Presenter: Hon. G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice Minnesota Supreme Court 2015 Court Rules Changes on Public Access.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phase I- Filing of Petition Phase II- Hearing/Review Phase III- Handling of Orders.
Advertisements

State Judicial System.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS. 2 Court System  District Court  Trial Court  Some “specialty” courts including  Family Court  Drug Court  Juvenile Court 
Starter What is an appeal? Describe the adversarial nature of the judicial process.
Juvenile Justice system
Notice of Removal Filings U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado for the District of Colorado January 2011.
Jurisdiction after appeal in family law cases Cheryl Howell June 2004 Institute of Government
PA/FOIA INTERFACE OSD/JS Privacy Office (703)
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
1 Appellate Courts Chapter Appellate Courts Appellate courts decide far fewer cases than the trial courts. Appellate courts subject the trial court’s.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Presented by: Michael B. Johnson Senior Legal Counsel State Court Administrator’s Office New Minnesota Court Rules: Overview of the Civil, General, and.
To provide justice through a system that assures equal access for the fair and timely resolution of cases and controversies. MJB Mission Statement Amendments.
1 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT Beverly T. Beal North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges June, 2006.
Chapter 21 Juvenile Justice. Introduction Juvenile Delinquency – actions of a juvenile in violation of the criminal law. Juvenile Delinquency – actions.
New Clerk Academy Tallahassee, Florida. OVERVIEW Role of the Clerk in the Courts: Honorable Bob Inzer, Clerk and Honorable Don Barbee, Clerk Elect.
Basic Housing Court Issues and Procedures An Introduction to Practice in Housing Court in Hennepin County.
Nick Melendez & Johanna Redick.  A typical state court system resembles the federal system.  Legislature makes the laws.  Executive branch enforces.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 4 Slide 1 The Court System Dispute Resolution and the Courts Federal.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 1Slide 1 Large Law Firm structure Senior Partners- ultimate control over the firm Senior Partners- ultimate control over.
Hennepin County School/Shared Social Work Project Social Work Project May 16, 2013 Mark Griffin Senior Assistant County Attorney.
Juvenile Courts Chapter Nineteen.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Amy Beauchaine, Esq.. Rule (b) (3) Original Jurisdiction. District courts of appeal may issue writs of prohibition. What is a writ of prohibition?
Chapter 3. Purpose: Solving legal disputes and upholding legal rights.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Legal Document Preparation Class 14Slide 1 Parties to an Appeal The appellate court is the court to which a case can be appealed to. Examples are circuit.
State Court System By: Ashanti, Glenn, Timmy, Julie.
Home Juvenile vs. Criminal Law Juvenile or Adult? Purpose of Punishment MN Juvenile Justice Juvenile Justice Jeopardy Juvenile Justice Jeopardy
Wisconsin Judicial Conference November 11, 2015
Confidentiality A Training Without the Video. Laws FERPA (1976) or the Buckley Amendment (1994) IDEA (1991) KY Safe Schools (1998)
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION APPEALS.
IN-CAMERA TRIALS PRESENTED BY CLLR. FELICIA V. COLEMAN CHIEF PROSECUTOR/SGBVCU MINISTRY OF JUSTICE.
Seeking Relief Through Appeals Appeals Before The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) Should a petition or application be denied or revoked by the USCIS,
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
School District Records Lindsay Hale David Wheelus Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
Texas Court of Appeals City & County Courts District Court Texas Supreme Court Texas Court of Criminal Appeals U. S. Supreme Court U. S. Circuit Courts.
Chapter Twelve. The Automatic Stay—11 U.S.C 362 After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Describe litigation that occurs in the bankruptcy system.
TRIAL PROCEDURE Dr. KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa) International Criminal Procedure.
U.S. District Court District of Minnesota Immigration Litigation in Federal Court January 30, 2015 Procedural Requirements in U.S. District Court.
Stacy L. Miller Attorney at Law. This session will cover appeals from Juvenile Court to Circuit Court and what is required of the Clerks of each court.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Virginia’s Judicial System.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Dr. Roger Ward.  Trial Courts ◦ Place where case begins ◦ Jury hears cases and decides disputed issues of fact ◦ Single judge presides over case  Criminal.
Judicial Review The Supreme Court’s power to overturn any law that it decides is in conflict with the Constitution.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
GETTING STARTED: Notices of appeal & the initial appellate documents.
Sensitive Data Redaction
Videoconferencing for Juvenile Detention Hearings
Intro to Virginia’s Judicial System
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
Judicial Branch Notes.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
Changes to Oregon Rules of Appellate Procedure
Sixth Circuit Federal Criminal Appeals
Chapter 2.
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
The Federal Court System
JUVENILE RECORDS Leslie Barrett Kinkead Court Improvement Program
Civil Appellate Process and Duties of an Appellate Paralegal in CPS Cases By: Assistant Harris County Attorney Robert J. Hazeltine-Shedd and Sally.
Confidentiality Overview
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Practice Before Florida Supreme Court
Presentation transcript:

Presenter: Hon. G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice Minnesota Supreme Court 2015 Court Rules Changes on Public Access

New Access Rules: Day Forward Only Access to records changes apply to documents filed/issued on or after 7/1/15 What happens to cases pending on July 1, 2015? Once new document filed, court staff will adjust case security, up or down, as applicable Individual documents filed before July 1, 2015, will not be adjusted unless it is to make them less accessible 2

Protecting the Child: No Public Access All records in proceedings for the civil commitment of a minor are inaccessible to the public. MINN. R. PUB. ACC. 4, subd. 1(o)(2)(H); MINN. CIV. COMM. R. 21(e). All CHIPS records in cases in which a child is a party are inaccessible to the public (e.g., truancy, runaway, sexually exploited child, and party by intervention). MINN. R. PUB. ACC. 4, subd. 1(o)(2)(D); MINN. JUV. PROT. P. R. 8.04, subd. 4(c), 21.01, subd. 2, 23. 3

Protecting Minor Victim of Sexual Assault Applies to: criminal or juvenile delinquency or extended jurisdiction juvenile cases involving a petition, complaint, or indictment issued pursuant to MINN. STAT. §§ , , , , , or – Note new statutes underlined Also applies to two other matters (next slide) Minn. R. Pub. Acc. 4, subd. 1(m). 4

Protecting Minor Victim of Sexual Assault Unless otherwise directed by presiding judge: – May use generic identifiers, such as “Child 1” or initials and date of birth, with full disclosure in a separate, non-public document if disclosure needed by the court – transcript of a publicly accessible hearing or trial may include the victim’s full identity (or victim may be referred to by initials and year or birth, or by a generic identifier such as “Child 1) Minn. R. Pub. Acc. 4, subd. 1(m). 5

Other Public Transcript Non-Redactions Unless otherwise directed by presiding judge, public proceeding transcript need not redact: Restricted identifiers (e.g., SSN) Specific data elements protected by laws, court rules or orders, including CHIPS Confidential Information (discussed above) Sealed records Minn. R. Pub. Acc. 4, subd. 4. 6

Protecting Medical Records non-public unless formally admitted into evidence in a testimonial-type hearing or trial, Exception: medical records in civil commitment cases will remain non-public even when admitted into evidence. Can discuss contents in briefs, motions, decisions, etc., but no restricted identifiers, minor victim of sexual conduct identifiers, sealed data, or CHIPS confidential information Minn. R. Pub. Acc. 4, subd. 1(f); 7

Referencing Other Confidential Docs Can discuss contents in public briefs, motions, etc., but no restricted identifiers, minor victim of sexual conduct identifiers, sealed data, or CHIPS confidential information Minn. R. Pub. Acc. 4, subd. 1(f); Previously applied only to medical records in commitment cases Expanded to all records filed on or after July 1,

Court Services Records Social services reports and GAL reports in CHIPS cases remain public documents subject to segregation of confidential Information by the filer Family case GAL and social services reports remain NOT public. Minn. R. Pub Acc. 4, subd. 1(b) 9

Remote Access Technology is still being developed For most public cases, documents will eventually be remotely accessible Will apply to documents filed on or after 7/1/15 10

Remote Access Type of Remote Access Case Type (document security changes needed) No Remote Access D-16, i CHIPS (change C2 to P2, so that will be available at MPA Courthouse) ii ROA (register of actions, calendars, index, and judgment docket) only civil commitment (change P1 to P2, so documents are only available at MPA Courthouse; make civil commitments of minors a confidential case type) 11

Remote Access Type of Remote Access Case Type (document security changes needed) ROA and court-generated documents family, post-adjudication paternity (for post-adjudication paternity, change from C to P2 and P1) ROA, court-generated documents, and party-generated documents civil, criminal (the name searching limitation on pending criminal cases remains; change P2 to P1) NOTE: If the public calls the court for pending criminal case file numbers, staff need not provide them. Direct the caller to any courthouse to access the public name index statewide with no name search limitation. 12

Remote Access to Exhibits Remote access to exhibits received into evidence is prohibited Does not prohibit remote access to full or partial versions of such records that were otherwise submitted to the court as a publicly accessible record Minn. R. Pub. Acc. 8, subd. 5(c) 13

Procedural Enforcement: Restricted Identifiers Filers still must remove Restricted Identifiers (e.g. SSN) from a publicly accessible document, and if needed by the court, submit the identifier on a separate Confidential form 11.1 If not, and court staff becomes aware of it, document must be placed on non-public status and filer sent a discrepancy notice. Minn. Gen. R. Prac

Procedural Enforcement: Restricted Identifiers Filer has 21 days from discrepancy notice to file a properly segregated document or Motion for relief. If filer wants segregated version to relate back to the original document filing date, s/he must file a motion to relate back. If no properly segregated version filed within 21 days or Motion for relief, document stays confidential and court staff place notation in MNCIS that the document is stricken. Minn. Gen. R. Prac

Procedural Enforcement: Restricted Identifiers STRICKEN? Court staff: – merely enters in ROA that the document is “Stricken” – Does not delete or remove document Judge decides the impact on the case/issues Document remains confidential Minn. Gen. R. Prac

17