Data Overview ~ Writing Achievement October 4, 2010 Presentation to South Middle School Seventh Grade Language Arts and Social Studies Teachers In good.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.

Advertisements

Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.

Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Grades 3-8 Grade Below Basic ProficientGoalAdvanced % At/Above Proficiency (AYP Goal) % At/Above Goal (State Goal)

Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS) and State and Federal Accountability Elementary and Middle School Principals November 5, 2009.

Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.

BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Reading and Writing Testing Results USD 244 Board of Education March 12, 2001.

Spartanburg County School District Two. GBE Process.

McAlpine Elementary School Improvement Plan Review January 29, 2015.

Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,

K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.

Understanding Data for Beginners School Community Council Training October 2013.

The Bucks County Montessori Charter School PSSA Results, Local District Comparisons, and Year to Year Progressions.

KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.

Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.

February 27,  Gather information regarding the CMT ◦ What, when, and why?  Try some CMT-like questions ◦ math and language arts  Learn tips/strategies.

1 Student Assessment Report One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013.

Title I Rights and Services Annual Parent Meeting Keansburg School District September 16, 2013.

2013 CMT RESULTS (Connecticut Mastery Tests) Riverside School, Greenwich, CT.

Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.

1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.

1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.

English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.

1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.

Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.

Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.

A CLOSER LOOK AT PINE LOG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL’S CRCT SCORES OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS A PRESENTATION BY JUDSON SMITH FOR THE FACULTY AND PARENTS OF PINE.

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Creating Your School Improvement Plan in ASSIST. Click on the “Goals & Plans” Tab.

Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.

Setting SMART Goals for The central purpose of the Professional Learning Community (PLC) is for the teacher to develop a new understanding.

PDSA/Fractal Data 8 th Grade Math. Steps to Identify Areas of Need Decided to focus on 8 th grade students in 8 th grade math Determined that I would.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.

Alabama Accountability Act Impact on Huntsville City Schools June 18, 2013.

Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

CMT Action Plan Beecher Road School Presentation to the Woodbridge Board of Education October 2012 Gina M. Prisco, Principal Nancy White, Assistant Principal.

GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT 2009 High School Testing Report.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.

California Standards Tests (CSTs) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Grade 10 Census Report Data to inform the evaluation of the district’s.

Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan

Amana Academy Title I Annual Parent Meeting September 30, 2016

76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income

Bennett County School District

Dalton Middle School Data Review

Closing The Achievement Gap Task Force

Wade Hayashida Local District 8

Redesign Family Meeting

Student Mobility and Achievement Growth In State Assessment Mohamed Dirir Connecticut Department of Education Paper presented at National Conference.

Redesign Family Meeting

Huntsville City Schools – 3rd Benchmark Assessment Report

School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.

Overview of Course Assessment National 3

Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System

Ola High School 11/12/16 Ola High School Data Team

Summerour Middle Planning Meeting

History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Secondary Data Presentation

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT)

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Presentation transcript:

Data Overview ~ Writing Achievement October 4, 2010 Presentation to South Middle School Seventh Grade Language Arts and Social Studies Teachers In good writing, words become one with things. ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson Principal: Karen Ryan Data Coordinator: Jane Phillips

CMT Writing Results, Grade 6 ~ 2010 Percent of Students in Each Performance Level State Results, Grade 6 South M.S. Results, Grade 6 Number Tested = 41,773 Number Tested= 276

Performance Statements and Reminders Currently meeting all NCLB requirements. In our District Reference Group, your current students ranked 2 nd in percentage of students reaching goal in writing (behind Davis by 1.7%) Our goal as a school remains 100% proficiency in all subjects. Our goal as a school remains 90% at or above goal level in all subjects.

Gender Achievement in Math, Reading and Writing Grade 6 CMT ~ 2010: Students Meeting Goal MathReadingWriting Subjects Assessed Percentage of Students at/above Goal Level Female, N = 135 Male N = 141

Students at/above Goal 6th Grade Writing CMT , State and South, by Gender Years Percentage of Students at/above Goal Level Males: State N= 21, ,933 Females: State N=20, ,952 B Males: South N= Females: South N=

Percent in Each Performance Level South M.S., Grade 6, CMT Writing, 2010 Female Number Tested: 135 Percent in Each Performance Level South M.S., Grade 6, CMT Writing, 2010 Male Number Tested: 141

South Middle School CMT Writing Holistic Scores Grade 6 ~ 2010 ~ by Gender Holistic Score: 12 Highest, 1 Lowest Percentage of Students Receiving Each Score F, n = 135 M, n = 141

Percentage of Students Achieving Mastery Composing and RevisingEditing Males Females Writing Subtests 2010 Writing CMT, Grade 6, Students Achieving Mastery in Editing and Revising Males N = 141 Females N = 135

M, n = 141 F, n = 135

Data Discussion Time! ~ You will each now review this data with your assigned partner. ~ Please compile a list of five to ten comments and questions. ~ After fifteen minutes, split into groups representing your two departments. ~Please work together to formulate what you believe to be the priority question regarding the presented data.