Presented By Bharat Gautam PhD Student

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Developments in Ukraine Mr. Tymofiy Motrenko, PhD, Head of the Main Department of the Civil Service of Ukraine September 7, 2010 guds.gov.ua.
Advertisements

Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
New Direction of the Reform of the Statistical System in Japan Masahiro HORIE Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies Former Vice Minister,
AfriMAP’s The Justice Sector and the Rule of Law in Namibia
Cohesion Policy focus on performance experiences of the Hungarian Presidency Dr. Györgyi Nyikos Deputy State Secretary for Development Affairs Ministry.
Organization and Structure of Government in Pakistan Lecture no. 14.
Information & Communication Technology for Development in Arab Region e-government in the Arab Region Najat Rochdi Regional Coordinator
RECAP OF DAY ONE PSC Conference: November 2014
Humberto F. Martins Public Management Secretary Presidency of the Republic of Brazil Seminar I Strengthening Country Capacity to Manage for Development.
1 A PAPER ON: The Privatisation Policy Transfer: A Nepalese Experience By Laxmi Kant Paudel Public Administration Campus Tribhuban University Nepal.
UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY: Thailand Country Report Charas Suwanwela 2008 ASAIHL Conference on University Autonomy: Interpretation and Variations Universiti Sains.
Lao PDR PAR & Decentralisation in LAO PDR: Problems and Prospects ( Presentation Bratislava Conference, 20 th April 2004) Presentation by: Bikash Ranjan.
1 Measuring the Agriculture indicators in South Africa Presentation to the 20 th Session AFCAS conference delegates on the State of the Food and Agriculture.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
1 The New Public Management and Beyond: Towards a Whole-of- Government or a Neo-Weberian Model? Professor Per Lægreid Department of Administration and.
Evaluation of OCHA’s Role in Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination Findings and Recommendations Seminar on Evaluation of UN Support for Conflict Affected.
UK Government experience in Performance Framework Reform
Eshboev B.A. Head of the Department for Monitoring of implementation of national development programmes of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.
Public Administration Jay Shaftitz & E. W. Russell
From Effective Aid to Effective Institutions Synthesis of Joint International Evaluations Julia Betts and Helen Wedgwood Paris 5 th October 2011.
1 UNDECLARED WORK IN CROATIA Executive Capacity of Governance and Underground Economy: The Case of Croatia Zagrebl, September 1, 2015.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Decentralisation and reorganisation of the Croatian Employment Service (CES) EuropeAid/119443/C/SV/HR EU CARDS 2003.
Defining a good governance assessment framework Decentralisation and local governance Shipra Narang Suri International Consultant, OGC Stakeholders’ Consultative.
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN CROATIA Presentation for the Conference “Reforms and modernization of administration in Western Balkan countries and their.
Utrecht University Governing pathways to work in Europe Rik van Berkel, Utrecht School of Governance ESPAnet/RECWOWE Summerschool ‘New Risks and New Governance.
THE PRIORITIES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE MIDDLE EAST THE PRIORITIES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE MIDDLE EAST 1. Decentralization.
C H A P T E R 2 Stakeholder Relationships, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance.
GOVERNANCE IN NEPAL: CONTEXT, ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Trilochan Pokharel,
Reforming civil service in the Baltic States: the Case of Lithuania Jurgita Siugzdiniene, PhD Department of Public Administration, Kaunas University of.
GOVERNANCE AND SERVICE DELIVERY Trilochan Pokharel,
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU THE COORDINATION OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS Claudia Lung.
EEA grants Conference in Bergen Norway, Bergen, April April 2012 Slovak National Focal Point – the Government Office of the Slovak Republic.
Current Situation and Problems Concerning of Regional and Rural Development of Nuwakot District of Nepal By Narahari Baral Local Development Officer District.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM IN TAJIKISTAN RAVSHAN KARIMOV AGENCY FOR PUBLIC PROCUREMENT UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN.
Constitution Hill Series Wits University Press, P&DM Inside Out Louis A. Picard Graduate School of Public and International Affairs University of Pittsburgh.
LOGO Mamdouh Abdel Aziz Refaiy Dr. Associate Professor, Business Administration Department, Faculty of Commerce, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Evaluating.
© The Centre for Effective Services 2015 Leadership to Implement Change in the Public Sector National Disability Authority Conference 12 th October 2015,
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Issues to be Addressed in Reforming and Improving Civil Registration and Vital.
Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.
Improving Co-ordination in National Statistical System of Nepal.
1 Statistical business registers as a prerequisite for integrated economic statistics. By Olav Ljones Deputy Director General Statistics Norway
Regulation Inside Government: Approach and lessons learned Punita Goodfellow, Better Regulation Executive, Cabinet Office, UK.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION Evaluation of the Batho Pele Principle of Value for Money in the Public Service.
SEL1 Implementing an assessment – the Process Session IV Lusaka, January M. Gonzales de Asis and F. Recanatini, WBI
A KEY CHALLENGE OF REFORMING NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SYSTEMS IN AFRICA THE CASE OF UGANDA’S EXTENSION REFORM PROCESS 1996 – 2011 Patience B. Rwamigisa.
An Analysis of Public Sector Reform in Korea: Institutional Isomorphism and Political Legitimacy Chang Soo Choe School of Public Administration Korea University.
REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE CURRENT CHALLENGES IN BUDGET REFORM SOFIAMR. LYUBOMIR DATZOV 03 DECEMBER 2004DEPUTY MINISTER
GAC Measures in Sector Operations – Experience in South Asia Region Presentation By Tahseen Sayed, Operations Adviser, Bangladesh.
Issues and Approaches of New Public Management, NPM and
PROJECT NO. 30 ON SIMPLIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES: A SUCCESSFUL STORY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN VIETNAM Tran Van Ngoi, Director General,
Osama A Samarkandi, PhD, RN BSc, GMD, BSN, MSN, NIAC
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
PAD 500 knowledge is divine-- snaptutorial.com. PAD 500 Week 2 Discussion For more classes visit How does the implementation of this.
Osama A Samarkandi, PhD, RN
Governance: Practices, Issues and Challenges
Governance and Service delivery
Governance: principles, context and agencies
E-Governance Initiatives and Its Challenges in Nepal
Governance: principles, context and agencies
Presentation on National Evaluation Policy and Political Participation for Policy Intervention in Nepal: July, 2013.
Malta Marisa Scerri Associate Consultant
The Relationship Between Politics and Bureaucracy
Constitution Hill Series Wits University Press, P&DM Inside Out
Trilochan Pokharel, NASC
Zsuzsa Sötét Monitoring and Evaluation Departement
Governance: principles, context and agencies
Governance: principles, context and agencies
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
PhD student, International Black Sea University
Presentation transcript:

Factors Affecting Application of New Public Management Oriented Reforms in Nepal Presented By Bharat Gautam PhD Student Central Department of Public Administration Tribhuvan University, Nepal At the International Conference On Challenges of Governance in South Asia In the Sub-Theme Application of New Public Management Kathmandu, Nepal December 15-16, 2008 Jointly Organized by Central Department of Public Administration, Tribhuvan University, Nepal And Department of Administration and Organization Theory University of Bergen, Norway

METHODOLOGY Main Purpose: To asses factors affecting application of NPM oriented reforms in the Nepalese context, Focus: Reforms initiatives after 1990 Dependent Varaible- Application of NPM oreinted Reforms Independent Varaible- Factors afffecting application of NPM (political, bureaucratic, policy process, institutional, and economic) Mixed Method- Quantitative and Qualitative Data, Data Collection Primary- Questionaire Survey- November, 2008 Ministry of General Adminostration, MOGA Section officer, Under Secretary, Joint Secretary, Secretary Central Department of Public Administration, CDPA Visiting Faculty, Lecturer, Associate Professor, Professor Secondary- Reform Reports, Policy Documents, Civil Service Acts and Rules

REFORM INITIATIVES IN NEPAL Before 1990 1952- M. N Buch Committee 1956- Administrative Reorganization Planning Commission 1968- Administrative Reform Commission 1975- Administrative Reform Commission After 1990 1991- Administrative Reform Comission, ARC 2001- Governance Reform Program, GRP 2006- Vision Paper for Civil Service, VPCS 2008- Commission on Administrative Reforms and Restructuring, CARR

MAJOR NPM RELATED REFORMS AND IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Reviewing the role of government- Not effectively implemented Privatization of Public Enterprises- Partly implemented, 30vs63 Rightsizing public organizations and number of employees- Poorly implemented. Procedural simplifications and reducing layers of decision making and paper works- Poorly implemented Managerial decentralization- Not implemented Improving performance of the Ministries to deliver better services to citizens based on NPM work culture- Not implemented Performance contract- Not implemented Application of Citizens’ Charter- Structure is implemented, spirit is not followed This implementation status indicates that application of NPM related reforms is not effective.

DISCUSSION ON QUESTIONAIRE Factors Affecting Application of NPM in Nepal Questionaire Survey Conducted in November, 2008 First questions was Which factors do you think are the major for ineffectiveness of NPM oriented reforms in Nepal ? Please ranks in order 1, 2, 3, 4, 5…(1 is high value) A. Political Factor B. Economic Factor B. Bureaucratic Factor D. Institutional Factor E. Policy Factor F. If any other, please specify…

RANK ORDER MADE BY RESPONDENTS SPSS software program is used and mean value is explored to interpret the data 1 is high value and 5 is least value in 1-5 rank order Factors Working Organization Total Mean Value Civil Service Ministry of General Administration MOGA University Central Department of Public Administration CDPA Political 1.40 1.50 1.45 Bureaucratic 2.44 3.10 2.79 Policy 3.11 3.22 3.17 Institutional 3.78 3.44 Economic 4.22 3.56 3.89 If any other... Bhavioural- rigid mindset (specified by two repondents from MOGA)

FINDINGS 1. Political Factor may be the most important factor for making application of NPM related reforms effective. Political instability may hinder the application process of NPM oriented reforms, but it is not major factor if politico-administrative leaderships (Prime Minster and Ministers) are committed to lead the reform programs. 2. Bureaucratic Factor may be the second important factor for the application of NPM oriented reforms. Supports from bureaucratic actors, relationship between senior and junior level employees, and relationship between administrators and general public is important to implement NPM based work culture and NPM orient service delivery. 3. Policy Process may be the third important factor for making NPM related reforms effective. There may be a causal relationship between policy transfer process of NPM and its effectiveness. If there is voluntary process of policy learning from NPM approaches of reforms, it may be effectively implemented. If policy process of reforms is hurriedly made with out taking sufficient time to analyze implication of certain reform policy this may not effective.

FINDINGS CONT. 4. Institutional Factor- (Performance of Reform leading and Monitoring) may be the forth important factor for making NPM oriented reforms effective and successful. Causal relationship between reform leading/monitoring institutions and effectiveness of reform programs. Success story of reform programs may largely depends on performance of reform leading/monitoring institutions. If reform leading institutions are active and work centred they can make difference for making reform process successful. 5. Economic Factor may be least influential in comparison with other factors for introducing NPM oriented changes in public sector. It may not necessary to have strong economic condition of the country to apply NPM approaches for reforming public administration. There is also minimal relationship between application of NPM oriented reforms and donors support. In other words, NPM related reforms may apply effectively without supports from donor agencies.

CONCLUSION A number of reform measures- review of the role of State, rightsizing public sectors, procedural simplification, performance contract, and use of citizen charter related to NPM have been introduced after 1990 for modernizing Nepalese bureaucracy. However, application process of NPM related reforms is not effective. There are many variables related to political, bureaucratic, policy process, institutional, and economic sector that have affected reform trajectory of Nepalese public sector. From our experience, we may conclude, to make reform programs effective, strong political commitment from plitico-administrative leaderships Prime Minister and Ministers may require.

Thank You