Altruism By Mr Daniel Hansson. Learning outcomes Distinguish between altruism and prosocial behavior Contrast two theories explaining altruism in humans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Altruism v. Self-interest. Thomas Hobbes: “Because I was in paine to consider the miserable condition of the old man; and now my almes, giving him some.
Advertisements

Chapter 13: Altruism Social Psychology by Tom Gilovich, Dacher Keltner, and Richard Nisbett.
Animal Interactions Responses to the biotic environment.
Presented by Clinical Psychologist SADAF SAJJAD
Explaining prosocial behavior: Why do people help?
Contrast two theories explaining altruism in humans.
Social Psychology (Pp )
Motives for Helping Altruism: A motive to increase another’s welfare without conscious regard for one’s self interests. Altruism: A motive to increase.
Prosocial Behavior What is Prosocial Behavior? Why do We Help? When do We Help? Who is Most Likely to Help? Whom do We Help?
Lecture Prosocial Behavior. What is Prosocial Behavior? When do We Help? Why do We Help? Who is Most Likely to Help? Whom do We Help?
Ch. 10: Helping Behaviors Part 1: Nov. 8, Helping (or not helping) Examples of people in distress who are ignored What determine why/when people.
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 9- Part II Kin selection.
How Psychologists Ask and Answer Questions
Social Psychology Alive, Breckler/Olson/Wiggins Chapter 12 Chapter Twelve Helpful Social Behavior.
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc Huffman: Psychology in Action (8e) Evolution of cooperation: Why make friends? Why be nice, making friends must have offered.
Sociality and the adaptive value of helpful behavior
Personal Factors: Empathy, Mood, Competence and Altruism. Chapter 10, pp
Altruism Chapter 9 Reading on Reserve. Questions to be Addressed What is Altruism? What motivates people to help others? Are differences in the tendency.
HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS.
Introduction to Social Responsibility Ms. Carmelitano.
Evaluate two theories explaining altruism. Prisoner’s Dilemma Play a game of ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’ d.html.
Prosocial Behaviour: Why Do People Help?. What is Altruism? Rooted in the Latin word alter – meaning other Altruism – means “living for others” Key component.
Influences on Prosocial Behavior 1/28/13. Plan for Today Why do we help? The Kitty Genovese case & it’s importance for social psychology Individual differences.
Chapter Six: Egoism, Self-Interest, and Altruism
Evolutionary and Motivational Factors
Chapter 9 - Prosocial Behavior
Chapter 12 Helping Behavior. Definitions Altruism means helping someone when there is no expectation of a reward (except for feeling that one has done.
PRO-SOCIAL AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR UNIT 2 – AOS 1.
SARA NISHIKAWA, BOBBY CASTILLO AND ARI SATURNE EVOLUTION Kruger, D. J. (2003). Evolution and altruism: Combining psychological mediators with naturally.
THE SOCIAL SIDE OF GIVING TO CHARITIES: THE EFFECT OF ALTRUISTIC AND EGOISTIC MOTIVATIONS ON ANONYMOUS GIVING (WORKING PAPER) Ömer TORLAK & Muhammet Ali.
PSYCHOLOGY: Perspectives & Connections 2 nd Edition GREGORY J. FEIST ERIKA L. ROSENBERG Copyright 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Psychological Altruism Ms. Carmelitano. Bell Ringer For homework you read about Patrick Morgan – He witnessed an elderly woman fall into the gap between.
Chapter 11 Helping and Altruism. Chapter Outline  Motivation to Help Others  Characteristics of the Needy That Foster Helping  Normative Factors in.
Hamilton’s Rule – Kin Selection. KIN SELECTION & ALTRUISM Kin Selection: selection of a trait through helping relatives, either 1.descendant kin (offspring):
Aronson Social Psychology, 5/e Copyright © 2005 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 11 Prosocial Behavior: Why Do People Help?
Altruism 8 June 2004.
Altruism and Aggression Chapter 8. 2 Class Exercise & Discussion  List three occasions when you helped another person.  What were your motives for helping.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Prosocial Behavior: Why Do People Help? Chapter 11 “If you want others to be happy, practice compassion.
Altruism: Lecture #9 topics  Why do we help?  evolutionary & motivational factors  When do we help?  situational factors  Who do we help?  interpersonal.
Prosocial behavior Why do people help?. Does Pure Altruism Exist? Altruism (textbook definition) - The desire to help another person even if it involves.
Altruism and Pro-social Behavior
 Inconsistent support › Expected mood enhancement did not decrease helping for individuals in a high-empathy situation (Batson et al., 1989) › Empathy.
 Daniel Batson  Robert Cialdini  Altruism: motivational state in which the ultimate goal is increasing a victims’ welfare  Egoism: motivational state.
HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS Social responsibility 8.1. Social responsibility Learning outcomesLearning outcomes 1.Evaluate psychological research (through theories.
Lecture Outline Theories of helping: –Socio-biological theory –Kin protection –Perceived similarity –Norms.
Ethics.
Kin selection. actor +- + cooperativealtruistic - selfishspiteful recipient Individual interaction behaviors.
Family and Kinship Isaiah Magpali-Isaac Tatiana Hughes Tanisha Tatum Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules.
Ms. Carmelitano. Define Altruism: When one person helps another for no reward, and even at some cost to themselves Bell Ringer.
Social Psychology II.
1 PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR. 2 What is Prosocial Behavior? Prosocial Behavior is voluntary behavior that is carried out to benefit another person.
Perceptions of Altruistic and Criminal Behavior Rochelle Smits & Jeffrey Goodman University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Perceptions of Altruistic and Criminal.
Chapter 9 Prosocial Behavior: Doing What’s Best for Others © 2014 Wadsworth Cengage Learning Oskar Schindler’s grave. The Hebrew inscription reads: “A.
ALTRUISM What is it?. WHAT IS ALTRUISM? Altruism (also called the ethic of altruism, moralistic altruism, and ethical altruism) is an ethical doctrine.
Altruism and Pro-Social Behavior
Conflicts & Peacemaking Internal Conflicts – Approach & avoidance approach=-approach – Boat or plane to vacation? avoidance-avoidance – Homework or bed.
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY to help or not to help others.
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR Social psychologists are interested in 2 extremes of human behavior: altruism and aggression.
Social Responsibility 8.1
Distinguish between etic and emic concepts.
Kinship and Inclusive Fitness
Altruism and prosocial behavior
Chapter 12 Helping Behavior.
Whom do we help? When do we help? Why do we help?
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY MARQUEZ, QUENIE V. AB PSYCHOLOGY 3
Inclusive Fitness and Its Implications
Theories of Altruism Contrast two theories of altruism.
Reciprocity and Cooperation
Chapter 12: Prosocial Behavior: Helping Others
Social Influence.
Presentation transcript:

Altruism By Mr Daniel Hansson

Learning outcomes Distinguish between altruism and prosocial behavior Contrast two theories explaining altruism in humans

Questions for discussion 1.Try out how egoistic/altruistic you are by taking this test: egTest=692 2.To what extent are people egoistic? 3.What do you think are the reasons for people acting altruistically? 4.In the movie Pay it forward, a boy comes up with an idea that everyone has an obligation to do three good deeds in repayment for every good deed that one receives. Such good deeds should be things that the other person cannot accomplish on their own. This type of helping is expected to spread exponentially through society, creating a social movement. Do you think the idea can work in reality? Why or why not?

Important Definitions Prosocial behavior: Every behavior that benefits others or society. E.g. controlling aggression and other antisocial behaviors, emphasizing Altruism (psychological): Prosocial behaviors without expectation of benefit to oneself. Sharing, helping and cooperation are altruistic behaviors. Altruism (evolution): A behavior that reduces the fitness (chance of survival) of the helper but increases the fitness of the victim

Oscar Schindler. Saved 1,200 people during World War II

Raoul Wallenberg. Saved 100,000 people during World War II

Harald Edelstam. Saved 1,300 Chileans during Pinochet’s military coup in 1973 Harald

Two theories on altruism Kin altruism hypothesis/Inclusive fitness The Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis

Batson’s (1991) Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis There are two main motivators for helping: 1. Egoistic, cost-benefit analysis 2. Feeling empathy for the victim, non egoistic

Supporting research: Toi & Batson (1982) Participants were asked to help a girl named Carol who couldn’t attend lectures. She had lost her legs. She needed help with lecture notes. Participants listened to an audio recording of Carol. Independent variable A: Empathy level Condition 1: Participants were asked to imagine how Carol is feeling (High empathy condition) Condition 2: Participants were asked to be objective and not concerned with how Carol felt (Low empathy condition) Independent variable B: High or low cost conditions Condition 1: High cost. Carol would be in the class. It would be embarrassing to deny her the lecture notes Condition 2: Low cost. Carol would not be in the class. It would not be as embarrassing to deny her the lecture notes.

Independent Variables of Toi & Batson (1982) High empathy independent variables Low empathy Independent variables Empathized; Carol would be in the class Did not empathize; Carol would be in the class Empathized; Carol would not be in the class Did not empathize; Carol would not be in the class

Findings of Toi & Batson (1982) The high empathy group were equally likely to help in either condition The low empathy group was more likely to help Carol in the high cost condition

Classroom activity The class will be divided into two groups One of the groups should now leave the classroom

Scenario 1 Your sister has been unexpectedly admitted to the hospital for a relatively serious surgical procedure. Once she is back at home, she is bedridden for a solid week. She states that she understands that you have stuff to do, but would greatly appreciate if you could do two errands for her as well as some minor grocery shopping. She makes it clear that she has lots of other people helping out, and that she has spread the favors around, so she really only needs you to do these specified errands. Unfortunately, you have an extremely busy week and you cannot see that you have got time to help her. What is the likelihood between 1-5 that you will help her? (1=Very unlikely, 5=Very likely)

Scenario 1 Your distant cousin has been unexpectedly admitted to the hospital for a relatively serious surgical procedure. Once she is back at home, she is bedridden for a solid week. She states that she understands that you have stuff to do, but would greatly appreciate if you could do two errands for her as well as some minor grocery shopping. She makes it clear that she has lots of other people helping out, and that she has spread the favors around, so she really only needs you to do these specified errands. Unfortunately, you have an extremely busy week and you cannot see that you have got time to help her. What is the likelihood between 1-5 that you will help her? (1=Very unlikely, 5=Very likely)

Scenario 2 You are on a canoe trip with your son and his friend in Kanchanaburi. Unfortunately the canoe capsizes in a streamy river. You manage to grab hold of a rock. During a split second you have a chance to save either your son or his friend before they disappear under the water. You can only try to save one. Who will you go after?

Kin selection hypothesis/inclusive fitness Hamilton (1964) Some behaviors have evolved to increase the fitness of an organism’s close relatives We are more likely to help close relatives than distant relatives because we have the same copies of the same allele An individual can sacrifice himself if the total copies of the allele is increased (I would sacrifice myself for 2 brothers or 8 half-cousins)

Supporting research Animal studies: Vampire bats are more likely to share blood with close relatives. (Wilkinson) Squirrels are more likely to warn relatives than non relatives for predators (Sherman) Human studies: In helping scenarios, humans are more likely to help close kin in emergency situations (Burnstein, Crandall and Kitayama, 1997)

Contrasting the theories Explanation: Kin selection biological focus, more reductionist (only focus on one factor). Empathy-Altruism model focus on cognitive and situational factors (thinking – feeling empathy, cost benefit) Focus on two factors (interactionistic) Generalizability: Kin selection theory based on animal research has more supporting research but difficult to generalize to humans (although there is research on humans). However, kin selection theory has been tested across cultures with similar results (e.g Madsen et al. 2007) Empathy-altruism focuses on humans but has less supporting research. Toi and Batson (1982) was conducted on female American psychology students Applicability: Kin selection theory fails to explain altruism when helping non related strangers. Empathy-altruism can explain altruism when helping non-related strangers Egoism-altruism: Kin selection hypothesis - more “egoistic” helping. Empathy-Altruism hypothesis – Helping can be less “selfish” under some circumstances.

Conclusion The hypotheses may complement each other More research may be needed (e.g. to test the generalizability of the Empathy- Altruism-Hypothesis) The theories may contribute to our understanding of helping behavior and can have applications in areas such as economics