Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Advertisements

Reference Frames Issues to consider Implementation in GLOBK
IAG Sub-Commission 1.3c Regional Reference Frames for North America 1 Regional Reference Frames for North America Current Status & Future Plans of Regional.
3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Jake Griffiths & Jim Ray NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Acknowledgement: Kevin Choi SUBDAILY ALIAS AND DRACONITIC ERRORS IN THE IGS ORBITS Harmonics of.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
© TU Darmstadt-IPG p 1 The CEGRN 2011 Campaign and the densification of ETRF2000 in Central Europe A. Caporali, M. Barlik, M. Becker, L. Gerhatova, G.
WEGENER Nice 2006 OLG Monitoring of the Eastern Mediterranean and Arabia Velocitiy Estimations of Permanent GPS Stations 1Space Research Institute, Austrian.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Overview of the SNARF Working Group, its activities, and accomplishments Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group (SNARF) Chair: Geoff Blewitt.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Reference Frame Theory and Practice Kristine Larson University of Colorado.
1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.
CORS and SNARF Giovanni Sella NOAA- National Geodetic Survey noaa.gov AGU Fall Meeting SNARF Splinter Session San Francisco, CA December.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,
SOPAC Reanalysis for SNARF and Web-based Analysis Tools Yehuda Bock, Peng Fang, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Paul Jamason, Ruey-Juin Chang, Ian Macleod, George.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
First SNARF Workshop: Conclusions Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
First SNARF Workshop: Introduction Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
An updated Canadian GPS velocity field using NRCan’s Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Software – Plans and preliminary results J. Henton 1, M. Craymer 2,
1 NAREF Analysis & ITRF2004 Densification Mike Craymer, Joe Henton Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 3rd SNARF Workshop Santa Ana Pueblo,
Original objective = quantify intraplate deformation –Pros: Larger number of sites High density of sites in some areas Minimal cost… –Cons: Density varies.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
PBO Frame Definition using SNARF Version 1.0 Tom Herring MIT.
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea, James Davis, and Emma Hill Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
EGS Nice 2003 G17 Deficits of CEGRN Solutions and Time Series G. Stangl.
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008 Combination of the Analysis Centers Reprocessed “SINEX” Solutions Rémi Ferland Geodetic Survey Division.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates
Reference Frame Working Group
SNARF Ver 2.0 Construction
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Reference Frame Working Group Report
Presentation transcript:

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco December 11, 2007 Earth Sciences Sector

SLIDE 2 Outline NAREF velocity solution (Continuous GPS)  Data used  Weekly solutions  Cumulative (velocity) solution  Plate motion estimates CBN velocity solution (Episodic GPS)  Data used  Epoch solutions  Cumulative (velocity) solution Future plans

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 3 NAREF Data Combination of regional continuous GPS solutions Regional SolutionsSolutions Since# Stations Used (GPS Week 1399) GSD (Bernese) GSD (GIPSY) PGC WCDA (Bernese) NGS CORS (PAGES) SIO PBO (GAMIT) MIT PBO Combination

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 4 Stations in Multiple Solutions (Stations with Redundant Checks) GPS Week 1399 – 708 Stations Total Number of Stations Percentage 1 Solution48869% 2 Solutions9413% 3 Solutions9513% 4 Solutions213% 5 Solutions71% 6 Solutions30.4%

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 5 NAREF Combination Network GPS Week stations total 56 IGS constraint stations

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 6 Weekly Combination Procedure Remove constraints Align to IGS wkly soln Scale cov matrix wrt IGS Test for outliers Remove outliers Combine all regional solutions Align to IGS wkly soln Scale cov matrix wrt IGS Test for outliers Apply weighted constraints For each regional solution

RMS of Weekly Regional Solutions vs. Weekly Combinations More US CORS included

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 8 RMS of Weekly NAREF Combinations vs. IGS Weekly Reference Frame

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 9 NAREF Cumulative Combination 1)Removed a priori constraints from weekly NAREF solutions 2)Aligned weekly solutions to IGS05  7 parameter transformation  Used 11 N.A. sites in IGS05  Propagated IGS05 to epoch of week 3)Combined aligned weekly solutions & estimated velocities  Used official IGS/ITRF discontinuity table + NAREF discontinuities 4)Applied velocity equivalence constraint across discontinuities where appropriate 5)Re-aligned cumulative solution to IGS05 (14 parameters) 6)Analysed residual time series for additional discontinuities  Add to discontinuity table and restart from step (3) 7)Optionally included IGS05 solution as a priori constraints

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 10 NAREF Velocity Solution Summary statistics  Time span of weekly solutions (wks )  Number of weekly solutions used305  Number of stations available906  Number of stations used578 (328 omitted*) *Reasons for omitting sites  Short time span (less than 2 yr)~260 sites  Collocated/redundant sites (mainly USCG sites)~50 sites  “Bad” time series (noisy, gaps, multiple offsets)~20 sites

Omitted NAREF Sites 328

Included NAREF Sites 578

NAREF Horizontal Velocities

w.r.t. ITRF2005 plate motion

NAREF Vertical Velocities

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 16 Plate Motion Estimates Based on same 29 sites used by UNR RY (mas/y) RZ (mas/y) ITRF UNR (7 t+r+s) NAR (3 r) NAR (6 t+r) NAR (3 t+r+s)

NAREF Horizontal Velocities w.r.t. NAR (3 r)

NAREF Horizontal Velocities w.r.t. NAR (6 t+r)

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 19 Canadian Base Network (CBN)

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 20 CBN Data & Episodic Solutions CBN (Canadian Base Network) episodic data  Using 27 repeated campaign surveys from 1994 to 2006 –1st campaign (no 1998) –2nd campaign2001/2002 –3rd campaign2005/2006 –Several other smaller campaigns  Each stations occupied multiple times in each campaign –3-5 independent occupations –24 hr observation sessions All epochs processed with Bernese GPS Software v5.0  Same processing strategy as for continuous GPS

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 21 CBN Cumulative Combination 1)Removed a priori constraints from individual CBN solutions 2)Aligned solutions to common sites in IGS05  7 parameter transformation  IGS05 propagated to epoch of each CBN solution 3)Each CBN covariance matrix scaled by WRMS of residual from alignment 4)Combined all aligned/scaled CBN solutions (summation of normals) & estimated velocities  Used official IGS/ITRF discontinuity table for IGS sites  Optionally included translations for each solution 5)Applied velocity equivalence constraint across discontinuities where appropriate 6)Re-aligned cumulative solution to IGS05 (14 parameters) 7)Optionally included IGS05 solution as a priori constraints

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 22 CBN Velocity Solution Summary statistics  Time span of episodic solutions (12 yr)  Number of episodic solutions27  Number of stations (incl. IGS sites)206  Total number of parameters1,170

CBN Horizontal Velocities

CBN Horizontal Velocities w.r.t. ITRF2005 Plate Motion

CBN Vertical Velocities

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 26 Future Solutions Need to reprocess all data again due to… IGS adoption of absolute PCV since week 1400  Solutions since 1400 incompatible with older ones  Need reprocessed older IGS orbits with absolute PCV Including more NAREF stations  Upgrading SINEX software to handle >2000 stations  Will include all sites submitted by contributors  Will include more global stations for better frame realization Additional redundancy in NAREF combination  SIO will process all Canadian & many more CORS stations  Will provide more redundancy for CORS stations No new CBN surveys planned until after 2010  Only eastern part in support of new IGLD

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 27 Acknowledgements NAREF regional solution contributors  NGS – Mike Cline et al.  SIO – Peng Fang & Yehuda Bock  PGC – Herb Dragert  MIT – Tom Herring  GSD GIPSY solution – Caroline Huot & Brian Donahue SINEX combination software  Remi Ferland

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 28 Time Series Offsets KEW1MIMQ Possible offset Periodic behaviourShort time series HBCH Possible offset BFNY Possible offset