Measuring social added value A model for public authorities Floriana Nappini [ Network: Better Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BFSE Recommendations A proposal for a common template
Advertisements

Measuring social added value A model for public authorities
STRAND II MEASURING SOCIAL ADDED VALUE. Main topics Comparability (framework?) Dissemination: bottom up process Dilemma: how to justify capacity building/processes/cultural.
Slovenian experience MEASURES TO STRENGHTEN THE CIVIL DIALOGUE AND PARTNERSHIP Irma Mežnarič Brussels - 10 October 2006.
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
Deutsches Mikrofinanz Institut e.V. Microfinance in Germany Brigitte Maas.
Methodologies for Assessing Social and Economic Performance in JESSICA Operations Gianni Carbonaro EIB - JESSICA and Investment Funds JESSICA Networking.
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Networks and projects on Social economy promoted by Italian Regions Milan, 5 November 2011 Rita Porru Networks and projects on Social economy promoted.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Building a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Workshop ‘New challenges in higher education research and policy in Europe and in CR’,
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Dorotea Daniele, Facilitator. The members Polish Ministry of Regional Development ESF Council in Sweden Lombardy Region Ministry of Labour and Social.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Europe and Education School Education COMENIUS. The School Education Action of the European Community’s Programme “Socrates” on Education 2 nd phase:
Daniela Gatti Lombardy Region [
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
EU support to social economy & social entrepreneurship Ciprian Alionescu DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Livorno: a knowledge province for senior at work – VS/2005/0313 Local strategies for active ageing based on continuous training and Lifelong Learning for.
Primary, general objectives  To mainstream gender equality  To promote work-life balance  To tackle gender-based violence  To enhance knowledge and.
Social Responsibility: Training Students and Working with Business in Russia ISO General Assembly Open Session on Education Tatiana Guseva D. Mendeleyev.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Skills and occupational needs: the Occupational Information System in Italy Giovanni Castiglioni Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Milano
Structural Funds We have to act now! Javier Güemes Acting Director European Disability Forum.
Walking on two legs: LEARNING EVALUATION 1 Göran Brulin, Senior Analyst and professor, Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth Sven Jansson, National.
Twinning Project RO/06/IB/SPP/01 Support to Authority for Coordination of Structural Instruments (ACIS) to ensure a sound and efficient management of the.
Partnership as a tool to green regional development programmes Gottfried Lamers Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
1 European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network National Guidance Forum of the Czech Republic Open Session Career Guidance Council in Lithuania Aleksandra.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Kick-off Meeting Belgrade, 4-5 December 2008 Network of Centres for Project Development and Management.
Bilateral cooperation between Italy and Turkey FRAMEWORK FOR A MONITORING SYSTEM OF PUBLIC INVESTMENTS.
Eurodiaconia seminar on volunteering AGM,19 June - 21 June 2008 Vienna.
REvitalizing networks and New Emphasis in Transfer: preventing and facing early school leaving by sharing solutions and tools 1st Transnational Workshop.
Quality System Assessment in Italy European Curricula for Economic Animator in the Enlarging Europe – ECONOMIC ANIMATOR PT04/PP/08/36/446.
Mission & Activities Cristina Dorati Warsaw, 18 January 2008 [Regional Agency for Education, Training and Employment]
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
The Province of Milan …is one of the 12 provinces in the region of Lombardy …is a local government authority representing 134 towns and municipalities,
Commission européenne Active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market Michele Calandrino – policy analyst Inclusion, Social Policy Aspects.
SV WiRAM - Anja Gomm - March Local / Regional Economic Development Promotion Main ideas Factors for implementation Relationship to your work Aim:
1 Information by the Managing Authority on EU funds evaluation Monitoring Committee meeting October 15, 2009.
Using PCM, ISO and CAF to ensure quality in Lithuanian EQUAL and ESF Programme management and organisational development Jurgita Šakalytė ESF Agency, LITHUANIA.
Erasmus+ programme for boosting skills and employability of young people Youth cooperation with Eastern Partnership (EaP) and Western Balkan countries.
Do European Social Fund labour market interventions work? Counterfactual evidence from the Czech Republic. Vladimir Kváča, Czech Ministry of Labour and.
Forecasting the labor market needs of workforce skills Budapest 26 February 2014.
Małgorzata Lublińska Ministry of Regional Development in Poland.
Innovative Labour Market Measures to Fight the Crisis Prague, Czech Republic October 20 – 21, 2011.
Inese Vilcane Social inclusion department Senior expert
Operational Programme Education for Competitiveness
Measuring social added value Italian experiences
ESF - State of the Art in Romania
dr Paweł Wais Deputy Directort Department for Regional Development
Mainstreaming sustainability into the future EU budget
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
APPLYING A SOCIAL RETURN ON INVESTMENT ANALYSIS TO
27 November 2014 Mantas Sekmokas
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Dorotea Daniele, Facilitator
Purpose of the presentation
State of play of OP negotiations
Social Dialogue on Education and Training ESF Committee 10 March 2011
Social services for the active inclusion of disadvantaged people
Embedding Governance & Participation in the European Structural Funds
“Methodology SROI & Key Stakeholders”.
Presentation transcript:

Measuring social added value A model for public authorities Floriana Nappini [ Network: Better Future of Social Economy Partners and Experts seminar December 5 th, Milan

The 5 Strands: I-Public Procurement and Public-Private Partnerships Lead by the Polish Ministry of Regional Development II-Measuring Social Added Value Lead by the Lombardy Region III-State Aid and Social Services of General Interest Lead by the Flanders ESF Agency IV-Social Franchising Lead by the Swedish ESF Council V-Financial Instruments Lead by the Czech Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Network: Better Future of Social Economy

Methodology The research outline is based on two principles: the importance of the experience aspect the participatory approach collecting as many experiences as possible on local, national and international levels involving all stakeholders: project partners, subjects who in the future will use the evaluation tool, but also social enterprises that will be the object of evaluation It should lead to the implementation of a tool that is as close as possible to the actual needs of the players involved and applicable to/in the everyday life of organisations.

I. Attention to direct experience - Desk research Survey of documents and site-bibliography: to identify sensitive areas and aspects to be considered; approaches and models for quality and social responsibility were examined. Subsequently, the research has focused the analysis on: International systems of quality evaluation (and particularly the ISO, SA8000 and EFQM rules) Evaluation systems promoted by EU projects within the last few years (e.g. several projects under EQUAL Initiative) Experiences of social accounting developed in Italy and Europe during the last twenty years. SROI models and tools

II. Participatory Approach -Stakeholders The following type of stakeholders have been involved: Project Partners Social enterprises Banks/Credit Institutions These stakeholders were involved through a number of different tools: Questionnaires One-to-one interviews Focus groups

Main objectives and characteristics of the tool The general goal of the model is to measure the social value produced by a social enterprise as a whole or by a specific project. The primary goal of the system is to give funding entities, particularly public bodies, a tool for evaluating the social value created by social enterprises. Ex-ante evaluation of social impact Simple and easy to use

The tool for measuring social added value The Measurement Tool elaborate consists of two main parts: 1. The first part is designed to "measure" the social value produced by the social enterprise as a whole (based on Social accounting) 2. The second part is intended for evaluating mainly single projects (based on SROI) Each part could be applied at different levels of depth analysis, based on the context (i.e. amount of the financial grant, size of the social enterprise, etc..)

PART I- Evaluation of the overall social added value produced by the enterprise – The dimensions The system takes into considerations the following dimensions: Financial and economic soundness Democracy and governance Organizational functioning Professional resources Equal opportunities Socio-occupational integration Clients Networks and partners Project design and innovation abilities Environmental sustainability Services and interventions Each of the above dimensions is made up of further sub-dimensions.

PART I- Evaluation of the overall social added value produced by the enterprise – The sub-dimensions Dimension: Socio-occupational integration Sub-dimension: Effectiveness of job placements Sub-dimension: Quality of job placements INDICATORDEFINITION Job placement cases of persons from disadvantaged groups Total job placements ________________________ Total workers Job placements drop-outs N. of drop-outs during the given year ________________________ Total n. of placements in the year INDICATORDEFINITION Placement tutor Has a tutor been identified for each job placement? (Yes/No) Skills evaluation Has a skills evaluatio plan been drafted? (Yes/No)

PART II – Evaluation of the social added value produced by single projects (SROI-Social Return On Investment) SROI is an analytic tool developed recently in the United States for measuring and accounting for the social, economic and environmental impact created by organisations. This approach aims to reveal the value of changes experienced by stakeholders whether those changes have been priced in market transaction or not and helps identify which changes are significant. It uses financial proxies to help reveal the value and as part of the process of deciding which changes are significant. It allows for the calculation of a benefit to cost ratio. A 3:1 ratio indicates that an investment of 1 delivers 3 of social value.

Current Phases: Testing the tool Part I – Evaluation of the social added value produced by the enterprise Identifying a system of weights Benchmarking Building a specific software Modifying the evaluation system if necessary Part II – Evaluation of the social added value produced by single projects SROI case-study on a real social inclusion project in Lombardy

THANK YOU!