Successful Schools Strand: Up-Bending the Arc of Student Achievement Los Angeles Unified School District Academic English Mastery Program (AEMP) 18 th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
RTI and Title I An Overview Facilitated by Tara Black & Dean Richards.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Jerry Ross Elementary School All students and staff will grow as learners every day.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
T3: Turnaround Teacher Teams. T3 Program History The T3 Initiative began in 2009 as a policy proposal from Teach Plus’s first cohort of 16 Teaching Policy.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Myanmar October 3, 2013.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Effective Instruction in a Turnaround School- Instructional Focus REL Appalachia Featuring Ms. Kathy Fields Lead Instructional Administrator Jessamine.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
School Turnarounds: School Turnarounds: The Cross-Sector Evidence Julie Kowal Public Impact.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
What is Forward? Forward K-5 Instructional System Consultative Services Progress Monitoring Integrated Curriculum and Assessment Professional Development.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Nottingham West Elementary School
Comprehensive Planning
Presentation transcript:

Successful Schools Strand: Up-Bending the Arc of Student Achievement Los Angeles Unified School District Academic English Mastery Program (AEMP) 18 th Annual Weekend Professional Development Conference Randy Ross, Ph.D. Mikara Solomon Davis, Rima Zobayan LAUSD Board of Education’s Independent Analysis Unit

2 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Premise: All Schools in High Poverty Areas Can Succeed It can be done – School Success Forum It must be done -- AEMP schools’ pursuit of exemplary achievement (API 800 or higher)

3 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Successful Schools Forum: Approach 1. Find high-poverty schools that work for all students  Identify successful schools for targeted students.  Validate each school’s success.  Develop and document a compelling theory of action that describes how and why each school is successful. 2. Facilitate continued academic growth of successful schools 3. Transfer success to other high-poverty schools  Identify and develop school success transfer agents.  Conduct school success transfer demonstrations

4 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Successful Schools Strand - Overview A. Turning Around Low-Achieving Schools B. Learning from successful public schools C. Learning from successful charter schools D. Transferring success to low-achieving schools

5 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Turning Around Low-Performing Schools: IES Recommendations 1. Signal the need for dramatic change with strong leadership 2. Maintain a consistent focus on improving instruction 3. Make visible improvements early in the school turnaround process (quick wins) 4. Build a committed staff

6 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand 1. Signal the need for dramatic change with strong leadership A change in leadership practices in the school is essential. Because the current school leader may be enmeshed in past strategies, a new leader can immediately signal change. If there is no change in leadership, the existing leader can signal change by radically altering leadership practices. Make the school leader the instructional leader who is highly visible in classrooms. Publicly announce changes and anticipated actions (transparency and accountability).

7 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand What’s the focus of classroom observations for AEMP principals? Differentiated instruction Student access (student engagement/ responses) Specific subjects (e.g., ELA or math) Specific grade levels Teacher accountability (follow-up to prior feedback) Teacher evaluation (Stull)

8 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand How are classroom observations used? Provide feedback to teachers – Immediate written or oral feedback to teacher – Grade-level debriefings – Debrief leadership team (AP, coordinators, coaches) – Acknowledge excellence – Encourage teachers to volunteer to assist others – Offer suggestions, guidance, or directives – Arrange professional development as needed Develop individualized plans for students observed with learning/social challenges.

9 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand What percent of the school day do principals spend observing classrooms?

10 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand 2. Maintain a consistent focus on improving instruction Examine school’s student achievement data to identify specific gaps in student learning Have teachers use formative data about individual students to analyze their instruction in light of student progress toward standards. Establish priority areas for instructional focus. Arrange for targeted, differentiated professional development based on analyses of achievement. Have staff review curriculum to insure alignment with standards. Regularly monitor student growth in relation to school work and adjust work as necessary.

11 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Many AEMP schools use student performance data to assess needs How AEMP schools use data Number of responsesPercent Identify strengths and weaknesses by subject (English Language Arts, math)1348% Develop Plans for addressing areas of weakness (Smart Goals)830% Individual teachers use periodic assessment data to inform instruction (re-teaching)622% Individualization (Develop goal blueprints for every students with goals for improvement)622% Grade level analyses of student performance519% Target support to low-achieving students27% Frequent tracking of student achievement27% Display data (Data Wall)14%

12 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Many AEMP schools use formative data about individual students Response# of responsesPercent Periodic Assessments2178% Standardized Assessments1244% Other Assessments (teacher created; portfolios)1141% Develop Plans for addressing areas of weakness (Smart Goals)1037% Grade level planning415% Tracking progress of each student415% GSAT monitoring14% Share data with students and parents14%

13 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand 3. In the beginning, push for Quick Wins Start with a goal that is important, can be achieved quickly, and will provide visible improvement. Develop a strategy for accomplishing the goal that can be implemented quickly—for example, the school already has the authority and resources to implement the strategy Consider some common goals for quick wins, – use of time – improving access to resources – physical facilities – improving discipline.

14 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand What strategies do AEMP principals use to improve student achievement? Key Action Area# of responses Percent (n=27) Data analysis1244% Planning and monitoring1244% Professional development and teacher collaboration1244% Classroom Observation and teacher feedback1244% School or classroom intervention726% Individualized Student support726% Student Assessment519% Pedagogy311% Standards - High expectations311% Curricular focus27% Student Engagement27% Teacher: hiring/retention14% Hiring other staff14% Parent engagement14% Visiting successful principals and schools14%

15 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand 4. Build a committed staff Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the staff. Identify staff who are not fully committed to the school turnaround goals or who do not have the qualifications to carry them out. Redeploy staff members who have valuable skills but are not effective in their current role. Replace staff members who actively resist the school’s turnaround efforts. Recruit new staff who have the needed specialized skills and competencies for positions in the school—such as interventionists, reading specialists, and mentors and instructional coaches.

16 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand How do AEMP principals ensure staff are committed? Planning Active engagement of teachers in decision- making Monitoring and accountability Incentives and rewards

17 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand The challenge of linking student achievement to human resource decisions Role of Student Achievement Human Resource Decision: TeachersIdealStandard Practice Hiring Student achievement should be a key determinant of hiring. Qualifications (e.g., credentials) are the key determinant. Staffing (classrooms, programs/interventions) Staffing decisions should be made largely on the basis of the perceived ability of teachers to produce results. Seniority (rather performance of students) is key determinant Professional development PD should target areas in which a teacher's students have over time performed least well. PD is often one size fits all. Much PD occurs through salary point credits acquired for PD activities that often are not aligned with neither the teacher's nor the student's needs. Evaluation (Stull) Student achievement should be one of the key determinants Teachers are evaluated based on process variables that generally have a limited correlation with student achievement.

18 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Recap - Turning Around Low- Performing Schools 1. Signal the need for dramatic change with strong leadership 2. Maintain a consistent focus on improving instruction 3. Make visible improvements early in the school turnaround process (quick wins) 4. Build a committed staff

19 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Successful Schools Strand Turning Around Low-Achieving Schools Learning from successful public schools – Bursch Elementary (Compton Unified) – Baldwin Hills Elementary (LAUSD) Learning from successful charter schools – Watts Learning Center (LAUSD) – Wilder’s Academy (Inglewood Unified) Transferring success to low-achieving schools – Grape Street Elementary (LAUSD)

20 3/30/2009AEMP Conf – SS Strand Q & A