Evaluation of refractive error measurements obtained by three different aberrometers Radha Ram, BA Li Wang, MD, PhD Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS Disclosure:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count by Manual and Automated Methods in Normal Corneas and in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Somasheila I Murthy, Debarun.

Advertisements

Incidence of Blepharitis in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification Jodi Luchs, MD Carlos Buznego, MD William Trattler, MD The authors of this poster have.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

In-the-Bag Toric IOL for Correction of Astigmatism in Keratoconus and after Corneal Surgery Bart T.H. van Dooren, M.D., Ph.D Ilse E.M.A. Mol, M.D. Department.

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,

Vision-Related Quality of Life Assessment using NEI-VFQ-25 in Children With History of Phakic or Aphakic IOL Refractive Surgery. Claire Hartnett MD Michael.

Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,

Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.

David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD

Reliability of Aberrometry Versus Cycloplegic Retinoscopy in Prescribing Glasses to Undilated Child S.A. Erzurum, MD FACS Aylin Sarac.

Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes

26/11/04 BSCRS Aberrometry in daily practice Bernard Mathys, MD.

Sze H. Wong Emil W. Chynn, MD, MBA Maximiliano Plana, MD Emily Ceisler, MD ASCRS, May 2013 San Francisco, CA LASEK /Epi-LASIK to treat amblyopes is not.

Wavefront by Method of Ray Tracing: Because the Eye is Not a Telescope

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanics and Wavefront Aberrations Alejandro Rivera, MD Private Practice Mexico City The author has no financial interest.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master

Characterization of Higher Order Ocular Aberrations (HOA) In ‘Normal’ Versus Myopic Eyes To Study The Effect Of Myopia On Higher Order Aberrations Amit.

Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes

Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,

Using the ASCRS Post-Refractive Surgery IOL Calculator: A Retrospective Review Amit Patel MRCOphth, Achyut Mukherjee MRCOphth, Vinod Kumar FRCSEd(Ophth)

Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,

Paul “Butch” Harton, MD Harbin Clinic Eye Center Rome, GA USA ASCRS Boston Poster, 2010 The Author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.

P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.

Tracey Technologies AAO 2004 Advisors Group Breakfast Tom Padrick, PhD Director of Engineering.

Torsional Changes During Routine Ophthalmic Anesthesia

Clinical outcomes of Epi-LASIK : 1-Year-Long Results of Flap ON/OFF with Mitomycin-C ON/OFF Gil-Joong Yoon (MD/PhD) 1 Seong-Taeck Kim (MD) 2 Jae-Woong.

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.

M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Mean Keratometry Measurement Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Jacky Yeung MSc MD, Stephanie Baxter MD FRCS(C) Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital,

Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

Analysis of Ocular Wavefront Aberrations in Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Eyes with Two Different Hartmann-Shack Aberrometers Adriana S. Forseto 1, MD;

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.

IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.

Futoshi Taketani, MD,PhD,

Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,

LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.

iTrace Dynamic Laser Refraction: Clinical Application

Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,

Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.

Comparing Factors Affecting Surgically Induced Astigmatism

Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.

Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.

John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.

Lifestyle and Refractive Factors Associated with Progressive Addition Lens Preference The Center for Ophthalmic Optics Research, The Ohio State University.

Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.

Corneal CXL in Pediatric Patients with Progressive Keratoconus Stephanie Wise, Christian Diaz, Karolien Termote, Paul J. Dubord, Martin McCarthy, Sonia.

Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD,

Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.

Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront

Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.

The authors have nothing to declare

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness measured by

MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Comparison of Autokeratometry and Manual Keratometry

Vicente J. Correa-Gomez MD, Guillermo Tapia MD, Oscar Macias Manuel MD, Alejandro Navas Perez MD, Gilberto Islas MD, Tito Ramírez-Luquin MD, Enrique O.

*Center for Excellence in Eyecare

Prospective Comparison of Manifest Refraction with Autorefraction Before and After Sub-Bowman Keratomileusis Joel D. Hunter MD Frank Schwendeman OD Daniel.

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of refractive error measurements obtained by three different aberrometers Radha Ram, BA Li Wang, MD, PhD Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS Disclosure: No authors have any financial interest in this subject.

Introduction Accurate refractive error measurements are a crucial part of the ophthalmologic exam. Refractive error measurements not only influence proper prescriptive lenses, but they also serve an important role in preparing for refractive surgery and calculating IOL power in patients undergoing cataract extraction. Refractive eye surgery along with technology measuring refractive error have seen rapid advancements in recent years. The purpose of this study was to compare refractive error measurements obtained with three different aberrometers in eye screenings for refractive surgery.

Methods Used subjective manifest refraction (MR) as the gold standard Measured spherical equivalent, sphere, and cylinder Employed 3 aberrometers: 1. Hartmann-Shack 2. Ray tracings 3. Dynamic skiascopy Analyzed 79 normal eyes  Inclusion criteria  No history of refractive or other surgeries  Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/25 or better  Average age: 41 years (Range years)

Methods Bland-Altman plots  Plots graphed the difference between 2 measurements against their mean.  95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated as the mean difference +/ standard deviation of the differences (SD).  Indicating 95% of the differences will lie between the 95% LoA Vector Analysis for Astigmatism  Double-angle plots graphed differences between astigmatism from MR and 3 aberrometers.

Results

Bland-Altman plots of differences between MR SE and aberrometer SE vs. mean of MR SE and aberrometer SE

Vector differences between astigmatism measured by MR and aberrometers MR – Hartmann-Shack Mean difference: o +/ D MR – Ray tracings Mean difference: / D MR – Dynamic skiascopy Mean difference: / D

Percentages of eyes within certain errors of the MR values

Conclusions These results suggest that in normal eyes, the Hartmann-Shack, multiple ray tracings, and dynamic skiascopy technologies produce globally similar results within common refractions but may vary in some details. Overall, there was excellent agreement between the measurements of the 3 devices, as demonstrated by their mean differences, 95% LA values, and aggregate analysis of astigmatic values. Since the MR was based on the dynamic skiascopy refraction, the dynamic skiascopy may have greater agreement with MR. However, dynamic skiascopy also correlated well with the Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. With regard to vector analysis, the ray tracings instrument had the greatest standard deviation when compared to the other two technologies. These findings can help clinicians better interpret measurements of healthy, phakic eyes based on their available aberrometer.

Conclusions Limitations  Relatively small number of patients  MR was based on dynamic skiascopy refraction  Although reproducibility has been documented in other studies, the reproducibility was not analyzed in this study Future Directions  Further work is required to improve accuracy for measuring SE, sphere, and cylinder in post-operative, aphakic, and pseudophakic eyes.  Further studies are required to compare higher-order aberration measurements.

References Bland JM and DG Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: Kim DS, J Navaez, J Krassin, and K Bahjri. Comparison of the Visx WaveScan and Nidek OPD-Scan Aberrometers. Journal of Refractive Surgery 2009; 25: Lawless MA and C Hodge. Wavefront ’ s role in corneal refractive surgery. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2005;31: Rozema JJ, DEM Van Dyck, and MJ Tassignon. Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers Part 2: Statistical comparison in a test group. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: Wang L, M Misra, IG Palikaris, and DD Koch. A comparison of a ray-tracing refractometer, autorefractor, and computerized videokeratography in measuring pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: Wang L, N Wang, and DD Koch. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the WaveScan WaveFront system and the Tracey wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: