Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrew White, PhD Interim Dean and Director Director, Health Sciences Library Stony Brook University ALA 2011 June 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Queen’s Libraries User Surveys Selected information from the Faculty and Student surveys June 2002.
The Pennsylvania State University Service Learning- Engaged Scholarship Task Force Sponsored by Interim Provost Vice President, Student Affairs Vice President,
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring (and Increasing) the Value of Academic Libraries Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Center for Information and Communication Studies Demonstrating The Value of Scholarly Collections Through ROI and Other Methods Carol TenopirKira CooperRegina.
Use of the ACRLMetrics Service 9th Northumbria International Conference University of York, England Joe Matthews August 2011.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Beyond Usage: Measuring Library Outcomes and Value Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Library Statistics: what’s needed and what’s new Lynn Copeland Simon Fraser University Library Thurs. March 15, 2007 Vancouver Ass’n of Law Libraries.
Literature Review Week 3 Lecture 1. School of Information Technologies Faculty of Science, College of Sciences and Technology The University of Sydney.
Academic Research Library Support of Sponsored Research in the United States Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries Qualitative.
Library Faculty Market Equity – Nuts and Bolts - Welcome - Betsy Simpson Chair, Cataloging and Metadata University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
Strategic Review of Libraries Task Force workshop 28 January 2014.
UW-Platteville Convocations Robert Cramer Assistant Chancellor August 2011.
Academic Library Trends in Hong Kong: Global and Local Issues Peter E Sidorko The University of Hong Kong.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © NASFAA 2010 An Institutional Approach to Developing and Updating Cost of Attendance.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Measures that matter: Designing and developing your own Balanced Scorecard Karin de Jager & Jim Self 7th Northumbria International Conference on Performance.
Value of Scholarly Reading to Graduate Work: An Academic Survey of 3 U.S. Universities Rachel Volentine, Liz Whitson; University of Tennessee; College.
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
The Haves and Have Nots: Sophisticated Cross-Institutional Analysis Techniques that Support Budget Justifications Brian W. Keith 2014 Charleston Conference.
Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future ACRL Conference 2005 April 7, 2005 Minneapolis, MN Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics.
Proposal for Enhancement of the CAUL Statistics
Five Years of Keeping Score What are the Results? Jim Self Donna Tolson University of Virginia Library ALA Annual Conference Washington DC June 23, 2007.
Measuring the Value of Academic Libraries
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
John Carroll University Board of Directors Presentation Vice President for Finance and Administrative Services Financial Update December 14, 2004.
Fall 2003 Library Liaison Meeting. Agenda Introductions Role of Liaison Ordering schedule Library News –Valuable services to your department –Budget –Books.
LIBRARY COLLECTIONS AND CONTENT Lois Schultz University Library Advisory Committee October 20, 2008.
The Problem of Measuring E-resources *) Robert Hayes 1, Karin Karlics 2, Christian Schlögl 2 2 University of Graz Institute of Information Science and.
ARL Statistics and Measurement Library Assessment Thessaloniki, Greece June 13-15, 2005 Brinley Franklin, University of Connecticut Martha.
Statistics, Data, and Statistical Thinking
1 CONCERT 2004 Power to the Librarian Delivering Transparency in the Serials Market Doug McMillan Managing Director Bowker UK Ltd.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library 17 th Hellenic Conference of Greek Academic.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study. April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix.
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
Maximizing Library Investments in Digital Collections Through Better Data Gathering and Analysis (MaxData) Carol Tenopir and Donald.
December 1, 2010 Steering Committee Meeting Produced by Re-Imagining Services Task Force.
E-Journal Survey * FIRST DRAFT* A study of the impact of e-journal access on the information-seeking behavior of Notre Dame Faculty and Graduate Students.
Information Services The JCPSG case study BUFDG Full Economic Costing Seminars December 2004 / January 2005.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Shaping the Future of Scholarly Communication Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee (Visiting University.
Le New Measures Initiative de l’American Library Association (ARL) A CREPUQ 1 février 2005 Montreal, Canada Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL.
Avenues of Advocacy: Using Standards to Make a Difference Carla J. Funk Executive Director Medical Library Association.
Founded in 1615 National University “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” ukma.edu.ua of.
RCM BUDGET REVIEW George A. Smathers Libraries Judith C. Russell March 26,
USE PATTERN OF ELECTRONIC JOURNALS BY FACULTY MEMEBRS IN K.L.UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A STUDY Smt. K. Usha Rani Librarian K L University, Vaddeswaram Guntur,
FY14 BUDGET PRESENTATION September 2013 Board of Regents Meeting.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Scholarly Reading in a Digital Age: Some things change, some stay the same Carol Tenopir University of.
Old.libqual.org LibQUAL+ TM : A Total Market Survey Duane Webster ARL Executive Director January 2004 San Diego, CA.
Characteristics and Sources of Information
RCM BUDGET REVIEW George A. Smathers Libraries Brian Keith Cecilia Botero March 21, http://
ACRL Academic Library Trends and Statistics Editorial Board June 27, 2015.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Greater Western Library Alliance 2006 Spring Membership Meeting Arizona State University, Tempe AZ February 27, 2006 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
Reconfiguring Collection Development A Faculty Print Serials Review Audrey Powers, Matt Torrence Cheryl McCoy, Jared Hoppenfeld University of South Florida.
ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Quantifying the value of our libraries. Are our systems ready?
Assessing Library Performance:
‘Accessing Emerald’ Saudi Digital Library
New and Improved IPEDS Financial Aid and Finance Data and Analysis Tools for Student Aid Researchers Craig W. Bowen Postsecondary Institutional Studies.
Angie Maranville Director, Knowledge Access & Resource Management
The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’
LibQUAL+TM : A Total Market Survey
Elizabeth Brown James Galbraith
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Presentation transcript:

Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007

Ratio Analysis A tool used to conduct a quantitative analysis of information. Ratios are calculated from current year numbers and are then compared to previous years, other organizations, the industry, or even the economy to judge the performance of the organization. Ratio analysis is predominately used by proponents of fundamental analysis.

New Ways of Measuring Collections The ARL Task Force on New Ways of Measuring Collections was established in December, 2004 and charged with identifying relevant issues and proposing changes on how ARL should be measuring research library collections. More than 100 ARL directors were interviewed in early Some directors felt ratio analysis would help offset the traditional measures in which “bigger was better.” A recent article shows that the top fifteen liberal arts colleges libraries spend an average of $2,077 per FTE while the 216 liberal arts colleges reporting to NCES average $633 per FTE and the 3,700 academic libraries reporting to NCES average $386 per FTE.* (The 112 ARL libraries range from $2800 to $188 per FTE) Do we currently have meaningful ways to use ratio analysis to effectively describe our expenditures for collections? *D. Yvonne Jones, “How Much Do the “Best” Colleges Spend on Libraries? Using College Rankings to Provide Library Financial Benchmarks” College and Research Libraries (July, 2007)

Generating Ratios Using ARL Statistics

UConn’s current ARL ratios: Library Materials Expenditures$8.2 million # of Faculty1,541=$5,321 Library Materials Expenditures$8.2 million # of Undergraduates21,664=$378 Library Materials Expenditures$8.2 million # of Graduate Students4,130=$1,985 To actually spend this much per capita would require $24.6 million

Another Look at the Facts UConn Main Law Health Center Materials Expenses$8.2 m $5.34m $1.25 m $1.61 m # of Faculty 1,541 1, # of Undergraduates21,664 21, # of Graduate Students 4,130 2,

One of the ACRL Standards’ suggested points of comparison for input measures is: Ratio of material/information resource expenditures Combined total of student and faculty FTE All UConn Libraries = $8.2 million = $300 27,335 UConn Main Library = $5.34 million = $208 25,671 UConn Health Center = $1.61 million = $1, UConn Law Library = $1.25 million = $1,

At the main library, library user surveys have determined that library materials (all formats combined) are actually used as follows: % of use % of $ per capita Undergraduates 40% $2.14m $99 Graduate Students 51% $2.72m $936 Faculty5% $267,000 $243 All Other Users 4% $214,000 $200 Towards Meaningful Ratio Analysis This calculation truly reflects $5.34 million in materials expenses at the main library.

Incorporating User Survey Data At UConn’s main library, user surveys have demonstrated that library materials are actually used as follows, by format: Print Electronic Other Books Journals Resources Materials Undergraduates 34% 36% 28% 39% Graduate Students 52% 53% 35% 53% Faculty 9% 5% 28% 4% Other Users 5% 6% 8% 4%

Print Electronic Other Per Capita Books Journals Resources Materials Expenses Undergraduates $14 $16 $40 $7 $77 Graduate Students $154 $174 $566 $75 $969 Faculty $71 $43 $113 $15 $242 Per Capita Expenses by Format – Main Library

Towards Meaningful Ratio Analysis At the UConn Health Center library, user surveys have determined that library materials (all formats combined) are actually used as follows: % of use $ as a % per capita Graduate Students 49%$789,000$1,627 Faculty 41%$660,000$1,658 All Other Users 10%$161,000 $1,642 This calculation truly reflects $1.61 million in materials expenditures at the Health Center Library

At the UConn Health Center Library, user surveys have determined that library materials are actually used as follows, by format: Print Electronic Other Books Journals Resources Materials Graduate Students 57% 40% 35% 49% Faculty 36% 46% 54% 41% Other Users 7% 14% 11% 10% Incorporating User Survey Data

Per Capita Expenses by Format – Medical Library Print Electronic Other Per Capita Books Journals Resources Materials Expenses Graduate Students $170 $720 $410 $32 $1,332 Faculty $131 $1,009 $771 $32 $1,943

ARL by Total Materials Total Materials Expenses ARL Library ACRL Materials Use by Ratio Ratio Ratio Use Ratio Format Ratio All UConn Libraries Per Undergraduate $378 Per Graduate Student $1,985 Per Faculty Member $5,321 Students and Faculty $300 UConn Main Library Per Undergraduate $246 $99 $77 Per Graduate Student $1,836 $936 $969 Per Faculty Member $4,863 $243 $242 Students and Faculty $208 UConn Medical Library Per Graduate Student $3,320 $1,627 $1,332 Per Faculty Member $4,045 $1,658 $1,943 Students and Faculty $1,823 UConn Law Library Per Graduate Student $1,698 Per Faculty Member $27,778 Students and Faculty $1,600 Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis

If Libraries were to use ratio analysis to measure collections expenditures per capita: The combined cost of each materials expenditures ratio for a library (e.g., undergraduates, faculty, and graduate students) should total that library’s total expenditures for materials. Grouping different types of libraries together into an institutional ratio leads to very different ratios than looking at individual libraries separately. Identifying materials usage by user group by library gives more accurate ratios of materials expenses per capita than the other approached I identified.

This presentation is available at: