Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education as an Alternative to Academic Failure.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
IDEA 2004 and Section 504: Key Differences Wayne County Public Schools Exceptional Children Program Teresa Smith, EC Transition Coordinator Rhonda Wiggins,
Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
Best Practices in IEP writing September 26, 2012.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Evaluation Process Federal Law – IDEA – All eligible students, ages 3-21, are entitled to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Surrogate Parent Training
Evaluation & Eligibility Special Education Laws Made Simple November 2013 – Austin, Texas National Business Institute Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy, J.D.,
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
Special Education Process What are the steps if your child is suspected of having a disability? Mary K. Antonucci EDU 621.
1 CHILD FIND IDEA –School districts have an affirmative duty to locate and identify children in need of special education services. 20 U.S.C. § 1412(3)(A).
By Holly Barnes EDAD 689 February 9,  IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Mental retardation Hearing impairments Speech and language.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Identification & Evaluation Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Assessment Definition Pre-referral Decisions: Attempt to ameliorate the problem prior to referral (classroom based assessment) Entitlement Decisions:
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBINAR: MARCH 27, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
The New IDEA in Special Education
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
ECC. What is it?  Nine areas A C C R O S S V I Is it Separate?  The ECC is inclusive The regular curriculum is appropriate The regular curriculum is/should.
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
Welcome to Parent’s Rights SEPAC Meeting September 26, 2016.
Understanding the IEP Process
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Charter School Applicant Technical Assistance Session
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
An Introduction to Special Education
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Process
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Six Major Principles of IDEA
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University

Purpose of evaluation:  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To identify the strengths and needs of the students so that an instructional program under the Individualized Education Program (IEP) can be developed (  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To identify the strengths and needs of the students so that an instructional program under the Individualized Education Program (IEP) can be developed (

Evaluation must include…  gather academic, functional and developmental information necessary to determine whether or not a student has a disability defined in the IDEA, whether the student needs special education and related services, and the child's present level of performance and individual educational needs (p. 12)  covering all areas related to the student's suspected disability (including, if appropriate): health, vision, hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communication needs, and motor abilities (p. 13)  both eligibility AND the student's educational, functional, and developmental needs must be determined by the evaluation (p. 13) Note: screening to determine appropriate instructional strategies is NOT part of the evaluation  gather academic, functional and developmental information necessary to determine whether or not a student has a disability defined in the IDEA, whether the student needs special education and related services, and the child's present level of performance and individual educational needs (p. 12)  covering all areas related to the student's suspected disability (including, if appropriate): health, vision, hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communication needs, and motor abilities (p. 13)  both eligibility AND the student's educational, functional, and developmental needs must be determined by the evaluation (p. 13) Note: screening to determine appropriate instructional strategies is NOT part of the evaluation

Evaluation process: 1.Two ways a child can be identified for an evaluation: *Parents may request that their child be evaluated. *The school system may ask to evaluate the child. 2. Giving parents notice/ parent consent Before the school may proceed with the evaluation, parents must give their informed written consent. This consent is for the evaluation only. It does not mean that the school has the parents’ permission to provide special education services to the child. That requires a separate consent. 3. Timeframe for initial evaluation From receipt of parental consent for evaluation through eligibility and needs determination is 60 calendar days. 1.Two ways a child can be identified for an evaluation: *Parents may request that their child be evaluated. *The school system may ask to evaluate the child. 2. Giving parents notice/ parent consent Before the school may proceed with the evaluation, parents must give their informed written consent. This consent is for the evaluation only. It does not mean that the school has the parents’ permission to provide special education services to the child. That requires a separate consent. 3. Timeframe for initial evaluation From receipt of parental consent for evaluation through eligibility and needs determination is 60 calendar days.

Evaluation process continues… 5. Use a variety of assessment tools o classroom observation, student’s work samples, CBM, standardized tests, information provide by parents, interviews, etc o Also includes child’s health, vision and hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communicative status, and motor abilities o Test and evaluation materials are given in child’s native language or a way of communication. o Assessed in ALL areas related to suspected disability o Given by trained and knowledgeable personnel 5. Use a variety of assessment tools o classroom observation, student’s work samples, CBM, standardized tests, information provide by parents, interviews, etc o Also includes child’s health, vision and hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communicative status, and motor abilities o Test and evaluation materials are given in child’s native language or a way of communication. o Assessed in ALL areas related to suspected disability o Given by trained and knowledgeable personnel

Evaluation process continues: 6. After initial evaluations  Evaluations must be conducted at least every three years after the child has been placed in special education.  Reevaluations can also occur more frequently if conditions warrant, or if parent or if child’s teacher request a reevaluation. Informed parental consent is also necessary for reevaluations.  This review is to identify what additional data, if any, are needed to determine whether your child continues to be a “child with a disability” and continues to need special education and related services. 6. After initial evaluations  Evaluations must be conducted at least every three years after the child has been placed in special education.  Reevaluations can also occur more frequently if conditions warrant, or if parent or if child’s teacher request a reevaluation. Informed parental consent is also necessary for reevaluations.  This review is to identify what additional data, if any, are needed to determine whether your child continues to be a “child with a disability” and continues to need special education and related services.

What happens if parents refuse to have their child evaluated?  If parents refuse consent for an initial evaluation (or simply don’t respond to the school’s request), the school must carefully document all its attempts to obtain parent consent. It may also continue to pursue conducting the evaluation by using the law’s due process procedures or its mediation procedures, unless doing so would be inconsistent with state law relating to parental consent. It is at expense of the school district.

What happens if parents don’t agree with evaluation results?  If the parent of the child with a disability, disagree with the results of their child’s evaluation as obtained by the public agency, they have the right to obtain what is known as an Independent Educational Evaluation, or IEE. An IEE means an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner who is not employed by the public agency responsible for the education of your child. If parent’s ask for an IEE, the public agency must provide them with, among other things, information about where an IEE may be obtained.

Do’s: Evaluation and Identification  - notify and fully inform the parents/guardians of the proposed evaluation  - ask parents to participate in the process and recognize/value their input  - inform parents of legal rights and due process  - consider requesting a due process hearing/mediation if parents refuse  - notify and fully inform the parents/guardians of the proposed evaluation  - ask parents to participate in the process and recognize/value their input  - inform parents of legal rights and due process  - consider requesting a due process hearing/mediation if parents refuse

Don’ts: Evaluation and Identification  - single out a student for testing without parental consent  - unreasonably extend prereferral interventions  - equate evaluation to testing. Evaluation includes observations, interviews, parental information, etc.  - rely on one set of standardized assessments  - rely exclusively on any formula or quantitative guidelines  - ask a professional (physician, psychologist, etc.) if student has a disability  - use evaluation methods that discriminate based on race, language or culture  - single out a student for testing without parental consent  - unreasonably extend prereferral interventions  - equate evaluation to testing. Evaluation includes observations, interviews, parental information, etc.  - rely on one set of standardized assessments  - rely exclusively on any formula or quantitative guidelines  - ask a professional (physician, psychologist, etc.) if student has a disability  - use evaluation methods that discriminate based on race, language or culture

Case Study The psychologist at Happy Hearts Elementary has been asked by the 2nd grade teacher to evaluate Dell, who is currently in her classroom, because of her concern that Dell may have a disability. Dell is a 2nd grader who is struggling in reading comprehension and fluency. The teacher has noticed that Dell is not progressing in the general education reading curriculum at the same pace as her peers. Like the rest of the grade, DELL is in an RTI group for reading. Dell also has a difficult time with writing mechanics such as pencil grip and staying within the lines. Before the psychologist comes in to evaluate Dell, she must contact the parents for consent. The parents consented but question what this means for their daughter. During the evaluation phase, the psychologist conducts formative assessment tests, such as the Woodcock Johnson III. The results show that Dell is below grade level in mathematics and well-below grade level in reading and writing. So far, do we have enough information from the evaluation process to proceed to the next step of determining eligibility for special education services? If not, what should be included? The psychologist at Happy Hearts Elementary has been asked by the 2nd grade teacher to evaluate Dell, who is currently in her classroom, because of her concern that Dell may have a disability. Dell is a 2nd grader who is struggling in reading comprehension and fluency. The teacher has noticed that Dell is not progressing in the general education reading curriculum at the same pace as her peers. Like the rest of the grade, DELL is in an RTI group for reading. Dell also has a difficult time with writing mechanics such as pencil grip and staying within the lines. Before the psychologist comes in to evaluate Dell, she must contact the parents for consent. The parents consented but question what this means for their daughter. During the evaluation phase, the psychologist conducts formative assessment tests, such as the Woodcock Johnson III. The results show that Dell is below grade level in mathematics and well-below grade level in reading and writing. So far, do we have enough information from the evaluation process to proceed to the next step of determining eligibility for special education services? If not, what should be included?

References  Bateman, B.D. & Linden, M.A. (2012). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (5 th edition). Verona, WI: Attainment Company.  National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (September 2010). Evaluating children with disability. Retrieved from  Bateman, B.D. & Linden, M.A. (2012). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (5 th edition). Verona, WI: Attainment Company.  National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (September 2010). Evaluating children with disability. Retrieved from