Themis Competition 2012 Why are we against the application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues ? Team France 6 Milène Chebrout Stéphanie.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Substantive Law and Procedural Law in the Four Legal Traditions Richard H. Ward Dean & Director College of Criminal Justice Sam Houston State University.

Advertisements

Paris, 11th of July 2008 Quality Assurance in Higher Education Recognition procedures of agencies Bruno CURVALE Head of international affairs at AÉRES.

Communication from the Commission COM(2010) 171 final Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice.

Access to Court Records Developments in New Zealand.

EU/Switzerland Competition Law Cooperation Agreement David Mamane, LL.M. European Parliament ECON Briefing Session,

Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States Due process in competition law Michaela Nosa Antimonopoly Office of the SR.

INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.

The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.

Eurojust The European Union’s Judicial Cooperation Unit.

PROSECUTION OF CORRUPTION Maja Veber Šajn, M.Sc., Local State Prosecutor Specialised State Prosecution Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.

1 Access to file An effective right of defence? Karen Williams Hearing Officer EUROPEAN COMMISSION.

Introduction.  From the Greek word: “demos” or “people”

7 December 2010 Procedural rights of suspects and accused in the EU The Roadmap and its implementation Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.

Activity: What is Democracy? Civics

7 Principles of the Constitution How Does the Constitution Work.

Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.

European Commission, DG Competition Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CCE Member States 21 February 2014, Bratislava 1 Due Process.

M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.

Digitalization of courts in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters Dr Arkadiusz Lach Department of Criminal Procedure University of Nicolaus.

Personal data protection in criminal procedure International collaboration and principle of proportionality LEFIS ROVANIEMI MEETING 19TH 20TH JANUARY 2007.

Law Reform Commission Criminal Process Pre-Trial Procedures Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Wednesday, May 7,

Manuel Mariño Regional Director International Co-operative Alliance ACI-Américas CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CO-OPERATIVES Global Corporate Governance Forum.

Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,

European Private International Law JUDr. Tereza Kyselovská.

Public Health Ethics. 2 of 18 Ethics Principles and rules for behavior and duty Basic guide for deciding right and wrong.

7 Principles of the Constitution

BILL OF RIGHTS VOCABULARY. VOCAB Due Process “Principle that the government must act fairly and obey the rules of law.” Search Warrant “A warrant authorizing.

12.1—Students explain the fundamental principles and moral values of American principles and moral values of American democracy as expressed in the U.

The Law Chapter 15. Principles of US System  Due Process  Substantive  Procedural  Adversary System  Equal Justice  Presumption of Innocence.

CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.

MINISTRY OF FINANCE Counsellor, docent, Dr Tuomas Pöysti1 The Constitutionalisation and Evolution of Penal Law and Control Policy in the European.

Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.

M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.

Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.

SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.

František Nonnemann Skopje, 9th October 2012 JHA DP aspects related to provision of information about public figures in CZ.

The EU Accession to the ECHR after Opinion 2/13: Reflections, Solutions and the Way Forward Dr Sonia Morano – Foadi and Dr Stelios Andreadakis European.

Prof. Dr. Lorena Bachmaier, Universidad Complutense Madrid, Spain Section III- Criminal Procedure Information Society and Penal Law Lorena Bachmaier Doha,

Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division

Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice

Objective: Create your own definition of loyalty and rank circumstances of loyalty; defend your choices with evidence. In groups of 2-3: Write a specific.

JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU

What Is Criminal Justice?

7 Principles of the Constitution

Federal Government Vocabulary

Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)

9/13 Business Law Aim: Explain the rights of the accused? p. 78 # 24

US History, Foundations

Pre-trial detention decision-making: A European research project

7 Principles of the Constitution

The Mutual Recognition Regulation

Vocabulary Bill of Rights.

INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

7 Principles of the Constitution

With Liberty and justice for all

British Values.

Rule of Law SS.7.C.1.9 Define the rule of law and recognize its influence on the development of the American legal, political, and governmental systems.

Rule of Law SS.7.C.1.9 Define the rule of law and recognize its influence on the development of the American legal, political, and governmental systems.

Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR

What Is Criminal Justice?

DFG Ombudsman Germany Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice Recommendation of the Germany Research Foundation Prof. Ulrike Beisiegel Chair of the DFG Ombudsman.

WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PROVING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, HEARING OF EVIDENCE.

What is a Privilege? A privilege is a relationship between a witness and the subject of potential testimony (whether that subject be a person or something.

C-469/03, judgment of 10 March 2005, Miraglia

Sorting Out the Courts SS.7.C.3.11: Diagram the levels, functions, and powers of the courts at the state and federal levels.

PROCURA DELLA REPUBBLICA v. M.

Procedural Fairness Natural Justice.

Presentation transcript:

Themis Competition 2012 Why are we against the application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues ? Team France 6 Milène Chebrout Stéphanie De Porti Léopoldine Fay

What evidence are we talking about?

Evidence which already exists ?

What evidence are we talking about? Evidence which already exists ? The gathering of evidence ?

Main issues :  Harmonization is insufficient to fully respect the fundamental principles of criminal procedure

Main issues :  Harmonization is insufficient to fully respect the fundamental principles of criminal procedure  The consequences of the automatic application of the principle of mutual recognition on the rights and liberties of the defendant

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States

 Conceptual problem

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  Conceptual problem - In relation to the definition of the principle of mutual recognition

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  Conceptual problem - In relation to the definition of the principle of mutual recognition BUT NOT FOR EVIDENCE !

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  Conceptual problem - In relation to the definition of the principle of mutual recognition BUT NOT FOR EVIDENCE !  We are not talking about JUDICIAL decision

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  Mutual recognition requires Mutual Trust

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  Conceptual problem  The obstacles raised to an automatic application of the principle of mutual recognition in relation to the different applications of the notion of fair trial

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  The obstacles raised to an automatic application of the principle of mutual recognition in relation to the different applications of the notion of fair trial WHY DO STATES HAVE LAWS ON EVIDENCE??

Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States Part 1: The so problematic application of the principle of mutual recognition to evidence issues regarding the different legal orders of the Member States  The obstacles raised to an automatic application of the principle of mutual recognition in relation to the different applications of the notion of fair trial - WHY DO STATES HAVE LAWS ON EVIDENCE?? - Different applications of the standards : example : privilege against self incrimination, loyalty…

Principle of mutual recognition is not a magic wand

Part 2 : The problematic consequences of the application of the principle of mutual recognition on the rights and liberties of the defendant

 In relation to the fundamental rights

Part 2 : The problematic consequences of the application of the principle of mutual recognition on the rights and liberties of the defendant  In relation to the fundamental rights  In relation to the danger of a potential « forum shopping »

CONCLUSION…some proposals

 need to frame the rules on gathering evidence especially by checking the proportionality of the investigation measures

CONCLUSION…some proposals  need to frame the rules on gathering evidence especially by checking the proportionality of the investigation measures  necessity to apply the principle of mutual recognition only to decisions of judicial authorities

CONCLUSION…some proposals  need to frame the rules on gathering evidence especially by checking the proportionality of the investigation measures  necessity to apply the principle of mutual recognition only to decisions of judicial authorities  a prior harmonization of rules on gathering of evidence is necessary

Mutual recognition requires mutual trust = built step by step

Thank you for your attention!!