Improving Secondary Transition Services Through an Electronic Learning Community: An Online “Connect and Learn” Professional Development Model in Idaho.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hart. Interagency Coordination and Management of Supports College/Career Connection Debra Hart University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Advertisements

Audrey Desjarlais, Signetwork Coordinator Survey Findings SPDG Initiative Goals SPDG Initiative Outcomes.
Using New Technologies and Approaches Pamela Bigart World Bank.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Amy Jenks, Grant Coordinator NH RESPONDS Grant (SPDG) (603) 1 New Hampshire’s Advisory Board for SPDG.
Enhancing Academic Practice Nigeria Role of Newcastle University.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
…Promoting a collaborative partnership among families, schools and communities to create positive educational outcomes for Virginia’s school children.
Recruitment and Partnerships Module 2. Getting Acquainted How many of you have a background in 4‐H? Can any of you tell me just one thing about the system.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation Lisa Hood, LINC Project Director Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University Presentation.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Partnering with States to Improve Transition Services: Online and In-Person Approaches Mary E. Morningstar Patricia M. Noonan Amy Gaumer Erickson Barbara.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
Using Online Training & Resources for Statewide Professional Development Mary E. Morningstar, Ph.D. NSTTAC National Summit May 2-4, 2007
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Best Practices in Action in Special Education Kim Sweet, Advocates for Children of New York On the Same Page Summit September 2011.
+ Distance Learning PD History and Development Model: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Center for Educator Recruitment, Retention, & Advancement From Recruitment to Retention: A Continuum That Works!
The Vision Implementation Project
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
A Distance Learning Approach to Enhancing Technology Use in Rural Schools Jim Barber Wallace Hannum University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Connecting Classrooms Online. What is Connecting Classrooms Online?  Connecting Classrooms Online (CCO) provides a single, over-arching framework for.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | TECH TALKS: TOOLS WORTH KNOWING Professional.
Educational Outreach TPS Consortium Web Meeting January 2010.
Beginning Teacher Support Program (BTSP) Jed Stus; Executive Director of Professional Development & Support What Mentors Need to Know and Do to Start the.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
Building State Capacity: Tools for Analyzing Transition- Related Policies Paula D. Kohler, Ph.D., Western Michigan University National Secondary Transition.
The IDEA Partnership at The National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) IDEA INFO Building Unified.
“TAKING IT TO SCALE” A Statewide Model For Delivering Transition Services presented at 2007 CEC Annual Convention April 18-21, 2007 Louisville, Kentucky.
- Data Management System - Sioux Lookout District Principals Gathering October 21, 2009.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5,
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Best Practices in Parent Center – State Collaboration to Improve Student Achievement Federation for Children with Special Needs and Massachusetts Department.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Oregon’s Youth Transition Program YTP New Site/New Staff Training October
1.  Mapping Terms  Security Documentation  Predictor Table  Data Discussion Worksheet 2.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Sustainability Training Series 2016 From Piloting to Sustaining Practices January 13, :00pm - 3:00pm The Essentials of Full Implementation Part II.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Specific Learning Disability Criteria Implementation Update Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Federal Programs Division.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Transition Resources for Youth
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Presentation transcript:

Improving Secondary Transition Services Through an Electronic Learning Community: An Online “Connect and Learn” Professional Development Model in Idaho Jacque Hyatt, Idaho State Department of Education Cari Murphy, Idaho Training Clearinghouse

IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NEED: To build capacity for providing training and TA to meet local needs CHALLENGE: Rural and geographically disperse nature of the state

IDAHO Profoundly rural Geographically dispersed 684 schools 114 ‘typical’ districts 8 charter districts Large variation in size both geographically and attendance

IDAHO TRAINING CLEARINGHOUSE SDE identified need to provide information to stakeholders Partnership with Center on Disability and Human Development, University of Idaho Web based clearinghouse Focus areas of website: calendar, evaluation and distance education

Screen capture of th5e ITC website

BUILDING CAPACITY TechnologyContent People Content development Update/current content User-friendly Accessible Adaptable Content experts Users Facilitators

“Educators are ‘islands of excellence’ with no ferry service to connect them to each other or to groups of their peers.” (Reilly, 1999, pg. 60)

WHY DEVELOP AN ELC? To provide: A central repository for information, training and support A “place” where people can “connect and learn” from one another A means for increasing communication statewide A mechanism for the ISDE to provide ongoing support and supervision of LEAs

What Could an ELC Offer Participants? The ELC as a context for individuals to: Develop and share their work across distance and time, benefiting from the experiences of others Learn self-selected topics and identify their own issues that are related to their school situations Work collaboratively Experience diversity, creativity and flexibility in learning

DEVELOPING THE FOCUS What is the focus? CONTENT  OR  AUDIENCE Alternate Assessment Assistive Technology Results Based Model (RTI) Secondary Transition

JOURNEY TO ELC Phase SIG funded Website established Calendar of trainings On-line registration attempted Dedicated server installed Increase in staff time Additional grants/agencies utilize site Training modules developed Lingering questions about continuing the site

JOURNEY TO ELC Phase 1 External Factors Certification Requirements for Technology Albertson’s Foundation Idaho Student Information Management System Increased need and use of data Computerized Statewide Assessments Increased National use of technology to deliver TA

JOURNEY TO ELC Phase Present Needs assessment for SIG 2 Increase in staff time for ITC Additional programs use of ITC Decision to fully develop one ELC Contract with content experts Development of interactive features Mentor cohort conceived and developed On-line registration for trainings

JOURNEY TO ELC Phase 2 External Factors Reauthorization of IDEA Use of Webinars for TA LEAs have increased access to internet Increase in TA requests SDE focus on customized training to address individual LEA’s needs Continued low FTE at SDE Need to develop capacity statewide for LEAs and Communities to provide Secondary Transition Services

PEOPLE BACK END Content Experts Instructional designer Community facilitator FRONT END Target audience Recruitment Retention

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS MAINTENANCE Content development and updating Suggestions from the field EVALUATION Develop plan based on ELC focus How know if influenced practices DISSEMINATION/MARKETING Push-pull of recruitment vs. retention

WHAT WE LEARNED Some face-to-face still important in building sense of community Begin with subset of participants and build outward (e.g., mentors) Allow time for users to learn technology “Getting the word out” is a continual challenge

WHY SECONDARY TRANSITION? All 114 districts identify secondary transition on their district plans for improvement SDE reviews of IEPs and services verified need for statewide improvement Poor post school outcome data Lack of understanding about secondary transition services and post school focus

Train wreck Picture

MY DESIRE: Provide TA to every secondary special education teacher and administrator Presented in so that educators would receive it and change practice Give parents and students access to training and information Generate an understanding of importance of secondary transition

BUILDING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE Strategically focus activities to address needs identified through accountability process Leadership team to help guide content Partner with content experts Communicate needs to ITC Develop cohort of Mentors Provide face-to-face learning opportunities Don’t forget families and students

CONTINUING TO BUILD Mentors begin to provide information to others Youth Participation in ELC Information and training modules developed Local activities supported Youth Development Resource Mapping

Screen capture of Secondary ELC

CHANGES The ELCs have allowed the ISDE to efficiently: Organize content information Structure support for implementation Provide opportunities for networking among geographically dispersed educators, agency reps, and families

Has the ELC changed professional practices? Keep informed of state happenings in transition Able to view archived webinars at leisure Developed district plan to enhance transition assessment processes Enabled me to connect and share with teachers across the state

Will the ELC change future practices? Use ELC information in local inservice trainings with case managers Widen learning and interactions beyond local contacts Access webinar trainings to maintain best practices in my profession

ELC EVALUATION: GENERAL 85% learned a new skill, acquired needed information 80% have applied what learned 72% have positively changed practices Time – biggest hindrance to participation Still working through district network security issues

ELC EVALUATION: SECONDARY TRANSITION Pre-post Not at all prepared (1)-Very well prepared (5) Provide formal and informal assessment information to help determine students’ skills, preferences, and interests related to transition issues. Pre = 3.29 Post = 3.57

“Using the ELC has encouraged me that, even in rural southeast Idaho, I am not alone in the transition world and it is good to know that I can touch base with other knowledgeable colleagues when there are questions or just a need to connect.” (Secondary Transition Mentor)

CONTACT INFO JACQUE HYATT Idaho State Department of Education Phone: CARI MURPHY Idaho Training Clearinghouse Phone: