4. There are two possible decisions: Conclude that there is enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis (Reject H0) Conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis (Do not reject H0)
If we reject the null hypothesis, we conclude that there is enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is true. If we do not reject the null hypothesis, we conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is true. Ex. H0: Simpson did not kill his wife H1: Simpson killed his wife. It is a bad example in the sense no parameter is specified, but it helps you understand the concept.
But you frequently see someone set up hypothesis and do one-sided test like this: H0: μ =0 H1: μ <0 H0: μ =0 H1: μ >0 Usually, you do this when you have knowledge about μ (you know μ has been 0 in this case), but you now have doubt it might change. Last thing, put equality if necessary to include the case that parameter equals the number you believe or you know (status quo).
Q24-26 on Page 232, Course Pack In an effort to increase customer service. ….trying a new data entry program… ╮ ( - _ - ) ╭ Before they do it, they select randomly 7 guys, and recorded their data entry times with the old and new system. Step1: Set up hypothesis Step2: find test statistics Step3: find the critical value from correct distribution. Step4: Make your decision.
Q30-31 on page 234, Course Pack