Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies” Steve Pownall Transmission Workstream.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Gas Consumer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update 27th July 2009
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Project Nexus Workgroup Unique Sites 4 th November 2014.
CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.
TRANSACTION AND INDUSTRY REVIEW CONFERENCE NIGERIAN POWER SECTOR REFORM: AN OVERVIEW OF TCN AGREEMENTS.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
CSEPs Update Chris Warner. 2 Background  Review Group 0157  Incremental Improvements (eg: UNC Modifications 0167, 0180V, 0200)  Ofgem CSEP Group 
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Joel Martin 23 rd November 2010 MOD 329 – UNC Rules on setting SHQs / SOQs & the Network Referral Process.
Nexus Workgroup CSEP Transition Topic June
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 214 – Reservation of firm NTS Exit Capacity at new NTS Exit Points in the transitional period Steve Rose.
Gas Performance Assurance Framework 11 th January 2013 Confidential.
IGT Single Service Provision Requirements Update – 27 th March 2013.
UNC Review Group 0178 National Grid Distribution “Reclassification of SSP to Domestic only” Review Group Meeting – 22 February 2008 Chris Warner.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Offtake Arrangements Document – An Overview Paul Roberts 12 th May 2005.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services 7 th February 2012.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
Project Nexus Workgroup – Invoicing 11 th August 2014.
1 Modification Proposal 0199: Clarification around the application of the UNC Dispute Resolution Process Alison Chamberlain National Grid Distribution.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement topic 4 th October 2011.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Agency Charging Statement Overview of Consultation 11 th February 2008.
Madrid Forum 6-7 November 2008 Implementating the 3rd Energy Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper Lord Mogg, ERGEG chairman.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Connected System Exit Points Options for strategic regime change Chris Warner.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Gas Performance Assurance Framework 11 th January 2013.
DN Interruption Reform Transmission Workstream Mark Freeman 5 th April 2007.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
FGO: ASA Service Line Review
Modifications iGT 039 and GT 0440 re iGT Agency Services background
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Project Nexus Workgroup
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
Modification 440 Project Nexus iGT Single Service Provision
Joint Office UNC Elections
Retail Energy Code - Data Access Schedule
Joint Office UNC Elections
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
Joint Office UNC Elections
Presentation transcript:

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. UNC Modification Proposal 0440 Project Nexus – iGT Single Service Provision Proposed UNC contractual regime Chris Warner – 31 st January 2013

2 UNC Modification Proposal 0440 – Proposed regime outline  A definition of Independent Transporter will be included in UNC to refer to an iGT (i.e. a GT licence holder which operates a Connected Offtake System (Independent Transporter’s System, ITS) connected to a LDZ at an Unmetered CSEP  CSEP Supply Point and ITS Supply Point defined  For purposes of certain sections of TPD, references to Supply Points (etc) will include CSEP Supply Points  for those purposes, references in the UNC to the Registered User of a Supply Point will be the User which is registered user of the corresponding ITS Supply Point.  This has the effect that provisions of the TPD which apply to Supply Point Capacity, Output Nominations, UDQOs and NDM reconciliation at NDM and DM Supply Points Components will apply directly to CSEP Supply Point Components.

3 Proposed regime outline The UNC will be modified as follows:  a new document, the Independent Transporters Arrangement Document (ITAD) will be added to the UNC (alongside the TPD, OAD, GT, MR and TD);  in certain sections of TPD, references to Supply Points (etc) will include CSEP Supply Points;  in GT, Independent Transporters will be included as a new class of Party;

4 Proposed regime outline  in MR, the modification rules will be extended to include Independent Transporters;  transitional rules may be needed in TD.  LDZ CSEP NExA becomes redundant and will be removed  As under the existing CSEP NExA, the ITAD will (among other things) require the Independent Transporter to apply (in its network code) and operate provisions the same as the UNC in certain areas.

5 Proposed regime outline  the requirement under ITAD for the Independent Transporter to apply the same provisions as the UNC arises for two separate reasons:  so that (as with the existing CSEP NExA) the Transporters can implement capacity booking, allocation, reconciliation, etc at an Unmetered CSEP;  so that there is compatibility between xoserve’s systems and the rules of the Independent Transporters’ network code which (under 0440) xoserve agrees to support.

6 Transportation Principal Document  Changes likely to be required to:  Section A,B,C – General references to CSEP SP  Section E  References to Supply Meter Points (and any derivative references) include CSEP Supply Meter Points. References to Meter Readings, metered volumes, etc to include meter readings obtained by the Independent Transporter at ITS Supply Meter Points  This has the effect that individual reconciliation is triggered by each Meter Read of a meter on the ITS.

7 Transportation Principal Document  Section G  Generally the provisions of Section G will not apply to CSEP Supply Points; instead, under ITAD, the Independent Transporter will be required to operate equivalent provisions in relation to ITS Supply Points.  Section H  Will provide for estimation of demand (NDM SMPD), calculation of AQs, and determination of NDM Supply Point Capacity, references to NDM Supply Meter Points will include NDM CSEP Supply Meter Points.

8 Transportation Principal Document  Section J  The Network Exit Provisions in relation to an Unmetered CSEP are contained in the ITAD and relevant Supplemental Agreement  Other TPD Sections  There may be consequential changes to other provisions.

9 Independent Transporters Arrangements Document (ITAD)  Section A – scope and classification  The ITAD applies in relation to Unmetered CSEPs.  The ITAD provides arrangements between Transporters and Independent Transporters (as Connected System Operators) relating to Unmetered CSEPs and ITSs (as Connected Offtake Systems).  Definitions:  ITS Supply Meter Point – a supply meter point on an Independent Transporter’s System;  ITS Supply Point and ITS Supply Point Component – a supply point and supply point component on an Independent Transporter’s System;  ITNC – the Independent Transporter’s network code.  For each ITS System Exit Point there is (under TPD Section A3.3.5) a corresponding CSEP System Exit Point.  An ITS User is a User in its capacity as user under an Independent Transporter network code.

10 Independent Transporters Arrangements Document (ITAD)  Section B – Connection  Provisions for the connection of ITSs to LDZ at Unmetered CSEPs  Right for Independent Transporter to have and keep the ITS connected  Conditions and process for new ITSs to be connected/new Unmetered CSEPs. Requirements for connection facilities. Commissioning of new Unmetered CSEPs.

11  Section C – Operations at CSEPs  Operational obligations on Party (Transporter and Independent Transporter) as to operation and maintenance of their respective systems  Provisions relating to gas supply emergencies  Offtake rate provisions Independent Transporters Arrangements Document (ITAD)

12 Independent Transporters Arrangements Document (ITAD)  Section D – IT System classification and other requirements  Section D applies for the purposes of ensuring Transporters are able to allocate quantities of gas offtaken, and LDZ capacity, to Users at the CSEP in the absence of a meter.  the Independent Transporter will adopt and implement (in its transportation arrangements with ITS Users) rules which are the same as those from time to time of the TPD  agreed exceptions to the requirement  This section will provide for coordination of modifications to UNC and ITNC to ensure the ITNC remains in line with the UNC in the relevant areas.  The Independent Transporter will provide data to the relevant Transporter, in timescales stipulated by the Transporter as necessary for implementation of the relevant provisions of the UNC  Parties acknowledge that the data will be provided via xoserve

13 Independent Transporters Arrangements Document (ITAD)  Section E – DM CSEP Supply Points  This will set out additional rules applying where there are DM supply meter points on the ITS  Section F – ITS Shrinkage  This will set out rules for assessing shrinkage (if any) in the ITS  Section G – Role of Transporter Agency

14 Independent Transporters Arrangements Document (ITAD)  Section H – General  This Section will contain general provisions which are specific to the Transporter/Independent Transporter relationship (i.e. are not contained in the GTs).  It may cover  interpretation of ITAD;  nature of relationships between Transporters and Independent Transporters;  form and process for execution and amendment of Supplemental Agreements;  accession of new Independent Transporters;  withdrawal and termination of Independent Transporters;  confidentiality and data ownership;  liability;  any required governance (not including modification) required in relation to ITAD.

15 Other parts of UNC  Transition Document  Existing NExAs to be terminated from the date the new Supplemental Agreement takes effect.  Possible need for some other transitional arrangement; preferable for old NExAs to come to an end rather than to be converted into new Supplemental Agreement.

16 Other parts of UNC  Modification Rules  Details to be discussed but possible amendment to rules around appointment, status etc of the existing Independent Transporter's Representative, e.g. to become voting member of the Modification Panel?  To include scope for Independent Transporters participating in the UNC modification procedures; may be limited to those modifications relating to (i) IATD, (ii) provisions of the UNC which are referred to in the IATD and/or IATD Supplemental Agreements, (iii) those parts of the UNC which are binding on Independent Transporters and (iv) the Modification Rules themselves.

17 Other parts of UNC  GTs – Section A – Disputes  Rules re dispute resolution to be extended to apply to disputes between GTs and Independent Transporters.  GTs – Section B - General  UNC to now include ITAD as new part of the UNC. Independent Transporter to be defined (and not as a subset of Transporter). Independent Transporters to be a Party to the UNC (along with Transporters and Users).  Each Independent Transporter to contract with GTs through a IATD Framework Agreement (to give effect to the IATD). References to the Independent Transporter in the context of a ITS Supply Point etc to be to the Independent Transporter operating the Connected Offtake System on which ITS Supply Point is located. Possibly also include ITS Users, i.e. shippers in their capacity as shippers on an ITS.