Analytical epidemiology Disease frequency Study design: cohorts & case control Choice of a reference group Biases Alain Moren, 2006 Impact Causality Effect.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confounding and effect modification
Advertisements

Case-control study 3: Bias and confounding and analysis Preben Aavitsland.
Introduction to Logistic Regression Rachid Salmi, Jean-Claude Desenclos, Thomas Grein, Alain Moren.
Effect Modification & Confounding
1 Matching EPIET introductory course Mahón, 2011.
Analytical epidemiology
How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
EPI 809/Spring Two main complications of analysis of single exposure effect (1) Effect modifier (2) Confounding factor - useful information - useful.
M2 Medical Epidemiology
Third training Module, EpiSouth: Multivariate analysis, 15 th to 19 th June 20091/29 Multivariate analysis: Introduction Third training Module EpiSouth.
Principles of case control studies Part I Nature of the design of case control studies Odds ratio as the measurement of association Piyanit Tharmaphornpilas.
© Scott Evans, Ph.D. and Lynne Peeples, M.S.
EPID Introduction to Analysis and Interpretation of HIV/STD Data Confounding Manya Magnus, Ph.D. Summer 2001 adapted from M. O’Brien and P. Kissinger.
1 Confounding and Interaction: Part II  Methods to Reduce Confounding –during study design: »Randomization »Restriction »Matching –during study analysis:
Confounding and Interaction: Part II  Methods to reduce confounding –during study design: »Randomization »Restriction »Matching –during study analysis:
Chapter 19 Stratified 2-by-2 Tables
Chance, bias and confounding
Third Training Module, EpiSouth: Stratification, 15 th to 19 th June /50 Stratification: Confounding, Effect modification Third training Module EpiSouth.
Confounding And Interaction Dr. L. Jeyaseelan Department Of Biostatistics CMC, Vellore.
EPI 809 / Spring 2008 Final Review EPI 809 / Spring 2008 Ch11 Regression and correlation  Linear regression Model, interpretation. Model, interpretation.
Confounding. A plot of the population of Oldenburg at the end of each year against the number of storks observed in that year, Ornitholigische.
Confounding and Interaction: Part II
© Scott Evans, Ph.D. and Lynne Peeples, M.S.
1June In Chapter 19: 19.1 Preventing Confounding 19.2 Simpson’s Paradox (Severe Confounding) 19.3 Mantel-Haenszel Methods 19.4 Interaction.
Categorical Data Analysis: Stratified Analyses, Matching, and Agreement Statistics Biostatistics March 2007 Carla Talarico.
THREE CONCEPTS ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIPS OF VARIABLES IN RESEARCH
Confounding, Effect Modification, and Stratification.
Is Maternal Menstrual Cycle Length Associated with Twinning? Author 1 Author 2.
Stratification and Adjustment
Cohort Study.
Unit 6: Standardization and Methods to Control Confounding.
Analysis of Categorical Data
The third factor Effect modification Confounding factor FETP India.
Concepts of Interaction Matthew Fox Advanced Epi.
Measuring Associations Between Exposure and Outcomes.
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Tim Wiemken PhD MPH CIC Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville, Kentucky Confounding.
Confounding in epidemiology
Confounding, Matching, and Related Analysis Issues Kevin Schwartzman MD Lecture 8a June 22, 2005.
Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade Multiple regression analysis Analysis of confounding and effectmodification Martin van de Esch, PhD.
COMH7202: EPIDEMIOLOGY III – INTERMEDIATE CONCEPTS Confounding & Effect Modification
Introduction to Logistic Regression Rachid Salmi, Jean-Claude Desenclos, Alain Moren, Thomas Grein.
October 15. In Chapter 19: 19.1 Preventing Confounding 19.2 Simpson’s Paradox 19.3 Mantel-Haenszel Methods 19.4 Interaction.
Confounding, Effect Modification, and Stratification HRP 261 1/26/04.
What is “collapsing”? (for epidemiologists) Picture a 2x2 tables from Intro Epi: (This is a collapsed table; there are no strata) DiseasedUndiseasedTotal.
Matching (in case control studies) James Stuart, Fernando Simón EPIET Dublin, 2006.
Tim Wiemken PhD MPH CIC Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville, Kentucky Confounding.
Instructor Resource Chapter 14 Copyright © Scott B. Patten, Permission granted for classroom use with Epidemiology for Canadian Students: Principles,
11/20091 EPI 5240: Introduction to Epidemiology Confounding: concepts and general approaches November 9, 2009 Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology.
A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 9: Data analysis Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University Wellington, New Zealand.
Standardization of Rates. Rates of Disease Are the basic measure of disease occurrence because they most clearly express probability or risk of disease.
Principles of case control studies
31/7/20091 Summer Course: Introduction to Epidemiology August 21, Confounding: control, standardization Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology.
Instructor Resource Chapter 15 Copyright © Scott B. Patten, Permission granted for classroom use with Epidemiology for Canadian Students: Principles,
Confounding and effect modification Epidemiology 511 W. A. Kukull November
POPLHLTH 304 Regression (modelling) in Epidemiology Simon Thornley (Slides adapted from Assoc. Prof. Roger Marshall)
1 Introduction to Modeling Beyond the Basics (Chapter 7)
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Contingency Tables.
(www).
Acknowledgment: Kostas Danis
Lecture delivered during the 5th Health R&D Expo
Epidemiology 503 Confounding.
Lecture 6: Introduction to effect modification (part 2)
Jeffrey E. Korte, PhD BMTRY 747: Foundations of Epidemiology II
Saturday, August 06, 2016 Farrokh Alemi, PhD.
Kanguk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University
Evaluating Effect Measure Modification
Confounders.
Case-control studies: statistics
Effect Modifiers.
Presentation transcript:

Analytical epidemiology Disease frequency Study design: cohorts & case control Choice of a reference group Biases Alain Moren, 2006 Impact Causality Effect modification & confounding Stratification Significance testing Matching Multivariable analysis

Exposure Outcome Third variable

Two main complications (1) Effect modifier (2) Confounding factor - useful information - bias

To analyse effect modification To eliminate confounding Solution = stratification stratified analysis Create strata according to categories inside the range of values taken by third variable

Variation in the magnitude of measure of effect across levels of a third variable. Effect modification is not a bias but useful information Effect modifier Happens when RR or OR is different between strata (subgroups of population)

Effect modifier To identify a subgroup with a lower or higher risk To target public health action To study interaction between risk factors

AR NV - AR V VE = AR NV VE = 1 - RR Vaccine efficacy

VE= 1 - RR = VE = 72%

Vaccine efficacy by age group

Effect modification Different effects (RR) in different strata (age groups) VE is modified by age Test for homogeneity among strata (Woolf test)

Oral contraceptives (OC) and myocardial infarction (MI) Case-control study, unstratified data OC MIControlsOR Yes No Ref. Total

Physical activity and MI

* * * * * Relative risk (RR) of dying from coronary heart disease for smoking physicians, by age groups, England & Wales, RR Age Doll et Hill, Effect (OR or RR) is a function of the effect modifier Effect function

Any statistical test to help us? Breslow-Day Woolf test Test for trends: Chi square Heterogeneity

Confounding Distortion of measure of effect because of a third factor Should be prevented Needs to be controlled for

Simpson’s paradox

Second table

Day 2, one table only

Confounding Exposure Outcome Third variable To be a confounding factor, 2 conditions must be met: Be associated with exposure - without being the consequence of exposure Be associated with outcome - independently of exposure

To identify confounding Compare crude measure of effect (RR or OR) to adjusted (weighted) measure of effect (Mantel Haenszel RR or OR)

Are Mercedes more dangerous than Porsches? 95% CI =

Crude RR = 1.5 Adjusted RR = 1.1 ( )

Car type Accidents Confounding factor: Age of driver

AgePorschesMercedes < 25 years550(55%)300 (30%) >= 25 years Chi 2 = AgeAccidentsNo accidents < 25 years370 (44%)480 >= 25 years130 (11%)1020 Chi 2 = 270.7

Exposure Outcome Hypercholesterolaemia Myocardial infarction Third factor Atheroma Any factor which is a necessary step in the causal chain is not a confounder

Salt Myocardial infarction Hypertension

% Any statistical test to help us? When is OR MH different from crude OR ?

How to prevent/control confounding? Prevention –Restriction to one stratum –Matching Control –Stratified analysis –Multivariable analysis

Mantel-Haenszel summary measure Adjusted or weighted RR or OR Advantages of MH Zeroes allowed OR MH = k SUM (a i d i / n i ) i=1 k SUM (b i c c i / n i ) i=1

OR MH = k SUM (a i d i / n i ) i=1 k SUM (b i c c i / n i ) i=1

Examples of stratified analysis

Effect modifier Belongs to nature Different effects in different strata Simple Useful Increases knowledge of biological mechanism Allows targeting of PH action Confounding factor Belongs to study Weighted RR different from crude RR Distortion of effect Creates confusion in data Prevent (protocol) Control (analysis )

How to conduct a stratified analysis Perform crude analysis Measure the strength of association List potential effect modifiers and confounders Stratify data according to potential modifiers or confounders Check for effect modification If effect modification present, show the data by stratum If no effect modification present, check for confounding If confounding, show adjusted data If no confounding, show crude data

How to define strata In each stratum, third variable is no longer a confounder Stratum of public health interest If 2 risk factors, we stratify on the different levels of one of them to study the second Residual confounding ?

Logical order of data analysis How to deal with multiple risk factors: Crude analysis Multivariate analysis 1. stratified analysis 2. modelling linear regression logistic regression

A train can mask a second train A variable can mask another variable