LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix NOAA Biological Goals: 1) Allow fish the opportunity to exit the ladder without stalling or excessive up/down.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Advertisements

Colville Confederated Tribes and the Okanagan Nation Fisheries Commission.
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS
Eric Hockersmith,Gordon Axel, and Earl Prentice (NOAA Fisheries Service) Development of an Ogee-based PIT-tag Detection System for Spillbays Roger Anderson,
1 Bonneville 2 nd Powerhouse Corner Collector PIT Tag Detection System Project Bonneville Power Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Portland.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Evaluation of the PIT-Tag Detection Arrays in the Priest Rapids Dam Adult Ladders Steve Anglea, Anthony Carson – Biomark, Inc. Eric Lauver – Grant County.
Overview of Topics  Swimming Ability of Juvenile Salmonids  Behavior of Juvenile Salmonids  Guiding Juvenile Salmonids  Design Development  Selecting.
Design of Bypass Systems Special thanks to Ed Meyer, who provided the framework for most of these slides.
Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.
Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.
Claytor Hydroelectric Project Water Quality Study Mark Hutchins, Project Manager January 25, 2007.
Klamath Coho Integrated Modeling Framework (IMF)
Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.
1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.
Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U
Design and Performance of the River Mill Surface Collector
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection (SMP Traps) Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 11,
October 29, 2009 Scope Creep… Or Is it? David Heintzman PGE – Hydro Licensing NWHA/NHA Regional Forum October 28, 2009.
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
Annual SARs by Study Category, TIR and D: Patterns and Significance Presenter: Charlie Petrosky CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting February 20,
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Status of Columbia River salmon and links to flow: What we do and do not know Presentation to Northwest Power Planning Council December 11, 2002
Howard Schaller PSMFC Annual Meeting September 24, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.
The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,
03Nov2006 Revision11 Priority Questions of TID/MID/CCSF Regarding Tuolumne River Salmonids & Macroinvertebrates.
Chinook Salmon, the Fish Screen, and a Vanishing River. Paddy Murphy Idaho Department of Fish and Game Anadromous Screen Program Salmon, Idaho.
2005 Preliminary Summer Spill Data Fall Chinook Radiotelemetry Studies Performed by USGS – BRD, NOAA – NWFSC For the USACE Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
CRITFC Video Smolt Project Developed in response to Fish Passage Center interest to see if video could be substituted for at least some of the handling.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
2005 Subyearling Migration Fish Passage Center. Overview – summer migration Court ordered summer spill occurred from June 20 to August 31, 2005 Question.
Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume G. A. McMichael 1, R. L. McComas 2, J. A. Carter 1, G.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-Columbia River Projects and Large Spill Events Ken Duncan Portland District PM Environmental Compliance.
NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance by the Army Corps, SCWA, and.
Hydraulic and Biological Evaluations. Hydraulic Evaluations  Measuring flow distribution for fixed vertical or rotating drums (with adjustments available).
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
COLUMBIA BASIN KELTS: ABUNDANCE, DOWNSTREAM PASSAGE, AND REPEAT SPAWNING.
Chelan County Lead Entity Presentation SRFB 2005 Salmon Habitat Grant Cycle.
Wanapum Dam Total Dissolved Gas Characterization Evaluation of the Wanapum Dam Fish Bypass (WFB) 2008.
Changes in Production of one and two year old Steelhead Trout Smolts during Drought Conditions in a Northern California Stream Michael D. Sparkman (CDFW)
Fish Loss at Unit 1 McNary July 2016 July On July 25, the tailwater logs were installed at unit 1 for unit dewatering and 9 year overhaul. No salmon.
2016 Smolt Monitoring Program Juvenile Passage Data and
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Evaluation of Adult Salmonid Downstream Passage Through the Sluiceway and Turbines at The Dalles Dam During Late Fall, Winter, and Early Spring STUDY.
Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.
Lower Granite and Little Goose
2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley
Roza Dam Evaluation Post Modifications
2016 Snake River Adult Sockeye Passage and Smolt Condition
Adult PIT-tag Interrogation System Wells Hydroelectric Project (System Design, Installation and Evaluation)     Shane Bickford* Public Utility District.
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
Fenton Khan, Gary Johnson, and Mark Weiland
Behavior and Survival for Juvenile Salmonids Passing Ice Harbor Dam during reduced and BiOp spill treatments, Gordon Axel, Eric Hockersmith, and.
”Identification of water bodies as potentially heavily modified”
Presentation transcript:

LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix NOAA Biological Goals: 1) Allow fish the opportunity to exit the ladder without stalling or excessive up/down movement. 2) Give fish a cool transition to the deeper forebay water so they don’t continue to fallback at high rates. Discussion: Do not know/have confidence that fallback increases with higher water temperature or certain operational flow pattern and route magnitudes: i.e., H0 fish higher shallow water = higher fallback (due to greater exposure to surface spill?) versus H1: fish lower deeper water = higher fallback (due to greater exposure to turbine intake flow or deeper spill flow?). Corps Biological Goals: Reduce ladder entrance/exit differential in temperature to <2 deg F for no delay in fish passage from entrance attraction through ladder exit into deeper water of forebay.

LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix ESA Consultation: Covered in 2008 and 2014 FCRPS BiOp but coordination on specific installation details on timing work windows, plus construction effects and component needs/ specifications remain to be closed. 1) Received verbal on fish screens covering end of extended pipes not required due to deep depth (>66’) and limited exposure to entrainment hydraulics for capturing fry or smolts. Need to receive formal confirmation. 2) Scheduled allowable duration and work window dates (currently ending 29 May 2015). Effects::

5/29/2015

LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix Work window: Current schedule says install via divers through 29 May Corps need to know allowable work window end date by 15 September 2014 so BCOE on Final Design can be completed for FY2015 install –or- delayed for FY2016 install. Normal Operations during construction would be FPP operations for juvenile fish passage and adult fish attraction and passage. Dive to install each of auxillary pumps entended pipes and Diffuser 14 “chimney” requires the adult ladder exit to be closed in addition to Diffuser 14 Intake OUT = ladder hydraulic function OUT. Best to schedule completion by the first week of May to avoid adult Chinook passage impact. Full ladder outage required for 3-6 days in May. 30 hr dive for pipe extensions + 35 hr dive for chimney = 65 hrs. If 10 hr dive shifts then single shift days would = 6 days. PREFERRED: If double-shift with 10 hr dive shifts then would = 3 days. Adult Fish passage distribution: A concern for adult Chinook passage (10 yr 51.8% ( %)): if end 1 May then only 2001 dist’n affected. Minor concern for wild steelhead (10 yr 8.4% ( %)). No concern for sockeye because have not started until mid- to late-June.

24 APR – 29 MAY construction could overlap with ~90% run of juvenile yearling Chinook, steelhead, coho, and sockeye passing through summer spill of 20 LGR (16-28% spill for kcfs inflow). Although very high juvenile passage overlap, location of pipe install at LGR ladder should not other than consequential impact juvenile salmonid passage. Juvenile Salmon

Chinook APR-29MAY APR-23APR MAY-31AUG Total Run 1APR-31AUG % 24APR-29MAY

Wild Steelhead APR-29MAY APR-23APR MAY-31AUG Total Run %24APR-29MAY

No Sockeye in May

LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix Effectiveness Monitoring: 1) Repeat thermometer coverage to determine temperatures resulting from remedial actions: critical location temperature trending for differential distribution and sub-lethal maximums or too cold zoning. 2) PIT passage evaluation real-time to determine delay behaviors, fallout, up/down, over- nighting, multiple re-ascension, etc. 3) Hour and daily observe numbers and density of adults holding and exiting patterns (time and timing) through ladder exit to ensure successful exit and movement upriver through immediate forebay zone. Possible methodology: split-beam (or split-beam tracking) hydro-acoustics covering ladder exit numbers and direction to priority spill and priority turbines (determine risk to fallback and dominant route of fallback). A) Hydro-acoustics for sockeye/chinook behavior confounded by shad. Could tag only shad with JSATs or RT to sort? B) RT possible, better behavior tracking/directionality from JSATs sample of sockeye/summer chinook ~50 minimum, 100 better depending on trap location. i) During future LGR PSE following completion new JFF1a and 1b. Likely 2017? ii) If region deems priority importance…then Prior future LGR PSE. Likely 2016? Concern is what other construction being performed simultaneously where other construction consequences/effects could confound ladder temperature results interpretation. Likely most significant is major JFF1a construction