resistors (99.5 % in the dipole chains and 92 % in the quadrupoles).

Why Energy Extraction in the LHC (contd.)? For the LHC 600 A corrector magnet circuits: –No quench heaters nor by-pass diodes are provided in the corrector magnet chains –Apart from the presence of parallel resistors across certain corrector magnets, protection relies entirely on the operation of an energy extraction system Particularly important: Short reaction time and small time constant for the current decay is required due to reduced thermal margins for the superconducting busbars (typically 60 ms reaction time is required). –Two different energy extraction systems are foreseen: Medium-voltage, separate extraction facilities Low-voltage, converter-integrated systems

Current-equalizing Busways for distribution of currents into the four branches of breakers.

The Dump Resistors for the LHC 13 kA Circuits In spite of the large energy difference (664 MJ per diode system and 22/24 MJ per quadrupole circuit) the two extraction resistor types have much in common. The basic design criteria for both types are: –In order to maintain the peak voltage across the resistor at its lowest possible level, as defined by the resistance at room temperature, a ‘zero’ inductance concept are applied and an absorber material with low temperature coefficient have been selected. –The resistor bodies are dimensioned for high temperature operation, but within safe margins for long term reliability of its materials and components. Typically, the operating temperature at the end of the energy deposit attain o C. –The design assures a high short- and long term reliability. –The resistor units are available for energy extraction without need of any infrastructure, such as mains power and cooling water, during the extraction period. –The heat dissipation to the surrounding air is close to zero, due to underground installation. Connection to LHC de-mineralized cooling water circuit is therefore needed for evacuation of the heat. –A design, in which the resistor body is not immersed in water, has been favored. Direct cooling by forced air is a good choice, but requires an air-to-water heat exchange. Such a device is incorporated in the resistor assembly. –The units have their own water reservoir with sufficient capacity to assure worst-case no-boiling conditions. –The maximum cooling period shall be maximum 2 hours

600 A Extraction Constructional Details Separate facilities, located back-to-back or next to the associated power converter. Two systems share one standard rack. The chosen topology is a Series-inserted system with two main breakers (A & B) operated simultaneously, with a third breaker (Z) as back-up. The extraction switch is based on 3-pole electro-mechanical AC breakers (RU military standard), retro-fitted with DC Arc Shutes and Capacitive Snubber Circuits for arc suppression. The capacitor bank, bridging the switches, will strongly reduce the contact erosion (no arcing contacts), it will reduce the noise and it will shorten the arcing time. The 600 A is shared by the three poles in parallel. Also these AC switches have two independent modes of release, herewith providing a four-fold redundancy. The system controls are based on the controller AMS. The Power Abort Link is common with the associated power converter. All cards are made as SMD and burnt-in. The control electronics is commonly designed by CERN and BINP.

Other Basic Parameters Typical total opening time with pulsed release: ms Typical total opening time with under-voltage release: less than 20 ms Total opening time with motor drive / electromagnetic driver: 65 ms! Maximum DC voltage across one breaker during opening: 420 V Required Snubber Capacitance: 320  F. Extraction Resistor: 0.7 . Stainless steel. Equalizing resistors are required for current balance through the multi-pole breakers. All elements are natural-air cooled (low losses). Cooling time of Rdump after complete discharge with max. energy (160 kJ): Typically 10 min. Local controls and the supervision electronics mounted in a single 3U Euro-chassis.

Block Diagram Switch Control Z Interface 0 Extraction Resistance A B Interlock Snubber C Extraction Resistance Voltage S3- A S3-B Extraction Resistance Temperature Interface 1 AMS WorldFip Measurement Z S3-Z Switch Control A Switch Control B FPA OPEN - CLOSE Discharge Capacitors Voltages Switch Status Fast Power Abord Mains Control 230V UPS Mains Power Interlock Controller

Final Remarks All components were designed, manufactured and tested in close collaboration with CERN The 234 Energy Extraction Systems represent 296 Tons of Components 89 % is procured through contributions from Non-Member States (11 % from European Industry) The total cost of the systems is 18 MCHF (European Reference Price).