Absolute Stability and the Circle Criterion In this section we will examine the use of the Circle Criterion for testing anddesigning to ensure the stability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graphical Technique of Inference
Advertisements

(ex) Consider a plant with
Frequency Response Techniques
Chapter 8 Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Analysis of SISO Control Loops
© Goodwin, Graebe, Salgado, Prentice Hall 2000 Chapter7 Synthesis of SISO Controllers.
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Frequency Response Methods and Stability
Multivariable Control Systems
Dynamic Behavior and Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Ming-Feng Yeh General Fuzzy Systems A fuzzy system is a static nonlinear mapping between its inputs and outputs (i.e., it is not a dynamic system).
Chapter 8: System Stability.
Chapter 6 – The Stability of Linear Feedback Systems
Multivariable Control Systems
5.7 Impulse Functions In some applications, it is necessary to deal with phenomena of an impulsive nature—for example, voltages or forces of large magnitude.
Chapter 5 Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming Section R Review.
Chapter 5.1 Systems of linear inequalities in two variables.
MODEL REFERENCE ADAPTIVE CONTROL
1 Preliminaries Precalculus Review I Precalculus Review II
Automatic Control Theory-
FULL STATE FEEDBAK CONTROL:
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
1 2. Independence and Bernoulli Trials Independence: Events A and B are independent if It is easy to show that A, B independent implies are all independent.
Feedback Control System THE ROOT-LOCUS DESIGN METHOD Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul Chapter 5
Control Engineering Lecture# 10 & th April’2008.
1 Adaptive Control Neural Networks 13(2000): Neural net based MRAC for a class of nonlinear plants M.S. Ahmed.
Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming Chapter 5 Dr.Hayk Melikyan Department of Mathematics and CS
ME375 Handouts - Spring 2002 Root Locus Method.
Chapter 7 Stability and Steady-State Error Analysis
Automatic Control Systems
REFERENCE INPUTS: The feedback strategies discussed in the previous sections were constructed without consideration of reference inputs. We referred to.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
1 Chapter 11 Compensator Design When the full state is not available for feedback, we utilize an observer. The observer design process is described and.
Chapter 10 Frequency Response Techniques Frequency Response Techniques.
Lec 9. Root Locus Analysis I From last lecture, the locations of the closed loop poles have important implication in –Stability –Transient behavior –Steady.
Review. Feedback Terminology In Block diagrams, we use not the time domain variables, but their Laplace Transforms. Always denote Transforms by (s)!
System Time Response Characteristics
Lecture 9 Feedback Control Systems President UniversityErwin SitompulFCS 9/1 Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul President University
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
Stability Analysis . A system is BIBO stable if all poles or roots of
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Lec. 2 Transfer Functions & Block Diagrams.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Lecture 10 Feedback Control Systems President UniversityErwin SitompulFCS 10/1 Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul President University
Shroff S.R. Rotary Institute of Chemical Technology Chemical Engineering Instrumentation and process Control.
Lecture 11/12 Analysis and design in the time domain using root locus North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Chapter 6 The Stability of Linear Feedback System
Lecture 9\10 Analysis in the time domain (III) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
1 Chapter 9 Mapping Contours in the s-plane The Nyquist Criterion Relative Stability Gain Margin and Phase Margin PID Controllers in the Frequency Domain.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 6. TRANSIENT RESPONSE -- STABILITY Pusan National University Intelligent.
Feedback Control System THE ROOT-LOCUS DESIGN METHOD Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul Chapter 5
FULL STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL:
Digital and Non-Linear Control
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Learning Outcomes After completing this ppt the student will be able to: Make and interpret a basic Routh table to determine the stability of a system.
Methods of Determining Stability
Root-Locus Analysis (1)
Root Loci Analysis (3): Root Locus Approach to Control System Design
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Chapter 6 – The Stability of Linear Feedback Systems
Synthesis of SISO Controllers
Root-Locus Analysis (2)
Chapter 6. STABILITY Good relationships nurture you. They help you find yourself and who you are. I don’t mean just relationships with boys or men. Relationships.
IntroductionLecture 1: Basic Ideas & Terminology
Methods of Determining Stability
Presentation transcript:

Absolute Stability and the Circle Criterion In this section we will examine the use of the Circle Criterion for testing anddesigning to ensure the stability of a fuzzy control system. The methods of this section provide an alternative (to the ones described in the previous section) for when the closed-loop system is in a special form to be defined next.

Analysis of Absolute Stability Figure 4.5 shows a basic regulator system. In this system G(s) is the transfer function of the plant and is equal to C(sI − A)−1B where (A,B, C) is the state variable description of the plant (x is the n-dimensional state vector) The function Φ(t, y), represents a memory less, possibly time-varying nonlinearity—in our case, the fuzzy controller. Clearly, the fuzzy controller can be sector-bounded in the same manner as the saturation nonlinearity with either α = 0 for the global case, or for local stability, with some α > 0

Last, we define D(α, β) to be a closed disk in the complex plane whose diameter is the line segment connecting the points −1 α + j0 and −1 β + j0. A picture of thisdisk is shown in Figure 4.7.

Circle Criterion with Sufficient and Necessary Conditions (SNC) For the system of Figure 4.5 with Φ defined as Φ : L2e → L2e, and α,β two given real numbers with α < β, the following two statements are equivalent. 1. The feedback system is L2-stable with finite gain and zero bias for every Φ belonging to the sector (α, β). 2. The transfer function G satisfies one of the following conditions as appropriate: (a) If αβ > 0, then the Nyquist plot of G(jω) does not intersect the interior of the disk D(α, β) and encircles the interior of the disk D(α, β) exactly m times in the counterclockwise direction, where m is the number of poles of G with positive real part. (b) If α = 0, then G has no real poles with positive real part, and Re[G(jω)] ≥ −1 β for all ω. (c) If αβ < 0, then G is a stable transfer function and the Nyquist plot ofG(jω) lies inside the disk D(α, β) for all ω.

1. If 0 < α < β, the Nyquist plot of G(jω) is bounded away from the disk D(α, β) and encircles it m times in the counterclockwise direction where m is the number of poles of G(s) in the open right half-plane. 2. If 0 = α < β, G(s) is Hurwitz (i.e., has its poles in the open left half plane) and the Nyquist plot of G(jω) lies to the right of the line s = −1 β. 3. If α < 0 < β, G(s) is Hurwitz and the Nyquist plot of G(jω) lies in the interior of the disk D(α, β) and is bounded away from the circumference of D(α, β).

Example: Temperature Control Thermal process shown in Figure 4.8, where τe is the temperature of a liquid entering the insulated chamber, τo is the temperature of the liquid leaving the chamber, and τ = τo − τe is the temperature difference due to the thermal process. The heater/cooling element input is denoted with q. The desired temperature is τd. Figure 4.9. The controller Gc(s) is a post compensator for the fuzzy controller. Suppose that we begin by choosing Gc(s) = K = 2 and that we simply consider this gain to be part of the plant. Furthermore, for the SISO fuzzy controller we use input membership functions shown in Figure 4.10 and output membership functions shown in Figure Note that we denote the variable that is output from the fuzzy controller (and input to Gc(s)) as q.

If e is positive small Then q is positive small if e is zero Then q is zero If e is negative big Then q is negative big We use minimum to represent the premise and implication, singleton fuzzification,and COG defuzzification (different from our parameterized fuzzy controller)

Analysis of Steady-State Tracking Error A terrain-following and terrain-avoidance aircraft control system uses an altimeter to provide a measurement of the distance of the aircraft from the ground to decide how to steer the aircraft to follow the earth at a pilot- specified height. If a fuzzy controller is employed for such an application, and it consistently seeks to control the height of the plane to be lower than what the pilot specifies, there will be a steady-state tracking error (an error between the desired and actual heights) that could result in a crash

Theory of Tracking Error for Nonlinear Systems The system is assumed to be of the configuration shown in Figure 4.1 where r, e, u, and y belong to L∞e and Φ(e) is the SISO fuzzy controller ess = limt→∞ e(t) the steady-state tracking error. G(s) where ρ, a nonnegative integer, is the number of poles of G(s) at s = 0, and p(s) and sρq(s) are relatively prime polynomials (i.e., they have no common factors) such that deg(p(s)) < deg(sρq(s)

Tracking Error Theorem 1. If r(t) approaches a limit l as t→∞, then ess ≡ limt→∞ e(t) exists. Moreover, ess = 0 if and only if l = 0 and ρ = 0, and then ess = Θ(γ) 2. Assuming that r(t) = ν j=0 ajtj, t ≥0 (4.28) in which the aj are real, ν is a positive integer, and aν = 0, the following holds: (a) e is unbounded if ν > ρ. (b) if ν ≤ ρ, then e approaches a limit as t → ∞. If ν = ρ, this limit is ess = Θ(γ) An examination of the above theorem reveals that in actuality the proposed method for finding the steady-state error for fuzzy control systems is similar to the equations used in conventional linear control systems

Example: Hydrofoil Controller Design The HS Denison is an 80-ton hydrofoil stabilized via flaps on the main foils and the incidence of the aft foil. The transfer function for a linearized model of the plant that includes the foil and vehicle is We first determine that if α = 0, then β must be less than 1.56 for the circlecriterion conditions to be satisfied. Therefore, our preliminary design for the SISO parameterized fuzzy controller will have A = B = 1 If our input r(t) is a step with magnitude 5.0, then we will use the first condition of the theorem and γ = Using these values in the iterative equation, we find that our steady-state error will be 4.0. This is a very large error and is obviously 214 Chapter 4 / Nonlinear Analysis much larger than 1%. Even with β = we cannot meet the error requirement. Therefore, the system requirements cannot be met with a simple fuzzy controller Simulations for this system with A = B = 1 show that in fact ess = 0 and we have met the design criteria.