What is the twist of TMDs? Como, June 12, 2013 Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
Advertisements

June 20, Back-to-Back Correlations in p+p, p+A and A+A Reactions 2005 Annual AGS-RHIC User's Meeting June 20, BNL, Upton, NY Ivan Vitev, LANL Ivan.
QCD N06 - Monte Porzio Catone - 15/06/ SIDIS Cross Sections and Spin Asymmetries Predictions for Ongoing and Future Experiments M.Elena Boglione.
1 SSH05, BNL, June 2, 2005 Aram Kotzinian SSA in the target fragmentation region of SIDIS Cahn and Sivers effects Phenomenology & Data in the CFR Intrinsic.
Academia Sinica, Taipei
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
C.D. LuICFP31 Some progress in PQCD approach Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Formalism of Perturbative QCD (PQCD) Direct CP asymmetry Polarization in B 
Some questions on quantum anomalies Roman Pasechnik Moscow State University, Moscow & Bogoliubov Lab of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna 46-th Cracow School.
Polarized structure functions Piet Mulders ‘Lepton scattering and the structure of nucleons and nuclei’ September 16-24, 2004
QCD – from the vacuum to high temperature an analytical approach an analytical approach.
Universality of T-odd effects in single spin azimuthal asymmetries P.J. Mulders Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam BNL December 2003 Universality.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #14.
QCD Phase Diagram from Finite Energy Sum Rules Alejandro Ayala Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM (In collaboration with A. Bashir, C. Domínguez, E.
Xiangdong Ji University of Maryland/SJTU Physics of gluon polarization Jlab, May 9, 2013.
9/19/20151 Semi-inclusive DIS: factorization Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Exclusive limits of DY processes QNP-2012, Ecole Polytechnique, April 19, 2012 Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Quark Helicity Distribution at large-x Collaborators: H. Avakian, S. Brodsky, A. Deur, arXiv: [hep-ph] Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Chiral-even and odd faces of transverse Sum Rule Trieste(+Dubna), November Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
Chiral Symmetry Restoration and Deconfinement in QCD at Finite Temperature M. Loewe Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Montpellier, July 2012.
Eigo Shintani (KEK) (JLQCD Collaboration) KEKPH0712, Dec. 12, 2007.
Unintegrated parton distributions and final states in DIS Anna Stasto Penn State University Work in collaboration with John Collins and Ted Rogers `
Relations between single and double transverse asymmetries Transversity-05, Como, September O. Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
Beta-function as Infrared ``Phenomenon” RG-2008 (Shirkovfest) JINR, Dubna, September Oleg Teryaev JINR.
QCD-2004 Lesson 2 :Perturbative QCD II 1)Preliminaries: Basic quantities in field theory 2)Preliminaries: COLOUR 3) The QCD Lagrangian and Feynman rules.
1 TMDs, offering opportunities at small k T and small x! Piet Mulders Annual Meeting of the GDR PH-QCD (December 15-17, 2014) Ecole Polytechnique,
Precise α s from  Decays(*) M. Davier, S. Descotes-Genon, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang Tau08 Workshop Novosibirsk, Sept (*) arxiv: ;
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
Transversity (and TMD friends) Hard Mesons and Photons Productions, ECT*, October 12, 2010 Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
PQCD mechanisms for single (transverse) spin asymmetry in Drell-Yan production PQCD mechanisms for single (transverse) spin asymmetry in Drell-Yan production.
Nucleon Polarizabilities: Theory and Experiments
Многомасштабный нуклон Многомасштабный нуклон ИТЭФ O.В. Теряев БЛТФ, ОИЯИ.
Drell-Yan pairs from pion scattering on longitudinally polarized nucleons COMPASS DY meeting, Torino, March Oleg Teryaev BLTP, JINR, Dubna.
Quark-gluon correlation inside the B-meson from QCD sum rules based on heavy quark effective theory Tetsuo Nishikawa (Ryotokuji U) Kazuhiro Tanaka (Juntendo.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
International Workshop on Transversity: New Developments in Nucleon Spin Structure June 2004 Color Gauge Invariance in Hard Processes Vrije Universiteit.
TMDPDF: A proper Definition And Its Evolution Ahmad Idilbi University Of Regensburg QCD Evolution 2012 Workshop Jefferson LAB, May 15 M. G. Echevarria,
2/10/20161 What can we learn with Drell-Yan in p(d)-nucleus collisions Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Overview of Jefferson Lab’s Spin Physics Programme Stephen Bültmann - ODU RHIC/AGS Users Meeting, June 2007 Introduction Experimental Setup Asymmetry Measurement.
XXXI Bienal de la RSEF, Granada, España, septiembre Angel Gómez Nicola Universidad Complutense Madrid COEFICIENTES DE TRANSPORTE EN UN GAS.
Single spin asymmetries in pp scattering Piet Mulders Trento July 2-6, 2006 _.
Tensor and Flavor-singlet Axial Charges and Their Scale Dependencies Hanxin He China Institute of Atomic Energy.
The Spin Physics Program at Jefferson Lab Sebastian Kuhn Old Dominion University e e PtPt PePe.
Nucleon spin physics with CLAS at Jlab Fifth International Conference on PERSPECTIVES IN HADRONIC PHYSICS Particle-Nucleus and Nucleus-Nucleus Scattering.
Excited QCD 2014 Bjelasnica Mountain, Sarajevo. Outline Sara Taheri Monfared (IPM) 2.
Analytic properties of DPE amplitudes or Collinear Factorization for Central Production EDS’09, CERN, July Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
First Workshop on Quark-Hadron Duality and the Transition to pQCD, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 6-8 June 2005 MATCHING MESON RESONANCES TO OPE IN.
Aug Hadron Physics in China and opportunities, Lanzhou, China 1 Polarized nucleon structure functions, target mass corrections and the high twist.
Nonlocal Condensate Model for QCD Sum Rules Ron-Chou Hsieh Collaborator: Hsiang-nan Li arxiv:
Moments and Structure Functions at Low Q 2 Rolf Ent, DIS Formalism - F 2 Moments: Old Analysis (R “Guess”…) - E L/T Separation  F 2, F 1,
Structure functions are parton densities P.J. Mulders Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam UIUC March 2003 Universality of T-odd effects in single.
11/19/20161 Transverse Momentum Dependent Factorization Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna
Lecture 2 Evolution and resummation
Physics with polarized antiprotons at GSI-PAX
Semi-inclusive DIS at Small-x
TRANSVERSE POLARIZATION AND QUARK-GLUON DUALITY 1st Workshop on Quark-Gluon Duality, Frascati, June O. Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
Setting the Scale for DIS at Large Bjorken x
GPDs in dilepton production KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, January
Deeply Virtual Neutrino Scattering at Leading Twist
Duality in electron scattering:
Heavy-to-light transitions on the light cone
Towards Understanding the In-medium φ Meson with Finite Momentum
Improved alpha_s from Tau Decays(*)
in the Rein-Sehgal Model
Single spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive DIS
helicity distribution and measurement of N spin
Theoretical developments
Y.Kitadono (Hiroshima ),
Presentation transcript:

What is the twist of TMDs? Como, June 12, 2013 Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna

Outline Definitions of twist TMDs as infinite towers of twists Quarks in vacuum and inside the hadrons: TMDs vs non-local condensates HT resummation and analyticity in DIS HT resummation and scaling variables: DIS vs SIDIS

HT resummation in DIS Higher Twists in spin-dependent DIS: GDH sum rule – finite sum of infinite number of divergent terms Resummation of HT and analyticity Comparing modified scaling variables

What is twist? Power corrections ~1/Q // ~ M 2 DIS – it’s the same (~ M 2 /Q 2 ) TMD – usually ~1/Q 2 - (M 2 /k T 2 ) i attributed to Leading Twist However – tracing the powers of M is helpful for studying HT in coordinate (~impact parameter) space

Collins FF and twist 3 x(T) –space : qq correlator ~ M - twist 3 Cf to momentum space (k T /M ) – M in denominator – “LT” x k T spaces Moment – twist 3 (for Sivers – Boer, Mulders, Pijlman) Higher (2D-> Bessel) moments – infinite tower of twists (for Sivers - Ratcliffe,OT)

Resummation in x-space (DY) Full x/k T – dependence DY weighted cross-section Similarity with non-local quark condensate: quarks in vacuum ~ transverse d.o.f. of quarks in hadrons (Euclidian!) ?! –cf with Radyushkin et al Universal hadron(type-dependent)/vacuum functions?!

Hadronic vs vacuum matrix elements Hadron-> (LC) momentum; dimension-> twist; quark virtuality -> TM; (Euclidian) space separation -> impact parameter D-term ~ Cosmological constant in vacuum; Negative D-> negative CC in space-like/positive in time-like regions: Annihilation~Inflation!

Spin dependent DIS Two invariant tensors Only the one proportional to contributes for transverse (appears in Born approximation of PT) Both contribute for longitudinal Apperance of only for longitudinal case –result of the definition for coefficients to match the helicity formalism

Generalized GDH sum rule Define the integral – scales asymptotically as At real photon limit (elastic contribution subtracted) – - Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn SR Proton- dramatic sign change at low Q 2 !

Finite limit of infinite sum of inverse powers?! How to sum c i (- M 2 /Q 2 ) i ?! May be compared to standard twist 2 factorization Light cone: Lorentz invariance Summed by representing

Summation and analyticity? Justification (in addition to nice parton picture) - analyticity! Correct analytic properties of virtual Compton amlitude Defines the region of x Require: Analyticity of first moment in Q 2 Strictly speaking – another integration variable (Robaschik et al, Solovtsov et al)

Summation and analyticity! Parton model with |x| < 1 – transforms poles to cuts! – justifies the representation in terms of moments For HT series c i = - moments of HT “density”- geometric series rather than exponent: Σ c i (- M 2 /Q 2 ) = Like in parton model: pole -> cut Analytic properties  proper integration region (positive x, two-pion threshold) Finite value for Q 2 =0: - - inverse moment!

Summation and analyticity “Chiral” expansion: - (- Q 2 /M 2 ) i “Duality” of chiral and HT expansions: analyticity allows for EITHER positive OR negative powers (no complete series!) Analyticity – (typically)alternating series Analyticity of HT  analyticity of pQCD series – (F)APT Finite linit -> series starts from 1/Q 2 unless the density oscillates Annihilation – (unitarity - no oscillations) justification of “short strings”?

Short strings Confinement term in the heavy quarks potential – dimension 2 (GI OPE – 4!) scale ~ tachyonic gluon mass Effective modification of gluon propagator

Decomposition of (J. Soffer, OT ‘92) Supported by the fact that Linear in, quadratic term from Natural candidate for NP, like QCD SR analysis – hope to get low energy theorem via WI (C.f. pion F.F. – Radyushkin) - smooth model For -strong Q – dependence due to Burkhardt-Cottingham SR

Models for :proton Simplest - linear extrapolation – PREDICTION (10 years prior to the data) of low (0.2 GeV) crossing point Accurate JLAB data – require model account for PQCD/HT correction – matching of chiral and HT expansion HT – values predicted from QCD SR (Balitsky, Braun, Kolesnichenko) Rather close to the data For Proton

The model for transition to small Q (Soffer, OT ’04)

Models for :neutron and deuteron Access to the neutron – via the (p-n) difference – linear in -> Deuteron – refining the model eliminates the structures for neutron and deuteron

Duality for GDH – resonance approach Textbook (Ioffe, Lipatov. Khoze) explanation of proton GGDH structure – contribution of dominant magnetic transition form factor Is it compatible with explanation?! Yes!– magnetic transition contributes entirely to and as a result to

Bjorken Sum Rule – most clean test Strongly differs from smooth interpolation for g 1 (Ioffe,Lipatov,Khoze) Scaling down to 1 GeV

New option: Analytic Perturbation Theory Shirkov, Solovtsov: Effective coupling – analytic in Q 2 Generic processes: FAPT (BMS) Does not include full NPQCD dynamics (appears at ~ 1GeV where coupling is still small) –> Higher Twist Depend on (A)PT Low Q – very accurate data from JLAB

Bjorken Sum Rule-APT Accurate data + IR stable coupling -> low Q region

PT/HT duality

Matching in PT and APT Duality of Q and 1/Q expansions

4-loop corrections included V.L. Khandramai, R.S. Pasechnik, D.V. Shirkov, O.P. Solovtsova, O.V. Teryaev. Jun pp. e-Print: arXiv: [hep-ph] V.L. KhandramaiR.S. PasechnikD.V. ShirkovO.P. SolovtsovaO.V. Teryaev HT decrease with PT order and becomes compatible to zero (V.I. Zakharov’s duality) Analog for TMD – intrinsic/extrinsic TM duality!?

Asymptotic series and HT Duality: HT can be eliminated at all (?!) May reappear for asymptotic series - the contribution which cannot be described by series due to its asymptotic nature.

Another version of IR stable coupling – “gluon mass” – Cornwall,.. Simonov,.. Shirkov(NLO) arXiv: v2 [hep-th] 23 Nov 2012 HT – in the “VDM” form M 2 /(M 2 + Q 2 ) Corresponds to f(x) ~ Possible in principle to go to arbitrarily small Q BUT NO matching with GDH achieved Too large average slope – signal for transverse polarization (cf Ioffe e.a. interpolation)!

Account for transverse polarization -> descripyion in the whole Q region (Khandramai, OT, in progress) 1-st order – LO coupling with (P) gluon mass + (NP) “VDM” GDH – relation between P and NP masses

NP vs P masses Non-monotonic! “Phase diagram”

P/NP masses

Data at LO

NLO

Data vs NLO

Modification of spectral function for HT Add const × Q 2 /(M 2 2+Q 2 ) 2 -> First of second derivative of delta-function appear – double and triple poles (single – almost cancelled) Masses: P= 0.68 NP=0.76 Expansion at low Q 2 Real scale – pion mass?!

HT – modifications of scaling variables (L-T relations) Various options since Nachtmann ~ Gluon mass -//- new (spectrality respecting) modification JLD representation

Resummed twists: Q->0 (D. Kotlorz, OT)

Modified scaling variable for TMD First appeared in P. Zavada model X Z = Suggestion – also (partial) HT resummation(M goes from denominator to numerator in cordinate/impact parameter space)?!

Conclusions/Discussion TMD – infinite towers of twists Similar to non-local quark condensates – vacuum/hadrons universality?! Infinite sums of twists – important for DIS at Q->0 Representation for HT similar to parton model: preserves analyticity changing the poles to cuts Modified scaling variables – models for twists towers at DIS and (TMD) SIDIS Good description of the data at all Q 2 with the single scale parameter