Doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: 2014-07-12 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Doc.: ax Submission May 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Rate Control For MAC Simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission January 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC Date: 2015/01/12.
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Regime Evaluation Revisited March 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /0319r1 Submission March 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Impact of TPC coupled to DSC for legacy unfairness issue Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE r1 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Regime Evaluation Revisited March 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission Eduard Garcia-Villegas Drivers of the dynamic CCA adaptation Authors: Nov Date:
Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0386r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Discussions on MCS selection for SLS calibration Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek March.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Simulation Results for Box5
OBSS Preamble Detection
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
Performance Gains from CCA Optimization
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
TX Mask Shoulders vis-à-vis ACI
Box 5 Calibration Result
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:

doc.: ax Submission Introduction Multiple IEEE presentations have looked at the effects of CCA levels. –See next slide –Many claim significant gain by increasing CCA levels. –Numerous types of scenarios/simulators were used to make these claims –PHY simulator –Real devices –MAC simulator/scenario 3 This presentation focuses on understanding the effect of changing CCA levels in a residential scenario ( scenario 1) –Simulations are done with a MAC simulator Detailed MAC modelled Simple PHY abstraction – Optimal CCA levels for both mean and 5% TPUT are found for a variety of settings. July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 2

doc.: ax Submission Previous Contributions on CCA levels July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 3 Document #CompanyTitleNotes 11-14/0628r0SK telecommeasurements on CCA Thresholds in OBSS environments increasing CCA can help target APs overcome deferral due to ACI interference in dense setting. ( experimental results) 11-14/0578r0InterdigitalResidential Scenario CCA/TCPsimulation Discussion Optimal CCA for mean TPUT varies with Txpower, and reuse /0523r0OrangeMAC simulations results for Dynamic sensitivity Control ( CCA adaptation) and tranmist power control CCA and TCP are strongly increasing reuse and aggregate throughput 11-14/0635r1DSP GroupDynamic Sensitivity Control implementation CCA level per STA depends on distance to AP /0082r0 & 83r0BcomImproved Spatial Reuse Feasibility part I & II 2x-3x gains in both the mean and tail by increasing CCA levels. Densifi: date: Bcomperformacne Gains from CCA Optimiziation

doc.: ax Submission Simulation Setting I July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 4 Residential Scenario –IEEE residential scenario baseline Less apartments modelled for faster run times – Expect comclusions will not change 1 STA per AP –2x5x3 apartments –30 APs ; 30STAs ; –Pathloss as specified in 11ax Simulation Scenarios document –1 80 MHz channel –Results averaged over multiple random drops of APs and STAs locations Floor 1 Floor 2 Example of one drop Floor 3

doc.: ax Submission Simulation Setting II Simulation Details: –DL only Data traffic (+ UL BAs) –Full buffer UDP –Default Tx Power: 20 dBm per antenna (AP), 15 dBm ( STA) –Antenna Gain: 0 dBi APs, -2dBi STAs –Rate Control: MCS per link chosen to maximize long term goodput – MAC modelling MAC is fully modelled Deferral according to 11ah CCA rules –OBSS packets deferral only if RSSI > ED (assume BSS ID (color) in PPDU ED level controls deferral on a network level Nodes on the same 80 MHz channel have the same primary channel – PHY modelling Pathloss, shadowing, (pathloss as in SS document, shadowing w sd 5dB) no fading. Long term PER curves based on ChD 1x1 (tx antennas x rx antennas) July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 5

doc.: ax Submission Tests Run Using ChD PER curves: –Reuse 1 default power levels –Reuse 1, 6 dB higher tx power levels 6 dB higher power models total power when 4 antennas Using AWGN PER curves: –Reuse 1 default power levels –Reuse 1, 6dB higher tx power levels 6 dB higher power models total power when 4 antennas. July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 6

doc.: ax Submission RESULTS WITH CHD PER CURVES July 2014 Gwen Barriac (Qualcomm)Slide 7

doc.: ax Submission TPUT as a function of CCA for Reuse 1 July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 8 Optimal CCA for mean: -72 Optimal CCA for 5% point: -92 CCA level5 percentile50 percentile90 percentilemean

doc.: ax Submission TPUT as a function of CCA for Reuse 1, with 6 dB higher Tx Power at both AP and STA July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 9 Optimal CCA for mean: -72 Optimal CCA for 5% point: -82 CCA level5 percentile50 percentile90 percentilemean

doc.: ax Submission Possible Simultaneous mean & 5% TPUT July 2014 Qualcomm Slide 10 CCA level5 percentile50 percentile90 percentilemean CCA level5% tput Loss compared to optimal Mean tput loss compared to optimal % -8237%2% -7271%0% -6299%11% %22% Reuse 1, default Tx Power, chD PER curves

doc.: ax Submission Summary of Results so far ( chD PER curves) July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 11 Reuse 1 default TX power Reuse 1 6 dB Higher Tx power Optimal CCA for mean-72 Optimal CCA for 5% For default power case, the optimal mean TPUT comes with a 70% loss in 5% point. –It can be difficult to optimize for both mean and 5% point simultaneously.

doc.: ax Submission RESULTS WITH AWGN PER CURVES Note: Chan D curves better reflect reality. AWGN curves run for understanding of how simulator reacts in different settings. Slide 12Qualcomm

doc.: ax Submission Reuse 1, Default TX power AWGN curves. July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 13 Optimal CCA for mean: -62 Optimal CCA for 5% point: -92 CCA level5 percentile50 percentile90 percentilemean

doc.: ax Submission Reuse 1, 6 dB higher Tx Power, AWGN curves July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 14 Optimal CCA for mean: -62 Optimal CCA for 5% point: -82 CCA level5 percentile50 percentile90 percentilemean

doc.: ax Submission Possible Simultaneous mean & 5% TPUT July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 15 Reuse 1, 6 dB higher Tx Power, AWGN curves CCA level5% tput Loss compared to optimal Mean tput loss compared to optimal -9234%51% -820 %26% -7219%11% -6295%0% %14% CCA level5 percentile50 percentile90 percentilemean

doc.: ax Submission Summary of Results w/ AWGN July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 16 Reuse 1 default TX power Reuse 1 6 dB Higher Tx power Optimal CCA for mean-62 Optimal CCA for 5% Difficult to optimize for both mean and 5% point simultaneously. –Optimal mean can come with 95% loss in 5% point

doc.: ax Submission Comparison of Optimal CCA levels for AWGN and Chan D PER curves July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 17 Reuse 1 default TX power Channel D PER curves Reuse 1 6 dB Higher Tx power Channel D PER curves Reuse 1 default TX power AWGN curves Reuse 1 6 dB higher TX power AWGN curves Optimal CCA for mean Optimal CCA for 5% Changing PER curves has large effect on optimal CCA level for mean Changing Power level also affects optimal CCA  Optimal CCA level sensitive to parameters.

doc.: ax Submission Conclusions: Optimal CCA levels are highly dependent on parameter settings – example, Tx Power, PER curves Difficult to get simultaneously optimize both mean and 5% point July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 18

doc.: ax Submission Additional Considerations We would like to propose that the rate control used in these studies be included in the EM document for use with the MAC simulator and integrated simulator. –See document xxxxx We would also like to propose that the deferral method used in these studies be used for the next stage of MAC simulator calibration. July 2014 Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 19