Uniondale, NY At least two UST releases MTBE mass release estimated 7,000 lb Upper Glacial; Magothy Threatened PWS deeper in Magothy IRM design In-situ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
These describe matter. Starts with a “p”
Advertisements

Nutrient Retention Model Water Supply Model Precipitation Evapotranspiration Soil Depth and Plant available water Land cover Topography (slope/runoff)
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF POROSITY
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Blue Lakes Stream Gauge Improvement and Lake Level Stabilization Project: Summary of Dye Tracer Testing City of Twin Falls September 12, 2011.
Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System By Christy Crandall A New Study Jointly Funded by U.S. Geological Survey.
The Sacramento Regional Groundwater Model Derrick Whitehead Roseville City - Roseville, CA Norm Jones Aquaveo - Provo, UT Michelle Smilowitz Heatwave Data.
RunoffRunoff Creating a spatially explicit runoff grid.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney River Basin Modeling.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Indirect Determination of Surface Heat Fluxes in the Northern Adriatic Sea via the Heat Budget R. P. Signell, A. Russo, J. W. Book, S. Carniel, J. Chiggiato,
Time: Nov 3, 1998 South Coast Air Basin CAMx model 210 x 120 km domain 1 hour time step 2 x 2 km grid cells mid noon Concentration (ppb) benzene.
31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Green River Water Rights Distribution Model (MODSIM) Update By Division of Water Rights
Using topography to estimate flood risk Brendan Murphy CE 397 Flood Forecasting May 4, 2015.
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: –Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Detailed Design Review: Pre-Filter P13418
John N. Dougherty, PG Lisa Campbell, PG EPA Region 2, New York City
When Does Aquifer Heterogeneity Matter? Predicting the Influence of Alternative Conceptual Models on Contaminant Plume Migration A classroom exercise for.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
III. Ground-Water Management Problem Used for the Exercises.
Characterization of the Mammoth Cave aquifer Dr Steve Worthington Worthington Groundwater.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
(Zheng and Bennett) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values Traditional approach.
Urban Storm Drain Design: Rainfall-Runoff relations.
OHSU Oregon Health & Science University Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Impact of Inactive Wells on Public Water Supply (PWS) Wells Rick Johnson.
Local Groundwater Flow Model Addendum Guadalupe Restoration Project San Luis Obispo County October
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Cosolvent Flushing and Enhanced Bioremediation at a Dry Cleaner Site By Michael D. Annable Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences 1.
VIII: Methods for Evaluating Model Predictions 1. Define predictive quantity and calculate sensitivities and standard deviations (Ex8.1a) 2. Assess data.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
Water Quality Modeling of Bonnet Carré Freshwater Flows in the Pontchartrain Estuary Rachel Roblin Alex McCorquodale Ioannis Georgiou.
Techniques for Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Impact on Ozone for Possible Exceptional Events Daniel Alrick 1, Clinton MacDonald 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, Charles.
Geochemical Heterogeneity of Groundwater in Uncontaminated and Contaminated Aquifers Jean M. Bahr University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and Drought Related Forecasts Kevin Werner.
FULL - SCALE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PULSED AIR SPARGE AND SVE SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT OF VOCS, SVOCS, AND ARSENIC Authors: Kale Novalis, Nadira Najib, Omer Uppal,
STORM WATER STORAGE AND TREATMENT
First Define the Information Needed, Then Select a Course of Action John S. Irwin, NOAA EPA, OAQPS Air Quality Modeling Group RTP, NC
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Richard B. Winston 1 and Joseph D. Ayotte 2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston VA, 20192, United States of America,
Regularised Inversion and Model Predictive Uncertainty Analysis.
Linear Programming Water Resources Planning and Management Daene McKinney.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Robert Rice.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Modeling Subsurface transport of oil-field brine at the USGS OSPER “A” Site, Oklahoma William Herkelrath and Yousif Kharaka U.S. Geological Survey.
Hampton Bays At least one UST release MTBE, TAME TBA degradation product Upper Glacial; Magothy Sensitive shallow saline surface water discharge IRM rate.
Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.
Using Groundwater and Surface Water Models for the Marcus Hook Refinery CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Presented by Julie Kim April 29, 1999.
Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System—Update Presented by Rick Hicks of FDEP And Christy Crandall of USGS This.
Rainfall-Runoff modeling Forecasting and predictingForecasting and predicting –Flood peaks –Runoff volumes Due to Large rain and snowmelt events ***especially.
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF POROSITY
Rainfall-Runoff modeling
Soil Physical Properties Used to Assess Soil Quality
Bill W. Arnold, Al-Aziz Eddebbarh1, and Scott C. James2
Ward Sanford, USGS, Reston, Virginia
PARAMETERIZATION, UNCERTAINTY – AND “REAL WORLD” MODELING
Manoa Watershed Runoff
Long Island’s Water.
Groundwater Lab.
Chapter 5 Sources and Sinks
Central Valley Salinity Coalition
Presentation transcript:

Uniondale, NY At least two UST releases MTBE mass release estimated 7,000 lb Upper Glacial; Magothy Threatened PWS deeper in Magothy IRM design In-situ follow-up?

Critical Prediction(s) Mass removal rate at Interim Remedial Measure wells (4) for sizing of Air Stripping Towers* Maximum concentration at public supply well Probable source *IRM location f(constructibility)

Characterization Multi-level transects across plume Typically 8 to 12 nested sampling/wl points Oxygenates, BTEX One full single sampling event Typical representative sample: Volume:120,000 c-ft (x porosity)* Area:500 sq-ft (x porosity) * Long Island ‘Rule of Thumb: 50,000 to 100,000 c-ft

Characterization Flow PWS

Gridded MTBE, Water Levels

Model Domain Existing USGS model domain Local model

Water Level Calibration

8 Hour Pump Test Modflow Measured Log

Modeled Pathline

Current Investigation Calibration of recharge with cemetary, drainage basin, roadside run-off collection of interest Targets: XYZ path of particle through plume centerline Concentrations * Long Island ‘Rule of Thumb: 50,000 to 100,000 c-ft

Recharge Basin Area of increased recharge

IRM - Recovery Predicted from mass-flux: Early 250 Max 800 ug/L Predicted from model: Early 200 Max 900 ug/L Actual: Early 200 ug/L* * Weighted average of samples

Salient Point Presentation of a model’s reasonableness, goodness of fit, calibration, reliability, should always be in terms of the prediction for which the model was built. Other methods may be misleading.