UNDERSTANDING PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance Measure Requirements Performance Measure Development Targets – Met/Not Met Strategies to Increase Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Advertisements

1.  Three types: ◦ Financial Loans, Other - Provide AT, Other – Savings NOTE: Totals exceed 56 as some states report multiple State Financing programs.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
1 CDBG Income Survey Requirements For Grant Administrators.
Overview of Statewide AT Program Fiscal and Contract Management.
Evaluating the Alternative Financing Program Geoff Smith Vice President Woodstock Institute March 18, 2008 WOODSTOCK INSTITUTE.
Chapter 1: Introduction Agribusiness Management. Objectives Understand the functions of a farm or ranch manager and their responsibilities. Be familiar.
New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 10/11 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
1.  Decrease data element confusion  Increase data reporting consistency  Eliminate duplicative data (AFP/Telework)  Eliminate data elements not useful.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
The Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as amended & Statewide AT Programs.
1.  Data comes from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008 (FY 2008).  Sources include: State Plans, Annual Progress Reports, UIC data system.  The.
Raising Standards & Improving Outcomes for Independent Living Services 6/14/00.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
Object-Oriented Development Process Part I: Requirement Gathering Warsun Najib Department of Electrical Engineering Gadjah Mada University.
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
Funding Availability and Strategy for different types bank There is substantial variation among bank even in similar. The average small banks uses less.
Systems Change 3 Integrated Jobs Strategy Policy Funding Outcome Data Capacity Development Innovation Leadership Values Collaboration Hall et al (2007)
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
*With some FY2008 Comparisons 1.  FY09 data comes from October 1, 2008 to September 30,  FY08 data comes from October 1, 2007 to September 30,
Chapter 10 Recruiting Children ©2013 Cengage Learning.
Building Student Independence
WHAT IS EMIS? Education Management Information System Established by law in 1989, the Education Management Information System (EMIS) provides the architecture.
N I D R R National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Web-based Data Collection for AT Act Programs: Data from FY01 Annual Reports Presentation.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
2020 Census: Program Overview, Testing, and Technological Innovations
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students.
Transition Shannon Lawler 5/31/2007 EdSp 681. What is it? A coordinated set of activities designed within an outcome- oriented process that promotes movement.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
0 Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities PERFORMANCE MEASURES Craig Stanton Office of Planning, Evaluation,
0 Performance Measures: General Two survey instruments are provided: one for the “access” measure, and one for the “acquisition” measure. Two survey instruments.
The Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as amended & Statewide AT Programs.
Chapter 9 Probability. 2 More Statistical Notation  Chance is expressed as a percentage  Probability is expressed as a decimal  The symbol for probability.
Critical Components to Your Organization. Accurate Documentation – Understanding of definition of service provided. How to use units/hours Understanding.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
NRS and MABLE Changes July 1, new data fields for students Highest Credential Achieved Education Location – U.S. or non U.S. Diploma at Entry?
NRS JEOPARDY! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Quiz Show.
READY FOR FY15 DATA? Diane Cordry Golden July 2014.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
We now have data. What do we do next?. DATA... “Policy and Practice” Dr. Doug Christensen Commissioner, Nebraska Department of Education.
0 Device Reutilization: General Device reutilization includes:  device exchange  program serves as intermediary  program does NOT serve as intermediary.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
State Plan for FY and Program Review of Statewide AT Programs Jeremy Buzzell and Robert Groenendaal.
CHALLENGING DATA ELEMENTS CAN WE FIND SOLUTIONS? Basis for Current Data Element Problems with the Data Element Discussion – Ideas to Revise Concensus/Summary.
Data Reporting FY 2015 Planning for FY 2016 Diane Cordry Golden Vance Dhooge.
New York State’s Report Card Summary.  Evaluated in TWO Methods NYS Benchmarks Quartile Ranked Educational Gain = 46% Post Test Rate = 65% Follow Up.
Module 9 Monitoring and Evaluation Tuesday, Oct 14, 2013 Ngo Thi Loan and John Carter.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Identifying Target Audiences.
The Assistive Technology Act Legislative History and the Basics of the 2004 Law.
The Assistive Technology Act
Data Reporting FY 2015 Planning for FY 2016
Chapter 11 Managing Human Resource Systems
Using Results in FFY 2018 Part B Determinations
Demo Loan Community of Practice: Update
Early Childhood Educators Scholarship jointly administered by: Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.
The Assistive Technology Act
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Tier 2/3 Matching Support to Function of Behavior
ASISTS Program Manager’s Training
Annual Progress Report & State Plan Update
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Data Fidelity Preconference
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
pHase 1 payments Changes from SSA 12/2018 Mary Lynn ReVoir
The Assistive Technology Act
Presentation transcript:

UNDERSTANDING PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance Measure Requirements Performance Measure Development Targets – Met/Not Met Strategies to Increase Performance

PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIREMENTS AT Act Requirements “ measureable goals... related to – education, employment, telecommunications and information technology, community living” and “how the State will quantifiably measure the goals”.

PERFORMANCE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT Development Activities stakeholder group – RSA, CSAVR, Family Center on Technology and Disability, RESNA, State AT Programs (2 Directors) rejected secondary outcomes like - obtained job subsequent to obtaining AT improved grades/graduated by using AT move to independent living by using AT developed concept of “access” and “acquisition” ratio measure (percentage) rather than count count favors larger programs, eventually will max out percentage more equitable for all states

PERFORMANCE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT Access Measure Purpose of device demo and loan? Decision-making covered majority of purposes N = Demo/loan sufficient to allow decision to be made D = All demo/loans reported Acquisition Measure Why is SFA or Reuse program used? N = Only way can obtain (affordability/availability) N = Could use other program but too complex or long wait D = All SFA/Reuse recipients reported.

TARGETS Access Target FY11 set at 70% Education – 47 of 55 met; 31% lowest reported Employment – 46 of 55 met; 27% lowest reported Community Living – 45 of 55 met; 18% lowest reported IT/Telecommunications – 37 of 44 met; 33% lowest Acquisition Target FY11 set at 75% Education – 48 of 55 met; 1% lowest reported Employment – 38 of 48 met; 4% lowest reported Community Living – 43 of 53 met; 32% lowest reported

STRATEGIES TO INCREASE PERFORMANCE Low percentage causes No Decision Made (Access) or None of the Above (Acquisition) Non Responders (Access and Acquisition) Reporting events before complete Strategies Collect Performance Measure data at time of event Identify areas (ed, employ) as part of “intake” for event Allows you to report non-respondents accurately Do not accept data records without performance measure data In-house data system has a validation rule Data record from contractors rejected without performance measure Device Loan – Report when all follow-up complete Systematic follow-up, know when 35% allowance is reached Consequences for borrowers not submitting Other Ideas?