Rapid and Precise Orbit Determination for the GOCE Satellite P. Visser, J. van den IJssel, T. van Helleputte, H. Bock, A. Jäggi, U. Meyer, G. Beutler,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

KARTDATA TIL NYTTE FOR SAMFUNNET POSITIONING DATA – FOR SOCIETY’S BENEFIT DETERMINATION OF THE GRAVITY FIELD OVER NORWEGIAN TERRITORIES.

Advertisements

Page 1 ENVISAT Calibration Review, ESTEC 9-13 Sept 2002, DORIS & ORBIT, Berthyl Duesmann.

Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.

POD/Geoid splinter March 14, 2007 J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March 2007.

Long wavelength gravity field determination from GOCE using the acceleration approach M. Weigelt 1, O. Baur 2, T. Reubelt 1, N. Sneeuw 1, M. Roth 1 (1)

Solar Disturbance of GPS Satellite Orbits Merita Halili Orhan Veliu 06 june 2008.

Assessment of SLR observation performance using LAGEOS data Gang ZHAO, You ZHAO, Mingguo Sun, Huanhuan YU Changchun Observatory, NAOC, CAS, China 16 th.

TOR TanDEM-X 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, October 2008 ILRS Support for TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X - Status and Future Prospects.

Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.

13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.

University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 37: SNC Example and Solution Characterization.

Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.

Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room

ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München

Status of Multi-GNSS Monitoring Network Establishment Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Satoshi Kogure APEC GIT/15 June 14, 2011.

T SPP1788 “DynamicEarth“ Workshop, GFZ Potsdam, 3 July 2014 No. 1 Calibration/Validation of Swarm Data Products: German activities Hermann Lühr and Cal/Val.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)

NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.

ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC New Developments and Innovations T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, M. Otten, I. Romero,

October 8, session 2REFAG2010 Paris1 Distributed processing systems for large geodetic solutions IAG WG “Comparison and combination of precise.

Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.

Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,

Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.

Hydrological mass changes inferred from high-low satellite- to-satellite tracking data Tonie van Dam, Matthias Weigelt Mohammad J. Tourian Nico Sneeuw.

ESA living planet symposium 2010 ESA living planet symposium 28 June – 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway GOCE data analysis: realization of the invariants approach.

IGS Workshop, June 02, Validation of GNSS Satellite Orbits C. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler 1, S. Schaer, T. Springer.

GOCE Workshop at ESA LP Symposium, Bergen, 29./30.June, 2010 Precise Science Orbits for the GOCE Satellite – Aiming at the cm-level H. Bock 1, A. Jäggi.

1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.

Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.

ESOC Navigation Support Office EGU Vienna, , 1/18 Ground support network for the Metop GRAS atmospheric sounding mission R.Zandbergen, A.Ballereau,

01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.

Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,

AGU Fall MeetingDec 11-15, 2006San Francisco, CA Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC mission Bill Schreiner,

GRACE Science Team Meeting October 15-17, 2007 Potsdam Germany Alternative Gravity Field Representations: Solutions, Characteristics, and Issues Michael.

EUM/OPS/VWG/11 Issue /06/2011 Yoke Yoon Yago Andres Christian Marquardt COSMIC GPS Data Processing Slide: 1.

Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.

View on GPS and Galileo ‘From across the Atlantic…’ Ruth E. Neilan International GNSS Service (IGS) Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California.

C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;

Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.

1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.

Bouman et al, GOCE Gravity Gradients, ESA Living Planet Symposium 2010 GOCE Gravity Gradients in Instrument and Terrestrial Frames J. Bouman, Th. Gruber,

Implications of Errors in Density Response Time Delay on Satellite Prediction Error Rodney L. Anderson and Christian P. Guignet October 28, 2010, NADIR.

ESA Living Planet - Begen – June B. Christophe, J-P. Marque, B. Foulon ESA LIVING PLANET SYMPOSIUM June 28 th -July 2 nd 2010 Bergen (Norway)

Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.

Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Calibration of Radar Based Re-entry Predictions S. Lemmens (1), B. Bastida Virgili (1), T. Flohrer (1), H.

ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami IGS Real Time Pilot Project: Analysis Centre Activities Loukis Agrotis 4 June 2008.

Formosat-3/COSMIC WorkshopNov 28 - Dec 1, 2006Taipei, Taiwan Estimates of the precision of LEO orbit determination and GPS radio occultations from the.

Bouman et al, GOCE Calibration, ESA Living Planet Symposium 2010, Bergen, Norway Overview of GOCE Gradiometer Cal/Val Activities J. Bouman, P. Brieden,

Investigations on (radial) offsets between different Swarm orbit solutions 8 September th Swarm Data Quality Workshop, IPGP, Paris Heike Peter (PosiTim),

Astronomisches Institut der Universität Bern Global Navigation Satellite Systems for Positioning and Time Transfer T. Schildknecht, A. Jäggi R. Dach, G.

AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.

Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Christian Siemes Swarm Data Quality Workshop , Potsdam, Germany Swarm ACC and GPSR summary.

GOCE payload status, data quality and availability Rune Floberghagen, Michael Fehringer, Daniel Lamarre, Danilo Muzi and the GOCE Team European Space Agency.

ACC/GPSR Splinter Summary

GOCE L1b processing Frommknecht, Bjoern 1; Stummer, Claudia 2; Gilles, Pascal 1; Floberghagen, Rune 1; Cesare, Stefano 3; Catastini, Giuseppe 3; Meloni,

ACC and GPS summary Christian Siemes, QWG and Cal/Val team Copenhagen, Denmark 18/06/2014.

Introduction to geodesy & accelerometry with Swarm

Adrian Jäggi 24th IUGG General Assembly, July, Perugia

Presentation of Public ESA Multi-GNSS Products

D. Rieser *, R. Pail, A. I. Sharov

ESOC IGS Reprocessing T. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann,

Session 6 Aeronomy/ Novel applications

Agenda Background and Motivation

CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits

Presentation transcript:

Rapid and Precise Orbit Determination for the GOCE Satellite P. Visser, J. van den IJssel, T. van Helleputte, H. Bock, A. Jäggi, U. Meyer, G. Beutler, M. Heinze, U. Hugentobler ESA Living Planet Symposium Bergen, Norway 28 June – 2 July 2010

Outline - Introduction - Instruments - Tracking performance - Orbit determination products - Quality

GOCE-HPF: Orbit groups Responsibilities: DEOS => RSO (Rapid Science Orbit) AIUB => PSO (Precise Science Orbit) IAPG => Validation

GOCE Orbit Determination - Support to operations (RSO): -Format checks (RINEX) -Check of quality of GPS observations -Check of gradiometer (common-mode) -Geo-location of gravity gradients -Pseudo observations for quick-look gravity field determination - Support to gravity field determination (PSO): -Final geo-location of gravity gradients -Pseudo observations for final gravity field determination - Spin-off (PSO): -Orbit prediction for ILRS

Instruments for POD: GPS and SLR NB: star trackers required for center-of-mass offset computation

GOCE GPS data: used for POD GPS receiver with 12 channels 1 Hz data hardly any data gaps

GOCE GPS Lagrange and MetOp GRAS Receiver performance ReceiverRMS phase (mm) Lagrange5.6/7.7 (Antex/No) GRAS7.5 (no Antex) NB: 30-sec GPS clocks

GPS BlackJack Receiver performance (CHAMP and GRACE) GPS BlackJack Receiver performance (CHAMP and GRACE) ReceiverRMS phase (mm) CHAMPno kin. GRACE-A5.0 (Antex) NB: 30-sec GPS clocks

Currently the % of zero L2 observations during the middle of a pass is small again NB: more than sufficient high-quality observations remaining! GOCE GPS data: zero L2 observations

Zero L2 observations during middle of a pass mostly occur at geomagnetic poles as well as on both sides of the geomagnetic equator GOCE GPS data : zero L2 observations Cont’d

GOCE SLR data: used for validation 5.4 passes and 95 normal points/day (31 March 2009 – 13 June 2010)

GOCE SLR data

Start HPF orbit predictions

Orbit solution Software GPS Observ. GPS products Sampling Data batches Latency RSO reduced- dynamic GEODYNtriple-diff IGS rapid 10 sec24 h1 day kinematicGHOSTzero-diff CODE rapid 1 sec24 h1 day PSO reduced- dynamic BERNESEzero-diff CODE final 10 sec30 h 7-10 days kinematicBERNESEzero-diff CODE final 1 sec30 h 7-10 days GOCE orbit generation Precision requirement: 50 cm Precision requirement: 2 cm Precision requirement: 2 cm

GOCE orbit products Rapid Science Orbit product (1-day latency): Reduced-dynamic orbit solution: SP3 file (position Hz) & Observation residuals Kinematic orbit solution: SP3 file 1 Hz) & Observation residuals Rotation matrices (J2000 ECF) Quality Report Precise Science Orbit product (1-2/4 weeks latency for interim/final): Reduced-dynamic orbit solution: SP3 file (position Hz) Observation residuals (interim only) Kinematic orbit solution: SP3 file 1 Hz) & variance/covariance matrix Observation residuals (interim only) Rotation matrices (J2000 ECF) Quality Report

RSO latency

Overview RSO performance Currently consistency between RSO and PSO is nominally below 1 dm

Spin-off RSO: common-mode vs. accelerations from reduced-dynamic POD (DFC off) Along-trackCross-track

Spin-off RSO: common-mode vs. accelerations from reduced-dynamic POD (DFC on) Along-trackCross-track

PSO: Comparison reduced-dynamic  kinematic orbits Consistency between reduced-dynamic and kinematic PSO is at 2 cm

Validation with SLR Orbit solutionMean [cm]RMS [cm] RSO reduced-dynamic kinematic PSO reduced-dynamic kinematic

Summary Lagrange GPS receiver is state-of-the-art space-borne dual-frequency receiver Decent amount of SLR tracking supported by HPF orbit predictions Latency and precision requirements are fulfilled: Low latency orbits (RSO): < 10 1-day delay Post-processed orbits (PSO): weeks delay

More details 1.Precise Science Orbits for the GOCE Satellite: Aiming at cm- Level Precision, Bock et al., Session GOCE: Level 2 data processing and products II, Tuesday, 29 June Room 3 2.GOCE Rapid Science Orbits: Achieving Sub-Dm Orbit Precision with Minimal Latency, van den IJssel et al., Poster Session – GOCE, Wednesday, 30 June 2010, 17:40-19:00