LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Proposal for the authorship.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Authorship APS Professional Skills Course:
Advertisements

Doug Elliott Professor, Critical Care Nursing The final step: Presentation and publication Research Workshop: Conducting research in a clinical setting.
Guidebook Progress, & Maintenance Plan Chris Dore.
Technology and Ethics Joel Price. Lenses The first lens is as a technology user. The second lens is as an educator. The third lens is as a writer.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
DEVELOPING ACCURATE VOTER LISTS IN TRANSITIONAL DEMOCRATIES HANDBOOK FOR ACEEEO MEMBERS.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
RESPONSIBLE AUTHORSHIP Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University Adapted from Scientific Integrity: An Internet-based course in.
Chapter 4 Revise (Complete). NEU School of Business & Administration 2/Chapter 3 Why do you think revising is important?Why do you think revising is important?
Engineering the Curriculum An approach to curriculum renewal.
Technical and Professional Editing Editing: A thumbnail of the Big Picture From Rude, Carolyn. Technical Editing, 4 th ed.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School January 30, 2002 Works of Authorship (cont’d)
Editing, Peer-Reviewing and Team-Writing Editing isn’t a cosmetic process. It’s a thinking process. Richard Rhodes, author Making of the Atomic Bomb.
Chapter 1. Introduction to Technical Communication © 2004 by Bedford/St. Martin's1 What are some examples of technical communication?
Dobrin / Keller / Weisser : Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century. © 2008 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.
ACADEMIC WRITING Dr. Jamba Gyeltshen (6/4/2010) College of Natural Resources ROYAL UNIVERSITY OF BHUTAN.
OMICS Group Contact us at: OMICS Group International through its Open Access Initiative is committed to make genuine and.
SUBMIT YOUR MANUSCRIPT Ocky Karna Radjasa Department of Marine Science Diponegoro University.
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
 needs to be met  existing resources  content outline  contributor team  contract details  timeline.
By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.
Shobna Bhatia.  Telephone instrument  Computer  Software Instructions nearly always provided However, frequently not read At least, not until things.
GNET TECHNICAL WRITING 3. GNET REPORTS.
2015 Kathleen A. Zar Pre-Symposium Workshop What to expect as an author and what it takes to be a good peer reviewer Maryellen L. Giger, Ph.D. A. N. Pritzker.
How to Write Defne Apul and Jill Shalabi. Papers Summarized Johnson, T.M Tips on how to write a paper. J Am Acad Dermatol 59:6, Lee,
Being an Effective Peer Reviewer Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Responsible Conduct of Research Publications. Authorship Acknowledging contributors Conflicts of interest Overlapping publications
Writing and Editing Modular Documentation: Some Best Practices Yoel Strimling (Comverse) Based on a joint presentation with Michelle Corbin (IBM) at the.
Reviewing Papers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia Tech.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
Authorship, peer review and conflicts of interest.
Ethics and Scientific Writing. Ethical Considerations Ethics more important than legal considerations Your name and integrity are all that you have!
©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Dealing with Reviews. Rejection hurts, but is it fatal?
Tinus Pulles & Justin Goodwin Guidebook Revision Elements for a Maintenance Plan Consultants view.
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issue 1. Quality  Papers must be double -blind.
Ethics and Plagiarism AAHEP8 -- Amsterdam 2015 Erick Weinberg -- APS.
How to publish paper in journal. Step 1.Familiarize yourself with potential publications.
© 2003 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers. 1 Chapter 16 Adding Document Supplements Technical Communication, 9/e John M. Lannon.
Kick off meeting, 2008, Cavtat Guidance on the use of models for the European air quality directive An activity of WG1 FAIRMODE Bruce Denby 1*, Steinar.
Publishing Papers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia.
B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department of Plant Physiology FS CU RNDr. Jan Petrášek, Ph.D. 5. Presentation.
In the name of Allah. Scientific & Technical Presentation Leila Sharif Sharif University of Technology
Collecting Copyright Transfers and Disclosures via Editorial Manager™ -- Editorial Office Guide 2015.
ENG 328 Students Guide - snaptutorial.com snaptutorial.com For More Tutorials
Schools’ forum works together with the aim of ensuring funds are used effectively to ensure positive outcomes for all children and young people in the.
 In wikipedia, a peer-reviewed periodical in which academic works relating to a particular academic discipline are published. Academic journals serve.
Public Services Information Management
Technical Reading & Writing
Best Content Writing Services
Aylin AKÇA OKAN METU, Ankara Fall
COPERT 4 training workshop
How to Write Extended Abstracts
Science Fair Project: Basic Outline
TECHNICAL REPORT.
EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook
Jessica Sully, Secretariat
What the Editors want to see!
Guidelines Dear author(s),
Writing Scientific Abstracts
Status of the emission reporting guidelines
Types of Abstracts Informational Descriptive.
5. Presenting a scientific work
Projections expert panel agenda
TECHNICAL REPORTS WRITING
Presentation transcript:

LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Proposal for the authorship of the Revised Guidebook

Definitions – 1 (2) Editor Responsible for the scientific content of the Guidebook Writes the editorial / prologue Copy or Technical Editor The copy editor's job is summarized in the Five Cs: to make the copy clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, and consistent. (Wikipedia)

Definitions – 2 Lead Author Responsible for the scientific content of a sectoral chapter Main writer of the sectoral chapter Main compiler of the contributions from authors Contributing authors All individuals who have been actively involved in the scientific content of the chapter. This may include: Writing parts of the chapter Reviewing Data submission (for the purpose of improving the chapter) The consultants where they have also contributed to the scientific content

Guidebook authorship proposal – Level 1 Whole Guidebook  Editor For discussion between EEA and EMEP whether they want to keep current settled arrangements  Technical Editor The consultants

Guidebook authorship proposal – Level 2 Sectoral Chapters  Lead Author EPs to decide In principle, the current EP leaders or the current chapter authors  Contributing Authors Original authors Authors of previous versions Anyone the EPs consider need to be included (We should be generous and no limit should be put to number of contributing authors)

Contact Point for Chapters Address (tel, etc.) should not be part of the contact details as these frequently change or even persons change Reference should be made to the web-site of the corresponding EP in each chapter (need to standardize the web-page of the EPs) EP Leaders should be responsible to provide responses - or contact details of people that can provide responses - to specific questions from users