OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Advertisements

UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Project Nexus Workgroup Unique Sites 4 th November 2014.
Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
MIPI / RG140 Update Chris Shanley. Agenda  Review Group Background  MIPI Project - Background  RG140 Principles to be delivered via MIPI  Functionality.
NTS Update Gas Customer Forum 25 th September 2006.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
Amendments to NTS Shrinkage Reporting Process Nick Reeves.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
Review Group 291 – Balancing Arrangements Default Cashout Workshop 3 – 21 st June 2010.
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Flow Margin Assumptions for NTS Planning and Development Transmission Planning Code Workshop 3 5 th June 2008.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
UNC Proposal 329 – Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements - DM SHQs and DM SOQs Joel Martin – 21/09/10.
Offtake Arrangements Document – An Overview Paul Roberts 12 th May 2005.
DNPC06 LDZ NEC Charges Denis Aitchison 25 th January 2010.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
Gas Emergency Arrangements Proposal Transmission Workstream 5 th April 2007.
DN Interruption Reform Distribution Workstream 23 rd July 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Open letter on Development of the regime ahead of winter 2007/8 Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 28 June 2007.
Flow Flexibility Capacity Joint Office 7 th December 2006.
DN Operation Iain Ward DNCC Manager. Responsibilities  Licence Holder  Obligation For 1 In 20 Capacity  DNCC Operates Networks Under Direction of The.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Entry Capacity Trading Transmission Work Stream, 5 April 2007.
Enduring Exit Regime & NTS Risk Management Processes Offtake Arrangement Workstream – OAD Section I Review Group 316.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Administrative Changes to the UK-Link Manual Modification 414 and SIS Removal David Addison.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.
Safety Monitor modifications: Ofgem’s recent decisions Simon Bradbury.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
Connected System Exit Points Options for strategic regime change Chris Warner.
Review of Offtake Arrangements Document Section I - NTS Operational Flows 10 th June 2010 – Offtake Arrangements Workstream.
European Developments Transmission Workgroup 3 rd May 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
DNPC05 Consultation Paper Balance of Revenue Recovery between LDZ System Charges and Customer Charges Steve Armstrong 27 th July 2009.
DN Interruption Reform Transmission Workstream Mark Freeman 5 th April 2007.
System Operator information transparency. As Transmission System Transporter National Grid Gas undertakes responsibility for safe, effective and efficient.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Review of Demand Estimation Times for Modification Proposal 461
Review of System Alerts
System information provision
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
SO Incentives from April 2010
UNC Modification Proposal 0373
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Publication of Zonal Flex Data
MOD National Grid NTS Initiated Flow Swaps
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Presentation transcript:

OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves

OPNs/LDZ Demand Forecasts from DNs to NTS  Issue originally raised through SOMSA SC2004 work  Proposed that NG NTS pursue any identified issues with the DN demand forecasting processes via the Offtake Committee  OPN Accuracy and Timing – means data is not currently utilised in the NTS Demand Forecasting process  Removal of SC2004 will mean NG NTS will no longer have access to certain information  To assist in development of each DNs new systems, clarity is required on how best information can be provided at the right time  DNs are wary about redesigning systems/processes to meet any current SO incentives that may disappear in a couple of years  What are the problems impacting the OPN process and is this the best way forward to correct these inconsistencies  NTS to liaise internally to gain a greater understanding of the issues and potential options and report back to the Offtake Committee

Demand Forecasting Process - High Level Overview SC2004 GTMS/iGMS (METGAS) OPF D-1D DN Inputs NTS Related Activities NTS / LDZ Demand Forecasting* D-1: 14:00, 18:00, 00:00 D: 12:00, 15:00, 18:00, 21:30, 02:00 NDM Nominations / Demand Attribution D-1: 14:00 System Balancing * UNC publishing times are shown – for example the D-1 13:00 demand forecast must be published by 14:00

DN Inputs  Currently DNs submit information to National Grid NTS via 3 main routes  Forecast LDZ demand via SC2004  Forecast NTS take via METGAS screens within GTMS  METGAS inputs provide NTS ‘take’ information from DNs  NTS ‘take’ = Demand Forecast + VLDMCs - (Interruption, LNG Boil Off, On Shore Fields) +/- Stock Change & Inter LDZ transfers  Offtake Profile Notifications (also provides forecast NTS take)  UNC Obligations on DNs to provide D-1 forecast info is stated as follows:  An “End of Day Demand Forecast Notice” for;  Any relevant DN System Exit Point by 12:00  All LDZ/NTS offtakes by 13:00  An OPN setting out rates of offtake throughout the Gas Flow Day by 18:00  UNC Obligations on DNs to provide revised OPNs if there is an increase or decrease in rate of offtake SC2004 METGAS OPF DN Inputs

NTS / LDZ Demand Forecasting  As per UNC H 5.2; Transporters must notify demand forecasts (both LDZ and NTS) to Users at staggered times during D-1 and D  This is achieved by publishing data via National Grid Website  For LDZ info, LDZ forecasts within SC2004 flow through to NTS iGMS system and are published as is (SIS03 Report)  For NTS Demand Forecast, National Grid NTS use:  An NTS Total system demand forecast comprises of data from all offtakes, i.e. direct connects, interconnector, LDZs, etc  LDZ NTS take  OPF process will substitute (last approved from previous day) OPN data that is not provided  METGAS screens in iGMS are used to correct any substitute NTS / LDZ Demand Forecasting D-1: 14:00, 18:00, 00:00 D: 12:00, 15:00, 18:00, 21:30, 02:00

SO Incentive Scheme  The D-1 14:00 total system forecast has an SO incentive for accuracy within 3% of actual demand (D+5)  Annual scheme  SO Incentives from April 2010  National Grid leading on development of Initial Proposals  Initial views received are that current information/incentive is valuable to industry parties  Discussions being held on whether incentive should be extended to cover other times, for example D  Some respondents highlighted that more accurate NDM forecasts would be useful

NDM Nominations & Demand Attribution  D-1 NDM Noms are based on LDZ demand forecasts  SC2004 forecasts flow through to Gemini  NDM Noms calculated based on demand modelling  NDM Noms provided to Users via Gemini by 14:00 D-1  Obligations are within UNC Section C 1.2 & 1.5  Forecasts will need to be sent via new systems (SC2004 replacements) NDM Nominations / Demand Attribution D-1: 14:00

System Balancing  National Grid NTS calculate Predicted Closing Line Pack (PCLP) and undertake balancing actions based on input and output information  Input Notifications from Delivery Facility Operators  Output Notifications provided to NTS by both Users (Direct Connects) & DNs respectively  For LDZ NTS take, NTS use the following (depending on timing of PCLP calculation)  METGAS information  Offtake Profile Notifications System Balancing

OPN Timing and Accuracy (1)  OPN timing and accuracy – D-1 Forecast?  DN OPN processes run later than NTS demand forecast round up times  No consistency between SC2004, METGAS & OPN info  Differences between LDZ demand & NTS Take  METGAS currently most timely source  The first OPN for Day Ahead usually arrives around and is not used for the SO Incentive D NTS Demand Forecast

OPN Timing and Accuracy (2) – Mod history  Mod 0100 (Aug 2006)  Proposal sought to amend UNC section J and OAD to move initial submission time (14.00) for DN OPN to and any other exit point to  Mod 0123 (Urgent - Dec 2006)  Mod 0100 would require significant investment in systems, contractual arrangements and working practices  Proposed alternative route to allow UNC parties to meet NTS forecasting requirement  Amend current obligation on DNOs to submit day ahead forecast demand in time for Total system Demand Forecast  Shippers provide exit point level offtake data to relevant transporter by – predicted end of Day Offtake Quantity (LDZ Summary OPN (SOPN))  DNOs would provide NTS SOPN by (same as before Mod 0100)  We are led to believe that this requirement is met through the METGAS report

Current Requirements  To allow NG NTS to conduct their Demand Forecasting related activities ASIS:  NTS / LDZ Demand Forecasting  LDZ demand forecasts within SC2004* need to flow through to NTS iGMS system  DNs need to populate data that feeds into METGAS screens in iGMS to enable NTS to create their demand forecast  NDM Nominations & Demand Attribution  SC2004* LDZ Demand forecasts need to flow through to Gemini  System Balancing  LDZ NTS take - METGAS or OPN (depending on timing of PCLP calculation)  Offtake Profile Notifications  OPNs would be used more/exclusively if timing issues were overcome – METGAS preferred  Do we need to introduce governance arrangements (processes, audit, etc.) for METGAS? * SC2004 or replacement system

Future Considerations  Are we going to need more accurate and timely [within day] OPN (nodal offtake and flow information) in the future?  Flow Flex – not included in scope of Mod 0195AV  Flow Flex was to be driven off OPN data  NG System Flex initiative underway  Driven by concerns over the ability to manage a more volatile system due to wind, etc.  Exploring what indicators might quantify the need for change?  line pack utilisation and OPN accuracy  Ofgem Consultation to be undertaken in near future  National Grid NTS are also looking at how they will manage the system/constraints in the future  OPN data will be utilised in any associated tools