PEPII Magnet Feasibility in the MEIC ECR Tommy Hiatt – MEIC Collaboration 10/07/2015 1 of 15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Advertisements

Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
1 Tim Michalski October 6, 2015 Engineering Issues in MEIC.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
FFAG Lattice Design of eRHIC and LHeC Dejan Trbojevic and Stephen Brooks EIC 2014 Workshop – Dejan Trbojevic and Stephen Brooks 1.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 14 Sep 2007Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. Cooling Solid Wire Sextupoles 1 Report of the effort to cool an old FFTB solid wire sextupole.
9 October 2003S. DeBarger PEP-II Vacuum Status PEP-II Machine Advisory Committee.
Cost Evaluation of Storage Ring Magnets Claudio Sanelli March 19, 2012.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz Status and Plans for Linac and RLAs.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Status of Baseline Linac and RLAs Design.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Q0 magnet, cooling, support ideas
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Nonlinear Dynamics and Error Study of the MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Optics considerations for PS2
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
The Feasibility of Using RHIC Magnets for MEIC and Cost Impact
The MEIC electron ring as the large ion booster
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
JLEIC Magnet R&D Tim Michalski NP Community Panel Review of the EIC
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
Basic Error & Multipole Error for MEIC Ion Ring
G. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, Oct 27, 2015
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Arc FODO Cell Inventory
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Booster to Ion Ring Transfer Line
Presentation transcript:

PEPII Magnet Feasibility in the MEIC ECR Tommy Hiatt – MEIC Collaboration 10/07/ of 15

Introduction Ion Source Booster Linac 1.Background 2.Available Quantities 3.Dipole Analysis 4.Quadrupole Analysis 5.Sextupole Analysis 6.Future Plans 7.Summary 2 of 15

Background PEPII HER magnets are being considered for repurposing in the MEIC ECR A deck was proposed (Dec 2014) that specifies quantities and strengths for several types of PEPII magnets The MEG is endeavoring to understand the feasibility of using the repurposed PEPII magnets as prescribed in the deck Cross checked magnet availability between the deck and PEP publications Conducted several analysis to evaluate their usefulness –Field Analysis Linear hand calculations of field strength (order of scale sanity checks) 2d Tosca modeling (some 3d too) –Saturation effects –Field strength –Gauge field quality –Cooling Analysis Pressure drop LCW velocity Temperature rise 3 of 15

Available Quantities We need to know how many and what kinds of magnets are available to put in the ECR. There are two sources for the information - ’93 PEPII CDR and the ‘07 SuperB documents –The way the two documents refer to the magnets don’t match but the physical and magnetic characteristics do…mostly… –‘93 CDR named magnets by physical characteristic ie. “2.8C212” –SuperB named magnets by function/location ie. “IR Soft Bends” –Key to matching between the two documents was by physical and performance characteristics Combed through the Deck magnet characteristics and grouped them by like types and field strengths –Deck element names are associated with location and type ie. “BXARCL” –Deck specified other (non-PEPII) magnets as “new” 4 of 15

Available Quantities (cont.) 5 of 15

Available Quantities (cont.) The two sources for quantities don’t reconcile –‘07 SuperB document doesn’t match ’93 PEPII CDR (Uli tends to think SuberB is likely correct) Another count will be performed at SLAC to confirm available quantities Any shortages can be handled during the procurement of the new magnets that will be required in the ECR Magnet Name (‘93 CDR) MEIC – ECR Quantity Required 2007 SuperB CDR Available Quantity 1993 PEPII CDR Available Quantity ECR Field Strength Required (T, T/m or T/m 2 ) 2.812C Q Q SF/10SD of 15

Dipole Analysis 7 of 12 GeV 10 GeV (baseline) “ 2.8C212” – ‘93 CDR name – 12 GeV A –<0.2% saturation –~19 °C dT at 100 psid per coil

Dipole Analysis (cont.) “2.8C212” –From 2-18 GeV dB/B flat at ~0.06% –Arc dipole transverse 10 GeV: ± 4cm ±(10σ x + sagitta/2 + 1cm closed orbit distortion) 8 of 15

Dipole Analysis (cont.) “2.8C212” –Harmonics taken at 3 cm (84%) aperture at 5, 10 and 12 GeV 9 of 15

Quadrupole Analysis “4Q22” and “4Q29” ‘93 CDR –Both quads have the same cross section 330 A –~6% saturation –~11°C 100 psid per coil 10 of 15 Most PEP-II quads used in the MEIC baseline design have the gradient lower than 14 T/m at 10 GeV. There are some quads running close to 17T/m, but their gradients can be (hopefully) reduced by the optics adjustment in the future.

Quadrupole Analysis (cont.) “4Q22” and “4Q29” –’93 CDR name –Harmonics taken at 4.49 cm (88%) aperture at 5, 10 and 12 GeV 11 of 15

Sextupole Analysis “10SD”/”10SF” ‘93 CDR name –Documentation doesn’t distinguish “10SD” from “10SF” –210 T/m 260A –<0.5% saturation –~7°C 100 psid per coil 12 of 15

Sextupole Analysis (cont.) “10SD”/”10SF” – ’93 CDR name –Harmonics taken at 5.65 cm (94%) aperture at 5, 10 and 12 GeV 13 of 15

Sextupole Analysis (cont.) Max achievable sextupole field ~360 T/m 2 –Saturation limits field –Joule heating reaches allowable 40 C dT (assuming 100psid ) 14 of 15

Future Plans The plan is to continue to evolve our understanding of repurposing issues A magnet team will visit the PEPII ring –Count magnets –Visually examine magnets in situ Maybe even hipot or flow check some of the magnets Several magnets (at least one of each type) will be identified for removal and shipment to JLab Magnets will be assessed and measured at JLab –Understand the full scope of refurbishment requirements –Understand field characteristics Compare to models Provide harmonic and strength information to CASA 15 of 15

Summary Confirmed that all of the PEPII magnets can achieve the field strength requirements prescribed in the Dec 2014 deck Confirmed that all of the magnets can be sufficiently cooled at those field strengths (LCW temperature rise less than 40 °C per coil) A magnet team will visit the PEPII ring to count and examine magnets Any shortages in magnet availability can be handled in conjunction with new magnet procurements Several magnets (at least one of each type) will be identified for removal and shipment to JLab –Magnets will be assessed and measured to understand the full scope of refurbishment requirements and field characteristics 16 of 15