Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Keeping Up to Date: Accessing Your N&D Title I Funds For PAFPC Conference April 14, 2008 Don McCrone & Joe Hiznay.
Advertisements

1 Title I, Part D Data Reporting and Evaluation: What You Need To Know Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC Karen Neilson, California Department of Education.
1 Workshop Part I: Federal Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
Title I, Part D Program Office Q4 Updates 1September 18, 2012John McLaughlin, Federal Coordinator.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
CCDF Presentation September 9, CCDF: CCDF Budget Development The CCDF award is based on the federal fiscal year beginning October 1 st and ending.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
Workshop Part II: Subgrantee Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
1 (Almost) Everything You Need To Know About the Annual Count.
1 Planning and Funding Basics Lauren Amos and Liann Seiter, NDTAC Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Section 1113 of NCLB, Title I Eligible School Attendance Areas (Does not apply to LEAs with fewer than 1,000 children)
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
ND Community Call Salmon Community October 23, 2013.
1 Gold ND Community Call June 3, Agenda Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Adapting to the 2014 GED “That Time of Year”: Subgrantee Monitoring A Closer.
Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.
Update: Web Data Collection System (WDCS) Title I Administrative Meeting—September 30, 2010 Kristi Peters, Research and Evaluation Coordinator 1.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 What’s It All About?
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
1 Gold ND Community Call February 3, Agenda “That Time of Year”: CSPR Data Submission Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Questions from Community Members.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:
1 Topical Call Series: Improving Data Quality and Use CSPR Data Collection Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
Developing a Title I Budget Title I Directors Budget and Planning Workshop June 18, 2012 Embassy Suites.
Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). What do you need to know? If you choose to participate in CEP: You are required to STAY on the program for the.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 16, 2010 Sacramento,
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Spring N or D Application.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
AEBG Webinar September 25, Agenda for Today MOE & Consortia allocations update Governance Questions Adult Education Block Grant Reporting Toolkit.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community November 4, 2015.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection As of June 28, 2012.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 Introductions Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3x5.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Title III Application Process Maria Garcia-Morales (717) Title III Program Manager Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Thoughts for today *Teacher: I want you to tell me the longest sentence you can think of Pupil: Life imprisonment! You know you can’t sleep in this workshop…would.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of Federal Educational Programs ECTAC ADMINISTRATOR’S MEETING SONYA G. MORRIS, BUREAU CHIEF MARCH 3, 2016.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Challenges and TA Solutions for Allocating Part B Subgrants to LEAs
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
Final Jeopardy – MEP Services
Annual October Count of Children in
Presented by Sarah Martinez and Patricia Meyertholen June 2, 2016
Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan

2 Contacts and Support  U.S. Department of Education (ED)  Paul (Sandy) Brown Program Analyst, Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs (SASA)  John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator, Title I, Part D  NDTAC  State Liaisons: delinquent.org/nd/direct_assistance.asphttp:// delinquent.org/nd/direct_assistance.asp  Contact NDTAC:

3 ED and NDTAC Resources on the Annual Count  Federal Regulations  Title I, Part D, Statute  Title I, Part D, Nonregulatory Guidance  Annual Count survey form, guidance on eligibility and worksheet from ED  NEW! NDTAC Annual Count Toolkit: Determining Formula Counts for Title I, Part D, Funding Allocations

4 Annual Count: An Overview ED uses formula counts to calculate funding allocations; counts are collected on an annual basis via a survey form with two parts: Part 1 of the Survey = LEA Section  Count of students who are delinquent for Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 funds that are allocated to LEAs via the SEA  Count of students who are neglected for Title I, Part A, funds Part 2 of the Survey = SA Section  Count of students who are neglected or delinquent for Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 funds that are allocated to SAs via the SEA The Annual Count procedures for the State Agency (Subpart 1) and Local Educational Agency (Subpart 2) programs are different.

5 Annual Count: An Overview (1) ED distributes Annual Count Survey and guidance (mid- October) (2) Child count periods are selected (3) SEAs submit counts to ED (January) (4) ED prepares funding tables based on counts and funds available (5) ED announces preliminary awards in April/May and releases funds in July

6 From Counting to Reporting The Annual Count (aka the Annual Child Count and the October Count)  An annual count of children to determine funding for the subsequent fiscal year Funding and Reporting Program Performance  Students included in the Annual Count are most likely different individuals than the students who subsequently benefit from the funding once allocated  The eligibility criteria for being included in the Annual Count are different than the eligibility criteria for being served (more later) and reported under Part D  Counts are based on student caseload data that are months old when the fund administration occurs in the spring/summer Report 2010 Annual Count of students to ED R eceive FY 2012 funding and make awards for SY Report on students served in SY via CSPR to ED January June/July January 2013

Annual Count for State Agency Programs (Subpart 1)

8 State Agency / Subpart 1 Annual Count: Eligibility State Agency Eligibility  Agencies responsible for providing free public education to children and youth who are in N or D institutions, community day programs, or adult correctional institutions Facility Eligibility  Facilities that serve neglected or delinquent children and youth  Facilities that have an average length of stay of at least 30 days Student Eligibility  Students who are 20 years or younger  Students who are enrolled in State-funded regular program of instruction for at least 15 hours/week if in an adult facility or 20 hours/week in a juvenile facility or community day program

9 State Agency / Subpart 1 Annual Count: Procedure 1.Eligible SAs select a date  Each State Agency may select any one day during the current calendar year.  Each SA may select its own date, but every institution under a particular SA must use the same date. SEAs may also work with SAs to select a date to use across all SAs. 2.Eligible facilities conduct count  Each facility counts eligible students. 3.SAs or facilities adjust the count to reflect the length of the school year of the agency or institution  The child count reported by each SA to the SEA should be an adjusted count based on the formula below 4.SEA combines SA adjusted counts and submits to ED  SEAs are responsible for rolling up SA adjusted counts and completing Section A, Part II of the Annual Count survey. (single day count) * (length of school year in days) 180 days

10 State Agency / Subpart 1 Annual Count: Procedure (cont.) Impact of the Adjusted Count (single day count) * (length of school year in days) 180 days (100 students) * (220 school days) 180 days (100 students) * (180 school days) 180 days = =

11 State Agency / Subpart 1: Annual Count Quiz Department of Human Services June 1July 1Aug 1Sept 1 Facility Facility Department of Corrections June 15July 15Aug 15Sept 15 Facility What is(are) the optimal day(s) to choose for the count?

12 State Agency / Subpart 1: Annual Count Quiz Each facility under a State Agency must use the same day for its Subpart 1 count. However, different State Agencies can use different days. September 1st and June 15 maximize the counts for the Dept. of Human Services and Dept. of Corrections, respectively, and for the State overall. Department of Human Services June 1July 1Aug 1Sept 1 Facility Facility Department of Corrections June 15July 15Aug 15Sept 15 Facility

13 Common State Agency/Subpart 1 Count Issues Students who have earned their diploma Students who have earned their GED Students who are enrolled with but do not reside at a community day program